Main Points of Barry Hines' "Kes"

1311 Words3 Pages

Main Points of Barry Hines' "Kes"

In this essay, I intend to discuss three main points highlighted in

Barry Hines’ play, ‘Kes’. The main theme that I will explore is how

Barry Hines viewed teachers in the 1970’s (when the book was first

written). Kes brought up the question of whether corporal punishment

worked or not. I aim to conclude to whether or not corporal punishment

worked. Another aspect of the education system in the 1970’s that I

will explore is if pupils from poorer backgrounds were disadvantaged

and treated differently. Kes is the story of a young boy named Billy

who struggles in life to really do anything. At school, he is always

getting into trouble and fights, at home; his relationship with his

mother is non-existent because she is not a very good mother. When

Billy finds a young Kestrel and decides to train it his life changes

and suddenly he realises his potential in life.

One of the main differences from our education today that is shown in

Kes is how the teachers treat and act towards their pupils. In this

section, I will explore how the play depicts teachers in the 1970’s.

The headmaster, Gryce, is an excellent example of how the typical

1970’s teacher is viewed. In scene 11, The Headmasters study; Gryce is

shown to be a short-tempered man who seems to enjoy caning pupils. For

example you could tell that the messenger had never been in trouble

before because when Billy, Macdowall and the smokers asked the

messenger to keep the cigarettes he says, “I don’t want them, your not

getting me into trouble as well”(p18). Pupils who had often been in

trouble would not have said something like that, as they would have

been used to getting into bother. Another reason to think this is that

...

... middle of paper ...

.... The teacher will know this and is

just being cruel to him. This shows that children who were poorer were

disadvantaged when it came to school.

Having explored the main points of teachers in the 1970’s shown in Kes

I have concluded that although there is a few dreadful teachers there

are good teachers as well. Gryce and Sudgen being the worse teachers

and Mr Farthing being a great teacher. I concluded that Corporal

punishment did not work although I thought it did in a way because I

felt it worked well on pupils who were not getting into trouble very

often like the messenger but for pupils like Macdowall the belt would

not be so bad as they would get quite used to it eventually. Pupils

from poorer backgrounds were disadvantaged in their education I felt,

mainly because they had a bigger reputation for getting into trouble

and not really for being poor.

Open Document