Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Athletes doping with more serious consequences essay
Doping and its effects on players
Effect performance Enhancing drug use by athletes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Athletes doping with more serious consequences essay
The question of drug use among athletes in what was previously considered by the unknowing public to be a rather pristine sport, cycling, is important in that it will affect all future Tours and will place them and the athletes under scrutiny. To begin with, in Europe until the 1998 scandal occurred, despite a few exceptions, cycling was considered a drug free sport. The 1998 drug scandal tarnished the Tour de France and the reputation and image of other sports. The media response to the scandal took differing positions on what should be done next to clean up cycling. The scandal also affected advertisements, sales, and without question the 1999 Tour and Lance Armstrong. Since even the most naïve fan no longer trusts the cyclists, drug-testing procedures have been instituted. Also, the question now arises regarding medications used by seriously ill cyclists. Certainly, future Tours will be significantly affected. The Union Cycliste Internationale and other sports officials are left with several burning questions; do they seek a better testing system? Clearly, they must protect athletes and the image of sports even though it is costly. Do they perform uniform versus random drug tests? Both are necessary to keep athletes and trainers accountable. In fact, the 1999 Tour promoted both forms of testing (Fife 208). If they do random tests, how do they enforce them? On this point, committees and sports federations are still debating. For years cycling, a grueling, yet glamorous sport in Europe, has been fighting drug use and abuse. Despite a few exceptions, cycling had the reputation, in Europe and in France, of being a clean, pure sport, compared to others, until the 1998 scandal occurred. The question of drug use among athletes in what was previously considered by the unknowing public to be a rather pristine sport, cycling, is important in that it will affect all future Tours and will place them and the athletes under scrutiny. A Clean Reputation: The History of Drugs in the “Tour de France” In 1967, Tommy Simpson, a British cyclist, died during the Tour de France because of the amphetamines that he took. Succeeding years brought embarrassments: In 1978, the Belgian Michel Pollentier was suspended while leading the Tour de France after he was caught concealing a clean urine sample to trick testers. Furthermore, in 1988, the Spaniard Pedro Delgado won the T... ... middle of paper ... ...cess Story: Tour de Lance; Armstrong’s miraculous comeback from cancer to a Tour victory is worthy of an exclamation point, not a question mark.” The Los Angeles Times; Los Angeles, Calif.; 26 Jul. 1999: 1. Lemonick, Michael D. “Le Tour des drugs.” Time; New York; Aug 10, 1998: 76. MacAuley, Domhnall. “Drugs in Sport.” BMJ: British Medical Journal, 313.7051, 7/27/96, 211. Online. EBSCOhost. 16 Nov. 1999. http://www.EBSCOhost.com. Neff, Craig. “Drug sweep.” Sports Illustrated; New York, 9 Aug. 1999: 71 Pelkey, Charles ed. “Etxebarria takes Pau; Armstrong answers drug charge.” Velo-News, 21 July 1999. Phillips, Ian. “Armstrong Extends Tour Lead U.S. Star Bristles at French Media’s Drug Innuendos.” Seattle Post- Intelligencer; Seattle, Wash.; 15 Jul. 1999: E2. Velo-News. The sensational 1998 Tour de France: Conquests and Crisis. Boulder, Colorado: VeloPress, December, 1998. “Virenque admits to seeking drugs.” Velo-News Interactive. Velo-News; 11 May 1999. “Virenque released after admission.” Velo-News Interactive. Velo-News, 11 May 1999. Wilson, Stephen. “Doping Incidents Shake Sports from Swimming to Track & Field.” Seattle Post- Intelligencer, Seattle, Wash.,.1 Aug. 1998: E6.
Abstract: Since the beginning of sports competition, athletes have always looked for some kind of edge over their competitors. They will do whatever it takes to be one of the elite, and that includes injecting supplements into their bodies to make them bigger, stronger, and faster. Steroid use is probably one of the most common drug misuses in sports competition. Athletes found that with anabolic steroids, one could become a better athlete twice as fast. Not until 1975 was the drug first banned from Olympic competition because of the health risks it produced.
