Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Historical leadership essay
Character traits
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Leadership Secrets Of Attila The Hun – Wess Roberts
Attila the Hun throughout history has been portrayed as a ferocious ugly little tyrant. The book describes leadership as the privilege to have the responsibility to direct the actions of others in carrying out the purposes of the organization, at varying levels of authority and with accountability for both successful and failed endeavors. Attila’s nation has long died out, and he is a most questionable role model for anyone to follow. However, his career presents an enthralling and suitable opportunity for a prime on leadership. The Huns were a vigorous, deceitful people without common purposes. Of course Attila was faced with deceit, but he even experienced deceit from his own family.
…show more content…
He had a great pride of strength. He maintained a strong relationship with his father King Mundzuk. However, after his father’s death, his uncle Rugila took over the throne. Attila at the age of 12 was sent away as a child hostage to the Roman Court of Honorius. Ruglia’s plan was to spread the Roman influence into the foreign lands. Attila on the other hand, greatly resisted the publicity. He then began to observe the empires policies and practices. After many failed attempts of escaping, he decided to study and observe the empire. Through his observations, he learned about leadership, practices, and the other fundamentals suited for future …show more content…
Reflecting back on the death of his father, Attila wasn’t satisfied with his uncle Rugila. He felt that the Huns shouldn’t perform unnecessary services for strangers. Viewed as a threat to Ruglia’s reign, Attila was sent away. He was able to turn his anger for the empire into energetic ways of studying leadership. He was determined to reunite the Huns and conquer the Romans. When he saw a light, he took charge. He was very responsible, ambitious, courageous, and capable. He showed a great desire to lead. He was very committed with a willingly lust to serve the Huns. He had a resilience to overcome personal misfortunes, discouragement, rejection, and disappointment. He didn’t allow negative subordinates to mislead him. Also greatness can only be made possible through personality. He was never too overeager. Most importantly, he was fearless with a passion to succeed, learn, listen, and grow. “I leave you with the admonition to never accept an office of leadership for which you are not willing to pay the tribute necessary to successfully fulfill its
The book Black Hearts by Jim Frederick is an in-depth narrative about the 1st platoon, Bravo Company 1-502nd Infantry 101st Airborne Division deployed to Iraq in 2005. The leadership failures documented in this book range all the way from the general officer level down to the lowest private. LT general Ricardo Sanchez failed to understand the climate his command group was entering as they were deployed into Iraq. From then on the entire leadership failures continued to compound upon each other with improper time to plan. It is customary to have a six month lead time to have a proper battle hand off when preparing to take over an AO from another unit. To compound this problem, the entire time the 502nd was in pre-deployment training, they were preparing for the rigors of urban combat. In reality, they were given six weeks to recon their new area of responsibility and were going to a countryside crafted by the heavens for guerilla warfare. As Colonel Ebel said in the book, “It is not going to be an easy road. They are not even sure of what they have in the area. It just feels bad. We can expect a real fight.”
One of the more unique chapters in the book was when Roberts was explaining Attila's delegation techniques. Roberts claims that this was one of the main reasons Attila was so successful. In the introduction of the book Roberts explains that Attila went to Rome to study under their king and while he was there he learned many successful techniques that he was going to install in the Huns. Delegation was one of these techniques that Attila had learned while in Rome.
Leadership can be defined in a myriad of ways; but for the purpose of the question, it is but not limited to the affect someone who takes charge of a group of people with authority or rank; to be an influence to those who look to the leader. In the epic poem, “Beowulf”, there are two different views on leadership based on their leaders {i.e. King Hrothgar and Beowulf). With King Hrothgar, he accepted the help of Beowulf to fight in order to defend the people of the Herodot, “Beowulf my friend/fight for us” (457-458). Due to the understanding of his age, King Hrothgar shows humility and admirable stance, adapts to someone who admires him, allowing Beowulf to fight for the people of Herodot. Beowulf on the other hand, shows his leadership by taking the initiative and offering his aid to King Hrothgar’s people, to fight the demon Grendel, who is terrorizing the people. This leader...
