Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Advantages and disadvantages of leadership theories pdf
Comparisons of autocratic, democratic and laissez-faire leadership styles
Advantages and disadvantages of leadership theories pdf
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
This report is attempting to delve into the systemic differences autocratic, democratic and laissez-faire styles of leadership has on an individual, class, department or institution. As a nursing student, I believe it is important to understand the distinct differences inherent to each style as well as the benefits and disadvantages associated with the various styles of leadership. From my studies and observations an autocratic leader is less likely to use the opinions or suggestions of others; in fact they could be a working dictator. They are very hands on and believe their way is the only way. Autocratic leaders are normally inflexible. Working with or for this type of person could make for a very long day. (Lewin & Lippitt, 1938) (Vroom & Yetton, 1973). Conversely the nurse leaders who practice the laissez-faire style of leadership takes the hands off approach allowing new nurses such as myself to work independently and learn as they go with very little supervision (Lewin & Lippitt, 1938). I believe the work place would be less stressful than the autocratic but less productive than the democratic. This brings me to my personal favorite style of leadership democratic which I chose to follow as I move forward in my career. The democratic leader gives followers a vote in nearly every decision the team make (Lewin & Lippitt, 1938). Democratic leadership could be more time consuming than the other two styles of leadership with respect to reaching a majority consensus because decisions are made as a team (Denhardt & Denhardt, 2003; Hackman & Johnson). Regardless I believe leaders should rely on the team to create policy as they do when addressing a medical procedure. During my mother’s transition I had the opportunity to witn... ... middle of paper ... ...as I move forward in my career I will work as part of a team that will eventually change the world. Works Cited Conger, J. (1993). The brave new world of leadership training. Organizational Dynamics, 21(3), 46-57. Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2003). The new public service: Serving, not steering. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe. Hill, S. S. & Howlett, H. A. (2009). Success in Practical/Vocational Nursing: From Student to Leader. (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Saunders/Elsevier . Kanter, R. M. (1982). The change masters: Innovation and entrepreneurship in the American corporation. New York: Simon & Schuster. Lewin, K., & Lippitt, R. (1938). An experimental approach of the study of autocracy and democracy: A preliminary note. Psychometry, 1, 292-300. Vroom, V. H. & Yetton, P. W. (1973). Leadership and decision-making. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Encarta Dictionary within Microsoft Word defines leadership as,” the ability to guide, direct, or influence people.” Expanding upon that definition, my personal definition is influencing people to follow to achieve a goal, regardless of how unpleasant. Leadership is not something that happens overnight, it needs to be cultivated over time. During that process, it is necessary to identify delinquencies and make adjustments. Reviewing the feedback provided by my LPI/360 assessment, the three areas identified I need to improve on are, praising people for a job well done, actively listening to diverse points of view, and becoming more visible within the workplace.
Lorber, M., Treven, S., & Mumel, D. (2016). The Examination of Factors Relating to the Leadership Style of Nursing Leaders in Hospitals. Our Economy (Nase Gospodarstvo), 62(1), 27-36. doi:10.1515/ngoe-2016-0003
Laurent, & Laurent. (2000). A nursing theory for nursing leadership. Journal Of Nursing Management, 8(2), 83-87. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2834.2000.00161.x
In healthcare, there are several ways to influence others and each comes with a leadership style that the nurse possesses when they make decisions. When you put it in perspective, the attitudes, values and behaviors of an institution begin with its leadership (Azaare & Gross, 2011.) Democratic and autocratic leadership styles are very common for the professional nurse to use on a daily basis. Depending on the situation at hand, both leadership styles can be very effective.
However, though authoritative regimes have the right to exist, it is also considered, now, to be generally immoral; and, combats ideas of personal freedoms and individual rights. Thus, many countries have adopted and manipulated ‘democracy’ in order to reach authoritarian goals. Democracy stands apart from other types of regimes in that it generates freedom, promotes true and fair representation, and encourages self expression. Both communism and authoritarian regimes can become corrupt through the smothering of these individual freedoms. The denial of true representation for the people can stifle socioeconomic goals and development born from invention and innovation. The stigma on authoritarian regimes have become strong enough where currently, countries are self-pronounced democracies with little to no truth behind it.