The struggle against doping in sport is a very difficult one. Verbruggen (1997; as cited by Waddington, 2000, p.180) has stated that “the fight against doping simply by controlling and punishing doesn’t work. The cheats stay ahead”. In a way, he also emphasized the need for constant revision and reappraisal of existing policies; policies that work now may not work in the future due to any number of factors. What is encouraging about U.K. Sport is that it follows this principle. Indeed, U.K. Sport aims to replace the existing Statement of Anti-doping Policy with a new United Kingdom National Anti-doping Policy that will come into force on the 31st of January 2005.
Over the past century many athletes have been suspended from sports, titles and medals taken away, and received penalties for having tested positive for one of the banned substances (Timothy Herman 6). A major story that came about in 2013 was Lance Armstrong admitting to the use to performance enhancing drugs. An interview which aired on January 17th 2013 with Oprah Winfrey was the first time Lance admitted to the use of performance enhancing drugs (6). Lance admitted to the use of the following banned substances; EPO, testosterone, cortisone, HGH and illegal blood transfusions (6). In October 2012 the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency (USADA), a non-profit, non-governmental organization and the national anti-doping organization for the United States (USADA), released more than 1,000 pages of evidence in doping allegations against both Armstrong and his teammates (Greg Beaubien 7). After the evidence was revealed Armstrong was stripped of his seven Tour de France titles, and was to give back the bronze medal he won in 2000 (9). Cycling is a very common sport to find athletes using performance enhancing drugs. For example, eighty percent of the Tour de France medalists between 1996 and 2010 have been stripped of their title after failing a drug test or later finding out they were using banned substances, according to the USADA report on Armstrong (Timothy Herman 6). Armstrong didn’t just use one drug to enhance his performance he used multiple drugs (6). When tested Lance was found to have been blood doping (EPO), using corticosteroids and testosterone. All these drugs are banned by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), which is a foundation created through a collective initiative led by the International Olympic Committee (Dictionary). EPO...
The World Anti-Doping Agency code declares it to be an illegal drug if it is performance enhancing, a health risk, or if it violates the “spirit of sport”(WADA, 2009). Teams like the US postal team, place a ‘code of silence’ pressured athletes to use PED’s as well as groomed them to evade detection from the authorities so they can gain an unfair advantage (Tygart 2012). In the past 16 years of the Tour De France there have been 12 years that the overall winners have been linked with and found guilty of taking Performance Enhancing Drugs (McLean, Tse, Wannanen 2013). Considering the state of the doping culture in cycling throughout the last 20 years alone, its no wonder athletes like Lance Armstrong, Floyd Landers, Alberto Contador...
In July 2013, the U.S Anti-Doping Agency announced that the world famous Tyson Gay had been tested positive for an unnamed drug. And there are many more athletes performing various types of sports who have been banned from that particular sport because of their intake of drugs in order to cheat and therefore this is why it is important for athletes to stay away from drugs as it is the main reason as to why their training and performance level drops immensely.
