More handpicked essays just for you.
Personality traits and leadership style
Personal factors that influence style of leadership
Factors affecting leadership style
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Surrounding the public sector, it is common to assume that the leaders of corporations or governmental services are held responsible for a significant amount of stakeholders and the citizenry. Leaders are expected to be held at a higher standard than any other individual within the organization. With this high standard of accountability, a leader has to endure situations that could become extremely difficult at times. Some have questioned the ethics behind the issues in the public administration. Thus, an example of one’s beliefs and moral views could have a significant impact on the public sector, and the ability of success and individual had with their leadership position, under the law of the land. A highly publicized and current controversial issue in the public sector was the case of a county clerk named, Kim Davis, who denied a homosexual couple their marriage license. This situation sprouted after the supreme court ruling sided in favor of allowing every homosexual couple to become married in all of the states in America. A few months after the issue behind gay marriage was legalized, county clerk, Kim Davis disobeyed her duties as a leader in the public sector within this small county in Kentucky. Davis’s excuse for not allowing the homosexual couple to obtain a married certificate under the recent supreme court ruling, was because “under God’s authority” and the beliefs under Christian faith, she could not issue this couple a marriage license. Ms. Davis was an elected official, a leader among her employees in which she trains and controls. Furthermore, she was expected by the public to do her job within the guidelines of the laws within the united states and the rights Americans have as citizens. Officials concluded that Kim Davis was not following her duties as a leader in the public. Due to the actions of Ms. Kim Davis, she was taken into custody by the US Marshals for contempt of court after refusing to obey orders from the federal court to issue marriage license to same-sex couples. After her detainment, deputy clerks were ordered to not refuse the issuing marriage licenses to same-sex and then threatened with contempt charges if they refused to do so. One theory related to this issue is the trait theory, where the leadership is thought to be a leader that is born and not made.
These leaders focus on personal qualities, personal beliefs, and social characteristics. For example, a leader’s personality and social attributes might have a positive or negative effect on the public sector. Many problems ally with the trait theory in regards the courses of effective behavior that depend upon the situations. In the case of Kim Davis denying the right for a same-sex to obtain a marriage license, the trait theory is very much alive in this situation. Due to Ms. Davis’s personality and physical beliefs she refuses to obey her job as being an elected leader in the public sector. Kim Davis’s beliefs offer a small amount of insight into what she does as a leader. …show more content…
Another theory related to this case is the contingency theory.
Which is defined as a theory that reflex’s on traits and behaviors that are not guaranteed for a successful leadership. This is mainly due to the fact that some leaders lack the applicability of many situations. These leaders believe that effective results all depend on the correct correlation between the amount of control and style the leader has on a situation. Under the contingency theory the leader is task-oriented and relationship-oriented. This theory is related to the case of Kim Davis in many ways and has proven to have the potential to back fire on her leadership skills viewed by the public of the United States. With Davis, bringing her religious view into her work as a leader for the public sector, it creates a sense of power she thinks she has over the people. Kim Davis’s relationship with god and the belief of only heterosexual couples should be married, has shown that the contingency theory is something she follows when being a leader of the public
sector. Throughout this case of Kim Davis, a significant amount of knowledge was obtained on what it takes to be a leader of a governmental service. For example, an individual that was elected by the people in which they serve should obey the rules and all rights that citizens can have under the laws of the United States of America. It is unjust to take your beliefs, and deny a service that is legal for a citizen to have. Due to the leadership that Kim Davis showed in this situation, that citizens all over the United States were outraged by her decision to deny a same-sex couple a marriage license. In consideration of this case, other leaders should show more respect for the rights that all citizens have while still practicing their own beliefs and traits in their private life. In doing so, this action will prove the strengths an individual has a leader of the public sector.
Keita Powell is a pint-sized powerhouse. She is energetic, result oriented, focused, and driven. Ms. Powell is one of many women in the Mary Kay Cosmetics sales force. She rose through the ranks from Independent Beauty Consultant to Independent Elite Executive Senior Sales Director rather quickly because of her charisma, ability to build a sales team of energetic men and women, and sheer enthusiasm to succeed. One would think that she was an amazing leader to get so many women to follow her in teaching skin care, beauty techniques, increasing and maintaining sells goals and to rise from a very junior consultant to one who is an executive in the business. However, she has made mistakes along the way and continues to feign focus on her sales force and customers but the true focus is on her needs, wants, and desires as well as keeping the use of her free pink Cadillac. This paper will evaluate Ms. Powell's leadership approach through four leadership models discovered through the Unit 3 readings.
Such literal divides like this were enough for Davis to prove her stand against racial injustice. When the The Black Liberation Movement was active between the 1960s and 1970s, Davis took part in strong support of her African American people, particularly in prison systems. The Black Power movement was a powerful, action based assertion of racial pride, and self-definition where multiple Afro-American Terrorist groups stood together to fight racism. Interpreted differently both outside and within African-American communities, Black Power was a well reasoned advancement of civil rights. Davis already having a name for herself, being a close associate of the Black Panthers and Student Nonviolence Coordinating Committee. Davis had become a strong defendant of three prison inmates of Soledad Prison referred to as the Soledad brothers. The three men, John W.
