Kip Andersen Cowspiracy

1293 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: How eating meat affects animals

Cowspiracy : Do Cows put the “C” and “O” in CO2? “Raising livestock produces more greenhouse gases than the emissions of the entire transportation sector”(Cowspiracy). In other words, beef and dairy production contribute to global warming and climate change, more than that of every form of motorized vehicles combined. In the production of Cowspiracy, Kip Andersen a committed vegan environmentalist teams up with actor, environmentalist, and producer Leonardo DiCaprio--in order to investigate animal agriculture’s contribution to both global warming and deforestation. According to Andersen‘s research, "methane gas produced from livestock is 86 times more destructive than carbon dioxide from vehicles.”(Cowspiracy) Kip Andersen interviews environmental group experts and analyzes the effects mass-produce …show more content…

He also provided formal information about each interviewee in text on-screen in order to provide context. Logos is used to appeal to the audience in much more obvious ways, Andersen provided a large number of statistics, figures, facts and graphs to support his argument. One of the largest pathos appeals in this film was the background and story about Sister Dorothy Stang; an elderly nun, whose life’s purpose was to protect the Amazon. Stang was brutally gunned down by a hired gun from the cattle industry, for defending the forests (Cowspiracy). Deforestation is a major concern, but is nowhere near as endangering as the pollution and depletion of our water sources as well as air pollution by gaseous methane from livestock.This film dials in to raise awareness of the effects of animal agriculture’s effect on the environment. Andersen proves the validity of this fact throughout the film--stating that this is not the only threat to the environment, but it has the largest impact and should be the largest

Show More
Related

  • Barbara Kingsolver Called Home

    1391 Words  | 3 Pages

    Moreover, this system of mass farming leads to single crop farms, which are ecologically unsafe, and the unnatural treatment of animals (Kingsolver 14). These facts are presented to force the reader to consider their own actions when purchasing their own food because of the huge economic impact that their purchases can have. Kingsolver demonstrates this impact by stating that “every U.S. citizen ate just one meal a week (any meal) composed of locally and organically raised meats and produce, we

    Read More

  • Pesticides In The Movie Food Inc

    831 Words  | 2 Pages

    There are many issues regarding the raising and producing of various livestock animals, and the use of pesticides on various types of crops. The movie Food.Inc does a good job explaining these issues, but in a very biased way. It makes agriculturists look like terrible people, when this is not the case.

    Read More

  • The Effects Of Industrial Farming By Bill Mckibben And Blake Hurst

    887 Words  | 2 Pages

    To help end these negative effects, McKibben ends his argument suggesting that herding our cows and letting them roam and graze could also help, “put much of the atmosphere’s oversupply of greenhouse gases back in the soil inside half a century” (page 202). Although this won’t make a radical change, it could help the environment. McKibben simply believes that

    Read More

  • Omnivore's Delusion Summary

    303 Words  | 1 Pages

    In “Omnivore’s Delusion,” Blake Hurst, a veteran famer, calls attention to the “agri-intellectuals” who are critiquing farming when having no experience. First of all, the author wants “Agri-intellectuals” to take a walk in a farmer’s shoes. Throughout the article, Hurst throws jabs at the people criticizing choices a farmer makes, for example, he says, “It is important, though, that even people riding in airplanes know that there are environmental and food safety costs to whatever kind of farming we choose” (4). The author says this to show his anger and suggest to these critics they should know what they are talking about before they talk about it. Secondly, Hurst points out the food animal endangerment. The author tells his readers

    Read More

  • How Do We Farm If We Must?: Analysis With Peter Singer's Down on the Factory Farm and Stanley Curtis's The Case for Intensive Farming of Food Animals

