Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Diego rivera liberation of peon 1931 analysis paper
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Diego rivera liberation of peon 1931 analysis paper
The piece of artwork I chose for my Midterm Paper is The Liberation of the Peon by Diego Rivera. This work was published in 1931 and the medium used for this painting is Fresco. The reason I chose this particular piece of art for my assignment was because it spoke to me in a far bigger way than any of the other pieces we had to choose from, not only is The Liberation of the Peon by Diego Rivera a big painting in size (6 feet 1 inches × 7 feet 10 1/4 inches) but it is even bigger in the way it will speak straight to the heart of any human being that can truly see the content that is being portrayed by Diego Rivera, and that is that all men are created equally, and should be treated as such.
When I first looked at The Liberation of the Peon there were a few things that caught my eye
…show more content…
The person who is tied up by the hands and being drug around is the focal point of this piece of art, the content is all drawn to him and is trying to make the viewer see the true pain and suffering that he or she is going through, this you can tell by the slash marks to the body and the agonizing angles the body is being twist to. Another small form of content that I noticed in this piece is the facial expression of the older man holding the horses. His face shows pain and suffering, but you can also see that it is a somewhat normal occurrence because he does not seem to be in an agonizing pain, but rather just a dull sadness, overall the content of this artwork is remarkable and is why this painting is still relevant so many years
They are durable and inexpensive comparing to canvas.The artwork shows the happy emotions and realism with his interpretation of his wife and himself. Color theme of the painting was blue and background/negative space is dark blue. His right side of face is dark blue to show the shadow of his face and distance perspective. He used the black line which is stained glass like to separate the negative space/positive space. He used dark blue green for negative space on the Masonite board. Texture of oil painting is rough and we can trace of the paint brush stroke. They give the vivid or liveliness that he was well known of. The figures are realistic and impressionism style rather than photogenic. The title of paining and sub title of paining itself tell the story of artwork. Esther looks very relaxed, content and happy. Rattner looks happy , passionate, proud of himself as well. He certainly looks overcame the grief of death of his first wife. This painting gives warm feeling even though the theme color is cool color blue because of two figures of face expressions and relaxed body
Wayne, transforms this painting into a three dimensional abstract piece of art. The focal point of the painting are the figures that look like letters and numbers that are in the front of the piece of art. This is where your eyes expend more time, also sometimes forgiving the background. The way the artist is trying to present this piece is showing happiness, excitement, and dreams. Happiness because he transmits with the bright colours. After probably 15 minutes on front of the painting I can feel that the artist tries to show his happiness, but in serene calm. The excitement that he presents with the letters, numbers and figures is a signal that he feels anxious about what the future is going to bring. Also in the way that the colors in the background are present he is showing that no matter how dark our day can be always will be light to
Where do you imagine the painting was, say, between 1803 and 1890? Why do you think Vreeland places the painting in periods of history reflecting so many atrocities? What would have been gained--or lost--from this novel had the author placed the picture in more heroic moments of hu... ... middle of paper ... ... art is very self- rewarding and gives a great sense of accomplishment.
The composition of this painting forces the eye to the woman, and specifically to her face. Although the white wedding dress is large and takes up most of the woman’s figure, the white contrasts with her face and dark hair, forcing the viewer to look more closely into the woman’s face. She smokes a cigarette and rests her chin on her hands. She does not appear to be a very young woman and her eyes are cast down and seem sad. In general, her face appears to show a sense of disillusionment with life and specifically with her own life. Although this is apparently her wedding day, she does not seem to be happy.
We made our way through the animal exhibits, which is wonderful, but what really caught my eye was the Diego Rivera Lithograph Boy and Dog it was done in 1932, Rivera Native American style resonates with me. The shading and shadow blend seamlessly Boy and Dog is playful and joyful which harkens back to a simpler time. In addition to the Rivera’s Lithograph is the Rivera Court the Fresco is amazing and captivating I didn’t want to leave and spent most of my time. The Fresco was a “tribute to cities manufacturing base and labor force of the 1930’s; Rivera completed the twenty seven panel work in eleven months.”It is considere...
