Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Magnesium and acid reaction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Magnesium and acid reaction
Conclusion: In the experiment, we tested the reactivity of the alkali and alkaline earth metals when they are reacted with water, and when they are reacted with water plus the addition of heat. Each metal had a unique reaction due to several factors including their electronegativity and their atomic radius. We began the lab by experimenting with the alkaline earth metals. The first metal that we chose to react with water was magnesium. When we observed magnesium’s reaction with water, we saw very little take place in the test tube. The magnesium ribbon settled to the bottom of the test tube. When we added the burning splint over the test tube, the reaction wasn’t greatly affected, and a white, cloudy film formed over the test tube. We …show more content…
We began the alkali metals with lithium, the first in the group. Lithium caused a strong reaction when added to the water. The water bubbled and the reaction made a sizzling noise. The lithium piece at the bottom of the tube spun around until it dissolved. When we added the burning splint, it made a popping noise, but rather than immediately extinguishing, a red flame was briefly lit on the mouth of the test tube. After we added the phenolphthalein, the solution became a light pink color. After testing lithium, we tested sodium. The reaction between sodium and water was similar to the reaction of lithium and water. The sodium spun, caused bubbles, and made a sizzling sound. The flaming splint held over the test tube caused a popping noise and then it extinguished. The addition of phenolphthalein caused the solution to become bright pink. Finally, we tested potassium which caused a large reaction. The potassium instantly began dissolving, and a large amount of gas spilled from the mouth of the test tube. The reaction made a sizzling noise, and the solution left behind was cloudy and white. After adding phenolphthalein to the solution, the solution was left a hot, dark pink color. Before ending the lab, we observed the addition of phenolphthalein in water compared to the addition of phenolphthalein to sodium hydroxide. When the phenolphthalein was added to water, the water was unchanged. …show more content…
This is due to the fact that both the ionization energy and electronegativity decrease as you move down a group. These two properties are largely affected by the atomic radius, which becomes larger as you move down a group. A larger atomic radius has more electron shells and therefore more shielding. The shielding of the positive charges from the nucleus makes it highly difficult for the atom to attract electrons, which decreases the electronegativity. The shielding of positive charges also makes it easier for other atoms to remove valence electrons, which lowers the ionization energy. As you across a period, of metals, the reactivity decreases. The reactivity decreases because the atomic radius decreases as well. As the atomic radius increases, ionization energy and electronegativity increase, because the effect of shielding isn't as great as it is on smaller atoms. A larger ionization energy means that the atom is less prone to giving electrons and a larger electronegativity means that the atom has more of an attraction on other atoms'
Solid A was identified to be sodium chloride, solid B was identified to be sucrose, and Solid C was identified to be corn starch. Within the Information Chart – Mystery White Solid Lab there are results that distinguishes itself from the other 4 experimental results within each test. Such as: the high conductivity and high melting point of sodium chloride, and the iodine reaction of corn starch. Solid A is an ionic compound due to its high melting point and high electrical conductivity (7), within the Information Chart – Mystery White Solid Lab there is only one ionic compound which is sodium chloride, with the test results of Solid A, it can be concluded that is a sodium chloride. Solid B was identified as sucrose due to its low electrical
The purpose of the Unknown White Compound Lab was to identify the unknown compound by performing several experiments. Conducting a solubility test, flame test, pH paper test, ion test, pH probe test, conductivity probe test, and synthesizing the compound will accurately identified the unknown compound. In order to narrow down the possible compounds, the solubility test was used to determine that the compound was soluble in water. Next, the flame test was used to compare the unknown compound to other known compounds such as potassium chloride, sodium chloride, and calcium carbonate. The flame test concluded that the cation in the unknown compound was potassium. Following, pH paper was used to determine the compound to be neutral and slightly
The primary goal of this laboratory project was to identify an unknown compound and determine its chemical and physical properties. First the appearance, odor, solubility, and conductivity of the compound were observed and measured so that they could be compared to those of known compounds. Then the cation present in the compound was identified using the flame test. The identity of the anion present in the compound was deduced through a series of chemical tests (Cooper, 2009).
