Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Business ethical issues and dilemmas
Ethics for business owners
Ethics in business topic
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Business ethical issues and dilemmas
While reading this article about Lance Armstrong, I thought to myself what would using performance enhancing drugs have to do with ethical decision making? As I read further into the story it all began to make since. Not only is ethnical decision making important for businesses but, it is just as important for individuals.
As we all know Lance Armstrong is famous for winning the Tour de France a record number of seven times. This is unreal for the normal human being and he did so after winning the battle against testicular cancer. I know you are probably sitting there wondering how can someone that has already been through so much from battling cancer go on to win the Tour de France seven times. Well this went through the minds of others as well and they began to question whether Lance was taking performance enhancing drugs during the times he raced.
Mr. Armstrong denied that he had ever used performance enhancing drugs for many years and even told an attorney for SCA that if he continued to say that he used these performance enhancing drugs he would sue him. SCA was the promotional company that paid Armstrong
…show more content…
after winning the races. SCA along with others had a suspicion that Armstrong used the drugs during the times he was racing and continued their investigation and found lots of evidence against Armstrong. After the evidence was presented to the courts Armstrong was eventually stripped of all seven titles from winning the Tour de France. Armstrong was unfazed by the punishment and even posted a photo on Twitter of him relaxing in a room at his Austin home with the seven jerseys he wore for the races.
This is the problem we have athletes these days believe that they are untouchable and that there was no punishment for taking performance enhancing drugs. Lance Armstrong would later learn that this is not the case anymore. Arbitration was over turned against Armstrong in 2013 and he was ordered to pay SCA ten million dollars. This is just some of the money that Armstrong was paid by SCA during the times he was racing. Not only was this a huge hit to Armstrong but, after admitting to Oprah Winfrey in 2013 that he did indeed use performance enhancing drug every one of his sponsors dropped him costing him a whopping seventy five million. He was also banned from professional cycling for
life. For a long time Armstrong thought that he had gotten away with taking these drugs and was only stripped of his titles and still seeing his self as someone that had won the Tour de France seven times. After losing the arbitration Lance had soon realized that he made a huge mistake in his career and it was now costing him millions and millions of dollars. Had Lance made an “ethical decision” earlier in his career as to not use performance enhancing drugs and to win the Tour de France by means of pure determination and training he would still today be considered one of the most elite athletes of all time. So as you can see making an ethical decision can cost companies millions and even billions of dollars. However, ethical decisions are just as important to individuals as they are to a large company. Every day we should use ethical decision making. What we do today could affect us for the rest of our lives not only financially but, professionally as well. Just as it did with Lance Armstrong he not only lost millions of dollars but, now he can never compete in professional cycling for the rest of his life and this is something he dearly loved and enjoyed doing after overcoming his battle with cancer. When making big decisions in your life I would recommend that you use the Ethical Decision Making Model to assist you in making the right decision.
Solberg, J, and R Ringer. "Performance-enhancing drug use in baseball: The impact of culture." Ethics & Behavior. http://go.galegroup.com.libproxy.howardcc.edu/ps/retrieve.do?sgHitCountType=None&sort=DA-SORT&inPS=true&prodId=AONE&userGroupName=c (accessed December 5, 2013).
Those who believe the use of anabolic steroids should be allowed in professional sports have numerous arguments for those in opposition. Professional sports leagues have tried to stop the use of steroids by drug testing players and punishing those who do not pass. A number of major athletes, such as Lance Armstrong, have been stripped of their athletic accolades due to discoveries of drug use. Despite witnessing the fall of great competitors due to “doping,” people continue to use. Because of unsuccessful attempts at banning the drug, many people believe “it may be time to head in the other direction: legalize performance enhancers” (Smith 1). No matter how many rules and regulations are made against the use of steroids, athletes will continue to abuse the drug in order to get ...
In “The Real Scandal,” Sharon Begley and Martha Brant develop an argument against the tacit allowance of the use of “banned” performance-enhancing drugs among Olympic athletes. The 1999 Newsweek cover story details incidents involving individual athletes caught using banned substances, the continuous race between the discovery and detection of new performance-enhancing drugs, and examples of the International Olympic Committee’s (IOC’s) complacency. In particular, the authors question the validity of the IOC’s current drug testing policies and protocols within the context of their self-defined role to “lead the fight against doping in sport” and “encourage and support measures protecting the health of athletes” (Organization). In order to better argue against doping in sport and advocate for more efficient and rigorous drug testing, Begley and Brant employ emotional appeals, logic, and a kairotic stance within their writing to persuade their audience of the necessity of firm action by the IOC and the worldwide community on the subject of performance-enhancing drug abuse.
