Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Has technology changed society
Reflection of society in literature
Society in the word of literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Has technology changed society
Lies and deceit are a truly major theme throughout Matched. When you suddenly understand, society, relationships, convictions, and qualities are ingrained in lies, you're most likely going to start questioning everything you’ve ever known. Where do you even go from that point? For Cassia, the main place to go is to begin taking in reality—and the best way to do that is to begin keeping privileged insights, telling lies, and for the most part misdirecting Society's Officials. Throughout the novel Cassia is forced to deceive her match Xander because of a mechanical error made by the government. Cassia deceives many people including the government throughout the novel and this is shown through my three points of evidence.
“For a moment, I think I should tell Xander everything. I should tell him about Ky's face on the screen. I should tell him about Ky in the woods, how he saw the poem. Instead, I shake my head. I don't want to talk about it right now.” This is the first time Cassia purposely conceals the truth from Xander. While she grapples with the choice, it foreshadows how regular concealing the truth from Xander and many others will become. The reason that this quote reflects lies and deceit is because of the repetition. Constantly repeating a point convinces the reader about your argument. In this case cassia is lying to xander- similar to the officials
…show more content…
It wasn't a mistake, I think. And then I realize: She doesn't know. He hasn't told her. My father has a secret from my mother.” To Cassia, her parents match is impeccable and gives a strong establishment of her faith in the standards and request of society. Understanding that falsehoods exist between her parents ruins her established faith in the society. Therefore Cassia’s parents relationship clearly shows how lies and deceit are shown through this dystopian text. The society tries too hard to make the relationships “perfectly,” matched when in reality even husband and wife could lie to each
In the book, Unbroken, by Laura Hillenbrand, it follows a Olympian named Louie Zamperini, and his journey. Louie Zamperini was born in Olean, New York, his family later then moved to Torrance, California. Louie is: rebellious, resourceful, among many other things. Louie is who he is because of how he grew up, and the obstacles he overcame. Louie Zamperini shows rebellious and resourceful characteristic traits through his actions.
She admits her struggles with lying as she once attempted to go a week without lying and described it to be “paralyzing.” She also explains how lies can sometimes have positive outcomes such as when the bank calls for her deposit. Without her lie the bank would have charged her $60 in over drafting fees. Ericsson attempts to justify her lies explaining that “there must be some merit to lying.” She makes a personal connection though the lies she tells on a daily basis. Her tone is colloquial yet informational, utilizing terms such as “we.” She explains that “We lie. We all do.” She points out the obvious reasons we lie and the effortless ways we can lie, “we exaggerate, we minimize, we avoid confrontation, we spare people’s feeling, we conveniently forget.” She asks questions, “how much do we tolerate before we become sick and tired of being sick and tired?” to create a conversational tone. In paragraphs 35 through 37, her tone shift from accepting to cynical as she begins to question the limits of lying and their
In the well known book The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne, it discusses the theme of deception within a numerous number of characters. This theme can be explained in Chapter 20 “The Minister in a Maze” Hawthorne wrote “ No man, for any considerable period, can wear one face to himself and another to the multitude, without finally getting bewildered as to which may be true”. I believe this quote means, within this book there are individuals that seem to be one person but end up being a totally different person, those individuals can only be that different person for a period of time before someone out..Within this quote the two characters who certainly explain this quote are Arthur Dimmesdale and Roger Chillingworth. The major characters
To keep her daughter’s “virtue” intact Macaria beats her. In this way the mother establishes complete control over Marcela’s sexuali...
“She has wit, vitality, and a certain tartness of speech” (Raia). Sh ie also very entertaining, loyal to her mistress, and overdramatic. In Act 3 Scene 5 of Casina, Pardalisca plays a trick on her master Lysidamus to aid in Cleostrata’s quest for revenge. When the scene first begins Pardalisca wastes no time in doing Cleostrata’s bidding. She starts her performance by shouting things such as “I’m lost!”, “My heart’s stopped beating for fear”, and “Snatch the sword away from her! She’s beside herself!” (Casina, 69). Lysidamus being unaware alks right into her trap. “Hold me, oh do, or I’ll drop!” and Lysidamus complies. “Put your arm around my … waist … fan me, oh do … with your cloak!” and he fans her (Casina, 69). His compliance with Pardalisca’s outlandish requests not only shows Pardalisca’s ability as a trickster but Lysidamus’ gullibility as well. Pardalisca was able to trick Lysidamus into thinking that Casina, the salve that he was in love with, is enraged. Pardalisca said that Casina is going throughout the house wih a sword in her hand threatening to kill the man she spent the night with (Casina, 73). Also, according to Pardalisca, Casina was planning on killing Lysidamus too. She says “seeing you want to marry her to Olympio she vows she won’t let you or herself or her husband live through the night” (Casina, 75). And of course Lysidamus believes
2) What is the main conflict in the book? Is it external or internal? How is this conflict resolved throughout the course of the book?