    2210 Words  | 5 Pages

    Factory farming is often a sore spot for American and other first world consciences. Even those that are ethically comfortable with consumption of animal products are often discomfited by the large-scale maltreatment of living creatures that is present in contemporary agribusiness. Writings that are similar to Peter Singer's “Down on the Factory Farm”, which depicts the multitude of unnatural horrors and abuses that billions of farm animals undergo before they are ultimately slaughtered for our use, make up the majority of the commentary on the subject. There seem to be few writers with the audacity to dispute the popular outcry that there is something morally reprehensible in our systematic exploitation of other species. Yet, as Stanley Curtis shows in “The Case for Intensive Farming of Food Animals”, a less emotionally charged examination is likely to be necessary if we have any aspirations of revising the current model into one that is not only more humane, but also sustainable for the environment and for the growing human population. Though our sympathies are immediately swayed by Singer's work, we must remain cognisant that, as Singer himself said, “We can't take our feelings as moral data, immune from rational criticism” (The Lives of Animals 89). Though Curtis's work seems at times overly cold in its utilitarian views, it provides an undoubtedly useful contrast to the call-to-arms of Singer's work. Evaluating them in tandem is likely the best approach to deriving a model that placates our moral dissatisfaction while meeting the requirements set forth by reality.

    Read More

  • An Animal Place By Michael Pollan Summary

    1500 Words  | 3 Pages

    Pollan believes that American factory farms are places with technological sophistication, where animals are machines incapable of feeling pain (368). In other words, factory farms use plentiful of technology where they do not pay attention to animals feelings. For example, beef cattle who live outdoors are standing in their own waste, and factory farmers do not considered that wrong and unsanitary. Hurst alleges that “turkeys do walk around in their own waste, although they don’t seemed to mind”(5). This shows that factory farmers think that animals really don’t have feelings and really don’t care. Pollan also disagrees with industrial farming because he states that, “American industrial farms itself is redefined- as a protein production- and with it suffering” (369). He affirms this because industrial farming cages their animals. Interestingly, both authors believe that animals still die and suffer no matter what circumstances an animal is living. Pollan believes animals should be treated with respect and not be caged. On the other hand, Hurst asserts that “farmers do not cage their hogs because sadism, but because being crushed by your mother really is an awful way to go, as is being eaten by your mother”(6). So Hurst say that he cages animals to protect them. Also both authors believe that there needs to be ways to enrich the soil, so the farms can have bigger harvest, healthy plants, and keep cost down. However, Pollan believes that farmer should use compost. He states that “the finish compost will go to feed the grass;the grass, the cattle; the cattle , the chickens; and eventually all of the animals will feed us” (370). So he thinks compost is good for the farms. Hurst on the other hand, think manure and commercial fertilizer is good for the farms. Hurst spread poultry litter on pasture and this made cattle production possible in areas

    Read More

  • The Benefits Of Meatless Mondays

    1104 Words  | 3 Pages

    This statement is a myth and can be backed up by Meat Mythcrushers. According to the video, Myth: Going Meatless One Day a Week Can Have a Significant Environmental Impact, “reducing meat consumption one day per week as recommended by the Meatless Monday campaign has a negligible impact on greenhouse gas emissions.” This means that of the 3.4 percent of the gas emissions that are from animal agriculture, beef only contribute 1.4 percent. Even if the whole world were to reduce their beef consumption for one week, their carbon footprint would be just a meager .2 percent (2013). This misconception comes from people believing that livestock production is causing large emissions of greenhouse gas emissions when it is more so the transportation and energy production causing the problem. Meat is both economically and nutritionally efficient. Today, livestock farms require less land, water and energy than was required in the past

    Read More

  • The Omnivore's Dilemma Analysis

    1384 Words  | 3 Pages

    Our current system of corporate-dominated, industrial-style farming might not resemble the old-fashioned farms of yore, but the modern method of raising food has been a surprisingly long time in the making. That's one of the astonishing revelations found in Christopher D. Cook's "Diet for a Dead Planet: Big Business and the Coming Food Crisis" (2004, 2006, The New Press), which explores in great detail the often unappealing, yet largely unseen, underbelly of today's food production and processing machine. While some of the material will be familiar to those who've read Michael Pollan's "The Omnivore's Dilemma" or Eric Schlosser's "Fast-Food Nation," Cook's work provides many new insights for anyone who's concerned about how and what we eat,