...ad noble intentions and was completely loyal to the state, but in the end he is only human and his main weakness was his poor judgment.
to become leader and he began an amoral reign as he let the evil within take
From the beginning of his life as a warrior to the end as a king, he gains and develops glory, responsibility and courage, all vital to his reign as a successful king.
noble birth and he had a lot of responsibility in his kingdom. He is looked up to by most for leadership and guidance.
“The study of leadership rivals in age the emergence of civilization, which shaped its leaders as much as it was shaped by them. From its infancy, the study of history has been the study of leaders- what they did and why they did it.”
Even when he felt what his father wanted him to do was not ok with him he still went ahead to do what was asked like in the case of going to bring the aging Rostam in chains for his arrogance and disrespect toward the king. Ambition made him oblivious that his father was not willing to part from his position as king and thus was always finding dangerous tasks for him to perform which eventually lead to his death.
No other real qualities of Attila as a general really survived through time, but he is thought to have been an outstanding commander from his accomplishments as a barbarian. Huns themselves were mysterious and feared people. They first appeared in the Fourth Century around the Roman Empire. They rode their warhorses around and cause the Germanic barbarians and Romans alike to fear them. Yet, it was said that they were very uncivilized. It was said that they made no use of fire, and just ate the roots of plants they found in fields.
The Huns and The Roman Empire happened to be allies for numerous periods of time. The Romans negotiated and proposed promises in order to maintain a respectable treaty. Later, the Romans were accused of failure to fulfill their promises. Immediately, the treaty collapsed and Attila consumed with rage. With no time wasted, he then declared war against the Romans. But this attack didn’t satisfy Attila, instead he desired to continue retaliation against Rome. The Romans could no longer take anymore destruction to their land, and decided to bribe Attila with more gold than before in order to preserve any amount of peace offered. For years Attila ordered the Huns to continue invading different territories, stealing their valued goods and murdering innocent
Some scholars believe Herod the Great was “one of the most notorious” figures in history to rule as a king. On the other hand, Herod’s life reveals a political leader who should be considered as “brilliant politician,” who successfully dealt with Roman Empire during his whole career. Herod’s success was molded with hardships he experienced throughout his life. As a young man, Herod was accustomed to “hardships,” which helped mold his ironclad character. As a soldier, Herod was “an excellent horseman” as well as an expert with both “lance” and “arrow.” Herod’s determination to excel would mold him as a future leader. As a young man, Herod already “won a reputation” as being a successful military leader. Regardless, one Jewish historian remarked that Herod “was destined” to become an “evil genius” who would rule “the Judean nation”
He ruled as an absolute ruler, and liked to be called “master” or “god”. These caused him to become unpopular. He even renamed two months after himself. He stripped the senate of its power. He killed his own cousin. He killed many senators and officers because of his paranoia. And by the end of his reign he would kill anyone who came in contact with him. He made unfair laws for the littlest things, and when he committed them, they didn’t apply to him. Many of these actions forever remembered in the empire. With his paranoia causing him to make these
On leadership is a book which deserve to be read by us. Although this book use a precise formation to help us to examine a widely comprehensive aspects of the leadership, there are some drawbacks. Gardner cited different examples to talk about leadership, but just in a particular area, that is political area. So,
Mundzak and his brother Ruga had begun terrorizing the Romans when Attila was still a child. After destroying many of their cities, the Romans began to pay tribute to the Huns and even struck a peace treaty with them. When Attila was only 12 years old, as part of the Roman peace treaty, he was sent to live with the Romans for 5 years. This gave Attila a unique perspective into the Roman Empire and he would later use this knowledge during his Roman conquests. In 433, Attila and his brother Bleda succeeded King Ruga and became the co-rulers of the Hunnish Kingdom. Although, Bleda was given the official title of King, it is commonly believed that they ruled