Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of the Second World War on people
U. S. involvement in the Korean War
Effect of the Second World War on people
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effect of the Second World War on people
The Second World War was coming to an end with the surrender of Germany in May 1945. At the Potsdam Conference, the leaders of the Allied states came together to determine the postwar order of Europe and took decisions on the strategies of the ongoing war in the Pacific. Despite the repeated Allies demand for the surrender of its forces, Japan maintained fighting against the Allies. This situation left no more choice to the United States other than using atomic bomb to break the Japanese resistance and provide its surrender. The destruction caused by the bombing led Japan to surrender and obey the Allies terms. The next Allied move was to discuss and make decisions about the future of the Japanese colonies in the East Asia. Korea was also among the colonies, which the Imperial Japan had annexed in the early 1900s. The ultimate decision of the Allies for Korea was the joint occupation between the United States and the Soviet Union. With regard to this agreement, Korea was divided into two parts at the 38th parallel: the United States occupied the south of the demarcation line while the Soviet Union invaded the northern half. The demarcation line dividing Korea into two parts has led a nation to become polarized and also terminated the history of Korea as a single nation. The division of the country by an artificial line gave rise to more problems than solving the existing ones. While the United States was determined to create a trusteeship in the country, which would give its place to independent Korea after five or ten years, the Soviet Union opposed to the idea of an immediate independence. The Soviet Union had an intention to establish communism functioning in Korea. The United States, on the other hand, was not willing to l... ... middle of paper ... ...ersity Press, 2004. Goncharov, S. N., John W. Lewis, and Xue Litai. Uncertain Partners: Stalin, Mao and the Korean War. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1993. Cumings, Bruce. The Korean War: A History. New York: Modern Library, 2011. Pierpaoli, Paul G. Jr. Truman and Korea: The Political Culture of the Early Cold War. Columbia: University of Missouri, 1999. Zhang, Shu Guang. Mao's Military Romanticism: China and the Korean War, 1950-1953. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1995. Jian, Chen. China's Road to the Korean War. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996. MacDonald, Callum A. Korea: The War before Vietnam. New York: The Free Press, 1986. Lowe, Peter. The Origins of the Korean War. New York: Longman Publishing Group, 1987. Whiting, Allen. China Crosses the Yalu: The Decision to Enter the Korean War. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1960.
The Korean War changed the face of American Cold War diplomacy forever. In the midst of all the political conflict and speculation worldwide, the nation had to choose between two proposed solutions, each one hoping to ensure that communism didn?t sweep across the globe and destroy American ideals of capitalism and democracy. General Douglas MacArthur takes the pro-active stance and says that, assuming it has the capability, the U.S. should attack communism everywhere. President Harry Truman, on the other hand, believed that containing the Soviet communists from Western Europe was the best and most important course of action, and that eliminating communism in Asia was not a priority.
Gittings, John. The Changing Face of China: From Mao to market. Oxford University Press, 2005.
Offner, Arnold A. Another Such Victory: President Truman and the Cold War, 1945-1953. 1st September 2002. New Article. 11th March 2014.
Pearson, Lester B. "Documents on the Korean Crisis." University of Manitoba. January 24, 1951. http://www.umanitoba.ca/libraries/units/archives/canada_war/tribune/website/clippings/korea/Documents_on_the_Korean_Crisis1.shtml (accessed December 18, 2011).
Hasegawa, Tsuyoshi. “Racing the Enemy: Stalin, Truman and the Surrender of Japan.” Taking Sides: Clashing View in United States History. Ed. Larry Madaras & James SoRelle. 15th ed. New York, NY. 2012. 289-298.
Roberts, G. (2004). Sexing up the Cold War: New evidence on the Molotov-Truman talks of April 1945. Cold War History, 4(3): 105-125.
Offner, Arnold. “‘Another Such Victory’: President Truman, American Foreign Policy, and the Cold War.” Taking Sides: Clashing Views On Controversial Issues in United States History. Ed. Larry Madaras and James M. SoRelle. 14th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2011. 291-301.
The initial terms of surrender were laid out in the Potsdam Declaration of July 26, 1945, in which the United States, Great Britain, and China all participated. But unlike post World War II Germany, which was split into four quadrants among the Allies, the occupation of Japan was solely and American endeavor. This document was by no means tame. Military occupation would see to it that its measure would be properly carried out. Justice would be served to those "who deceived and misled the people of Japan into embarking on world conquest," Disarmament of the military, reparations as the Allies saw fit, and the "remove all obstacles to the revival and strengthening of democratic tendencies among the Japanese people" were also to be enacted. At the head of this revolution, as spelled out in Potsdam, was Douglas MacArthur.
Cumings, Bruce. The Origin of the Korean War: Liberation and the Emergence of Separate Regimes 1945-1947. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1989. Print.
Today, Japanese and Korean civilizations are advanced, wealthy, and independent with their own system of government and religious beliefs due to the influences from China. The majority of Asia experienced changes in government and dealt with inter and intra state conflicts when the countries were most susceptible to influences from alliances made with other countries. The Tang Dynasty/ Silla alliance shaped the future of Korea’s religious and government movements. Art and literature from China also greatly impacted Korea’s and Japan’s society and provided new insight into literary expression through new forms of poetry and a new system of writing. Religion was also a major influence because of popularity and acceptance of new views and beliefs. Agriculture played an important role in the development of Korean and Japanese civilizations because new tools and forms of irrigation led to more efficient harvesting. The bulk of Chinese influence impacted Japanese society through the Heian period and Korea was heavily influenced by Chinese culture during the period when Silla unified Korea. Although there were many factors of Chinese culture that influenced Korean and Japanese civilizations, religion and government legislation had the most impact.
Kim, Yǒng-jin (1973). Major Powers and Korea. Silver Spring, MD: Research Institute on Korean Affairs. 46.
The Korean war had it’s rising announcement when the Japanese Empire fell at the end of WWII in September, 1945. Unlike other countries that had been recently occupied by Japan, Korea had no stable government to return to. In advance, the United States and Soviet Union mad an agreement in August of 1945 to separate Korea to remove the lasting Japanese troops. The US had seen this separation as a temporary method, but the Soviet Union had begun a calamity in northern Korea and drive thousands towards South Korea. Unable to reunify Korea, in 1947, President Harry Truman convinced the UN to take responsibility, and the US remained in control of South Korea until 1948. During this, Kim Il-sung had strengthened and increased his control over the
Solomon, Richard. Mao’s Revolution and the Chinese Political Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971
Malaspina, Ann. The Chinese Revolution and Mao Zedong in World History. Berkeley Heights, NJ: Enslow, 2004. Print.
In 1950, the Korean War began, North Korea on one side, South Korea on the other. The result was a stalemate, but this created conflict that is still lasting to this day. The war was a major step in the battle of containing or expanding communism. The war also remembered as a war between two superpowers, the U.S.S.R. backing North Korea and the expansion of communism, the U.S. supporting South Korea and containing communism. After the war, no real peace was made, and so far isolated battles make up the foreign relations of the Koreas. But before all of this, North and South Korea weren’t even separate countries, instead they were part of another country.