The artwork I chose for the art criticism project was ‘The Survivors’ by Kathe Kollwitz. The piece was created in 1923 in Berlin, Germany, where she resided with her husband. She and her husband resided in a poorer area, and it is believed to have contributed too much of her artwork style. ‘The Survivors’ is currently displayed in two museums, the MoMA and the Kathe Kollwitz Museum. In the piece there is a woman directly in the middle, with sunken in cheek bones is draped in a black cloak. Her arms are around three small children, who look very frightened. On each side of her body there are an additional four small children who convey sadness upon their innocent faces. Also, they are outstretching their arms as if they are begging for her to give them something. In the background, on the top left side, there are two elderly men with their heads down, looking as if they are very sad and
Diego Rivera was deemed the finest Mexican painter of the twentieth century; he had a huge influence in art worldwide. Rivera wanted to form his own painting fashion. Although he encountered the works of great masters like Gauguin, Renoir, and Matisse, he was still in search of a new form of painting to call his own (Tibol, 1983). His desire was to be capable of reaching a wide audience and express the difficulties of his generation at the same time, and that is exactly what h...
Bright colors jumping at you asking for attention, images so real viewers can not tell the difference. These are the thoughts that came to my head as I gazed at two works of art by two Mexican artists at MoLAA museum of art . I visited two museums, Bowers Museum of cultural Art in the heart of Southern California and the Museum of Latin American Art in Long Beach for my report unfortunately I only liked the works in MoLAA and will talk about it through out my paper. I will talk about two Mexican artists Rafael Cauduro and David Alfaro Siqueros that caught my eye, and made me want to learn more of them and their approach to art. Siqueiros caught my eye and interest because according to his biography “no individual associated with the arts with the possible exception of André Malraux, had been involved in direct political action more than David Alfaro Siqueiros” (Siqueiros Biography online). Personally that to me said a lot and that got me intrigued, and made me want to know more about him and his work. Cauduro on the other hand got me intrigued through his illusionistic approach to art and interpretation of his view of things. Eve thought they seem like different approach to art they are both similar in different ways.
The story has a lot of suspense it tends to be really scary. At one point of the story there was a man that was alone on a rock facing back to the protagonist. The protagonist was afraid when the man started to stand up, he saw his face. And when he did his heart stopped, he noticed it was the guy he was painting. Which this is absurd how is it that a painting comes to life? These stories use a lot of different ways to scare the reader.
many other emotions that the artist is trying to display in his painting. Although we can try and
Imagine you can own one of the famous painting in the world. Which one would it be? What will you do with it? If I got to own a famous painting, I would hang it in my bedroom and I’ll show it to my family. In this situation, If needed to narrow it down it will be The Persistence of Memory by Salvador Dali or Nighthawks by Edward Hopper. These paintings are extremely different, and their artistic movement is opposite from one another. By the end of this essay, you’re going to know the differences and similarities of these paintings.
I noticed the accent colors of the high bronze Gilt cup and the bright yellow half peeled lemon. These caught my eye the most because it resembles a “what if “to the paining. What is the painter trying to insinuate on these two items that seem to stand out more than anything else in the picture? The paining looks as if it is awaiting someone’s arrival or the person left in a hurry. The small details in the paining such as the half peeled lemon and half nibbled at bread would impose to me that the person recently left, questions in my head ponder it such as if it was hurried or not by the way things are positioned. The right side of the table is scrunched up, the totally opposite of its neat left counterpart. The painter also shows depth which on the contrary makes me ponder the picture even more, because the plates as I noticed later, are showing shadows which could amplify that they are on the edge of the table. It can be said also without any text context that the people who owned the table were extremely wealthy. Considering the time this portrait was painted in the 17th century, it concludes to me that they were wealthier because of the plethora of oysters, fine china, and spices laid by the
He is dressed in a flashy bronze tunic and tights, wears a pointed headdress on his head that resembles a set of horns, and his face is painted bizarrely. One might even think, upon first glance, that the subjects of this painting are indeed whimsical creatures of the artist’s imagination. But this work is most certainly one of realism, and it is one that portrays the genuine—though often overlooked—bereavement of a different, but very human,
To me the painting is a way of showing you what everyone else is seeing. That the painter had the men looking right at each other so they can see themselves running away. In turn I got to see myself doing the same thing and was able to change because of it. When other people look at the painting they probably see something else. That is why I choose to do the painting, it gives you the choice too interpret it any way you see fit. Or it can just be a beautiful painting to look at, but the painting was so much more to me. It painted a thousand words for me.