Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Discuss gender bias in international business
Machismo in Hispanic culture
Machismo in Hispanic culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Discuss gender bias in international business
Cárdenas, M., Eagly, A., Salgado, E., Goode, W., Heller, L. (2014). Latin American female business executives: An interesting surprise. Gender in Management, 29(1), 2-24 In this study, the authors discuss women 's status in Latin American countries and why they perform so well in their careers, given that socioeconomic and cultural factors could limit their possibilities of achieving higher management positions. Women’s representation at the highest levels of management, especially as executives in the private sector, has remained light. In Latin American nations, cultural machismo and limitations of economic development might seem to brutally restrict women’s access to powerful positions. A common assumption about Latin American countries …show more content…
They understood their success in terms of individual factors such as personality characteristics, performance and results, and their own leadership traits. Most admitted that the machismo they encounter daily, limits their access to higher positions. They recognized their ambition to attain power positions mainly for personal satisfaction, and their main goal was personal development and fulfilment. Latino males have projected their machismo attitudes on their female counterparts as a part of their everyday life however, times are changing. Women’s representation in decision-making roles, given as the percentage of women among those who occupy roles as legislators, senior officials, Latin American female business executives and managers, ranges from a high of 48 percent in Panama to a low of 19 percent in Peru, with a mean value of 32 percent, which is the same value as that of the comparison nations with more developed economies. The message of male dominance that has fostered workplace discrimination against women, especially at higher levels of management, is slowly changing. This study is unique in shedding light on a multinational sample of Latin American female executives and their perceptions of their success, leadership style and the challenges that they face. Implementing mentor programs for females in …show more content…
In Australia, woman continue to be under-represented in workforce participation and senior leadership roles. Women in Australia currently make up 49% of accountants but this seemingly balanced number is not reflecting the same with senior positions as Principals or Partners. This under-representation in the accounting profession continues to be a challenge for the women of Australia. The accounting profession has always been dominated by males that make it difficult for women to progress in their careers. Although technical and professional qualifications of women working in contemporary accounting firms are comparable to men, recognition and success at higher levels of the profession have not benefited women. More women enter the profession as junior accountants or trainees than males, but they tend to depart from the company leaving women with only 19% of senior positions. Challenges that these women face include career advancement paths that tend to be inflexible and have often forced women to resign. The way woman’s performance is evaluated and the substructure in how the organizations are structured continue to be a disadvantage to their career progression. This are reasons that create an absence of women in senior roles which continue to be an ongoing problem in the profession.
Women are not given the same opportunities as men to receive a promotion. Not only this, but women actually have to work harder for a promotion to “prove themselves” because they are not taken as seriously as their male counterparts in the workplace. This may be the reason we see a significantly less amount of women in executive positions, such as CEO’s, chief financial officers, and other key roles in major companies. “Women currently hold 4.4% of Fortune 500’s CEO roles” (Zarya). Besides the workplace, the government can be used as an example of just how unequal females are to males. Females make up 20% of senators, 18% of representatives (84 out of the 435) and only 6 governors (Chew). If females see that women only make a small percentage of our government, why should they aspire to be like them, if there is a scare that they are going to be rejected based on their gender? Women in power are role models to other females, and if there is a lack in them, females will continue to believe that they will not be able to achieve that kind of
Parcheta, N., Kaifi, B., & Khanfar, N. (2013). Gender Inequality in the Workforce: A Human Resource Management Quandary. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 4(3), 240-248.
Wirth, Linda. “Women in Management: Closer to Breaking Through the Glass Ceiling.” Women, Gender and Work. Ed. Martha Fetherolf Loutfi. Geneva:
Valente, Marcela. "LABOR-ARGENTINA: FEMALE EXECUTIVES SOUGHT AFTER BY BIG BUSINESS." 28 July 1999. Newsletter, Interpress Service. Argentina: Global Information Network, 1999.
One topic that arises in management is the lack of female CEOs, especially in the Fortune 500. With only 26 out of the 500 being female in 2013, we question on why this is the case. Are there differences between male and female leaders? While some research argue that there are no gender differences in the leadership styles employed by men and women, others support the idea that there is a difference between male and female leaders on how they lead. By exploring the literature research on both views, we would then be able to get our own conclusion on whether there are differences.
Although this norm is a stereotype and does not necessarily reflect an ideology that is viewed as an acceptable form of treatment, we must consider the degree in which it affects the possibilities of women compared to men. In a table constructed for Costa Rica’s employment population per occupational group by nationality and sex in 2000, exploring the total professionals and technicians that enter the work force on a scale of 100%, Nicaraguan men make up 1.9% while Costa Rican men hold a position of 9.4%. What is most astonishing is that women in Costa Rica have higher positions in this field with 18.2% while Nicaraguan women hold 2.5%. Women of Costa Rica are able to work in administrative positions at 13.4%, surpassing that of men’s administrative positions at only
Many writers have addressed the popular question of women and the relationship between gender and leadership. These vary from women not possessing the quality and traits necessary for managerial work to the negative stereotypes attached with women striving to succeed in a male dominant quarter. 3% of CEO’s in the Fortune 500 companies are women [10], therefore this gap in leadership means that there are many obstacles barricading women in senior positions to make that leap through the glass ceiling that is holding them back. In this essay, I will be explaining a few obstacles women in leadership face and what can be done to address them.
