Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sport doping issues
Sport doping issues
Performance enhancing drugs in sports today
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
INTRODUCTION
The use of performance enhancing drugs (PED’s) in elite cycling extends well beyond the 60’s. Evidence suggests that PED’s where used as far back as the Ancient Greeks. They used various methods of doping to gain the performance edge (Bowers 1998). People will always use and abuse substances in the pursuit to get the edge as well as personal appearance (Fernandez, Hosey). These days with equipment being technologically advanced and available to all professional teams athletes need to find a way to perform at the new levels. There have been many theories to explain the contributing factors for professional athletes deliberately using PED’s to gain an unfair advantage, a competitors success or failure should be a result of their
…show more content…
Teams like the US postal team, place a ‘code of silence’ pressured athletes to use PED’s as well as groomed them to evade detection from the authorities so they can gain an unfair advantage (Tygart 2012). In the past 16 years of the Tour De France there have been 12 years that the overall winners have been linked with and found guilty of taking Performance Enhancing Drugs (McLean, Tse, Wannanen 2013). Considering the state of the doping culture in cycling throughout the last 20 years alone, its no wonder athletes like Lance Armstrong, Floyd Landers, Alberto Contador and many more, have to make a choice when becoming a professional athlete. To either take the banned substances and be apart of the PED winning program or be at a competitive disadvantage (Dime 2014). Graeme Obree a professional cyclist in the 90’s quote sums up exactly what happens at top end of professional …show more content…
That pressure to succeed and fit in within the team structure can force these athletes to participate in performance enhancing drugs or risk losing their contract that they have worked hard to gain. If the team doesn’t support the taking of PED’s then athletes may rely on outside assistance to gain an advantage on competitors within their own team and oppositions. In these cases athletes may seek advice from medical physicians outside of their organisation that are willing to supply the performance enhancing drugs (Dunn, George, Churchill, Spindler 2007). Drugs are not the only way to potentially enhance performance. Some athletes have surgical procedures to improve performance for example baseball pitchers having shoulder tendons replaced after injury with a knee tendon (Thompson 2012). However these enhancements are not illegal. It’s no different from bike companies pushing the rules to be able to develop aerodynamic bike. How far could the human body really go before we go to far, (Thompson, Helen 2012) or have we already gone to
Those who believe the use of anabolic steroids should be allowed in professional sports have numerous arguments for those in opposition. Professional sports leagues have tried to stop the use of steroids by drug testing players and punishing those who do not pass. A number of major athletes, such as Lance Armstrong, have been stripped of their athletic accolades due to discoveries of drug use. Despite witnessing the fall of great competitors due to “doping,” people continue to use. Because of unsuccessful attempts at banning the drug, many people believe “it may be time to head in the other direction: legalize performance enhancers” (Smith 1). No matter how many rules and regulations are made against the use of steroids, athletes will continue to abuse the drug in order to get ...
In “The Real Scandal,” Sharon Begley and Martha Brant develop an argument against the tacit allowance of the use of “banned” performance-enhancing drugs among Olympic athletes. The 1999 Newsweek cover story details incidents involving individual athletes caught using banned substances, the continuous race between the discovery and detection of new performance-enhancing drugs, and examples of the International Olympic Committee’s (IOC’s) complacency. In particular, the authors question the validity of the IOC’s current drug testing policies and protocols within the context of their self-defined role to “lead the fight against doping in sport” and “encourage and support measures protecting the health of athletes” (Organization). In order to better argue against doping in sport and advocate for more efficient and rigorous drug testing, Begley and Brant employ emotional appeals, logic, and a kairotic stance within their writing to persuade their audience of the necessity of firm action by the IOC and the worldwide community on the subject of performance-enhancing drug abuse.
The question of drug use among athletes in what was previously considered by the unknowing public to be a rather pristine sport, cycling, is important in that it will affect all future Tours and will place them and the athletes under scrutiny. To begin with, in Europe until the 1998 scandal occurred, despite a few exceptions, cycling was considered a drug free sport. The 1998 drug scandal tarnished the Tour de France and the reputation and image of other sports. The media response to the scandal took differing positions on what should be done next to clean up cycling. The scandal also affected advertisements, sales, and without question the 1999 Tour and Lance Armstrong. Since even the most naïve fan no longer trusts the cyclists, drug-testing procedures have been instituted. Also, the question now arises regarding medications used by seriously ill cyclists.
Abstract: Since the beginning of sports competition, athletes have always looked for some kind of edge over their competitors. They will do whatever it takes to be one of the elite, and that includes injecting supplements into their bodies to make them bigger, stronger, and faster. Steroid use is probably one of the most common drug misuses in sports competition. Athletes found that with anabolic steroids, one could become a better athlete twice as fast. Not until 1975 was the drug first banned from Olympic competition because of the health risks it produced.