The purpose of conducting experiment was to determine the identity of white compound. Based on the 5 gram of unknown white compound several experiment conducted including solubility test, pH test, flame test, and ion test. Several materials including chemicals used throughout experiment and will be described through paragraphs.
* It was almost impossible to tell when the Alka-Seltzer tablet had dissolved, each time the experiment was done. This was a huge problem for the experiment as this could have totally caused problems to the experiment. A special type of detector apparatus, which bleeped when the correct amount of Alka-Seltzer tablet dissolved, could improve this, each time the experiment was done.
The objective of this experiment will be to combine various substances, liquids and metals, and to observe their behavior when they are combined. The types of reactions observed shall determine the nature of these reactions: physical or chemical.
Observations: Once the magnesium was in the crucible and was being heated by the Bunsen burner, it glowed for a brief time. It then caught fire before the lid was placed on top. When it came into contact with the oxygen, the magnesium started glowing extremely bright, and intensely white. The glow became orange after some time. The magnesium ribbon then turned white.
Lithium has an atomic number of 3, and an atomic weight of 6.94. In general, lithium is more stable than hydrogen, and slightly less stable than nitrogen, carbon, and oxygen. When looking at chemical ion properties, it is useful to consider three main characteristics: the size, or radius, of the ion, the charge, and the ion's electron affinity. Lithium has a similar charge to radius ratio to that of magnesium, which is in group IIA of the periodic table, and so chemists say that the two elements are "chemically similar.
The first step that we took to accomplish our goal was to put on our safety goggles and choose a lab station to work at. We received one 400ml beaker, one polyethylene pipet, two test tubes with hole rubber stoppers, two small pieces of magnesium (Mg), one thermometer and a vial of hydrochloric acid (HCl). We took the 400ml beaker and filled it about 2/3 full of water (H20) that was 18 OC. Then we measured our pieces of Mg at 1.5 cm and determined that their mass was 1.36*10-2 g. We filled the pipet 2/3 full of HCl and poured it into one of the test tubes. Then, we covered the HCl with just enough H2O so that no H2O would be displaced when the stopper was inserted. After inserting the stopper, we placed the Mg strip into the hole, inverted the test tube and placed it in the 400ml beaker. HCl is heavier than H2O, so it floated from the tube, into the bottom of the beaker, reacting with the Mg along the way to produce hydrogen gas (H2). We then measured the volume of the H2, cleaned up our equipment and performed the experiment a second time.
The solution turned pink - The next thing to do was to put to put the
The reaction observed in test tube 1 went from a clear solution to light yellow after putting it in the hot water bath for about one minute. The reaction in test tube 2 showed that once all of the substances were placed in the tube it immediately turned a cloudy, milky color. In test tube 3 the reaction observed showed that it immediately went from cloudy to clear after a few seconds. In test tube 4 after about a minute the mixtures became soft white color. My expectations were that all of them would turn cloudy and stay cloudy and that the test tube solutions would not need to be heated.
Experiments 3,4, and 5 removed one of the variables. We found in Experiment 3 with Sodium Bicarbonate and the Red Phenol Solution that the reaction was cold, red, and no bubbles or gas was released. In Experiment 4 with Calcium Chloride and Red Phenol the reaction was red, hot, and again no bubbles or gas was released. The Calcium Chloride once again slowly dissolved. Experiment 5 removed the Red Phenol and replaced it with water.
The Group 2 elements are all metals with a shiny, silvery-white colour. The alkaline earth metals are high in the reactivity series of metals, but not as high as the alkali metals of Group 1. These elements are all found in the Earth’s crust, but not in the elemental form as they are so reactive. Instead, they are widely distributed in rock structures. The metals of Group 2 are harder and denser than sodium and potassium, and have higher melting points.
In this experiment the Sodium Hydroxide solution went through three different phases where its quality and quantity changed. The first phase was called I. Preparing Approximately 0.1M NaOH, 1000mL of clear distilled water was boiled and then chilled to room temp.
Free electrons also account for three properties most commonly associated with metals: conductivity, malleability and ductility. The flow of electricity is a flow of electrons passing from atom to atom, so the materials that have the most electrons and want to pass them on will be the best conductors. In malleable or ductile elements, the free electrons act as a sort of lubricant, allowing the atoms to slip out of the lattice structure without cracking, smashing or