Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Military leadership philosophy essay
Today's emergency management
Characteristics of military leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
1. This memorandum summarizes my Leadership Philosophy as the Emergency Management NCO for Region III, 76th Operational Response Command. This philosophy goes beyond the “Right Time, Right Uniform” directive that we apply to all of our Soldiers; it is about being fully involved, not just about being present. 2. While Command Readiness programs are concerned with ensuring that there are enough Soldiers physically present and capable of mobilizing, my leadership philosophy is more concerned with ensuring that we have what it takes to get the job done, and to get it done as a functioning team. My leadership philosophy is built around the “Big Four” that I expect from all peers and subordinates, and what you can expect from me. 3. The “Big Four” …show more content…
Treat People Right: “If you treat people right, they will treat you right… ninety percent of the time.” –Franklin D. Roosevelt. A team cannot be effective if individuals, or the whole, are treated poorly by their leader. Make it a point to go the extra mile to take care of Soldiers and treat them how you would want to be treated. You will be a better leader for it, your Soldiers will respect you more for it, and your seniors, peers, and subordinates will notice and emulate you because of it. c. Give All Out Effort: “The achievements of an organization are the results of the combined effort of each individual.” –Vince Lombardi. An expectation of absolute perfection is unreasonable, but always learn from your mistakes and try to do something better than you did yesterday. Do the best that you honestly can, and no one will fault you for your shortcomings. d. Have an All-In Attitude: “Don’t find fault, find a remedy.” –Henry Ford. Contribute to your unit’s mission and accept additional responsibilities. The successes of the organization depend on the willingness for everyone to accept that they are a member of the team. If you think that there is something that needs fixing or if there is a better way to do something, this is your organization as well. Be the change you want to see. Soldiers will never speak up, or be the change, if they have an attitude that is not committed to the team. Drink the Kool-Aid. Take a piece of the
...e leadership characteristic that popped out at me was how Cap. John Goodwin was his resilience to overcome all the horrific parts of this deployment and still stayed with it and worked his hardest with no breaks until he was forced to go on that leave to rest and then as soon as he heard something bad had happened, he stopped everything he was doing and got back to his men as quickly as he could it showed how much he cared, he also listened to his men and what they needed and tried helping them all the time. One thing he did not do a good job of was letting Kunk get to him and knock his confidence down and taking care of his own health so he could be awake and alert as company commander each and every day. His soldiers mentioned how weak, and tired and malnourished he looked from being next to the radio 24/7 which should never happen when you are calling the shots.
Dwight David Eisenhower (1955), the 34th President of the United States, gave an explicit definition of leadership, “The job of getting people really wanting to do something is the essence of leadership….” The Army, like any other civilian organization, defines different levels of leadership depending on a size of a unit a leader is in command of. Tactical and organizational leaderships are two first interconnected levels of leadership in the Army. Both levels of leadership have many commonalities regarding duties and responsibilities; yet they are very different in the way the leaders develop themselves, train, and take care of their soldiers.
Sir, I am honored by the privilege to once again serve in 4th Armored Brigade Combat Team (ABCT). Over of the last 30 days, I had an opportunity to reconnect, and reflect on the current state of the Brigade. The 4th ABCT has a rich history of success and glory. It is my goal to put in place the systems and practices for this great organization to exceed all past and present accomplishments. As a result of my assessment, I identified three areas of focus that will improve our organization: a unit vision, a change in organizational culture and climate, and building organizational teams. I have no doubt that with the implementation of these three areas of focus, I will be the transformational leader that 4th ABCT needs as we prepare for the upcoming National Training Center (NTC) rotation and tackle the task of the Regionally Aligned Forces (RAF) mission.
Commanders that serve in a forward deployed environment inherit a greater duty to perform under more pressure, while adhering to six additional principles. The principles of mission command are Build Cohesive Teams through Mutual Trust, Create Shared Understanding, Provide Clear Commander’s Intent, Exercise Disciplined Initiative, Use Mission Orders, and Accept Prudent Risk (ADRP 6-0, 2012). Major General David Petraeus took command of the 101st Airborne Division in 2002. In March 2003, he was leading the division into Iraq. He built his team on mutual trust, having two of three maneuver brigade commanders previously serve together in Bosnia, Kosovo, and stateside (Atkinson, 2007). The 18,000-Soldier force shared an understanding based on Petraeus’ intent and their mission orders. The remaining principles would come to the forefront, following the
As a Non-commissioned Officer you can expect me to be a professional leader dedicated to taking care of soldiers, the mission, and the army way of life. You can expect me to use Army Regulations, Technical Manuals, and direct orders from my superiors as my guidance on what actions to take in each situation faced whether tactical or technical. I will not be afraid to make sound and timely decisions in the absence of my leadership’s orders. When left in charge I will take charge.
