Analysis of Michael Levin´s Article The Case of Torture

856 Words2 Pages

Michael Levin's article on "The Case for Torture." is an article which mainly discusess the use of torture as necessary and important in order to safeguard the lives of the many innocents and society and, is justifiable. In one of his examples, he verbally states that the mass murder of millions of an innocent crowd by a terrorist justifies the use an act of torture to stop such a brutal and barbaric act. This is a question of ethics on the action of wreak havoc. We need to look at the scenario of a war. People will never say that it is immoral or bad to let our soldiers kill or inflict pain on the enemies in a war because we know that it is the only way to make secure and safeguard our nation's freedom and the lives of our country men. The motives are very clear as mentioned in the article. Thus it‘s justifiable to let our soldiers kill those who want to harm the lives of our people. When a terrorist clearly have a willingness to harm the lives of millions of people, why is it not justified, to inflict pain on the terrorist, with the aim of wanting to protect and secure the lives of many more innocent people? Surely it is a right decision! Now one may look at this argument: The Constitution of America protects the interest of one's rights but, to torture a person is a breach of law that protection of interest is not there. Therefore, Torture is illegitimate. Torturing is however, is an illegal act only when the aim behind it is deemed reasonably immoral. One should then not inflict pain mainly just to push the other party to make a confession of the truth to a matter if one does not wish to do. But, what if the truth will then lead to the place of say, a bomb, which could then be diffused in time an... ... middle of paper ... ...ded at the time. Should we all know the truth and would actually accommodate to orders under torture. If people reject the author's argument and we have carry out exact pain to pressure out the truth from them, we may just get that since the likelihood must have been higher because of the accuracy of the agencies' information. As a closing statement, I feel that eventually, the case for torture is an exercise that is acceptable so long as it satisfies the completion of the concept of "moral or character standards…” as a whole. There will not be a close answer on “whether torture was right or wrong”. It will be a question that will continue to be implemented onto humanity should they decide to attain one definite approval. Till then, we should continue to equilibrium the innocent lives against the means wanted to save them, with regards to attention of morals

Show More
Related

  • Michael Levin's Essay: The Case For Torture

    948 Words  | 2 Pages

    Who wouldn’t have agreed? Yes, torture is cruel but it is less cruel than the substitute in many positions. Killing Hitler wouldn’t have revived his millions of victims nor would it have ended war. But torture in this predicament is planned to bring no one back but to keep faultless people from being sent off. Of course mass murdering is far more barbaric than torture. The most influential argument against using torture as a penalty or to get an acknowledgment is that such practices ignore the rights of the particulars. Michael Levin’s “The Case for Torture” discusses both sides of being with and being against torture. This essay gets readers thinking a lot about the scenarios Levin mentioned that torture is justified. Though using pathos, he doesn’t achieve the argument as well as he should because of the absence of good judgment and reasoning. In addition to emotional appeal, the author tries to make you think twice about your take on

    Read More

  • The Torture Myth, by Anne Applebaum

    897 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...themselves interrogating. Often, people who are in such situations are trained and prepared to withstand the pain. This results in the inability to acquire any or little factual and useful information.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Alan Dershowitz 'Should The Ticking Bomb Terrorist Be Tortured'

    1238 Words  | 3 Pages

    Rather, when torture is acceptable, and on which term should be it performed? The argument lest authorization torture his an advisor Sharde presumption that torture is currently happening and will be happening in the future hence the the. Plan of torture and. Dershowitz believes in a formal, visible, accountable, and controlled system of inflicting that would ideally leave torture as a last resort. The system would begin by granting the suspect immunity. Then suspect the be would compelled to testify; if the suspect were to refuse to exchange information, the next step would be acknowledging the possibility of torture while continuing to give the option of immunity. In a case of a suspect refusing to exchange information, even with immunity, a judicial warrant must be granted to proceed with purposely elicited

    Read More

  • Critical Analysis Of Michael Levin's 'The Case For Torture'

    794 Words  | 2 Pages

    In his essay “The Case for Torture,” printed in The Norton Reader 13th Edition, Michael Levin argues that torture is justified and necessary under extreme circumstance. He believes that if a person accepts torture to be justified under extreme cases, then the person automatically accepts torture. Levin presents weak argument and he mostly relies on hypothetical scenarios. There is not concrete evidence that torture solves problems and stop crime but rather the contrary. Under international law, torture is illegal and all the United Nation members have to abide by those rules. The use of torture does not keep people safe, but rather the opposite. Torture has a profound effect on democracy. As the use of torture becomes normal in society, the right of the citizen will suffer greatly.

    Read More

  • The Effectiveness of Torture in Relation to Criminal Justice and its Ethical Implications

    1779 Words  | 4 Pages

    The debate is out about torture and interrogation. There will always be opposing views and arguments. The War on Terror has changed the way that we handle suspected terrorists, and the right way to handle hem will forever be debated. Weather torture works or doesn’t work, whether it is morally right or morally wrong can be viewed differently by everybody, and will for sure be at the forefront of ethical dilemmas in the criminal justice field.

