Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethnic cleansing bosnian war
The disintegration of yugoslavia
The disintegration of yugoslavia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethnic cleansing bosnian war
Submission 1: Would you classify the rule of the ‘dictator’ you have researched as a true dictatorship or is it better regarded as a benevolent dictatorship? Josip Broz, more commonly known as Marshal Tito, was the Prime Minister and later President of Yugoslavia following its conversion to communism during the post-World War II era. Ruling from 1944 until his death in 1980, Tito implemented many crucial reforms that furthered the development and prosperity of his nation during his rise to power, his policies once in power, and how he kept Yugoslavia united, whilst simultaneously consolidating his power through an authoritarian regime that removed political opponents. Although opinion remains divided, Marshal Tito’s dictatorship was mostly benevolent for overseeing the most peaceful and prosperous period experienced by the region, resulting in a stronger nation. Tito’s rise to power documents the values he gained throughout his youth, which shaped him to be a fit ruler. Born on May 7, 1892 in Kumrovec in northern Croatia, then part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, as the seventh child of Slovene and Croat parents , Tito moved to Sisak, in central Croatia, where he worked as a machinist’s apprentice . Joining a union of metallurgy workers, Tito was introduced to the labour movement and became a member of the Social Democratic Party of Croatia and Slavonia . In the following years, his work took him to the German Empire, employed in a Benz car factory, and later to Austria, as a test driver for Daimler . However, his plans in the automotive industry were forced to be postponed after he was conscripted in the Austro-Hungarian Army in 1914 , becoming the youngest Sergeant Major and being recommended for the Silver Bravery Medal ,... ... middle of paper ... ... launched the Belgrade Offensive to liberate the city from German forces. The first post-war elections were set for 11 November 1945, with Tito’s Communist Party dominating the results with over 90% of the vote , with Tito proclaiming the Federal People’s Republic of Yugoslavia , and the new Yugoslav Constituent Assembly formally abolishing the monarchy. The election confirmed that the people of Yugoslavia supported Tito, as he was viewed as the liberator of Yugoslavia from the Germans . Tito, as their new leader, was already seen as their saviour and as a benevolent figure. Paragraph 3: On Tito’s policies while in power (positive: economic liberalisation and non-alignment, negative: removal of political opponents and authoritarian rule) Paragraph 4: How Tito suppressed Yugoslavian nationalism and kept six different countries united until his death Conclusion
In fact, sometimes it is actively encouraged as part of preserving the culture and the traditional aspects of the nation in question; for example, routine celebrations of national holiday and the wearing of cultural clothing demonstrate moderate forms of nationalism. However, it is when extreme pride in one’s nation leads to acts that contravene common decency that the forces of nationalism become dangerous. A historical example of such an event was the Bosnian war and the resulting Bosnian genocide that occurred shortly after the partition of Yugoslavia in the early 1990’s. In this event, extreme Serbian nationalism called for the unity of the Serbian peoples in Bosnia-Herzegovina - an event that echoes the words of the source. Serbian leaders and followers believed that their culture and people were superior to that of the neighbouring ethnic groups - the Bosniaks and the Croatians - and thought that they needed to be eliminated because of the potential threat they posed to the establishment of an autonomous Serbian Republic, or “Greater Serbia”. In the course of the war, and the ethnic cleansing that followed, more than 100,000 Bosniaks and Croatians were to be killed in a mass act of genocide. This appalling and gruesome figure shows the extent to which extreme nationalism is unacceptable and how unification of a people by force is both detrimental and wrong on all
In 1992 (and with resolutions created earlier) Kosovo's Albanian majority also voted to secede from Serbia and Yugoslavia, hoping to unite with Albania. The conflict in Kosovo could be seen as t...
It was created out of the Austria-Hungary empire that lost the war and lost its land. Serbians, Croatians, Slovenes, and Bosnians and Muslims lived all in one country. The problem was the people didn't get along and each republic wanted to take control of the country. This went on until after WWII, when the Soviet Union took power and control over the country. Joseph Broz (Tito) was leader of Yugoslavia until the 6 republics separated.
The last two decades of the twentieth century gave rise to turbulent times for constituent republics of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, eventually leading them to split apart. There were a number of damaging aspects of past history and of the political and economic circumstances that contributed to the breakup and eventually caused the situation to snowball into a deadly series of inter-ethnic conflicts. Yugoslavia was reunified at the end of the war when the communist forces of Josip Broz Tito liberated the country. Under Tito, Yugoslavia adopted a relatively liberal form of government in comparison to other East European communist states at the time and experienced a period of relative economic and political stability until Tito’s death in 1980. In addition to internal power struggles following the loss of their longtime leader, Yugoslavia faced an unprecedented economic crisis in the 1980’s. As other communist states began to fall in the late 1980’s and early 1990’s, some former Communist leaders abandoned communism and founded or supported ethno-national parties, blaming the economic suffering on the flaws of communism and other ethnic groups. The ethnic violence that followed would not have been possible without the willingness of politicians from every side to promote ethno-nationalist symbols and myths through media blitzes, which were especially effective due to low levels of education in the former Yugoslavia. Shadows of the events of World War II gave these politicians, especially the Serbs, an opportunity to encourage the discussion and exaggeration of past atrocities later in the century. The ethnic violence in the former Yugoslavia can be traced back to a series of linked damaging factors such as the de...