An Olympic cyclist, Chris Boardman won in 1992 using a specially engineered bicycle. Tiger Woods had LASIK surgery to improve his vision to 20/15 which is above an average person’s abilities to see. Swimmers suits are now designed to minimize friction in the water. Uniforms are not only designed for more protection but for better performance and endurance. Even Little Leaguers have bats that are designed to increase the speed and power of the hit. Regulators are taking such advantages into consideration in keeping the sport fair by regulations, keeping equipment similar, and judging violators. Major League Baseball still uses wooden bats. Colleges and youth baseball have in the past years outlawed the use of certain bats and set controls on acceptable baseballs. But there is still a difference in using steroids or using PEDs that produce unnatural capacities. This choice is being made by the role model currently being presented to younger athletes. Is the result of winning worth the health risks and ethics of competing? Pressure on young athletes are great enough without added the need to keep up with the others using substances in sports and feeling they have to take PEDs to
“In athletics events in the Olympics all the way back in the 1948 London Games, but it wasn't until the 1968 Olympics (Grenoble/Mexico City) that electronic timing became the primary method of determining finish order — both in and out of the water”(Sporting News). The touch pad timer was introduced to the sport of swimming in 1968 and improved the accuracy of the times. “The IOC instituted its first compulsory doping controls at the Winter Olympic Games in Grenoble, France in 1968 and again at the Summer Olympic Games in Mexico City in the same year”(Procon.org). “the International Olympic Committee (IOC) establishes the Medical Commission to fight against doping in sports. The Commission is given three guiding principles: protection of the health of athletes, respect for medical and sport ethics, and equality for all competing athletes”(Procon.org). The International Olympic Committee tested all athletes to make sure that the Olympic Games were fair and accurate. As a result, the Olympic games were very high-tech at the time and improve the fair play of the sport.The amount of participation and skill level of the 1968 Olympics wasn’t to be compared to the amount of athletes that participated in the 2016 Rio Olympics. “The Games were attended by 112 countries represented by almost 5,500
The testing system was so lax that cyclists felt confident of beating it. There was little by way of out-of-competition testing, and a lack of stringent application of regulations. With the support of professional team managers and unscrupulous doctors, cyclists could use new substances and techniques and stay ahead of the
Sports play an important role in society because they promote the health of individual bodies through hard work and dedication, embodied and encompassed by fair play and sportsmanship(Llewelyn). In the sports world today, performance-enhancing drugs (PED's) are very prevalent and have changed the way that almost everyone perceives sports figures. A substance is categorized as a PED when it has the potential to enhance a sport performance and when it poses a potential health risk to the competitor (U.S. Anti-Doping Agency). Since the dawn of Performance-Enhancing Drugs in the world of sports, the game has been forever changed by those who use them because of their potential
Controlling doping in sport has been a growing problem since the issue of doping has risen in the 1960s (3). This is due to the fact that doping activity cannot be tested for because the methods of doping are changing. Cheating in sport is usually deceptive and hidden, this occurs either by the cheating being done in secret or by finding ways to suppress key information (3). Cheating also occurs when someone breaks a rule that gives them an advantage over others (3). The ban on performance enhancing drugs should be lifted because it would decrease the cheating in sport and increase the autonomy of the athlete.
Dr Kare, Birkerland, I Hammersbach, P. . (July 1999). The future of doping control in athletes . Sports medicine . 28 (1), 25-33.
Drug use in sports is considered cheating. Doping has many historical backgrounds, but now it is on a larger scale in order to maximiz...
Ignoring other factors that may set into motion the causes for doping or any educational preventive measures, Herman puts Olympic doping data on the table for careful scrutiny. In many ways, these conclusive statistical findings are crucial in determining the next step after the ethical considerations of nootropics. If we are to deem nootropics unethical we need to examine what other systems have done to prevent similar types of cheating and to what extent their effectiveness is. After reviewing the data, Herman concludes that, “Testing is not economically viable for effective detection.” This statement is consistent with what Cakic and Greely et al. have stated in their articles over the ethical considerations of nootropics. Due to the lack of hard evidence in the area of nootropics, I need to attempt to extrapolate data from elsewhere and apply it to the subject. This will aid in my literature review by adding solid evidence to the otherwise unsupported claims of drug usage in the face of massive hurtles. As seen by these athletes, people are already willing to get an edge on competition by way of pills, injections and supplements; thus setting to rest the counter argument against this
Doping is a very big problem in road cycling and has been around for a long time. The earliest incidents of doping date back to 1886 which is only two decades after the first race. However, doping was not illegal until 1964 and is still constantly being revised. The biggest doping scandal (possibly in any sport) involved former 7 time Tour de France winner Neil Armstrong who was stripped of all his victories when he admitted to doping.
Overall it is clear that the need to use performance enhancing drugs is outweighed by the consequences and issues caused by performance enhancing drugs. Sporting events such as the world cup, the Olympics or the World Series make young children feel inspired and encouraged about what they could achieve through dedication and hard work. I feel it is important for the sporting industry as well as the athletes to return respectability to the sport. By