Primo Levi once said, " Human memory is a marvelous but fallacious instrument. The memories which lie within us are not carved in stone; not only do they tend to become erased as the years go by, but often they change, or even increase by incorporating extraneous features.." The memory of a human being is a fascinating matter, but it is not something that stays with us forever. Memories will often change or multiply with unnecessary information, but they are what define you as you.
In Cooper's "Labyrinthine," he acknowledges his unclear memories and compares the journey through life to that of the "loopy and confusing" maze (108). Bernard Cooper understands how memory works, "Recollecting the past becomes as unreliable as forecasting the future; you consult yourself with a certain trepidation and take your answer with a grain of salt" (Cooper 109). He says, "Remembered events merge together or fade away. Places and dates grow dubious, a jumble of guesswork and speculation" (108). He is "growing middle-aged" and "lost in the folds and bones of [his] body" (109). Cooper's perspective of life is
…show more content…
bleak and he shows fear of forgetting as he wrote to his parents. He longs to "remember the days [his parents] were here" (109). Aging has caused his memory to fail, but aging has also allowed Cooper to ponder over life from his past or his view as a child. "At the age of seven I changed forever, like the faithful who see Christ on the side of a barn or peering up from a corn tortilla," Bernard Cooper writes; "Everywhere I looked, a labyrinth meandered" (107). His new "obsession" and "hobby" of the mazes that he obtained as a child gave him an "embracing safety" and "triumph and finality" (107). He remembers his "first maze among the pages of a coloring book," suggesting the future mazes that would approach him during his childhood. Nostalgia comes into play with the short memory of his parents as they age and pass away. The progression of time joins with memory to affect the certainty of the past. Therefore, will nostalgia become something uncertain because of the fact that memories will be "altered" from the real event? This leads Cooper to compare life to a labyrinth, "Labyrinthine. The very sound of that word sums it up---as slippery as thought, as perplexing as the truth, as long and convoluted as life" (109). He has come to understand that memories fade away or change from the actual event, but he does not like that fact. The mazes from his childhood have become a labyrinth, with one path and no exit. It might be questionable as to how we can define ourselves with unclear memories.
I am a person with more of a passive personality, so I don't have too many close friends in general and I am often alone after I entered college. So, like Cooper, I also fear to forget and fear to be forgotten. I also think that it is inevitable that I will forget as time progresses, as I age, as I change, as I walk down the path of my life. How could I survive without my friends as we go our separate ways to different colleges? The memories and the nostalgic times of being with my friends will become fuzzy with time. I did not want that to happen. After reading Eva Hoffman's "Lost in Translation," I found that it may be true that memories will dwindle or change, but memories and the feeling of nostalgia are not that easy to forget and that they will always be a part of
us. Hoffman also recalls about her childhood, but focuses on the "feeling" of luxury of being at "home," an irreplaceable place. Nostalgia makes up Eva Hoffman's "Lost in Translation." "It is Cracow, 1949, I'm four years old, and I don't know that this happiness is taking place in a country recently destroyed by war,....I love knowing, from my bed, the street over which it is moving; I repeat to myself that I'm in Cracow; Cracow, which to me is both home and the universe" (Hoffman 134-135). She is forced to emigrate from her hometown of Cracow, her "home and universe" to Canada (135). Hoffman does not see a happy and enjoyable future, she says, "Looking ahead, I come across an enormous, cold blankness--darkening, an erasure, of the imagination, as if a camera eye has snapped shut, or as if a heavy curtain has been pulled over the future" (133). Being forced to leave her "home", she desires to return to her childhood paradise. She did not "want to be pried out of [her] childhood, [her] pleasures, her [safety], [her] hopes for becoming a pianist" (134). Not only do her memories and nostalgia serve as her comfort, they serve as her past, a part of her identity. There is no fear in Hoffman and she continues to remember and reminisce the wonderful feeling of her childhood. Change is "inevitable," Cooper would probably say, but Hoffman never truly forgot the feeling and memories of her "home." Would "the endless succession of burdens and concerns [was] enough to make anyone forgetful" (108)? Hoffman tells us about she meets a woman "many years later" that tells her about "an enchanted childhood" that came to an end and "she felt she had been exiled from paradise, and had been searching for it ever since" (134). Hoffman replies that "wonder is what you can make a paradise out of" and that "when it came time to leave, [she,] too, felt [she] was being pushed out of the happy, safe enclosures of Eden" (134). Hoffman demonstrates that time and age cannot kill the feelings, nostalgia, and memories of the past that easily. It doesn't matter if the memories have slipped away or changed. They are your memories and will only and always be yours. There are many things that are "inevitable" in life as Cooper shows us in "Labyrinthine," and he implies that life is drenched in the fear of forgetting, trying to remember, and is like that of a labyrinth, which has only one path to no end. Hoffman suggests otherwise. She suggests that memory is a beautiful thing that people will definitely remember and that life is made for remembering.