    Read More

  • Cowspiracy Analysis

    764 Words  | 2 Pages

    The comparisons tended to stay amid machines or humans versus cattle. Using only one comparison in a scenario tends to leave out background information that is imperative to understanding situations. Filmmaker of Cowspiracy, Kip Andersen verifies that, "hydraulic fracturing for natural gas uses... staggering 100 billion gallons of water is used every year in the united states... raising livestock just in the US consumes 30 trillion gallons of water, and it turns out the methane emissions from both industries are nearly equal"(5:37). Many other things use water in the US aside from cattle and hydraulic fracturing. The presented information leads us to believe that cattle are the main cause aside from outside factors or other contributors to water use.

    Read More

  • A Rhetorical Analysis Of Junk Food

    692 Words  | 2 Pages

    618.3 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent are produced each year in the United States alone for agriculture (EPA). Agriculture is one source of greenhouse gasses we can’t eliminate, but we could as a species decide to eat greener. Cows are a massive producer of methane, but very few people are willing to give up or downsize their stake intake. With so much greenhouse gas produced the problem is compiled when the amount of clean water used is taken into context. “Globally we use 70% of our water sources for agriculture and irrigation, and only 10% on domestic uses.” On the same note of water conservation 783 million people don’t have access to clean water. The issue as addressed isn’t agriculture, but where we invest most of our resources in production (The Water Project). McDonalds would not have been happy if he mentioned this, but a Big Mac produces 6.8 lbs. in greenhouse gas emissions (Ganeshan,

    Read More

  • Animal Abuse In The Food Industry

    1031 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are many debates around the world about the topic of animal abuse. Animal abuse in the food industry has become a major problem due to the cruel treatment of animals. Most of the world's population might think that animal cruelty is only found in homes and on the street, but they forget about the other forms of animal abuse that affect the food industry. Large contributors to animal abuse are due to fishing methods, animal testing, and slaughterhouses. "Animals have always been a major part of our society in history and they have played huge roles in agriculture" (ASPCA). Factory farming is a system of confining chickens, pigs, and cattle under strictly controlled conditions. Slaughterhouses are places where animals are killed

    Read More

  • Animal Welfare In Farming

    1683 Words  | 4 Pages

    America focuses heavily on its livestock and crops earning us a major role in global trade as a farming nation. Unfortunately this has led to some poor choices in treatment of our animals. Many farmers who believe in animal rights say that it started back when farmers only tended to fewer animals, “Ownership of farm animals became concentrated in fewer hands, and flocks and herds grew larger. As a result, the individuality of animals was lost to their owners and they began receding from most people's everyday life” (Namit 29). When people lost their connection to the animals that provided their food, the quality of the animal's lives began to dramatically decrease. Consumers constantly pushed farmers to their limits with high quotas. To keep up with demands agriculturalists turned to some unorthodox practices to keep costs low and still maintain their annual quotas; “To raise efficiency and cut costs, farm animals began to be engineered for abnormally rapid weight gain, fed unnatu...

    Read More

  • Saving the Environment with Veganism

    908 Words  | 2 Pages

    Silverman, Jacob. "Do Cows Pollute as Much as Cars?" HowStuffWorks.com. Discovery Communications, n.d. Web. 01 Dec. 2013. .

    Read More

  • Examples Of Persuasive Speech To Prevent Animal Cruelty

    1047 Words  | 3 Pages

    ... individuals may understand and spread the word of the horrific conditions the animals are forced to be a part of on factory farms.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Eating Meat

    1598 Words  | 4 Pages

    “Currently 80% of the world’s agricultural land is used directly or indirectly for animal production. In the US over half the total land mass is used for the production of meat and dairy products” (Clarke).

    Read More

More about Kip Andersen Cowspiracy

Open Document