Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
In just poem analysis
In just poem analysis
Poetry comparison analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: In just poem analysis
Everyone in the world has one thing in common. Every single person wants love. Ted Hughes’s beautiful poem “A Moon-Lily” uses an extended metaphor to compare a moon-lily to love. At the poem’s beginning, the speaker describes the “moon-lily” as “marvelously white” (1). The speaker uses the color white as a symbol of purity, wholeness, and completeness. A person feels whole and complete when they are in love. The speaker is implying that the flower is love and that the love is pure. The persona uses this image of love to describe the type of love one person tries to give to another. In this poem the person giving the love is the woman and the person refusing their love is the man. In Hughes’s “A Moon-Lily” the speaker compares a moon-lily to …show more content…
love to show the effects that an unhealthy relationship has on love. The speaker immediately describes the subtle beginning of love between the woman and the man. The speaker explains, “…before its bud shows any white/ You think you hear a ghost inside your house” (4-5). This passage implies that people experience attraction or tenderness before they fall in love. Since the flower has not bloomed this tells the reader that the woman and man are not in love. The speaker compares attraction or the beginnings of love to a “ghost” and a “mouse” (5-6). Most people see ghosts and mice as intruders. The speaker also states that the ghost and the mouse were “inside your house” (5). In this situation, the house is a metaphor for the man’s life, and the intruder is the woman and her feelings. The speaker’s comparisons suggest that the man is uncomfortable with the idea of someone loving him. The mood of the whole poem shifts after the first few lines. The speaker now describes the ghost’s and the mouse’s noises as “a happy humming” sound (7). The change in mood is sudden and swift. The line that follows explains why the mood changes: “…look at your lily…see a split of white/ petal coming” (8-9). The speaker explains that the change in mood was because The female’s attraction evolved into love. When the speaker describes the blooming lily he is telling the reader that the female is beginning to fall in love. Hughes’s speaker uses a lot of metaphors that all tie together into the one central idea, love.
The speaker personifies the flower by describing how the moon-lily sings: “…it is singing—very far/ but very clear and sweet” (10-11). The voice of the flower is the voice of the woman. The flower is calling out to the man. The fact that the flower has to call out to the man implies that he does not accept the love of the woman. The speaker also describes the distance between the two people. He states, “The voice is always in some other room” (12). Once again the speaker is describing distance, but the man does not try to close the distance. The reason the man does not try to close the distance is because he does not love the woman. The lily represents the female and their love. In the poem, the speaker talks about a “garden” which is a metaphor for the female’s life (13). In the garden the speaker describes the flower as “in bloom” and that the flower “stands full and/ proud” (13,14-15). This section of the poem tells the reader that the woman’s love is strong and unwavering. The speaker compares the woman’s love to a lily because the love is pure of heart and beautiful. The relationship that the poem depicts is unhealthy for the female. The woman is putting too much effort into a nonexistent
relationship. The voice of the lily follows the man wherever he is: “Comes and goes in your house, and all night long” (18). This passage suggests that the man is feeling guilty. The guilt is eating away at the man. Since he feels guilt it means that he cares for the woman, but he does not reciprocate the love that the woman feels. In the last few lines of the poem there is a sudden change in mood. The lily’s voice is “-suddenly-weeping” (19). The speaker uses the weeping of the lily to show that the woman accepts the fact that the man will not return her love. The female’s acceptance of this knowledge mirrors the life of the lily. The speaker states, “The lily has started to fade, there is brown on her/ snow” (22-23). The lily is a metaphor for the woman’s love. Since the lily’s color is fading that means that the woman’s love for the man is fading. The color brown is tainting the lily’s pureness. The brown represents the woman’s sadness and anger toward the man for not loving her back. The speaker describes the female mourning her loss with “quiet sobbing” (24). The speaker then states, “… no sleep for/you, / Till your lily’s withering is quite through” (24-26). The speaker is talking about the man and how he should suffer. The guilt of not loving the woman has overcome the man. The speaker is implying that the man will not rest until the woman finds someone new to love. If both people involved in a relationship do not reciprocate the same feelings for each other then they should not be in a relationship. Love is delicate and beautiful like a flower, and it can die if the people do not care for and attend to it. It is healthier to not be in a relationship than to be in an unhealthy relationship.
Love. Love is generous, boundless and is one of the greatest gifts one can obtain from God, however when in love anything can transpire. And that is exactly how the poets Mariam Waddington’s, “Thou Didst Say Me” and Alfred Tennyson’s, “Now Sleeps the Crimson Petal” navigate their poems. Both offering conflicting sentiments toward love relations to the table and ultimately delivering a unique testimony about the subject of, love.
word “art” which may imply something about the materialistic world that she tries to be a part of. Interestingly, and perhaps most symbolic, is the fact that the lily is the “flower of death”, an outcome that her whirlwind, uptight, unrealistic life inevitably led her to.
Part II: Explication The title of the poem “Love is Not All” asserts the impression that suggests the unimportant of love to its reader at first. However, the ending of the poem reveals the ironic truth that love is worthwhile. Millay’s intention is not to confuse readers by using a title that forcefully disrespects love. However, she projects the title of the poem to ascertain the grounds for her argument that love is important.
Literature shows us the changes of our society from time to time. It also gives us an idea about people, culture, politics, gender traditions, as well as an overall view of previous civilizations. As a part of literature, poetry introduces us to different cultures with different perspectives. Ancient Egypt and ancient China may differ in terms of culture, politics, economic stability, tradition, or even in religious belief. However, in poetry, especially in love lyrics both Egyptian and Chinese poems portray common area of describing women, social attitudes toward love, sexuality and the existence of romance or selfishness in relationships. . If we look at the Egyptian poem “My god, my Lotus” and the Chinese poem “Fishhawk”, we will see both poems have similarities in describing relationships. Also, they have the similarity of imagining the lovers and their expression of love toward each other. However, both poems have some significant differences in terms of representing female sexuality, gender disparity and the display of love.