    Read More

  • Torture Is Legal, Moral and Necessary

    1211 Words  | 3 Pages

    Because of the 9/11 terrorist, the U.S. have been able to limit the outcomes they produce by using physical and mental torture against their emotional torture they used on the Citizens. Its not the U.S. that started this battle over the use of torture, america had to protect itself from further hurt. “The suffering caused by the terrorists is the real torture (Jean-Marie Le Pen).” people argue that torture it is an inhumane act to deliberately beat a victim physically and mentally. The problem is that there are no other possible solutions to obtain information that are as effective as torture on such events other than force it out of them by using torture as their primary weapon (The Legal Prohibition). If the U.S. wants to pursue the safety of americans they have to take actions, As long as there are no bombs going off around the world, the U.S. will continue to use torture . Terrorism has become a much greater threat than before. regardless if the beating are too extreme, it is still the duty of the state to protect its citizens (Torture Is Just Means). Even if the interoges are suffering from severe torture, the U.S. is able t...

    Read More

  • Dirty Harry Problem relative to Police Officer Roles and Functions

    1266 Words  | 3 Pages

    through legal and just means, from time to time that may need to be broken. The use of violence to gain something should not be condoned as a routine occurrence. It is not a reliable method of gaining the truth. However, it should also be understood that sometimes there is no other choice but to do what must be done. Unwarranted use of violence does not warrant or justify an ethically, politically, or legally dangerous means for obtaining information. This could escalate out of control and create many miscarriages of justice (Klockars, 1980).

    Read More

  • Is Torture Ever Acceptable?

    867 Words  | 2 Pages

    From a moral standpoint, torture is wrong and unacceptable. Many religious people are against this act of violence because they see it as a violation of the dignity of a human being. Humans have the right to not have intentional harm upon themselves from others. The ban on torture furthermore supports this certain right. Not only does torture violate people’s rights, but they also violate the demands of justice. In the past, many of our nation’s people have been tortured and we have had a problem with it; but when it’s not you the one that is being tortured, it seems to be fine. Have you heard of the golden rule, “Treat others only as you consent to being treated in the same situation? (7)” This applies very well to this problem.

    Read More

  • The Case For Torture, by Michael Levin

    1173 Words  | 3 Pages

    In “The Case For Torture” an article written by Michael Levin, he attempts to justify the use of torture as a means of saving lives. Throughout the article, Levin gives the reader many hypothetical examples in which he believes torture is the only method of resolution. Though I agree with Levin, to some degree, his essay relies heavily on the fears of people and exploits them to convince people to think pain is the only way. In certain aspects, I could agree entirely with Levin, but when one reads deeper into the article, many fallacies become apparent. These fallacies detract from the article's academic standing and arguably renders the entire case futile.

    Read More

  • Torture as an Interrogation Device

    2511 Words  | 6 Pages

    Torture is one of the most extreme methods of eliciting information; unfortunately, it has been used for centuries and is still prevalent worldwide.

    Read More

  • Medieval Torture

    2181 Words  | 5 Pages

    Torture (Latin torquere, “to twist”), in law, infliction of severe bodily pain either as punishment, or to compel a person to confess to a crime, or to give evidence in a judicial proceeding. Among primitive peoples, torture has been used as a means of ordeal and to punish captured enemies. Examination by torture, often called the “question,” has been used in many countries as a judicial method. It involves using instruments to extort evidence from unwilling witnesses.

    Read More

  • Ethical Ethics Of Torture

    1250 Words  | 3 Pages

    Torture may be an inhumane way to get the information needed to keep the citizens of the United States safe from the attacks that are threatened against them, but there is rarely a course of action that will ensure the safety of a nation’s citizens that doesn’t compromise the safety of another group of people. Nevertheless, we must conserve as much humanity as possible by looking at the situation we are in and ensure that we are approaching the torture in an ethical manner. Although torture is valid on moral grounds, there are many who oppose it, such as Jamie Mayerfeld as he states in his 2009 article “In Defense of the Absolute Prohibition of Torture”.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Convention Against Torture

    1925 Words  | 4 Pages

    In addition, there is no way to enforce the treaty in states, even if they have ratified it. Which makes it hard to make any progress on reducing the use of torture, fortunately, there may be some headway in the future in the form of the Optional Protocol to the Convention Against Torture. The Optional protocol would allow monitored visits to states to ensure that no cases of torture were occurring. The purpose of this paper is to research the Convention Against Torture and how why states decide to accept the convention. We will also look at the enforceability of the Convention Against Torture and what the future for it may possibly

    Read More

  • Ethics in War Are Necessary

    815 Words  | 2 Pages

    War has always been, and will always be, a necessary action perpetrated by man. There are many reasons for war: rage, passion, greed, defense, and religion to name a few. When differences cannot be solved or compromised through mediation with an opposing party, war is the last remaining option. Muslim historian Ibn Khaldun wrote in fourteenth-century Spain, that “War is a universal and inevitable aspect of life, ordained by God to the same extent as the sky and the earth, the heat and the cold. The question of whether to fright is not a significant moral question because fighting is constant; the minor decision not to fight this war will be made only in the context of knowing that another war will present itself soon enough because it is simply always there.” (Peter S. Themes. The Just War)

    Read More

  • The Convention Against Torture

    1107 Words  | 3 Pages

    Around the world and around the clock, human rights violations seem to never cease. In particular, torture violations are still rampant all over the world. One regime, the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, establishes a strong elaboration of norms against torture. Despite its efforts, many countries still outright reject its policies against torture while other countries openly accept them, but surreptitiously still violate them. The US, Israel, and Saudi Arabia have all failed to end torture despite accepting the provisions of the Convention.

    Read More

More about Analysis of Michael Levin´s Article The Case of Torture

Open Document