All soldiers, especially leaders, are highly recommended to keep a certain set of values that radiate throughout the entire U.S. Army. They are challenged to keep them near and dear to their hearts and to define and live them every day. A leader is one who takes these challenges serious and abides by
While there are many military stressors in the culture of the National Guard, there are many studies done on the machismo of the Army as part of the culture. This alone would prevent many people from bringing up issues with the status quo or much less developing a new leadership development plan. However, to create a culture relevant to today’s work environment, it is a must do for the Mississippi Army National Guard. Once the implementation occurs, I believe the organization will have a better work environment, have better trained leaders
As a leader we are expected to adhere to the standard and expect our subordinate to do the same. I have had one soldier in particular that does not agree with the battle buddy system. In AIT we have the same standards as in basic training every student is designated a battle buddy that has to be with at all times. This particular soldier has continuously been counseled on many occasions about having the proper battle buddy and not being alone ever! She ends up alone on many occasions and does not seem to understand why the battle buddy system is in place. Even though she has been a challenge I have remained patient with her, and explained why this rule is in place. We have made strides in leaps and bounds with this soldier. Just giving that extra time has opened her up to understanding and willingness to change. If you can get through to the soldiers by giving them some one on one time and really caring about where they come from as well then you have been successful in your mission. If you can give some extra for whatever they need while getting the mission accomplished, then you have become an advantageous
As our forefathers before us stated, ‘‘No one is more professional than I. I am a Noncommissioned Officer, a leader of soldiers. As a Noncommissioned Officer, I realize that I am a member of a time honored corps, which is known as “The Backbone of the Army (“The NCO Creed writing by SFC Earle Brigham and Jimmie Jakes Sr”). These words to Noncommissioned Officer should inspire us to the fullest with pride, honor, and integrity. The NCO creed should mean much more than just words whenever we attend a NCO’s school. For most of us this is what our creed has become because we learn to narrate or recite. The military from the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard has an overabundance of NCOs who fall under their pay grade of E-5, E-6 and etc. Yet somehow there still not enough leaders. I believe that the largest problem afflicting the military today is our lack of competent leaders, ineffective leader development, and how we influence our subordinates under us who are becoming leaders.
The ability to be a leader is a direct derivative of both natural selection and learned academia. Some people are born with the ability to lead which reflect in both actions and attitude, while others are academically educated to become leaders. In either case the US Army is an institute that is in need of leaders who can create passion and conviction among its subordinates. The problem however lies not in the aspiring positive leaders of the US Army, but yet in the leaders that form a negative connotation of what a leader should immolate. A toxic leader in any US Army leadership position, most definitely in a Special Forces position, creates a leader that exudes negativity. The root cause of this leaders short comings revolve around the
. A job well done is the goal of every Coast Guardsman. We seldom agree on how that goal is best achieved and we have different levels of motivation for achieving the goal in a given timeframe but we all still feel good when we get there. A good leader knows that he must work with the tools he has. The tools in this case being the personnel he is leading. Every unit is different and every unit is staffed with a unique crew of individuals which all have their own strengths and weaknesses, skills and personalities. A good leader will quickly recognize the self starters and those who require more direction; those who work well alone and those who work best in a team. A good leader also understands that everyone has value and its okay if some have more value than others. Nothing in life is fair and some members are going to work harder than others. Unfortunately, in my career, I have had more poor leaders than good
The Army must develop a leader to comfortably make decisions under unstable and dangerous situations. The Army as a whole is teams of teams, starting from the lowest team which the buddy team---two military members who look after each other in a variety of positions and environments. As we all know it is proven that team’s actions are better than individual actions when members work together. The Army depends on effective team work to perform tasks and achieve objectives, and accomplish missions.
Regardless of the career you choose in your life, whether it be an accountant or a Soldier in the United States Army, someone, somewhere most likely had an influence to bring you to that decision. The Army defines leadership as the process of influencing people by providing purpose, direction, and motivation while operating to accomplish the mission and improve the organization (JP, p. 1). Now imagine you are a young Private, in one of the most dangerous places in Iraq and you have constant leadership changes, and not much support from your direct leadership. I am sure at this point you can imagine, it is not the best scenario to be in. Throughout the duration of this essay you will read about Sergeant First Class Rob Gallagher and Sergeant First Class Jeff Fenlason, their leadership abilities, and the techniques they attempted to use to resolve the issues in this Platoon that was in a downward spiral after losing many leaders to the hell of war.
Military leadership lessons are not going to always apply to the organizational structure. In an organization leadership there has to be some compassion and caring about the individuals that are working there, but with the military they are strictly about business. Military leaders are more direct and stern which may not work with everyone in an organization. Military leaders would have to relearn how to address individuals that they are in charge of when working for an organization due to not everyone can be address liked they are in the military. In many organizations that I have worked for there is a transactional leadership approach, which means the leaders help their followers to set goals by clarifying roles and task assignments (Robbins & Judge, 2015). This may not happen in the military so a military leader would have to learn how to help set these goals along with what would need to be done to help the follower to reach their
As an officer in the United States Army, it has been imperative for me to understand every facet of leadership and why it remains important to be an effective leader. During this course, I have learned some valuable lessons about myself as a leader and how I can improve on my leadership ability in the future. The journal entries along with the understanding of available leadership theories have been an integral part of my learning during this course. For all of the journals and assessments that I completed, I feel it has given me a good understanding of my current leadership status and my future potential as a leader. All of the specific assessments looked at several areas in regards to leadership; these assessments covered several separate focus areas and identified my overall strengths and weaknesses as a leader. Over the course of this paper I will briefly discuss each one of these assessments and journal entries as they pertained to me and my leadership.