Cowspiracy Analysis

764 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Cowspiracy documentary summary essay

Cowspiracy Analysis

The 2014 documentary Cowspiracy, directed by Kip Andersen and Keegan Kuhn, attempts to show the world what kind of impact raising cattle makes on the earth. Andersen and Kuhn do an exemplary job of exploiting expert testimony to explain their views but lacked emotional appeal. The logic seemed to fall short since the documentary was packed with many facts that didn’t explain all contributors to the statistics. The directors did attempt to use all fields appropriately but only had one strong suit, therefore it was not as persuasive to viewers.

Cowspiracy utilizes experts in a way that persuasively move readers toward their opinion. The main person of cowspiracy ask, direct questions that persuades his expert to go into …show more content…

The comparisons tended to stay amid machines or humans versus cattle. Using only one comparison in a scenario tends to leave out background information that is imperative to understanding situations. Filmmaker of Cowspiracy, Kip Andersen verifies that, "hydraulic fracturing for natural gas uses... staggering 100 billion gallons of water is used every year in the united states... raising livestock just in the US consumes 30 trillion gallons of water, and it turns out the methane emissions from both industries are nearly equal"(5:37). Many other things use water in the US aside from cattle and hydraulic fracturing. The presented information leads us to believe that cattle are the main cause aside from outside factors or other contributors to water use. In the documentary they go on to a more generalized statistic. Kip Anderson continues this explaining, "...Domestic water use is only 5% of what is consumed in the US versus 55% for animal agriculture"(6:51). The statistic covers a broad expanse not really going in depth on different domestic use or different animals' contribution to the consumption of water. Also, there is 45% of water being used that is unaccounted for in the statistic. With the given statistics being bias to the cause it is easy to infer that there is more information that the documentary is withholding from

Show More
Related

  • The Omnivore’s Dilemma by Michael Pollan

    1761 Words  | 4 Pages

    Fast food consumption is taking America by a storm and it is for the sake of our lives. Fast food relies heavily on industrialized corn because of how cheap and easy to grow it is. With that being said, animals are being fed with corn rather than being fed with grass. In the Omnivore’s Dilemma, Rich Blair who runs a “cow-calf” operation s...

    Read More

  • Omnivore's Delusion Summary

    303 Words  | 1 Pages

    In “Omnivore’s Delusion,” Blake Hurst, a veteran famer, calls attention to the “agri-intellectuals” who are critiquing farming when having no experience. First of all, the author wants “Agri-intellectuals” to take a walk in a farmer’s shoes. Throughout the article, Hurst throws jabs at the people criticizing choices a farmer makes, for example, he says, “It is important, though, that even people riding in airplanes know that there are environmental and food safety costs to whatever kind of farming we choose” (4). The author says this to show his anger and suggest to these critics they should know what they are talking about before they talk about it. Secondly, Hurst points out the food animal endangerment. The author tells his readers

    Read More

  • The Middle Class In Robert Reich's Inequality For All

    827 Words  | 2 Pages

    Overall, it was very difficult for me to find valid responses to his arguments. This documentary has left me with three questions: what is the most logical solution to fix this problem, how to prevent this problem from occurring in the future, and does the increase in population affect the data in any way?

    Read More

  • How Do We Farm If We Must?: Analysis With Peter Singer's Down on the Factory Farm and Stanley Curtis's The Case for Intensive Farming of Food Animals

    2210 Words  | 5 Pages

    Factory farming is often a sore spot for American and other first world consciences. Even those that are ethically comfortable with consumption of animal products are often discomfited by the large-scale maltreatment of living creatures that is present in contemporary agribusiness. Writings that are similar to Peter Singer's “Down on the Factory Farm”, which depicts the multitude of unnatural horrors and abuses that billions of farm animals undergo before they are ultimately slaughtered for our use, make up the majority of the commentary on the subject. There seem to be few writers with the audacity to dispute the popular outcry that there is something morally reprehensible in our systematic exploitation of other species. Yet, as Stanley Curtis shows in “The Case for Intensive Farming of Food Animals”, a less emotionally charged examination is likely to be necessary if we have any aspirations of revising the current model into one that is not only more humane, but also sustainable for the environment and for the growing human population. Though our sympathies are immediately swayed by Singer's work, we must remain cognisant that, as Singer himself said, “We can't take our feelings as moral data, immune from rational criticism” (The Lives of Animals 89). Though Curtis's work seems at times overly cold in its utilitarian views, it provides an undoubtedly useful contrast to the call-to-arms of Singer's work. Evaluating them in tandem is likely the best approach to deriving a model that placates our moral dissatisfaction while meeting the requirements set forth by reality.

    Read More

  • Pesticides In The Movie Food Inc

    831 Words  | 2 Pages

    There are many issues regarding the raising and producing of various livestock animals, and the use of pesticides on various types of crops. The movie Food.Inc does a good job explaining these issues, but in a very biased way. It makes agriculturists look like terrible people, when this is not the case.

    Read More

  • The Logic of Industry and of Nature

    1229 Words  | 3 Pages

    Although feeding corn to cattle speeds up the process until they reach slaughter time, evidence shows that feeding corn to cattle that are genetically wired to eat grass produces unhealthy beef which then plays a role in healthy people, minimizing the longevity in Americans. Furthermore, the logic of nature relies on complex mutual relationship where each animal contributes to the sustainability of their environment in a cyclic manner as stated in the chapter “All Flesh is Grass”:

    Read More

  • The Harm Caused by Factory Farming

    1395 Words  | 3 Pages

    As can be seen throughout history with events such as the industrial revolution, a desire for high production and high profits often times leads to conditions that are unsafe and inhumane. Today we have realized this and made many reforms to abolish this kind of callous behavior, yet these reforms have not been extended to apply to the animals that are daily abused at factory farms. In order for these operations to have the high amount of output they do they must train their workers to desensitize themselves to the plight of the animals. At a typical slaughterhouse approximately 250 cows are killed every hour, this rush forces workers to shift their view of the animals to become mere objects of production, and in effect promotes inhumane treatment to force cooperation (Factory Farming: The Truth From Behind The Barn Door).

