In this assignment, I will answer three questions from the ethical dilemma study. The introduction will list the three questions; the body will provide answers and feedback about the questions, and conclude with my thoughts about being unethical.
Ethical dilemma: It’s easy to be unethical when everyone else is
The choice to act unethical in any situation comes from within you or is a part of your personality. To act unethically, however, can be influenced by others depending on the circumstance. Groups were consensus is required and not everyone is held accountable for the outcome will produce greater chances of unethical behavior. In this ethical dilemma, I will answer three questions; why did Lance Armstrong’s teammates blow the whistle
…show more content…
I believe I am a good judge of character when I met individuals. After viewing the Oprah Winfrey interview, I came to realize Lance Armstrong is a classic narcissist, arrogant, and egotistical individual who is only concerned about himself and carries a sense of entitlement. There are plenty of reasons why his teammates may have blew the whistle on him from jealous, envy, or proper incentives not paid. You hear of these types of stories when either party feels betrayed, not compensated enough for their involvement, or switch to a competitor. For example, Steve Wozniack the co-founder of Apple Computer with Steve Jobs left Apple; their competitor Google recently recruited him. Why do you think companies escort recently fired or disgruntle employees out of the building? These employee access codes and passwords are immediately deactivated. If they are allowed to return to …show more content…
According to Robbins and Judge (2015), when dealing with unethical behavior especially on the global scale is difficult to manage because dissimilar cultures have different perspectives on certain ethical issues. According to Boundless (2015), the French unlike the Americans have different views on whistle blowing. Compared to the French, American companies consider it to be a natural part of business. They actually set up anonymous hotlines to field such calls. The French, tend to think whistle blowing as damaging cohesion among coworkers. In the past I would have acting unethically not realizing the damage and long-term effect I was creating for myself. However, now the thought of acting unethically is disturbing to me because I do not see the benefit in it anymore. The choice to make ethical decisions are solely on the individual, no one can make you act in such a manner if it was not already a part of you. For me, in my younger years, I would have definitely been a part of that borrowed experiment. Now I realize the benefit of not taking the paper and educating myself on the new methods and procedures being introduced. These are concepts I could use in future situations, but if we never came up with the original problems and solutions; how would I know the pros and cons of the situation and where to begin to resolve the problem.
However, it may not be the best solution to be used first when dealing with unethical corporate practices. From more of a Utilitarian approach one should seek to do the greatest good. An approach that gives the company a chance to change its unethical behavior internally would follow this idea. Having the ability to change practices internally before outside intervention can have many positive effects. The company is able to make the changes, reestablish its integrity, maintain business, and retain employees. The whistleblowing option brings in outside forces that could lead to repercussions for the company which may include restitution or even being closed down. If the business is closed it effects more than just the corporate entity, all of the employees are also negatively impacted by this as well when they would lose their jobs. Sometimes however, when the company is unwilling to change its practices and do business in a more ethical manner people are left with little choice but to report to outside sources what is occurring within the business. Many see whistleblowing as law-breaking when employees are contractually obligated to
By looking further into this dilemma using various ethical standpoints allows for a broad understanding of principles and complexity in a specific situation with these paradigms. The focuses are three prominent ethical paradigms such as: teleological utilitarianism, deontological duty theories and virtue based ethics. Each of these three paradigms will be applied to the aforementioned dilemma, each will be evaluated and the best option will be revealed.
No matter your career, you will eventually run into a situation where an ethical or moral decision has to be made. I am planning on going into athletic training where many ethical dilemmas will surround the health or actions dealing with athletes. Here are three different scenarios I could face as an athletic trainer and how I would resolve each ethical issue.
3. In thinking about your experiences as a sport participant, consumer, and/or professional at various levels of sport (i.e., informal, organized, and corporate), what are some examples of ethical dilemmas you have faced, and how did you deal with them? (Chapter
Since you examined the number of moral issues you will face in this profession, look through the code of ethics that you chose for this assignment and explain
Their organizational initiatives are often self-serving; however, the emerging workforce isn’t motivated by selfish managers. This selfish behavior often turns into unethical conduct. Unethical dealings in the workplace are always wrong. It is crucial to promote ethical behavior. Everyone must understand that once caught, unethical behavior is not just a problem for those directly involved, it is everyone’s problem.
