Levin The Case For Torture

647 Words2 Pages

Chasity Hatch
Mrs. Erskine
English 1301.N09
08 May 2017
Torture
In the article, “The Case For Torture”, Levin attempts to validate the use of torture as a reason to help save innocent lives. Throughout his article, Levin provides his readers with logical examples that help widen the perspectives of his audience. The author attempts to paint a clearer picture on why he believes that torture is a reasonable method of resolution. It is relatively challenging to conclude whether torture is acceptable or not. Should innocent lives be endangered? Torture is the practice of inflicting pain upon someone as a method to force him or her to do or say something (Levin 95). Should the life of one be sacrifices for the lives of many? Levin uses mainly pathos along with logos and ethos to successfully convince his readers that torture is not a …show more content…

These scenarios are logical and highly effective since they also relate to similar issues, such as 9/11, that society has overcome (McCrisken 792). This stance is incredibly valid and in the long run could have resolved a lot of issues before some of these problems occurred. “Suppose a terrorist has hidden an atomic bomb on Manhattan Island which will be detonated at noon on July 4 unless… (here follow the usual demand for money and release of his friends from jail). Suppose, further, that he is caught at 10 a.m. on the fateful day, but preferring death to failure, won’t disclose where the bomb is. What do we do? If we follow due process, wait for his lawyer, arraign him, millions of people will die” (Levin 95). This quote indicates that the legal and more ethical way of handling things terroristic acts could result in the death of thousands rather than resolving the

Open Document