How should we treat outsiders in our society? Would it be logical to treat them differently for their differences or assimilate them into believing the same ideas we do? Or should we hunt them down and treat them as less than humans? This issue was brought up in Lord of the Flies and was never properly answered. William Golding is the author of this story, first published in 1954, and has had two movies adapted from it. Lord of the Flies is a critically acclaimed story about English school boys and their descent into savagery after being marooned on an isolated island tucked away from civilization. This essay will focus on the message that Golding has about the treatment of outsiders. The three main points revolve around each of the three main …show more content…
As time continues on the island, the boys begin to lose their sense of civilization and start to give in to their primal instincts. Going savage against each other and craving violence and destruction. The only exception to all of this is Simon. Simon, unlike the other boys, realizes that the beast is not something that has a physical form. The real beast is inside all of them; it is a curse that humanity suffers from. Simon is the only boy to realize this truth, among the others. This is what sets him apart from the other boys. He did not believe in what the other boys did; he did not fear the same beast that they were afraid of. This played a part in what made Simon an “outcast” among the other boys. In the events of Chapter 5, the boys hold a meeting regarding the existence of a beast. Simon steps forward and reveals that a beast might exist within them. He was humiliated and jeered by the other boys for sharing his opinion on the matter. The boys now view Simon as an unreliable and foolish kid for believing such a stupid lie. Simon showed his determination to prove himself on his journey up the mountain to uncover the true existence behind the beast. He understood the existence of the beast through his meeting with the Lord of the Flies. Simon is mocked throughout the …show more content…
Ralph had gone from being a leader to the other boys that they could look up to for guidance and assistance to being a wanted outlaw who would be hunted down. Ralph had become Jack’s enemy because of their indifference to goals and priorities. Ralph had always had his main objective to maintain the signal fire to get rescued and return to their civilization. Jack, on the other hand, wanted to relish the fact that he could dominate others and hunt down living things for the fun of it. The two boys argue several times during the novel over this fact, with Ralph taking the stance that they shouldn’t be distracted by this savagery and should focus instead on keeping the fire going. Jack argues that the boys wish to eat meat and that Ralph is a coward for a leader. This is seen during chapters 3 and 4, when Jack returns from the forest to find Simon and Ralph building huts. Ralph complains that Jack is wasting his time hunting when they should focus on ensuring their survival on the island. Jack retorts that the boys want meat. Again in chapter 4, when Ralph confronts Jack about his failure to keep the fire going, the boys are so giddy and lost in the pleasure of the murder of a pig that they ignore Ralph’s silly idea of being rescued and see Jack as a more entertaining leader during this
In “Lord of the Flies” Ralph has the goal of getting himself and the rest of the tribe off the island. His plan to execute it is by making a signal fire that a passing ship or boat will see to rescue them. Ralph realizes that maintaining order within their tribe is crucial to their survival and chance of being saved. As chief of their group, he assigns Jack the leader of the hunters. He then puts them in charge of keeping the signal fire lit. During this process, Jack and his boys get distracted from keeping it lit as they attempt to kill a pig. After a couple of hunts, Jack and his boys finally kill a pig and return in cheers. As they get back, Ralph gets mad at Jack saying “You and your blood Jack Merridew! You and your hunting! We might have gone home” (70). Ralph is angry with Jack because he realizes as leader that he has to make sure everyone understands their main goal, and are able to focus on that by blocking out distractions. These actions that Ralph show display why he is successful as a leader and why they accomplish the goal of getting
However, as the plot progresses, Ralph faces both internal and external conflicts; from those conflicts he greatly matures. Ralph always has the strong belief that all the children will be saved from the island sooner or later; he is so sure that he even insists that they should have fire at all times to signal. However, when the boys abandon the fire which is symbolic of Ralph’s hope of getting saved, Ralph faces an internal conflict that makes him fear about their future; perhaps they will not be rescued at all. By insisting that the children should keep the fire going, he creates an external conflict with Jack whose values are different. Jack is enjoying life as a leader of the savages, and he fears that fire will possibly end his authoritarian rule over the savages. Both conflicts are resolved when Ralph finally meets the naval officer.