The left door which they entered was a dead end. After sprinting a hundred yards, they ran into an enormous boulder that completely blocked their way.They could hear something breathing heavily which didn't sound human. Tyson pushed the boulder blocking the place where they could hear the heavy breathing and soon Annabeth realized they were in Alcatraz so she told the group about it.
Their memories will give them an ideal live to go towards or a life in which they want to progress from. If an individual chooses to run from the past in which they lived, it is still a component in their life which shaped them to be who it is they became, despite their efforts to repress those memories. Nevertheless, the positive memories of an individual’s past will also shape who they are. Both good and bad memories are able to give an individual a glimpse into their ideal life and a target in which they wish to strive for and memories in which they can aim to prevent from happening once
“Holding onto past memories helps humans avoid pain in the future. These experiences also help them make better decisions in the future.” (Kenny) Many people advise others to learn from the past and apply those memories so that you can effectively succeed by avoiding repeating past mistakes. On the contrary, people who get too caught up with the past are unable to move on to the future. Memories are the foundation of a person's mindset because what you make of them is entirely up to you.
And if you just take a person, what is a memory for a person in his daily life? In my opinion, this is the basis for the formation of a person as a person. The existing experience and knowledge, which are stored in our memory, are the basis for our future development. Human memory is daily accumulated life experience, which allows it to grow and develop in all directions of life - mental, spiritual, moral. The paradox is that we use memory
The first issue that needs to be addressed however is what exactly is memory? “ Without memory we would be servants of the moment, with nothing but our innate reflexes to help us deal with the world. There would be no language, no art, no science, no culture. Civilization itself is the distillation of human memory” (Blakemore 1988). The simple interpretation of Blakemore’s theory on what memory is that a person’s memory is at least one of the most important things in their life and without it civilization itself could not exist.
...Although there may be a few benefits to erasing a person’s memory, in the end it is wrong. Without their memories a person doesn’t have the chance to form their identity and without being able to learn from our mistakes, they will continue to be made. Being an adult with a blank slate isn’t right, and you can’t experience good things without also experiencing bad things.
Mary Wroth alludes to mythology in her sonnet “In This Strange Labyrinth” to describe a woman’s confused struggle with love. The speaker of the poem is a woman stuck in a labyrinth, alluding to the original myth of Theseus and the Minotaur. The suggestion that love is not perfect and in fact painful was a revolutionary thing for a woman to write about in the Renaissance. Wroth uses the poem’s title and its relation to the myth, symbolism and poem structure to communicate her message about the tortures of love.
The film emphasizes on the power of our long-term memory and our episodic memories. Would we be happier if we forgot about traumatic past experiences? Or are our long-term memories so tangled up with emotions and sensations that our brain is unable to truly let go of long-term memories? The film also looks at the difference between explicit and implicit memories.
Once we have learned something I believe that we will always remember it, we may forget about it at a certain time, but if we ever came across the information again, it will be retrieved from our long term memory. Just because we do not use all the information we learn it is still stored in your memory, so in all actuality we never really forget anything. If information isn’t stored in our memory then learning would be pointless.