...ackdate a prescription for corticosteroids for a saddle sore to explain a positive steroid test result” ( Sinnott). Because Armstrong’s desires to win at the Tour de France, he chose to take steroids to make himself more powerful than his competitors. This is similar to how some businesses cheat by creating monopolies in order to control all the money. Armstrong is like those corporations that make the choice to be more powerful but is morally unethical because it causes inequality of opportunity to others around them.
In 1967, Tommy Simpson, a British cyclist, died during the Tour de France because of the amphetamines that he took. Succeeding years brought embarrassments: In 1978, the Belgian Michel Pollentier was suspended while leading the Tour de France after he was caught concealing a clean urine sample to trick testers. Furthermore, in 1988, the Spaniard Pedro Delgado won the T...
Professional athletes have been taking steroids for decades, it is proven. Athletes get stripped of gold medals they’ve won in the Olympics because of steroid use. Many sports have been now increasing the amount of steroid testing because they feel it is an unfair advantage. People who take steroids clearly are more super...
Lance Armstrong, who was the winner of the Tour de France for an unsurpassable 7 straight times, was alleged for one of the most controversial doping scandals ever in the history of Sports. In January 2012, it was claimed by the United States Anti-Doping Agency, that Armstrong had doped and was also one of the highest ranking leaders of doping. As a result he was unstoppable at the Tour-winning...
He has two options in his situation, each with a possible outcome that is not ideal. Paul can take the performance enhancing drugs to ensure his starting position on the team or he can continue training without the drugs and risk losing his position. If Paul takes the drugs he may guarantee himself a starting position, but taking the drugs is cheating, they can be dangerous, and how long until the league catches up to the use and begins testing for them (Petersen & Kristensen, 2009)? If Paul doesn’t take the drugs he will have to work twice as hard to keep up with his teammates or risk losing his position on the
Unfortunately, some athletes in the eagerness to reach this goal, end up passing the limit of what is considered ethical. The big problem is that some athletes, due to the lack of orientation, end up being punished and labeled as unethical without even knowing what is happening. As for example accepting to take certain supplements given by their trainer to enhance their performance.
Wilson, Jacque. "Lance Armstrong's Doping Drugs." CNN. Cable News Network, 18 Jan. 2013. Web. 12 July 2013.
It was an unforgiving 95 degrees Fahrenheit in eastern France last week. Rain had fallen nearly every day of the week prior to Stage 16, Wednesday, July 21, making for a very steamy road up the face of one of the most unforgiving mountain rides a cyclist can make in the course of his or her riding career. Nearly one million people lined the narrow mountain road leading to the peak of L'Alpe D'Huez to watch a one man, Lance Armstrong, in the time trial of his life. This seemingly immortal man had survived cancer to make this climb his top achievement leading him to victory five times previously. Could Lance pull off an unprecedented sixth win? He rehearsed this scene time after time over the course of the previous year in preparation for such a time as this. That preparation paid off. He climbed this mountain in exactly 61 seconds faster than any of his nearly 200 competitors. One million people in a less than 20 mile stretch of road all to watch a bicycle race. But this was no normal race, this was, after all, The Tour de France. Considered to be the most physically unremitting sporting event known to man, this mere bicycle race has a history richer than many nations in and of themselves. Over a hundred years ago, in a turbulent, at best, France, two men found their way into a personal disagreement. The results of which, over a century later would still draw spectators by the thousands to the hillsides of France for what would become the greatest continuing nationalist and sporting spectacle of that country.
..., Kjetil K. "Why We Shouldn’t Allow Performance Enhancing Drugs in Sport." Academia.edu. Academia.edu, 1 Apr. 2011. Web. 06 Jan. 2014. .
Many people believe that drug use in professional athletics is not a serious problem, however it is more widespread and serious than people think. In professional athletics the use of drugs is looked upon as somewhat of a serious problem, but is also very discrete and low key. Every once in a while one might see a prominent figure in a certain sport being reprimanded for the use of some outlawed drug, however this is just one of the many who happened to get caught. Athletes today seem to find no moral problem with using performance-enhancing drugs, or in other words cheating. Also many of them feel that because they are "stars" there should be no repercussions for their illegal activity.
Respected scholars have dedicated vast amounts of research towards developing ethical decision-making models and outlining factors believed to influence the process of decision-making. An overview of various ethical decision-making models and influential factors demonstrates the importance of the ethical decision-making process. Furthermore, various models and techniques traditionally used in business ethics can also be applied to policing, positively impacting law enforcement as a whole.
Or even continuous attempts and repeated failure. Some might say even the penalty for a positive test in performance enhancing drugs as become too weak. Just last week professional American sprinter Tyson Gay has been suspended for just one year by the US anti doping agency. He was arguably the second fastest along side Yohan Blake ranking second or third after Usain Bolt. CONCLUSION