Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effect of trade on developing countries
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effect of trade on developing countries
• Less developed nations sometimes argue that the industrialized nations’ tariff structures discourage the less-developed nations from undergoing industrialization. How?
To understand the tariff structure of industrialized nations, it is important explain a nominal and an effective tariff rates. The nominal tariff rate is applied to the value of a finished product that is imported into a country. The nominal tariff rate is published in the country’s tariff schedule. The effective tariff is the nominal tariff of a finished product plus the nominal tariff applied to the raw materials or intermediate goods that are used to produce the finished product (113).
An industrialized nation’s low tariffs on primary commodities encourage the less
…show more content…
The producer surplus is the revenue received over and above the minimum amount required to induce them to supply the good. This minimum amount has to cover the producer’s total variable costs and that total variable cost equals the sum of the marginal cost of producing each successive unit of output (122).
The size of consumer surplus is affected by the market price. A decrease in the market price will lead to an increase in the quantity purchased and a larger consumer surplus. Conversely, a higher market price will reduce the amount purchased and shrink the consumer surplus. If the market price of x rises, more x will be supplied and producer surplus will rise. It is equally true that if the market price of x falls, producer surplus will fall (122).
• What factors influence the size of the revenue, protective, consumption and redistribution effects of a tariff?
The effects of a tariff include a revenue effect, a redistribution effect, a protective effect, and a consumption effect. As might be expected, the tariff provides the government with additional tax revenue and benefits domestic producers; at the same time, however, it wastes resources and harms the domestic consumer
…show more content…
The protective effect of the tariff results in loss to the domestic economy from wasted resources used to produce additional items at the increasing unit cost. The tariff prompts increased domestic output that uses resources that are less suited to produce the item and that increase the production costs. A tariff’s protective effect happens because less efficient domestic production is substituted for more efficient foreign production. Any prior consumer surplus is lost because the tariff has caused it to go to the government as revenue, be transferred to home suppliers as income and lost by the economy because of inefficient domestic production
When people in America see foreign goods for outrageous prices and then they see American goods for normal prices, they are going to buy American products. Unfortunately, this is not the only effect of a protectionist policy. Foreign nations often get upset at the increase in American tariffs and respond by increasing their own tariffs on American goods. This weakens the sales of American goods to foreign nations. In order for the United States to have a favorable balance of trade, then they must have strong exports.
Bentley, J., & Ziegler, H. (2008). Trade and encounters a global perspective on the past. (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 182-401). New York: McGraw-Hill.
While free trade has certainly changed with advances in technology and the ability to create external economies, the concept seems to be the most benign way for countries to trade with one another. Factoring in that imperfect competition and increasing returns challenge the concept of comparative advantage in modern international trade markets, the resulting introduction of government policies to regulate trade seems to result in increased tensions between countries as individual nations seek to gain advantages at the cost of others. While classical trade optimism may be somewhat naïve, the alternatives are risky and potentially harmful.
ROBINSON, Joan (1965b). “The General Theory after Twenty-Five Years”. Collected Economic Papers, vol. III, pp. 100-2.
[15]. Andrei Shleifer and Lawrence H. Summers, 1990. Journal of Economics Perspectives, Vol. 4, No. 2, Spring 1990, pp. 19-33
Strange, S. (1994), ‘Wake up Krasner! The world has changed’, Review of International Political Economy, Summer 1994, 1 (2), pp. 209-20, Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
In realising that foreign investments are the key source of the nation’s economic rise, the Chinese government has given special preferences to foreign investors (Financial Express, 2006). This is mostly done through reduction of most favoured nation (MFN) tariff rate. In India, on the other hand, fair competition exists between domestic and foreign investors. Although the Indian government states that it aims to reduce its MFN tariff rate, which currently doubles the rate in China, to other ASEAN country levels, it is in reality a big challenge because a large portion of the nation’s tax revenue comes from customs tariffs (Henley, 2004).
Gilpin, Robert. Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001. Print.
Balaam, David. Introduction to International Political Economy, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Pearson Education, 2005.
With so much focus on the positive elements of free trade, the negative aspects of an open system are often overlooked. However, they do exist, and protectionism is needed. Consequently, safeguards are built into the system. States look out for their own good, whether that is through the use of escape clauses or the choice of the optimal forum for dispute settlement based on the precedent they do or do not want set. This paper argues that protectionism is valuable and inherent in the current system; however, not enough. Powerful states exploit weaker states, and “free trade” exacerbates the problem. I will first discuss why free trade does not work. Then, I will explain how the current system enables the inherent protectionist attitude of states. Finally, I will analyze the fairness of the system.
level. The sand is Both developed and developing countries benefit from tariff reduction. The consumer will have more choices with more products and a wider price range.... ... middle of paper ... ... Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/0109121e.pdf?expires=1394821453&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=148EDDDFD930AFCF166F34498B8601B6.
Comparison Between MEDC and LEDC The comparisons between MEDC- More Economically Developed Country and LEDC-Less Economically Developed Country are many and varied but are mainly related to finance which gives the MEDC a higher standard of living for its occupants than those of the LEDC. Geographically most MEDC are situated in the northern hemisphere were as the LEDC are mostly in the southern hemisphere. Most MEDC are well advanced or have completed their development period for example the United Kingdom were as the LEDC are still in the early stages. Development of a country can be shown in a demographic transition model; this model consists of four stages.
Dornubusch, Rudiger. Macroeconomics. USA. McGraw-Hill Publishing Company. 1990.
Firstly, what should be noted here is that international trade has been providing different benefits for firms as they may expand in different new markets and raise productivity by adopting different approaches. Given that nowadays marketplace is more dynamic and characterized by an interdependent economy, the volume of international trade has grown substantially in recent years, reducing the barriers to international trade. However, after experiencing the economic crisis that took its toll in 2008 many countries adopted a different approach in terms of trade barriers by introducing higher tariffs in order to protect domestic firms from foreign competition (Hill). Secondly, in order to better understand the implications of the political arguments for trade it is essential to highlight the main instruments of trade policy (See appendix 1).
In 1950s and 1960s, the development of export processing zones, in the developing countries, was the outcome of a move for industrialization to increase the pace of economic growth by adopting various strategies. This drive was strongly motivated by import substitution. In order to reduce or eliminate the importation of foreign industrial goods, domestic production were encouraged by protecting the ma...