In the story of the Scarlet Letter, Reverend Arthur Dimmesdale possesses more guilt and fear than any other character portrayed within this fascinating book by Nathaniel Hawthorne. There are many examples that make this theory evident: by him putting off his confession about his act of passion, it results in a woman being punished and set apart from the rest of civilization, all while dealing with his moral obligations as a pastor and finally comparing him to the other major male character within the story. Even with his abundant knowledge of what is right and wrong, Dimmesdale attempts to rationalize his mistakes and reason to himself throughout the story that what he is doing is best for everyone. Is this a only a sign of just fear or hypocrisy
In the first mediation meeting between Susy and Gary, Susy lies about telling Katy, her sister, everything that happened between her and Gary. Katy lies by saying that Susy suffered seven months of vicious sexual persecution' and Gary lies by saying that the claim is utter bullshit.' At this stage in the play, the audience is unsure as to who is telling the truth due to the fact that everyone is lying, and this is a statement that Williamson makes about personal and business relationships and how society operates. He is saying that everybody needs to lie in order for them to look out for their best interests, no matter who gets hurt.
The Glass Castle is a novel that follows the life of a dysfunctional family from the perspective of Jeannette Walls, the third child of the Walls family. Throughout the stories, the readers see all the hardships the children face, as their lunatic parents do what they think is right. After reading the book, it seems to agree the quote “Parents can only give good advice or put them on the right paths, but the final forming of a person's character lies in their own hands” by Anne Frank.
Honesty helps people bond. One of the characters, Emilia, lies about her life at the Kleist’s farm and about her friend August, who she said she was married to because she was ashamed of being raped by a Russian soldier. She thought if she lied about it to everyone, including herself, then
Many people see Susanna Rowson’s book, “Charlotte Temple”, as a comment on the need for youth to listen to their elders. However, the theme is far more complicated than this as it shows that the advice itself is flawed. As the characters travel from England to America, the inherent problems of the advice appears. It is here that Montraville father’s advice which is assuming similar experiences leads to lifelong misery. Charlotte the most obvious proof that ignoring your parents advice leads to trouble suffer far greater consequences because of the reversibility of that very same advice. Even the readers experience the dangers of advice as the author cautions the mothers reading the novel that their views and consequently advice are not enough because of the inherent problem of advice not being law. Montraville’s, Charlotte’s, and reader’s stories show that it is not enough to follow parental advice if the advice is misguided, founded in untrue expectations, creating more trouble and misery for the youths.
When initially asked about the morality of lying, it is easy for one to condemn it for being wrong or even corrupt. However, those asked are generally guilty of the crime on a daily basis. Lying is, unfortunately, a normal aspect of everyday life. In the essay “The Ways We Lie,” author Stephanie Ericsson makes note of the most common types of lies along with their consequences. By ordering the categories from least to most severe, she expresses the idea that lies enshroud our daily lives to the extent that we can no longer between fact and fiction. To fully bring this argument into perspective, Ericsson utilizes metaphor, rhetorical questions, and allusion.
Klytaimestra has thought up an ingenious plan to uncover the outcome of the Trojan War as quickly as possible; however, when she tries to share the news, the Chorus castoffs her declaration. This constant stichomythia between the Chorus and Klytaimestra annoys her because of the persistent disbelief, “And you have proof?/That, or a phantom spirit sends you into raptures” (272-274). The Chorus, which consists of men, do not accept that a woman can have any sort of knowledge before they do. They dismiss her claims until they hear it from a male messenger, which makes Klytaimestra very angry: “I cried out long ago!/You made me seem deranged” (580-586). Further, when she explains how she discovered the outcome, the men automatically assume that because she is a woman, she got her information from gossiping. “Just like a woman/to fill with thanks before the truth is clear . . . So gullible. Their stories spread like wildfire,/they fly fast and die faster;/rumours voiced by women come to nothing.” To the Chorus, a woman to devise a plan as clever as Klytaimestra’s, is inconceivable. But even after Klytaimestra’s facts are proven, the Chorus will later undermine her abilities again.
It is inferred that the parents should take care of their children and have their best interest at heart. This however, is not the case in Greek and Roman mythology. The killing of ones own children, or filicide, was not viewed as negative upon in their era. The contemporary times contrast with the ancient Greek and Roman’s because it was justified to use any means necessary to obtain a higher status. The Greeks and Romans valued keeping a high social reputation and having respect for those of great power. The motherly union between their children conflict with the reality that the father strives to retain or gain control. These circumstances cause a tense bond between the members of the family. The strained parent to child relationship in Greco-Roman myths is prevalent in the fact that the parents are fearful of being overtaken by their children, and endeavor to limit their upbringing.
The naivete of a child is often the most easily subjected to influence, and Pearl of the Scarlet Letter is no exception. Throughout the writing by Nathaniel Hawthorne, she observes as Dimmesdale and the rest of the Puritan society interact with the scarlet letter that Hester, her mother, wears. Hawthorne tries to use Pearl’s youth to teach the reader that sometimes it’s the most harmless characters that are the most impactful overall. In the novel, The Scarlet Letter, Pearl has learned the greatest lesson from the scarlet letter through her innocence as a youth and her realization of the identity of both herself and her mother.