Rhodes, R. and Strain, J.J. (2004) Whistleblowing in academic Medicine. Journal of Medical Ethics. 30 (1)
The act of whistle-blowing is an ethical issue that all employees have the right to. Whether they decide to make the corrupt information known publicly or anonymously, the information they provide can protect everyone involved. The ethical and moral sides of whistle-blowing can go both ways. In order to protect the customers, patients, or consumers of the harmful products the companies are offering, employees that have morals and feel the need to make the truth be known have an ethical responsibility to do so. Issues of being a whistle-blower are more controversial than the responsibilities of the employees doing so. When a whistle-blower takes action, they expose information from their company that it not meant to be public. They basically turn their backs away from their company and colleagues by revealing the truth. When surveying these issues, an employee who is torn by exposing information or keeping silent must decide whether it is more ethical to stay loyal to their organization or to the organization's
The term Whistleblower means “An employee who discloses information that s/he reasonably believes is evidence of illegality, gross waste or fraud, mismanagement, abuse of power, general wrongdoing, or a substantial and specific danger to public health and safety. When information is classified or otherwise restricted by Congress or Executive Order, disclosures only are protected as whistleblowing if made through designated, secure channels. (What is a Whistleblower?)” The idea behind whistleblowers is that they believe trying to inform the public of illegal acts within their businesses has the potential to protect the public from wrongdoing. The following studies analyze scholar’s findings on different factors related to whistle blowing as
“Faced with what is right, to leave it undone shows a lack of courage” (Confucius Quotes, 2012). The person who does her duty, at great risk to her own interest, when most others would defy from fear is considered a hero (Schafer, 2004). Dr. Nancy Olivieri is a hero who blew the whistle on Apotex, University of Toronto (U of T) and the Hospital for Sick Children (HSC); and fought for her academic rights till the end. Whistle-blowing refers to actions of an employee that breach her loyalty to the organization but serves the public interest. When other constraints proved to be ineffective, whistle-blowing acts as a check on authority of the organization. Whistle-blowers expose severe forms of corruption, waste, and abuse of power within their organization and put the organization in a position where it is answerable to the public, thus enhancing its accountability (Cooper, 2006, pg. 198-205).
While reading this article about Lance Armstrong, I thought to myself what would using performance enhancing drugs have to do with ethical decision making? As I read further into the story it all began to make since. Not only is ethnical decision making important for businesses but, it is just as important for individuals.
In this assignment we will be identifying an ethical dilemma an individual has experienced. We will begin with a short introduction of what an ethical dilemma is, moving on to providing brief details of the dilemma an individual has experienced. We will then go on to selecting one ethical theory, to show how it can help an individual understand and deal with the situation when placed within, followed by a conclusion.
In today society you always hear about how company is conducting themselves ethically. This concept can sometimes help or hurt a company in the worst way possible at times. However, ethical conduct is not only the company’s responsibility but also the individuals. Granted the majority people do have that internal sense of what is right and wrong, that however doesn’t mean that they always listen to that still small voice.
Everyone in this world has experienced an ethical dilemma in different situations and this may arise between one or more individuals. Ethical dilemma is a situation where people have to make complex decisions and are influenced based on personal interests, social environment or norms, and religious beliefs (“Strategic Leadership”, n.d.). Leaders and managers in the company should set guidelines to ensure employees are aware and have a better chance to solve and make ethical decisions. Employees are also responsible for understanding their ethical obligations in order to maintain a positive work environment. The purpose of this case study is to identify the dilemma and analyze different decisions to find ways on how a person should act ethically when left with an ethical dilemma.
3. Allow for the fact that ethical questions do not always have a unique, faultless answer.