Sylvia Plath was known as an American Poet, Novelist and Shorty story writer. However, Plath lived a melancholic life. After Plath graduated from Smith College, Plath moved to Cambridge, England on a full scholarship. While Plath was Studying in England, she married Ted Hughes, an English poet. Shortly after, Plath returned to Massachusetts and began her first collection of poems, “Colossus”, which was published first in England and later the United States. Due to depression built up inside, Plath committed suicide leaving her family behind. Sylvia Plath was a gifted and troubled poet, known for the confessional style of her work, which is how “Mirror” came to be. Although this poem may seem like the reader is reading from first person point of view, there is a much deeper meaning behind Plath’s message throughout the poem. Plath uses several elements of terror and darkness to show change to the minds of the readers.
...en a woman conforms to a society’s standards she is not as beautiful as someone who is unrestricted of these limitations. Consequently, comparing her to a “goldenrod ready to bloom” (19) draws implications of flowers blooming in springtime, which are lovely. This allows the reader to see natural life growing from the woman and beginning to break free of the shell society creates. She shows resistance to the ideas of how women should act be look like. The poem ends with potential: the women can change how she is viewed in the world but she has to take the first step.
Some people are born into this world without as many chances to get a better position in life. This can affect the people born into a lower class for the entirety of their life. In the poem “Saturday’s Child,” Countee Cullen uses imagery, personification, and similes to suggest the differences between people that are born into poverty and those that are born into an upper class part of society. Throughout this poem Cullen speaks about how the different social classes affect people; he does this with a pessimistic tone throughout the entirety of the poem.
In the passage, “Clover,” there is a man named Graham. In many different ways, he interacts with his students. For example, when Graham states, “Before I begin with a poem, I might just talk about my hair a moment.” The author then says that everyone in the class starts to smile at Graham. According to the passage, Graham loves to interact with his students, and he also has very unique characteristics in the classroom and at home.
In “The Echoing Green” the speaker chooses to use words such as “our” and “they” which gives a warm and thoughtful impression of people being together (9 and 14). Unlike “The echoing Green,” “The Garden of Love” uses the singular pronoun “I” (2 and 9). The use of the singular pronoun conveys that the speaker no longer has the close companionship that he felt he had as a child. Though the experience of growing up the speaker now seems to feel alone in the world.
Authors use poetry to creatively present attitudes and opinions. “A Man’s Requirements,” by Elizabeth Barrett Browning, and “A Letter to Her Husband, Absent upon Public Employment” are two poems with distinct attitudes about love that contain different literary approaches. In both of the poems, love is addressed from a different perspective, producing the difference in expectation and presentation, but both suggest the women are subservient in the relationships.
...ce of outside forces. However, the male-female love still exists in the world because the world in reality is a play where each being can write their script. In poetry reality holds no limitations. Even though the lover’s love is not true, it exists in the world because of the human being’s fight to preserve it. True love may only be able to exist in the female-friendship as shown in the play, but love in relationships still exists because the world allows any being willing to become a poet to be one. Any person can preserve a dream of false love and turn it into true love is they are willing to believe it possible. True love can only exist without penetration, domination, desire, or loss of identity, which exist in male-female love. However, love exists in this relationship because poetry has the ability to transfer this love away from a dream and into existance.
How does one define a perfect match? Society defines two equally attractive individuals as perfectly matched, and that a woman’s beauty defines her attractiveness. In “Litany,” Collin’s speaker presents and describes a true, unconditional and unequally relationship as a picture-perfect puzzle. The speaker names characteristics and attributes that his lover lacks while also listing others attributes in as backhanded manner. While using “you” the speaker portrays and addresses his lover with unusual comparisons and with ordinarily undesirable. He describes himself more attractively and the fact that despite his superior characteristics, he still needs and loves her. Many of his comments are backhanded with double meanings. “Litany” much like Shakespeare’s, “My Mistress’s Eyes Are Nothing Like Sun,” mocks the perfection and romantic idealism of love. Through metaphors, an effective use of syntax, structure, and contrast, Collins effectively conveys humorous satire towards traditional love poems while describing a view of a perfect match.
When it comes to art and poems, there are a lot more in common than people think. You can find many of the same values in paintings and in poems. For example, in William Blake’s poem “The Tyger” and in Abbott Handerson Thayer’s painting Tiger’s Head, there is seen a type of division in them. In “The Tyger”, a religious type of separation is seen. In Tiger’s Head, a good and evil type of separation is seen. “The Tyger” and Tiger’s Head both show types of separation, but have some different types of separation involved. Abbott Handerson Thayer’s painting Tiger’s Head depicts a tiger’s face in the grass. The tiger appears to be a Sumatran tiger at night. The tiger’s
Love is one of the main sources that move the world, and poetry is not an exception, this shows completely the feelings of someone. In “Litany” written by Billy Collins, “Love Poem” by John Frederick Nims, “Song” by John Donne, “Love” by Matthew Dickman and “Last Night” by Sharon Olds navigate around the same theme. Nevertheless, they differ in formats and figurative language that would be compared. For this reason, the rhetoric figures used in the poems will conduct us to understand the insights thought of the authors and the arguments they want to support.
On a literal level, this poem is bashing true love. This is made apparent throughout the poem. The speaker states things like “listen to them laughing-it’s an insult” and “it’s obviously a plot behind the human race’s back”. It is apparent that the speaker doesn’t have a positive opinion about true love. They even so far as to claim that it an outrage to justice and that it “disrupts our painstakingly erected principles”. This poem is about how true love is just illusion; especially to those people that never find it.