Jack and Ralph’s motivation is used in the novel to show their interest and needs expecting from the island through the narrative; for Jack, it is mostly to impress the boys with his singing and hunting skills. The two foil characters Jack and Ralph have different desires. Jack who thinks one of the ways to survive on this island is by hunting pigs and he gives no importance to the rescue fire. Ralph who is eager to get back to his parents is always keeping an eye on the fire hoping to be rescued. After Ralph was disappointed because they missed the ship that could have rescued them, Ralph called an assembly to do a small speech. “‘The fire is the most important thing on the island. How can we ever be rescued except by luck, if we don’t keep
Upon the arrival of the boys to the island Jack immediately found himself in the center of a power struggle. Although the conflict was brief, there was still a very obvious confrontation between Jack and Ralph. Once the boys had assembled themselves there was an election to see who was to be chief. Despite the fact that Ralph was voted leader, the desire to be in command never left Jack. Jack already had some leadership skills, being head choirboy at his old school, and he continuously challenged Ralph. The greatest source of conflict between Jack and Ralph was the debate over the necessity of maintaining a fire. Ralph felt that it was necessary to keep it burning at all times while Jack believed that hunting pigs and getting meat was much more essential.
Ralph shows that he has a better understanding of the boys than Jack. He knows that the boys need some sort of order on the island in order for them to survive. He starts a simple form of government and sets a few rules for them. Even though they don’t last very long, the fact that he tried to help the group is what makes him a better leader. Ralph’s wisdom and ability to look toward the future also has an advantage over Jack. He has a sense to keep his focus on getting off the island. When the fire goes out, Ralph gets upset because the chance to be rescued was gone as well. Ralph enforces his role of leadership as he gives the boys a sense of stability of an authority figure. He keeps the boys in pretty good order at the meeting by making a rule that they can only speak if they have the conch. Ralph knows that the littleuns are afraid and they need shelter to feel more secure. They work together for a while, but as the time goes on the smaller boys want to go play. They slowly lose all their help until Simon and Ralph are the only ones left to work on them. Ralph knows that this is a necessity and keeps bringing it up at the meetings. Jack, on the other hand, is doing nothing but causing chaos.
He dies trying to give them the simple enlightenment that the beast they fear is non-existent. Simon makes the intuitive discovery that all the terrors on the island exist within the boys themselves, the psychological factor of the 'beast' that is their own imagination. Simon is seen as the Christ of the group, the sympathetic and caring one. In Chapter 3 we start to see some advancement in the building of their shelters and homes.
Despite his frailty, Simon soldiers on his quest to discover the identity of the beast on the mountaintop because he sees that need for the boys to face their fears, to understand the true identity of the false beast on the mountain and to get on with the business of facing the beast within themselves. His character signifies morality, kindness and compassion and ironically, it is these qualities which lead to his murder, and ultimately the final collapse of society on the island and deterioration into savagery of the boys.
William Golding, the author of the highly-acclaimed book, The Lord of the Flies took the reader into a world where underage boys live in an uncharted island with no adults no other human contact; just themselves and finding ways to survive and to get off the island. However, that is no easy task, Golding shed some ground-breaking light on how really boys will act with no authority in their lives and the term “boys will be boys” will arise. The boys were placed in a situation where they were force to act a certain way of nature and condition. In consequence, the boys’ savage and immoral behavior shown is to be blamed on the situation/environment nurtured factors.
The need for social order is a very common theme throughout The Lord of the Flies. Over the course of the novel the reader witnesses the slow collapse of all forms of order, government, and civilization on the island. The results of this collapse are astounding. Golding writes, “As they watched, a flash of fire appeared at the root of one wisp, and then the smoke thickened. Small flames stirred at the trunk of a tree and crawled away through leaves and brushwood, dividing and increasing… Beneath the capering boys a quarter of a mile square of forest was savage with smoke and flame” (Golding 44). This quote marks the first point when the boy’s Civilization begins to collapse. If the boys had person overlook the building
The reason the Lord of the Flies threatens Simon is because Simon knows that the beast is not a tangible creature that lives in the forest which is dangerous information. In reality, the beast is simply the innate evil that resides in every man. Simon knows this because he realizes that all the information the boys know about the beast does not add up and that such a creature cannot exist so it must be something impalpable but powerful, something that is making them so afraid that it is changing them from the inside out. He questions this “beast with claws that scratched, that sat on a mountaintop, that left no tracks and yet was not fast enough to catch Samneric” and grasps the concept that the more they fear the beast, the more they change (112).
