Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
My definition of leadership
Leadership definition webster dictionary
Strengths of a situational leader theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: My definition of leadership
Contingency Theory Originally presented in the 1964 article “A contingency model of leadership effectiveness”, Fred Fiedler’s Contingency Theory states that there is no one best managerial style effective for all situations. Rather, effective leadership is attained when leader style and situational forces or aligned. (Fiedler, 1964) Definitions and Descriptions Similar to Situational Leadership discussed previously, Contingency Theory classifies managerial behavior and style as either task based or relationship based, the former characterized by low interpersonal connections and the latter by high interpersonal connections. Contingency Theory then seeks to define the situational forces as they relate to three main categories: Leader-Member Relations, Task Structure, and Position Power. (Fiedler & Chalmers 1974), with each category being rated in high/low or weak/strong type format. In order to gauge inherent leadership style, the Leaser Preferred Coworker scale is employed, attained through the use a personality trait questionnaire. This 18 question quiz, asks the respondent to rate their least preferred coworker on scales such as Pleasant to Unpleasant, Agreeable to Disagreeable, etc. (Fiedler 1972) Care is taken to reiterate “That person does not have to be the person you like the least but should be the person with whom you had the most difficulty in getting a job done.” (Fiedler & Chalmers 1974) With both leadership style and situational forces clearly assessed, prescription can me made regarding what type of leader should be placed in what type of situation. Strengths Like Situational Leadership covered previously, Contingency theory has over 40 years of research and study upon which to rest. This longevity and academic ... ... middle of paper ... ..., T. H. (2001). Situational leadership style as a predictor of success and productivity among Taiwanese business organizations. The Journal of Psychology, 135(4), 399-412. Fiedler, F. E. (1964). A contingency model of leadership effectiveness.Advances in experimental social psychology, 1(1), 64. Fiedler, F. E., & Chemers, M. M. (1974). Leadership and effective management. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman. Fiedler, F. E. (1972). The Effects of Leadership Training and Experience: A Contingency Model Interpretation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(4), 453-470. Fiedler, F. E. (1993). The leadership situation and the black box in contingency theories. In M. M. Chemers & R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership, theory, and research: Perspectives and directions (pp. 1–28). Shoonhoven, C. B. (1981) Problems with Contingency Theory. Administrative Sciences Quarterly. 26, 349-377
Hoy, W. K., & Tarter, C. J. (2010). A Theory of Leadership: A Situational Approach. Retrieved January 28, 2014, from http://www.waynekhoy.com/pdfs/theory_of_leadership.pdf
2) “Attitude reflects leadership, captain”. That shows that Julius is satisfied by the way his captain is thinking. Managerial leadership has influenced organizational activities in many ways. These influences include motivating subordinates, budgeting scarce resources, and serving as a source of communication. We are referring to the LPC contingency theory. "The first and perhaps most popular, situational theory to be advanced was the ‘Contingency Theory of Leadership Effectiveness' developed by Fred E. Fiedler" (Bedeian, Glueck 504). This theory explains that group performance is a result of interaction. (Online reviews)
Vroom, V. H., & Jago, A. G. (2007). The role of the situation in leadership. American
Pierce, Jon L. and John W. Newstrom (2011) 6th edition. Leaders and the Leadership Process.
Kirkpatrick, S. A., & Locke, E. A. (2001). Leadership: Do traits Matter? Academy of Management Executive,5,, 48-60.
The situational leadership theory states that leaders use different styles and strategies depending on the situation. There are two models that support this theory. The Fiedler’s Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness states that an “effective leadership occurs only when there is an ideal match between the leader’s style and the group’s work situation” (pg
Hersey, P. & Blanchard, K. (n.d.) Situational Leadership. In Wren, J.T. (Ed.). (1995). The Leader’s Companion (pp. 207-211). New York: Simon & Schuster.
Lord, R. (2000). Leadership. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology, vol. 4. (pp. 499-505). Doi:10.1037/10519-216
(Schermerhorn, 2012) defines Contingency thinking, “Recognizes that management practices must be tailored to fit the exact nature of each situation” (p.6). The research suggests that Trader Joe’s management is very formulaic in their approaches from defining and maintaining company culture to site location and advertising methods. Daft, R. L. (2015) States, The idea behind contingency theories is that leaders can analyze their behavior to improve leadership effectiveness” (p.17).
“Contingency theory is a class of behavioral theory claiming that there is no best way to organize a corporation, lead a company, or make decisions” (Pfeffer, 1997). There is no simple or one right way to run things. In the 1950’s and 1960’s, two men named Henri Fayrol and Frederick Taylor continued the study of contingency theory. Research in the 1970’s dealt with the organizational structures and leadership styles for different situations (Thompson, 2005). Contingency theory was started by Joan Woodward, whose company research found that different types of processes were linked to different structures and amounts of control. She said that certain organizational forms are appropriate for certain forms of work. Woodward was a pioneer for the theory. Woodward composed several studies using differential variables such as management levels of a company, industry compressions, and management styles in her measurement (Thompson, 2005).--. From those tests, she has identified that there are three influential aspects to contingency theory: environmental, organizational, and leadership. These factors are the key components that influence the success of a business.
The situational theory approach and contingency approach are both two major types of leaders approach that researchers have studied for several years. Northhouse (2013, p.99) stated that, “the premise of the theory is that different situations demand different kinds of leadership”. For simple understanding it means that leaders have to be able to switch and adapt their style as different situation arise. Situational approach is broken down into two main dimensions, which is the directive (task) and supportive (relationship) behaviours.
Those who take this approach assess the current situation by identifying its major factors, then focus and act on those aspects of the situation (McNamara). In his book, “Leadership Management: Achieving Breakthroughs,” K. Barman writes that by adopting the Contingency theory, the manager believes that there is no correct or best way of leading; what works in one situation may not necessarily work in another. Due to this assumption, one can say that contingency theory is similar to situational theory; there is no single, simple, or exact way to handle all situations, and effective management depends on the situation (50). Contingency theory is different from situational theory, however. He writes,
Workers typically report higher levels of job satisfaction in such environments, and the company often benefits from increased creativity. On the downside, the democratic process is slower and may not be practical in workplaces where fast decision-making is a necessity. The next leadership style is bureaucratic leadership. Bureaucratic leadership is normally used in highly regulated, administrative workplaces, where the rules are more strictly followed and a concrete hierarchy is vital. These leaders ensure people follow the rules and accomplish tasks “by the book.” Naturally, this works well in roles such as health and safety, but can also prevent innovation and creativity in more fast-paced companies. The eighth common style of leadership is charismatic leadership. There is some overlap between charismatic and transformational leadership. Both heavily rely on the positive charm and personality of the respective leader. However, charismatic leadership is typically considered less favorable because success is closely linked to the leader being present. While transformational leaders build confidence in a team that remains upon absence, the removal of a charismatic leader typically leaves the opposite effect. The ninth and final style of leadership is situational leadership. Developed by management experts Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard in 1969,
Lussier, R.N. & Achua, C.F. (2010). Leadership: Theory, application, skill development (5th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western.
The Situational Theories of leadership explain how leadership style must be tailored to the demands of the task and the qualities of subordinates.