In today’s business environment, corporations must be able to adapt and develop strategies that allow them to remain as competitive as possible within the markets they serve. Leaders within those corporations must be able to fully understand the most effective leadership style required depending on the situation at hand. One style may be effective in one situation while another style may need to be used in another. In this day of environmental dynamism, organizations have had to refocus on organizational capabilities in order to attain a competitive advantage in such an environment. This refocus has led to a break in routines and involves a shift in organizational norms and required knowledge. James Clawson discusses the three levels of leadership in his book entitled “Level Three Leadership: Getting Below the Surface.” This article will discuss some issues that may arise within corporations and what leadership styles may be most effective for differing situations based on Clawson’s text.
A person’s title within the organization does not make them a leader. The driving factor which determines if someone is in a leader position is their behavior. This person who is a leader will guide those in the organization by influencing, guiding, giving direction, and opinions (Marquis & Huston, 2012). The culture as well as the climate of an organization begins with the leadership (Azaare & Gross, 2011). Each individual person has their own leadership style. Knowing one’s own leadership style will help them understand themselves and be able to grow as a leader. The purpose of this paper is to look at my own leadership style, including my strengths for leading others. A description of a potential challenge that I foresee due to my leadership style and a plan for my personal leadership development will be discussed.
Leadership is defined by Northouse (2013) as a transactional experience between persons whereby one individual influences a group of individuals who have a mutual goal. Leaders may hold authority attributed to them by the group, substantiated by how they are regarded, whether or not they have positional authority. In contrast to management, where the goal is to provide order through control, leadership is concerned with producing change through transformation and practical adjustments (Northouse, 2013). Because of the nature of nursing, its obligation to promoting health and healing of people, nursing leadership concentrates change efforts based on human needs and concurrently ponders the needs of administrations largely because they understand the interrelatedness of the two influences.
Leadership is a quality many of us strive to achieve. To be an excellent leader has been an elusive quest. However, the pursuit of excellent leadership is movement in the right direction. In this paper we will examine the major types of leadership styles. The three types are, Participative or Democratic, Laissez-Faire, and Authoritative.
Submission 1: Would you classify the rule of the ‘dictator’ you have researched as a true dictatorship or is it better regarded as a benevolent dictatorship?
Leader’s will continue to devote their time to help others but in order to be a successful leader one must close the communication gap between nurse leaders and their staff. Lastly, formal leadership education is essential prior to taking on a leadership role to allow for proper recruitment and retainment of Generation Y leadership roles. If we do not educate our upcoming Generation Y leaders they will be too scared to take on a leadership role and this puts nursing leadership at
Authoritarian forms of government do sometimes fail. The reasons for such failure include the public’s dissatisfaction with the current governmental regime, the emergence of relevant opposition, political negotiation with elites, the physical location as well as history of freedom in a given nation, and the deserting of the authoritarian leader.
So, to reiterate, democratic leadership when reduced to its core characteristics promotes equality and mutual respect, is not dictatorial, and recognises that all parties have the right to a say that can influences productivity in the workplace. It is with these characteristics of democratic leadership, that this paper will now explore how effective they are in managing or resolving challenges that may confront the registered nurse in the
The leadership style combination between autocratic leadership and empowerment leadership would give the futuristic cutting edge per se, to create a diversified ultimate decision making policy. Autocratic leadership, which is a style that leaders who make decisions on their own without consulting employees enjoy and empowerment, which is a practice in which managers lead employees by sharing power, responsibility, and decision making with them (Boone, L. E., & Kurtz, D. L. 2009 p. 260-270). This mixture creates responsibility and accountability. If the leader is made to lead then, in return they will make certain key decisions based on experience, proven results and a “pocket” of advisors that will guide them based on their on comprehension of the field along the way. This creates a “hierarchy” which is necessary to let the employees who are coming up on the ladder to have a cause and effect “history” so to speak, for many different common and uncommon situations to use in the future.
One prominent leadership style that began came from The Iowa Studies that were conducted by Kurt Lewin, Ronald Lippett and Ralph White in 1939. Kurt Lewin was the social scientist in charge of the study. They were called the “Iowa Leadership Studies”. This study put leadership styles into three distinct categories of authoritarian, democratic, and laissez-faire leaders and group dynamics (Smith, 2001). The study was interested in the analysis of group interactions and the organizational application of each leadership style. It also takes into account exactly how a leader determines when they direct others or have others participate, and when to delegate to others.