His concern for the individuals in the group is pertinent from the beginning: he conveys to Jack the necessity of shelters “as a sort of [home]”, upon noticing the distress of the younger children (pg. 58). It is seen that Ralph’s problems are not his own; he assumes the role of leader to bring orderly forces of civilization to all. By approaching circumstances with logistics rather than emotion, Ralph does not lose sight of himself in the face of adversity. Despite this, he is later forced to act irrationally in order to preserve his status. When confronted with the evidence of the beast, Ralph is hesitant to hunt it; he is only manipulated into doing so when Jack “[sneers]” and questions him if he is “frightened” (pg. 100). However, Ralph does not respond out of his spite or self-pride as he understands that he must retain his status among the boys. If he does not remain chief, Jack will secure the position, bearing the notion that there will always be individuals working against altruism for their own benefit. Ralph sacrifices his morals by becoming subservient to Jack’s ego, yet does so in order to preserve civility within the group. On the day of the boys’ rescue, Ralph understands that his efforts to preserve peace and order are all for naught. Man’s destructive forces overwhelm him as “[he weeps] for … the darkness of man’s
On contrary from all the other boys on the island Simon, a Christ like figure in the novel, did not fear the ‘beastie’ or the unknown. “Maybe there is a beast....maybe it's only us” Simon explained. (p. 97) The fear of the unknown in the novel contributes to the boys’ terror of the beast, the beast is an imaginary figure which lays in all of the boys’ minds and haunts them. Golding uses the beast as a symbol of the evil that exists in every creature. "You knew, didn't you? I'm part of you? Close, close close! I'm the reason why it's no go? Why things are the way they are?" The sow head announced to Simon to be the “lord of the flies”. The “lord of the flies” is a figure of the devil, and brings out all the evil and fear in people. It wants you to fear it, but if you don’t believe in the “lord of the flies” nothing can happen to you. Therefore Simon didn’t fall into the trap, but the beast killed him, meaning the other boys on the island did. Simon discovered that the beast is in fact just a dead parachute man before he died and ran down to tell the boys about his finding. When Sim...
Furthermore, Simon’s gifted power of true inner visionary to look beneath the souls is revealed, “..Simon thought of the beast, there rose before his inward sight the picture of a human at once heroic and sick” (112). As the boys continue to indignantly quarrel and give the beast a form and figure, Simon visualizes the beast in man himself. Thus, he loses his former innocence when he realizes the ‘darker’ side of mankind, which the boys named as the beast and understands that evil is inherent in all humans. Furthermore, his eyes represent mystical wisdom and knowledge as well as magnifying lenses to see clear pictures of the obnoxious happenings such as, “The tangle of the lines showed him the mechanics of this parody; he examined the white nasal bones, the teeth, the colours of corruption” (162). Out of all the boys present, he is the only one who receives the opportunity to see the true illusion of the beast, adding more comprehension to his understanding of the beast that the more the bitter acts of violence are committed, the more the beast will come alive on the island. This also shows his ‘superego’ personality, consisting of a fully developed mind of social and parental values. With these values, he understands the difference between the right and wrong; savage and civility and is also both naturally good willed and civilized. His identity of a keen observer appears when he comprehends that on the surface, the island is extremely peaceful and calming, but the inside is where the roots of brutality grow which slyly evoke the inner savage present in all humans. Moreover, Simon’s character also has a touch of spirituality which is revealed when he hallucinates his conversation with the Lord of the Flies, where Lord of the Flies is symbolized as the devil and Simon as Jesus. He also has a
Cruelty can ruin people and destroy their morals and humanity. In the novel, Lord of the Flies, written by William Golding, British schoolboys begin to become savages after they have inhabited an island without adults, rules, or order. They regress from being proper boys into inhuman savages all because they don’t have any rules to keep them in order. The novel proves that everybody needs rules, order, and intelligence because it is easy to lose one’s humanity and become cruel and evil without those three things.
Crime happens every day. Some of the most common reasons people commit crimes are child abuse, drug addiction, mental health issues, and repetitive crime history. Many criminals have a logical reason for their crime and believe they are doing the right thing. That is the case with a man who calls himself The Puppet Master. The Puppet Master makes a solid argument against the government, but uses the wrong methods to show it. He is supporting a cause he believes in, but manipulating the situation, and threatening people’s lives.