Memory is an important part of our lives. It fills us with comfort, warmth, and happiness when recalling a joyous event; it may also illicit feelings of anger, sadness, or discontent. Unfortunately, our memory is not as perfect as we may think. In fact, our memory is extremely malleable. Most people think memory acts as a tape recorder; you experience an event, and like a video tape, you can replay the event over and over in exact detail as it happened. This belief could not be further from the truth. In fact, our memory is constantly being shaped by external factors. It is reconstructed in the way we want to remember it. Memory does not act as a tape recorder; rather it is constructed by us and warped by time, emotions, and external forces. Such forces can include the input of family members and friends who want “get the facts straight” with their recollection of the event. This falsification effect can have severely damaging consequences, not only for the person undergoing the recollection, but also for those under attack for these recovered memories.
As I have been reading memoirs about memory for this class, each essay made me recall or even examine my past memory closely. However, the more minutely I tried to recall what happened in the past, the more confused I got because I could not see the clear image and believe I get lost in my own memory, which I thought, I have preserved perfectly in my brain. The loss of the details in each memory has made me a little bit sentimental, feeling like losing something important in my life. But, upon reading those essays, I came to realize that remembering correct the past is not as important as growing up within memory. However, the feelings that were acquired from the past experience tend to linger distinctly. The essay that is related to my experience
Alison Stine, author for The Atlantic, investigates “Labyrinth” in her essay (Labyrinth and the Dark Heart of Childhood) and how the theme, which seems to be geared towards adults, actually has turned to favor viewers of a younger age as time has went on. Not only has this genre of stories been read to children, but they also talk about kids and the bad things that can happen to them. Labyrinth is portrayed as a world of men, where almost all characters accept for the Junk Lady are male. In a gist the story is about a girl named Sarah, and her baby brother who is kidnapped by Jareth, a goblin. Sarah has to rescue her brother, or he’ll be turned into a goblin like Jareth. Jareth promises a magical world, but it isn’t as it seems, then Sarah
Most people are very convinced that they have memories of past experiences because of the event itself or the bigger picture of the experience. According to Ulric Neisser, memories focus on the fact that the events outlined at one level of analysis may be components of other, larger events (Rubin 1). For instance, one will only remember receiving the letter of admission as their memory of being accepted into the University of Virginia. However, people do not realize that it is actually the small details that make up their memories. What make up the memory of being accepted into the University of Virginia are the hours spent on writing essays, the anxiety faced due to fear of not making into the university and the happiness upon hearing your admission into the school; these small details are very important in creating memories of this experience. If people’s minds are preset on merely thinking that memories are the general idea of their experiences, memories become very superficial and people will miss out on what matters most in life. Therefore, in “The Amityville Horror”, Jay Anson deliberately includes small details that are unnecessary in the story to prove that only memory can give meaning to life.
Memory is the tool we use to learn and think. We all use memory in our everyday lives. Memory is the mental faculty of retaining and recalling past experiences. We all reassure ourselves that our memories are accurate and precise. Many people believe that they would be able to remember anything from the event and the different features of the situation. Yet, people don’t realize the fact that the more you think about a situation the more likely the story will change. Our memories are not a camcorder or a camera. Our memory tends to be very selective and reconstructive.
According to Sternberg (1999), memory is the extraction of past experiences for information to be used in the present. The retrieval of memory is essential in every aspect of daily life, whether it is for academics, work or social purposes. However, many often take memory for granted and assume that it can be relied on because of how realistic it appears in the mind. This form of memory is also known as flashbulb memory. (Brown and Kulik, 1977). The question of whether our memory is reliably accurate has been shown to have implications in providing precise details of past events. (The British Psychological Association, 2011). In this essay, I would put forth arguments that human memory, in fact, is not completely reliable in providing accurate depictions of our past experiences. Evidence can be seen in the following two studies that support these arguments by examining episodic memory in humans. The first study is by Loftus and Pickrell (1995) who found that memory can be modified by suggestions. The second study is by Naveh-Benjamin and Craik (1995) who found that there is a predisposition for memory to decline with increasing age.