    Read More

  • What Are The Pros And Cons Of GMO

    906 Words  | 2 Pages

    One of the important things that they talked about in the documentary was the lack of safety inspections being performed by the U.S.D.A and because of that, cases of salmonella have increased exponentially. Based on the documentary “Food Inc” “in 1972, the FDA conducted 50,000 food safety inspections, in 2006 they conducted 9,164.” Another thing that was talked about in the the video was that the animals are forced to wade around through ankle high manure for days on end until they are brought to slaughter. They are also forced to subsist on a corn only diet. This is due to the fact corn is subsidized by the US government and it is cheaper to feed animals while also fattening them up at the same time. Cows are not biologically designed to live off corn; their diet should consist of only grass. Research shows this change of diet is causing a mutated strain of e.coli to form in the cow’s stomach that is acid resistant. This strain of E.coli is known as 0157:H7 that was stated in the movie (Food

    Read More

  • Saving the Environment with Veganism

    908 Words  | 2 Pages

    A United Nations report states that land used for animal agriculture, both for grazing and production of crops fed to livestock, takes up an astounding 30% of land on Earth. ("Meat Production Wastes Natural Resources") To meet the industry’s demands, over 260 million acres of forest in the U.S. have been cleared to grow grain fed to farm animals. ("Meat Production Wastes Natural Resources") With that in mind, the meat industry also dumps disease-causing pathogens through animal waste that pollutes water and forces the need for waste lagoons to be constructed, which are susceptible to leaking and flooding. ("Facts about Pollution from Livestock Farms”) Scientists say that about 14% of the world’s greenhouse gases are released by said agriculture industries, which is a growing concern for climate change and global warming. (Silverman) The meat industry uses one-third of all the fossil fuels consumed in the United States. (Moore) There is no question that farming animals has a negative effect on the environment and steps should be taken to mitigate air and water pollution risks and future deforestation. If animal agriculture was phased out, land used for animal grazing could be returned to forest land and some of it converted into fields for cultivating crops for humans. A global shift toward veganism, resulting in the elimination of the meat and animal agriculture industries, would protect the environment from various detrimental effects.

    Read More

  • A Rhetorical Analysis Of Junk Food

    692 Words  | 2 Pages

    618.3 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent are produced each year in the United States alone for agriculture (EPA). Agriculture is one source of greenhouse gasses we can’t eliminate, but we could as a species decide to eat greener. Cows are a massive producer of methane, but very few people are willing to give up or downsize their stake intake. With so much greenhouse gas produced the problem is compiled when the amount of clean water used is taken into context. “Globally we use 70% of our water sources for agriculture and irrigation, and only 10% on domestic uses.” On the same note of water conservation 783 million people don’t have access to clean water. The issue as addressed isn’t agriculture, but where we invest most of our resources in production (The Water Project). McDonalds would not have been happy if he mentioned this, but a Big Mac produces 6.8 lbs. in greenhouse gas emissions (Ganeshan,

    Read More

  • Animal Welfare In Farming

    1683 Words  | 4 Pages

    America focuses heavily on its livestock and crops earning us a major role in global trade as a farming nation. Unfortunately this has led to some poor choices in treatment of our animals. Many farmers who believe in animal rights say that it started back when farmers only tended to fewer animals, “Ownership of farm animals became concentrated in fewer hands, and flocks and herds grew larger. As a result, the individuality of animals was lost to their owners and they began receding from most people's everyday life” (Namit 29). When people lost their connection to the animals that provided their food, the quality of the animal's lives began to dramatically decrease. Consumers constantly pushed farmers to their limits with high quotas. To keep up with demands agriculturalists turned to some unorthodox practices to keep costs low and still maintain their annual quotas; “To raise efficiency and cut costs, farm animals began to be engineered for abnormally rapid weight gain, fed unnatu...

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Eating Meat

    1598 Words  | 4 Pages

    “Currently 80% of the world’s agricultural land is used directly or indirectly for animal production. In the US over half the total land mass is used for the production of meat and dairy products” (Clarke).

    Read More

  • Persuasive Speech On Gardening And Its Benefits

    1015 Words  | 3 Pages

    "The United States Environmental Protection Agency has estimated that one third of all water use is used on grass, and some experts estimate that as much as 50% of that that water is wasted to evaporation, wind and runoff" (Outdoor Water Use)

    Read More

  • Animal Welfare

    1665 Words  | 4 Pages

    Freeman, Carrie Packwood. "Framing Animal Rights in the "Go Veg" Campaigns of U.S. Animal Rights Organizations." Society & Animals 18.2 (2010): 163-182. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 21 Sept. 2011.

    Read More

  • Tap Water Essay

    1450 Words  | 3 Pages

    Water is one of the most essential non-renewable natural resources on the Earth. Technically, an un-hydrated human being can live no more than three days. In the United States, people consume water mainly from tap water and bottled water. However, the consumption between these two sources is not even, but lean to one side heavily. According to the Natural Resources Defense Council, people consume from 240 to over 10,000 times more per gallon of bottled water than they usually do for tap water.

    Read More

More about Cowspiracy Analysis

Open Document