These PED’s provide an unfair advantage to the athletes who take them. But by taking them away we can level the playing field for athletes. In 2010 Lance armstrong finishes has last Tour De France cycling race in 23rd place. He plans to retire soon and step away from the sport of cycling with his 7 Tour De France wins and focus his time with his family and cancer research because he is a cancer survivor. But a year after his retirement in 2012 the USADA (United States Anti Doping Agency) notified Mr. Armstrong that they were looking into new doping charges. Armstrong quickly fired back with a lawsuit against the charges and accusations made against him. But a federal judge dismissed the lawsuit against the USADA saying his right to due process is being violated. Shortly after Lance Armstrong said that he would no longer fight these charges. The USADA would go on to srtip Lance of his 7 Tour De France titles and banning him from the sport of cycling for life. Within a span of 3 years one of cycling's most prolific cyclists had lost it all. This is a huge example of how doping and PED’s effected a man's life, a sport, and others lives negatively. Imagine all of the money and the hopes and dreams that came along with Lance Armstrong that are now stamped with words like cheater, scandalous, false hero, and failure. Lance Armstrong wasn't only a hero to sports
Justin Gatlin, Alain Baxter and Lance Armstrong are just 3 of thousands of athletes to be accused of doping. Taking drugs to enhance your performance in sport is completely forbidden. The dictionary definition of the word ‘cheat’ is ‘to act dishonestly or unfairly to gain an advantage’ and this is exactly what drug cheat’s do. When athletes make the decision to take performance-enhancing drugs (PED), they might as well be making the decision to end their career and destroy their reputation. Millions of children in every sport around the world look up to someone and to think that athletes who are aware of this knowingly abuse their success by taking PED is disgusting. For athletes now, with the technology available, to expect to slip under the
Since the beginning of sports competition, Athletes have always strived for victory over their competitors. With the increase in the stigma attached to being a sports champion, in addition to the social ranking and affluence. Competitors will stop at nothing to be one of the elite, and this includes injecting illegal supplements into their bodies to enhance their performance. The evolution of sport has begun as an amateur affair into a big business with millions of dollars in endorsements and commercialisation. This pressure to become successful or to be the best has contributed to the rise in drug taking within the sporting community.
As the use of PEDs is becoming more common, controversy over the legalization has emerged. Among the many different types of performance enhancing drugs out there, the common ones consist of: steroids, red blood cell doping, and human growth hormone. Lance Armstrong was convicted of red blood cell doping and has been stripped of his title and banned from professional cycling. With the numerous amount of athletes convicted of PED abuse, one can question if it is a problem with the athletes or if it is a problem with the state. In all professional sports in the United States, the use of PEDs is prohibited.
Drug use in sports is considered cheating. Doping has many historical backgrounds, but now it is on a larger scale in order to maximiz...
Many people believe that drug use in professional athletics is not a serious problem, however it is more widespread and serious than people think. In professional athletics the use of drugs is looked upon as somewhat of a serious problem, but is also very discrete and low key. Every once in a while one might see a prominent figure in a certain sport being reprimanded for the use of some outlawed drug, however this is just one of the many who happened to get caught. Athletes today seem to find no moral problem with using performance-enhancing drugs, or in other words cheating. Also many of them feel that because they are "stars" there should be no repercussions for their illegal activity.
First, when athletes cheat, they are not pushing themselves to achieve success. Cheating also affects the culprit physically, mentally, and emotionally. Doctor Yesalis, a prominent Professor of Health at Pennsylvania State University, states, "You do not need drugs to have a sense of fulfillment, to feel that you've left it all on the field," Yesalis says. "[Drugs have] taken something that God has given us—love of game and sport—and perverted us" (par. 3). Allowing drugs in sports will not prove who is better at the sport we will just see who is the biggest drug user. This is a great integrity check for the individual because it proves who is true to their profession. This also tests their intestinal fortitude to see if they will be man or women enough to do the correct thing.
...thlete under twenty-four hour surveillance is neither feasible nor lawful. Only when there are more accurate tests can the enforcement of drug rules and regulations be possible. As more sophisticated tests come to market, fewer drugs will escape detection. With the limited ability of current techniques to catch athletes red-handed, pressure must be put on the athletic community to reject doping. Until the athletic community refuses doping as a means to an end, little can be done to stop it from happening.
Performance enhancing drugs are substances or methods that can be used to improve the performance of humans during any physical activity. According to WADA, a substance is prohibited when it has any of the following characteristics: the potential to enhance or enhances sport performance, it represents an actual or potential health risk to an athlete or that it violates the spirit of sport. (USADA (2017) WADA Prohibited list, Available at:https://www.usada.org/substances/prohibited-list/ ) During the Essendon Football Club’s supplements program in 2012 that became one of the sports longest running sagas. Many of the clubs players were found to be injected with banned peptides. Peptides are natural biological or artificially manufactured short
What do ethics, fair play, fun and joy, dedication and commitment, and respect for rules and laws have in common? It’s simple, they are all values that characterize the “The Spirit of the Sport”. The use of performance enhancing drugs, or P.E.D.S for short, violets the ethics and moral of any sport. The World Anti-Doping Agency (W.A.D.A), stated the following in the Mar. 2003 World Anti-Doping Code: "Anti-doping programs seek to preserve what is intrinsically valuable about sport. This intrinsic value is often referred to as 'the spirit of sport'; it is the essence of Olympism; it is how we play true.”
The usage of performance-enhancing drugs in sports is commonly known as Doping. Doping is banned worldwide in every sports administration and competitions and doping gives an unfair advantage to those using illegal substances, such as steroids to boost their performance. It also puts at stake the integrity of those athletes who do not use performance-enhancing drugs also known as “clean” athletes. In fact it seems that we’re now entering the era of performance-enhancing drugs within professional sports. Doping rids the true athletes of what they truly deserve and is wrong; because why should those who put in a hundred per cent of their effort, be outshone by individuals who are choosing to use substances to enhance their physical and mental abilities? Doping damages the sports industry as a whole because it has a serious physical and mental effects on the athletes, as well as damaging the idea of sportsmanship and it also breaks the trust of the fans, as they realise their idols are hypocrites.