struggle, however, fought under the guise of ethnic hatred. Bibliography Glenny M, "The Balkans, 1804-1999", 2000. Lampe JR, Yugoslavia as History. Twice There was a Country, 1996. Kegley and Wittkopf, "World Politics", 2001.
people decide that they want a dictatorship. If I was a ruler during the period of the
During World War II, Yugoslavia was invaded by Nazi Germany and was partitioned. A fierce resistance movement sprang up led by Josip Tito. Following Germany's defeat, Tito reunified Yugoslavia under the slogan "Brotherhood and Unity," merging together Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia, Serbia, Montenegro, Macedonia, along with two self-governing provinces, Kosovo and Vojvodina. Tito, a Communist, was a strong leader who maintained ties with the Soviet Union and the United States during the Cold War, playing one superpower against the other while obtaining financial assistance and other aid from both. After his death in 1980 and without his strong leadership, Yugoslavia quickly plunged into political and economic chaos.
The decline and the disappearance of traditional monarchies in the 19th and 20th century has paved for other individuals and/or groups to rule. The three main dictators of World War II were Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler, and Benito Mussolini. The pursuit to gain over cultural, economic, and political factors of people and land are the main goals of the dictators. To achieve their goals, they eliminate anything and anyone that gets in their way.
In 1922, Benito Mussolini held leadership in Italy, promising a proficient and militaristic nationalistic state. During his control as prime minister, he gained a large group of followers, banned the disparagement of government, and used extreme violence against his enemies within the parliament. According to Oppenheimer, Adolf Hitler idolized Mussolini’s rise and respected his tactics to gain power. Hitler was a violent leader who brought For example, “corporatism” largely contributed to later policies that we still practice today.
Although Milosevic was a key figure during this period whose actions undoubtedly influenced the chain of events that unfolded, I believe his power-seeking motives were not unique to him; his actions in the former Yugoslavia could have been committed by a number of others who had the same desire for power driving them. Nevertheless, as he was president of Serbia and essentially commander-in-chief of Serb forces who carried out unconscionable acts of cruelty against Muslims and other non-Serb civilians, particularly in the attempt to annex Bosnia-Herzegovina, he bears responsibility for his actions as an authority figure. Though his main goal seemed to be focused on territorial expansion of the Serbian state, he led military forces to deport and murder non-Serb civilians in massive numbers and therefore was in vi...
Internally, several factors lead to the radical events in October of 1956. the forces of the Soviet Union pressed the ideas of soviet communism almost unilaterally, ?the Soviet Embassy supervised all activities in Hungary?Soviet ?experts? were present in all important agencies (Felkay 45).? The communist regime in Hungary wanted to remake Hungary in the image of the Soviet Union, ?the newly elected Peoples? Front adopted a new Hungarian Constitution , almost an exact copy of the Soviet Constitution of 1936 (Felkay 43).? Such Sovietization was of course aided by the Soviet Union, and it had been a policy of Stalin, to ?aid and support the fledgling Soviet states by any and all means necessary (?
a few ways a dictatorship has advantages over democracy it's more efficient. A dictatorship is a
Bullies vs. Dictators When we hear the word “bully”, we normally think of little kids picking on other little kids. However, though bullying is an adolescent phase as well, grown adults can threaten other adults, too. On another note, a dictator, which seems to be an adult bully on a larger scale, misuses their power and controls a nation with a posse. They mostly use violence in order to scare citizens into changing their ways of life. Bullies and dictators are very similar because they use violence, they feel superior in their position and they tend to have their own cliques but they’re different in degree.
...Croatian. The policies of the Republic of Croatia and its leader Franjo Tuđman towards Bosnia and Herzegovina were never totally transparent and always included Franjo Tuđman's ultimate aim of expanding Croatia's borders. Bosniaks were an easy target, because the Bosnian government forces were poorly equipped and unprepared for the war.
Life in 1950’s Yugoslavia was a complicated affair as families navigated through the complexities of a socialist society under the authoritarian rule of Marshal Tito. In the film Tito and Me, director Goran Markovic depicts the interactions and adventures of a young boy, Zoran, whose admiration for Tito catapulted him into an adventure through the Yugoslavian countryside. The film, though presented as a comedy, provides insight into a culture where political beliefs dominate daily interactions and impact family dynamics.