Businesswomen in America face unique challenges that businessmen in the same position do not experience. They are told that they are “too soft” or “not manly enough” for leadership positions in the industry, despite equivalent qualifications. The main problem is that business women in leadership positions are under represented in today’s mass media. In a day where the path to equality is of great importance, businesswomen still endure a lack of respect and understanding inside and outside of the workplace, which consequentially keeps many intelligent and influential women from having their voices heard. Personally, becoming a leader in business is important; therefore this topic is of great importance. In order to understand why there are
Female expatriates miss out global assignments due to various reasons. Lack of mentors or role models, access to appropriate network, sponsorship are the most common ones. International managers need to understand the reasons for varying male and female roles as well as contrasting interpretations of equality. Most cultures differentiate between the appropriate roles for men and women. Women are still perceived as child bearers and child reapers. These traditions are still deeply ingrained even when it is no longer necessary for women to remain at home. The result has been that women who worked outside the home often work in subordinate positions. The expatriate glass ceiling is one of the prominent obstacles that women in the foreign organizations
Meanwhile, men continue to be provided with greater access to leadership roles than women. Given that the majority of the incumbent leaders are men, if the evaluators do not have previous exposure to competent women leaders, they may have a harder time choosing females of equal background and experience over their male counterparts. This perpetuates the cycle of men continuing to dominate the upper management positions, and leadership being equated with stereotypical masculinity. Women have to be more highly qualified than men to obtain the same roles (Eagly, 2007).
The goal on gender equality and impact of gender discrimination varies from country to country, depending on the social, cultural and economic contexts. Anti-discrimination laws have performed a critical role in expanding work place opportunities for women, yet they are still denied full equality in the workplace. Even though they can now secure powerful professional, academic and corporate positions once reserved for men, the ever present glass ceiling still deters the advancement of large segment of the female workforce (Gregory, 2003). Interest in the careers of females remained strong among both scholars and practitioners. Women have made considerable progress in entering the managerial ranks also but not at the highest levels. However, the promotion of women who hold top management positions increased only slightly during the last decade (U.S. Department of Labor, 1992). Shrinking gender differences between men and women in job related skills and aspirations may not reduce employer discrimination that is rooted in the belief that women’s emotions prevent them from managing effectively (Kanter, 1977). Stumpf and London (1981) identified criteria that are commonly used when decisions are made about management promotions. The specified job-irrelevant criteria, such as gender, race and appearance, and job-relevant criteria, such as related work experience, being a current member of the organization offering the position, past performance, education and seniority.. The central question is whether the hiring, development, and promotion practices of employers that discriminated against women in the past have been remedied or continue in more subtle forms to impede women’s advancement up in the hierarchy
Women make up over 50 percent of the college graduates in the United States, yet only 14 percent of executive officer positions within companies are filled by women. Within the Fortune 500 CEOs, only 21 of them are women. The United States prides itself on equality and justice, but the majority of the population is not adequately represented in leadership roles. It is time for the entire country to reevaluate its internal gender biases. Women are taking strides to overcome the centuries-old tradition of men being the breadwinners and women taking care of the family and having low-demanding jobs. Biases do not just come from men, as it is proven that women are just as biased against themselves. Society puts more pressure on men to be successful while not expecting as much from women. Men typically attribute their successes to themselves, while women underestimate themselves and attribute their successes to luck or hard work. This lack of self-confidence can be traced back to years of women constantly doubting themselves (Sandberg). Women need to follow Facebook Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg’s advice written in her book “Lean In”: “But feeling confident—or pretending that you feel confident—is necessary to reach for opportunities. It’s cliché, but opportunities are rarely offered; they’re seized” (Sandberg 34). Willing women have to overcome societal traditions and sit at the table. To do this they have to either get into leadership positions to then break down barriers or break down barriers to get into those coveted leadership positions. These barriers are deeply-rooted into almost every culture worldwide. Sexism and discrimination are constant issues for women in the workplace and not enough is being done to address the...
In spite of having an influential women leader as a prime minister to lead the country and massive policy initiatives for bringing women empowerment in achieving millennium development goals, Bangladesh ranks lower in terms of women participation in leadership position and top management in the private sector of the economy. Gender diversity in business leadership is an emerging requirements to be fulfilled in order to become competitive globally. It is well regarded that woman are well able to play the role of a true leader by demonstrating their altruism beyond the boarder of the family, friends and even country. An in depth interview of 19 corporate women leaders in Bangladesh has been undertaken to draw the recommendation for facilitating
Women leaders have the crucial soft skills of empathy, innovation, facilitation, and active listening (Masaoka, 2006). They also have first-hand life experiences that bring technical skills and experiences from the street level to the workplace (Masoka, 2006). Women often build stronger relationships with clients and outside contacts than their male counterparts. This relationship building skill, provides a key aspect which helps to move businesses forward (Giber et al., 2009). Fortune 500 companies with a high percentage of women significantly outperformed those with fewer women. Companies with the highest representation of women showed higher returns on equity than those with fewer women employees (Giber et al., 2009). Thus, future organizations may have a higher percentage of female leaders than we have experienced in the past. Future leaders must ensure that there is equality among the workforce and that women are accurately represented among the
In an attempt to accomplish my research on the ‘Women In Corporate Sector: A Realistic View’, the following research papers, articles, extracts and case studies have been referred: