Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare and contrast classical and operant conditioning theories of learning
Compare and contrast classical and operant conditioning theories of learning
Essays on social learning theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Learning has given different definitions depending on the context in which it is used. Some individual have define it as any experience which changes the behavior of an individual. Moreover, Learning is all about how experiences affect the subsequent behavior of an individual. Learning theorists have some mechanisms to explain the consequences of experience on behavior change. However, human beings are flexible to adapt to environmental changes. They can learn from their environmental changes.
There are some learning theories which have contributed significantly to human development. These learning theories include Social Learning, Classical Conditioning, Operant conditioning and Cognitive Behaviorism.
Social Learning Theory
According to social learning theory, behavior changes does not rely on a given reinforcement pattern. Social learning uses social argument and element to help some individuals to learn through observation. The state of mind plays a major role in this theory and the fact that one learns something from the experiences does not confirm a behavior change in someone’s life. In this theory, the imitated is the model while the imitation process is modeling.
Cognitive Behaviorism
Cognitive behaviorism explains why the subsequent learning and performance of the learner influenced by what he or she has acquired from an outlook.
Classical and Operant theory
The other name used to refer to these two theories is conditioning theory of learning. Classical theory occurs when reflex behaviors respond to stimulus. On the other hand, the outcome of operant has some consequences which can be either a reward or punishment when antecedent comes after a behavior.
Learning theories have stages in which one must pass through. L...
... middle of paper ...
...have acquired to other learners to offer them assistance in behavior change as an outcome of the experiences. The experiences are based on the nature together with the direction of a given culture. They are all about the learnt behaviors, learning through observation, and the difference between what one has learnt and the act of one to implement what he or she has learnt
.
Learning theories also ensures that learners are in a position to change their perspective in terms of behavior change. The learners can shape and modify their behavior through the systematic changes which occur in their environment. As changes occur in their environment, the way they respond to the changes also changes. Moreover, the learning theories also explain why a number of individuals undergo through familiar environmental changes to help the learner understand their environment better .
Behaviorism, or learning theory is one of three “grand theories” of human development. The focus of behaviorism is observable behavior, with no reference to mental processes. As a learning theory behaviorism, assumes that learning occurs via interactions with the environment, through the process of conditioning.
Learning in its most basic form is our minds associating one thing with another. Digging deeper reveals that there are trends in how human beings and animals learn by association, usually this is done by a brain connecting one event to another. The two different ways a brain tends to learn is through either classical conditioning or operant conditioning. Classical conditioning is learning to associate one stimulus with another stimulus, and Operant Conditioning is learning by associating a response or behavior with a consequence. Knowing how people and animals learn is an important piece of knowledge if one is to help benefit the greater good.
... it comes to what theory I believe is most accurate in describing human learning, it would have to be observational learning. I think this is so because you always hear that people are a product of their environment, and it works in both a negative and a positive manner. It is like saying that the negative produces the negative and the negative can also produce a positive. Once someone sees the consequences of how their life will turn out depending on what steps they take, then it is up to them to make the choice. Life for people learning about how to live, does not have to be a history repeating itself cycle. It can be making a better life, if they make the right decision.
From the time we are born to the time we die, we learn new things every day, everyone knows that if you learn something new a day then you are doing okay. However, what most people do not know is how we learn and how our minds become disciplined while we are learning. There are two ways that we, as humans, learn new things. One is called classical conditioning. Classical Conditioning is a process where one object is connected with another object that generates a certain response. The second way is call operant conditioning, which is more commonly used. Operant conditioning uses rewards and punishments for our actions. Both ways have been studied by psychologist by research and experiments.
According to Social Learning Theory, Bandura (1989) suggested cognitive factors cannot be overlooked if learning is needed to be understood. Bandura has also noted that while reward and punishment substantially shape one 's personality, cognition has as much impact as they do. Also, the principles of behavioural approach have mainly been tested on animals. It implies some findings may not be applicable to a human being, which as a creature is much more complex than an animal.
Learning is the process of attaining knowledge that can be obtained in a variety of ways. People learn through their own personal experiences, others experiences, actions, and by being taught. Over the year’s psychologist have categorized these different types of learning into more specific categories such as operant conditioning, vicarious learning and observational learning. These three methods of learning, though they all use different techniques, can affect a person’s behavior.
Bruning, R. H. Schraw, G. J. & Ronning, R. R. (1999). Cognitive psychology and instruction (3rd ed.) Upper Saddle River. NJ: Prentice Hall.
The learning theory has evolved to help describe the influence of behaviors within social situations. For example, there is a study on the model of decisions from experience (DFE) that is a part of the
of the mind from the learning process by behavioral laws was a primary theoretical cause
This theory is heavily researched and the more that the field of neuroscience progresses, counselors are finding how psychodynamic theory can actually benefit an individual’s brain. Though, psychodynamic theory can be more time intensive in comparison to some short-term theories because it includes interfering deeply rooted behaviors and requires significant work on understanding one’s self. Another theory is Behavioral therapy which holds the belief that behavior is learned. Classic conditioning is one type of behavioral therapy that starts with Ivan Pavlov’s research.
Social learning is both shown through personal experience of different reinforcement types and by the modeling of our peers (Leonard & Blane, 1999). Individuals emotions are influenced by the physical and social environment. According to this theory, we do not need to experience punishment or reinforcement to elicit a behavior. We elicit the behavior due to our own emotions and how a consequence will play out. This theory shows the behaviors of all humans at different ages.
Learning is defined as a “process of change that occurs as a result of an individual’s experience” (Mazure, 2006). Researchers assume that the process of learning follows certain general principles, which were developed, into the general process learning theories. These include operant conditioning and classical conditioning which has been put forward by leading psychologists like Pavlov, B.F.Skinner and Thorndike. However, in learning, operant and classical conditoning are opposed by biological constraints that state that there are limitations to the theories. Some of these biological constraints on learning will be discussed below.
Learning may not occur immediately .The observer could process the new behaviors but his or her learning may not be affected until a later point or never at all 3. There is an assumption of a goal directed behavior. Social cognitive theorists propose that people set goals for themselves and direct that behavior accordingly 4. Another assumption of social cognitive theory is behavior eventually becomes self regulated 5.The final one deals with reinforcements and punishment have indirect effects on learning and behavior FIVE CONTRUCTS OF SCT 1.Reciprocal
Description: (who, what, when, where, and how) The focus of reading and discussion in EDAT 6115 this week was on cognitive learning theories. Our discussions in class were based on the using varies strategies during instruction When thinking about cognitive learning it is important to think about the different ways children process information and recognize the various strategies that can be used to help students learn best. Analyze: (Contained thorough connections to reading materials and discussions from course – including examples and citations).
Behaviorism is the point of view where learning and behavior are described and explained in terms of stimulus-response relationships. Behaviorists agree that an individual’s behaviors is a result of their interaction with the environment. Feedback, praise and rewards are all ways people can respond to becoming conditioned. The focus is on observable events instead of events that happen in one’s head. The belief that learning has not happened unless there is an observable change in behavior. “The earliest and most Ardent of behaviourists was Watson (1931; Medcof and Roth, 1991; Hill 1997). His fundamental conclusion from many experimental observations of animal and childhood learning was that stimulus-response (S-R) connections are more likely to be established the more frequently or recently an S-R bond occurs. A child solving a number problem might have to make many unsuccessful trials before arriving at the correct solution” (Childs, 2004).