Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Medieval literature essay
Medieval european literature essay
Medieval european literature essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Walther von der Vogelweide (ca. 1170 - ca. 1230) was a German Minnesinger and is considered the most versatile and most significant poet of his time. In his early Lieder, he wrote mainly about courtly love, whereas his later Sprüche deal with political topics. “Unter der Linden” is one of his most known poems and belongs to the genre Mädchenlied. Unlike lieder of hohe Minne (high Minne), in which the poet sings about spiritual courtly love to an unattainable lady, Mädchenlieder are about the reciprocated love for a girl of lower rank and contain playful elements. The poem was originally written in Middle High German and later translated into modern German by several authors, including Karl Simrock, whose translation in Lieder der Minnesinger from 1857 was set, among others, by Grieg as “Die verschwiegene Nachtigall”, Op. 48 No. 4. Pfitzner based his setting on a slightly different translation by Karl Pannier from 1876. Berg set the first verse of yet another translation as the third of his Jugendlieder. The difference …show more content…
Her lover made a bed of flowers for her (vv. 19-21) and many passers-by still laugh at the view (vv. 22-24), probably because it is evident what the place was used for and because of the abundance of flowers. The passers-by might guess the placement of her head from the roses (vv. 25-27). The poem reveals little about the girl, though she gets characterised through the way she speaks about her experiences. Even less is told about the man. The girl never addresses him directly; she just talks about him as her beloved (v. 12) in third person. He seems to be apt at preparing their bed and his choice of roses, a symbol of love, for her head could be interpreted as a display of affection. It is possible that he is of higher standing and that their relationship is forbidden for this reason. Another reason for their secret meeting outdoors might be their unmarried
Right from the first stanza, we can clearly see that the girl emphasizes her passionate feelings towards the boy by explaining how she desires to be close to her love. Moreover, she expresses the theme of love through using a narrative of how she is prepared to trap a bird. Apparently, this symbolizes how she is prepared to trap her lover’s feelings with the desire to live together all through her life. Additionally, the young lady emphasizes on her overall beauty, her beautiful hair, and clothing which is of the finest linen which she uses to attracts her lover’s attention (Hennessy & Patricia, p.
It has been specified in the play that the setting must have a “small vase with too many flowers in it or a large vase with too few” on top of the small dining table where Vernon and Lucy eats. Considering that the scene presumably happened at Vernon’s place, it was assumed that he was the one who prepared the vase for their lunch. Accordingly, the “small vase with too many flowers in it, or a large vase with too few” represents Vernon in the play. (Hollinger 1385; act 1) A vase that is pleasing to the eye is arranged perfectly having a number of flowers matching the size of the vase. But in the play, the vase intendedly does not correspond to the amount of flowers in it. As a man, he would not care too much about the small details of the presentation, for what matters for him was his hope to be reconciled with his ex-partner and have a sexual intercourse between them. The vase symbolizes Vernon as the one being in control of the relationship. Considering that man was not expected to usually do house chores, the way Vernon did the flower arrangement implies masculinity. Aside from that, it also indicates that it is up to Vernon whether he would take too much effort on a work that is usually done by a woman. The imperfect flower arrangement in the vase represents Vernon’s character denoting manhood, being the manipulative and superior particularly in a
Through her use of the words “dreamed”, “sweet women”, “blossoms” and the Mythology of “Elysian fields” in lines one through three, she leads the reader to the assumption that this is a calm, graceful poem, perhaps about a dream or love. Within the first quatrain, line four (“I wove a garland for your living head”) serves to emphasise two things: it continues to demonstrate the ethereal diction and carefree tone, but it also leads the reader to the easy assumption that the subject of this poem is the lover of the speaker. Danae is belittled as an object and claimed by Jove, while Jove remains “golden” and godly. In lines seven and eight, “Jove the Bull” “bore away” at “Europa”. “Bore”, meaning to make a hole in something, emphasises the violent sexual imagery perpetrated in this poem.
Symbols are one of those most important things to a story. They share the meaning of themselves, as well as the meaning for something else. Symbols usually make the important ideas stick out as well as make the reader have different ideas of what is actually being said. One of the many symbols in “Paul’s Case” is flower’s. From violets to carnations, the flowers Paul talks about are ones of many meanings. The flowers represent a continual motif, expressing Paul’s character.
In the two novels The Sufferings of Young Werther and Candide, the authors create characters with absolute world views for the purpose of a starker contrast when their fantasy inevitably falls apart. Candide begins with the belief that “everything is for the best” and that this is the “best of all possible worlds” (Voltaire 101). Of course, this belief is shattered when he ventures out into the world and is consequently destroyed by reality in every possible fashion. However, Candide shoulders the struggles of life, showing resistance when he decides to “cultivate our garden” (Voltaire 159). In this way, Candide resolves to “bear a life of misery with fortitude” (Goethe), the very idea that Albert, representing the Enlightenment, argues for
Not only does this personification alter the pace of the poem, but the fact that the woman’s breasts – important sexual organs and symbols of female sexuality – are portrayed as sleeping conveys a lack of arousal and general desire, particularly on the behalf of the woman. This sense of a lack of desire between the gypsy and the woman is communicated later in the poem through the description of the characters’ undressing before they begin to have sex:
When he wakes up and goes outside in the morning, he sees a blue bowl on his porch and at first sight, it appears as though it is rose petals, but when the man gets closer and picks it up, it is full of dead bees. I think the rose petals are a metaphor for the love that she felt for him and the picture that she had painted in her head of the two. I think the bees symbolize how her hopes of finding someone to be with at her age were crushed the instant the man found out about her condition and was unwilling to accept it. I also think that there is another possible interpretation of the bowl. I think that the petals could also symbolize the desire they both had to have each other because someone normally gives a rose to someone during a romantic encounter, and the bees under them show how the man’s love for the woman died after he found out about her physical appearance.
