Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of effective communication as a leader
How to define leadership
Leadership vs management compare and contrast
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Leaders manage and managers lead but they are not one and the same (Bass 1990). In years past the concepts of leadership and management have often been meshed into one. Is the manager of a business able to lead? Is the leader able to manage his followers? Management is defined by certain functions which can possibly lead to leadership and leadership is characterised by certain activities which could play a role in management. However, a number of managers do not lead and some leaders do not manage (Zaleznik, 1977). Different styles of leadership exist, the basic being democratic, autocratic and laissez faire and several theorists. Both political and business leaders have their views on what leadership should be and the characteristics an effective leader should posses. Management on the other hand, also has several definitions but the views on management and who an effective manager is are often synonymous. This essay sets out to critically asses Dwight D. Eisenhower's definition of leadership in relation to business organisations and also how leadership differs from management while comparing it to other views on leadership. Grove (1986) stated that it is necessary for effective managers to have the same clarity of purpose and motivation attributed by effective leaders. Dwight D. Eisenhower was the 34th president of the United States of America and was also a five star general in the United States army (Bacharach 2013). Eisenhower defined leadership as "…the art of getting others to do something you want done because they want to do it." As a general in the army, Eisenhower saw the sort of difficult circumstances his men were fighting under and he realised that duty and discipline was not sufficient in maintaining their morale... ... middle of paper ... ...ent. London: Pitman. • Gardner, J. W. 1987. The tasks of leadership. Washington, DC: Independent Sector. • Grove, A. S. 1986. Tapping into the leader who lies within us. Wall Street Journal, Journal 22, col.3, April 7. • Heifetz, R, & Laurie, D 1997. 'The Work of Leadership', Harvard Business Review, 75, 1, pp. 124-134, Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost, viewed 18 November 2013. • Kotter, J. 1990. A force for change. New York: The Free Press. • Larson, A., 1968. Eisenhower: the president nobody knew. 1st ed. New York: Popular Library. • Needle, D., 2010. Business in Context. 5th ed. Hampshire: Cengage Learning. • Taylor, F. 1947. Scientific management, comprising Shop management. New York: Harper. • Zaleznik, A. 1977. 'Managers and leaders: Are they different?', Harvard Business Review, 55, 3, pp.67-78, Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost, viewed 18 November 2013.
Dwight David Eisenhower (1955), the 34th President of the United States, gave an explicit definition of leadership, “The job of getting people really wanting to do something is the essence of leadership….” The Army, like any other civilian organization, defines different levels of leadership depending on a size of a unit a leader is in command of. Tactical and organizational leaderships are two first interconnected levels of leadership in the Army. Both levels of leadership have many commonalities regarding duties and responsibilities; yet they are very different in the way the leaders develop themselves, train, and take care of their soldiers.
Pierce, Jon L. and John W. Newstrom (2011) 6th edition. Leaders and the Leadership Process.
Leadership at times can be a complex topic to delve into and may appear to be a simple and graspable concept for a certain few. Leadership skills are not simply acquired through position, seniority, pay scale, or the amount of titles an individual holds but is a characteristic acquired or is an innate trait for the fortunate few who possess it. Leadership can be misconstrued with management; a manager “manages” the daily operations of a company’s work while a leader envisions, influences, and empowers the individuals around them.
Fiedler, F. E., & Chemers, M. M. (1974). Leadership and effective management. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. p. 1-19. Retrieved from http://www.blackdiamond.dk/HDO/Organisation_Gary_Yukl_Leadership_in_Organizations.pdf
Mlls, D. Q. (2005). Leadership How to Lead, How to Live. Boston: Harvad Business School Press.
In a firm, management and leadership are important and needed. Leadership and management are similar. Actually, leadership and management are totally different. The leadership would influence the firm. The leader would have difference leadership styles to lead the subordinate.
Leadership is not a position but an action that is undertaken by an individual. Leadership is not just about giving orders, yet it is the action of serving others. According to Robert Townsend, “A leader is not an administrator who loves to run others, but someone who carries water for his people so that they can get on with their jobs” (2013). A good leader will support his or hers employees because a leader is not judged on their own actions, but they are judge on the success of those that they support. In the modern era, we look at business leaders in the same way that historians view military commanders or kings of the past.
Northouse, P. (2010). Leadership: Theory and practice (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Presently many of us have learned that managers are primarily administrators who have learned to write business plans, utilize their resources and keep track of progress. We must learn that we are not limited by job title, and that means we can utilize our management skills in any position that we are in. We must also know that we can use our leadership skills in the same situations. On the other hand we have also learned that leaders are people who have an impact on those that surround them. The main difference that separates these two roles is that management is a function that must be utilized in any type of business, and leadership is the relationship that the leader has with his followers, which in turn can motivate and energize the organization.
In today’s complex management environment, I believe that the mindset of a manger weigh the same as their views and attitude on the job. Certainly, Jonathan Gosling an established scholar and the director of the Centre for Leadership Studies at the University of Exeter provide an excellent view on the diverse talent requirements in effective management. The main issue identified by the author is the connection between leadership and management. Separation of management and leadership is impractical. However not all good leaders are good managers and vice versa. Gosling, and Mintzberg (2003), argues that management without leadership promotes uninspired behavior, which hinders business activities. On the other hand, leadership devoid of management results in disconnect of actions and ideas. I concur with the author’s argument on the relationship between management and leadership. I believe that good managers should be good leaders too. However, most organizations do not enjoy both the benefits of effective leadership and management. In particular, most organizations lack either of these ...
A manager cannot just be a leader; he also needs formal authority to be effective. In some circumstances, leadership is not required. For example, self-motivated groups may not require a single leader and may find leaders dominating. The fact that a leader is not always required p... ... middle of paper ... ...
Chan, K. W. & Maubourgne, R. A. 1992, Parables of leadership, Harvard Business Review, July-August.
Bennis, W. & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: The Strategies for taking charge. New York: Harper Row.
Leadership, without doubt, is a significantly important function of management. It helps to aggrandize efficiency and to fulfil an organization’s goals. Leadership is the ability of a manager to induce the subordinates to work with confidence, determination, courage and zeal. It is also defined as ability to influence a group towards the realization of a goal. Leaders should have the capability of developing future visions, and to drive the organizational members to want to attain the visions. This paper states my points in which I duly believe, justifies the importance of an outstanding leader in any organization.