The speaker personifies the flower by describing how the moon-lily sings: “…it is singing—very far/ but very clear and sweet” (10-11). The voice of the flower is the voice of the woman. The flower is calling out to the man. The fact that the flower has to call out to the man implies that he does not accept the love of the woman. The speaker also describes the distance between the two people. He states, “The voice is always in some other room” (12). Once again the speaker is describing distance, but the man does not try to close the distance. The reason the man does not try to close the distance is because he does not love the woman. The lily represents the female and their love. In the poem, the speaker talks about a “garden” which is a metaphor for the female’s life (13). In the garden the speaker describes the flower as “in bloom” and that the flower “stands full and/ proud” (13,14-15). This section of the poem tells the reader that the woman’s love is strong and unwavering. The speaker compares the woman’s love to a lily because the love is pure of heart and beautiful. The relationship that the poem depicts is unhealthy for the female. The woman is putting too much effort into a nonexistent
In the opening of the story Elisa is emasculated by the description of her clothing. She wears "a man’s black hat pulled low down over her eyes, clodhopper shoes, a figured print dress almost completely covered by a big corduroy apron…" (paragraph 5). When Elisa’s husband Henry comes over and compliments her garden and ability to grow things Elisa is smug with him and very proud of her skill with the flowers. Her "green thumb" makes her an equal in her own eyes. When Elisa’s husband asks her if she would like to go to dinner her feminine side comes out. She is excited to go eat at a restaurant and states that she would much rather go to the movies than go see the fights, she "wouldn’t like the fight’s" at all (paragraph 21). Elisa is taken aback with her own submissiveness and quickly becomes preoccupied with her flowers as soon as her husband leaves. When the drifter comes and asks Elisa for work to do she is stern with him and refuses him a job. She acts as a man would to another strange man and becomes irritated. When he persists in asking her she reply’s "I tell you I have nothing like that for you to do" (paragraph 46). The drifter mentions Elisa’s chrysanthemums and she immediately loosens up as "the irritation and resistance melt(ed) from her face" (paragraph 51). The drifter feigns great interest in Elisa’s chrysanthemums and asks her many questions about them. He tells her he knows a lady who said to him "if you ever come across some nice chrysanthemums I wish you’d try to get me a few seeds" (paragraph 56). Elisa is overjoyed by any interest in her flowers and gives the man chrysanthemum sprouts to take to his friend.
Comparing The Passionate Shepherd to His Love and Nymph's Reply to the Shepherd. and the stark contrast of the treatment of an identical theme, that of love within the framework of pastoral life. I intend to look at each poem separately to give my interpretation of the poet's intentions and then discuss their techniques and how the chosen techniques affect the portal of an identical theme. The poem The Passionate Shepherd to His Love appears to be about the Elizabethan courtly ideal of living with the barest necessities, like.
Throughout the life of Emily Grierson, she remains locked up, never experiencing love from anyone but her father. She lives a life of loneliness, left only to dream of the love missing from her life. The rose from the title symbolizes this absent love. It symbolizes the roses and flowers that Emily never received, the lovers that overlooked her.
Amidst the discourse, the history and tragedy, upon life and death, of tradition and change, of the struggle to find love in an otherwise hopeless place, we immortalize Emily by giving her the rose she so deserves. To a young woman, you give a rose to signify love and
The theme throughout the poetry collection is the emotion of melancholy and the speaker speaking with a wise and philosophical tone. She has also used the repetition of nature and religion-based implications in her poems. Most of the poem titles is named after a specific plant because it fits in the meaning of her entire poem collection. The title of the poems hold symbolism because of the flower language. You can constantly see the cycle of rebirth through the beautiful description of a nonphysical form of a soul and develop into beautiful flowers in her garden. The vivid imagery of the flowers by describing the color and the personification of these living beings. She is also trying to explore the relationship between humans and their god. The poet is a gardener who tends to the flower and she prefer the flowers in her garden over her god, “knowing nothing of the
The poet is explaining the relationship and where she currently stands after the fact. Reading the line “There’s much that’s fine to see and her” can suggest that she is relieved to be broken up and she can start life over again. Although she’s not a part of the relationship, there was something more too why she was hurting. The final two lines of the poem can clarify more, “ Tis not love’s going to hurt my days, / But that it went in litter ways” (17-18). She is not hurt that she had a break up, she is trying express how it relates to spring and fall. As stated before, the spring time is a fresh, new start of the relationship while the fall is a downfall of the relationship. With that being said, the final two lines of the poem is stating that the relationship she had was more than just the average love, she had to watch her relationship deteriorate over time. As readers can see the spring come, then soon the fall time approach; all of what was bloomed during the spring has now died in the fall. Hence her relationship with her ex-lover is very similar to how the season’s
...is ten year gap of philosophical and historical study exhibited new qualities that were not present previously. His later plays embodied his newly developed aesthetic theories on his claim of “naïve” works of art and “sentimental” works of art. “Naïve” works are moral whereas “sentimental” works have a moral. Schiller is considered by most Germans to be Germany’s most vital classical playwright.