In the story “Antigone”, Sophocles shows that Creon’s attitude is very angry, making everyone sees him as a tyrant more than as a king. His regard for the laws of the town causes him to abandon most viewpoints, like the laws of the gods, or the rights of the people. He believes that his subjects should obey the laws he has set in place, even if moral or religious beliefs contradict his laws and beliefs. Creon’s idea of a good leader is one who maintains order through violence and fear. More over his arrogant, power-seeking personality prevented him from seeking out advice or listening to his own people.
in leadership can be traced to his character which is shaped by his moral values and
Throughout history there have been many great leaders. Many leaders who have changed the shape of America and also soldiers of today’s Army. One leader that comes to mind and has shaped me into the leader I am today is Abraham Lincoln. When I look at Abraham Lincoln and what he has done, I think of what Army Leadership manual ADRP 6-22 defines what a leader should be and how leadership is based off of attributes and competencies.
Transformational leadership also integrates well with a biblical worldview because both advocate valuing followers as well as leaders, the importance of ethical behavior, the need to forgive and learn from mistakes, and the value of a high moral example. Kouzes and Posner advocate leaders having a “moral authority to lead” (2007, p. 41), practicing personal accountability and working to improve all aspects of their follower’s lives. This others-centered leadership approach fits well in the Christ centered atmosphere of a Christian school.
A leadership theory is a clarification of some features of leadership; theories have practical importance as they are being used for better understanding, anticipating, and controlling successful leadership. Hence, the main principle of any theory is to inform practice(Lussier and Achua 2009). Leadership theories could be classified into eight main categories: Great man, trait, behavioral, contingency, Situational, Participative, Relationship , management (Cherry 2010).
The leadership is a result of a combination of traits, with special emphasis on the personal qualities of the leader, which he should possess certain personality traits that would be special facilitators in leadership performance. This theory shows that leaders are born as such, there is no likelihood of 'making' them later with personal development techniques.
Introducing Michelle Rhee battle over education reform in Washington, D.C’s public schools. According to, the Houston Public Media Michelle Rhee remains one of the most notorious education reformers in the nation. In Washington, Rhee’s direct style helped turn around a struggling district, but her decision to close schools and fire hundreds of teachers and principals also generated criticism. In according with New week, Michelle Rhee showed that she was serious about reform the schools, by firing more that than a hundred non-union central office workers, including administrators, and thirty six principals for not educating the students in the public school. Therefore, the three leadership traits in which Michelle Rhee scores high was to drive
Leadership is being able to direct or guide other people by either your own actions or by actually guiding them into the right direction (Acumen). Inspiration to be a leader might come from many different areas like your family, friends, peers, or even teachers. My inspiration didn’t really occur to me until I started attending college in August 2013. In all actuality I never even thought of how to be a leader until I was in Mrs. Moore’s Perspectives class. I now have a desire to be a great leader, and the inspiration has come from Mrs. Moore, and my family. I am the first to attend college out of my family, so in a away I have already started leading my siblings in the right direction. Being a leader means inspiring others to pursue their dreams, and aspirations and helping throughout the journey to success. Being a leader has nothing with authority or being able to tell other what, and how to do things, it’s about having people who look up to you and want to follow your example.
The Trait Theory points out that there is a certain type of person making a good leader, with the decisive factor being: having or not having distinctive qualities of being a leader. Despite that, being an effective leader can still be a challenge. External and internal influences impact the effectiveness of the program and must be considered in order to succeed. Which leads us to the Behavioural Theory, thinking of what a good leader actually does. Kurt Lewin developed three leadership types, such as the autocratic leader who is a maker, someone who makes decisions without consultation with others.
The Traits theory, otherwise known as the Great Man theory, is the origination of leadership theories. This theory believes that there is a unique set of qualities for a leader, mainly: his intelligence and ability to judge, his knowledge power, self-confidence and dependabil...
As a growing debate, the question at hand is whether great leaders are born with specific leadership traits, or if one can be taught certain traits over time. According to (Wikipedia.com) the approach of listing leadership qualities, often termed "trait theory of leadership", assumes certain traits or characteristics will tend to lead to effective leadership. I believe that leadership traits such as honest, competent, initiative, inspiring, hardworking, intelligent, and the ability to lead the masses, are some of the leadership traits one should possess. Within this paper, I will examine the overall concept of leadership traits, while observing the traits that were, or can be associated with successful leaders.
We can divide the theories that deal with leadership in 3 chronological groups. First were the trait theories. Until the 1940's, research in the field of leadership was dominated by these theories. Second came the behavioral theories which were very influent until the late 1960's. Finally, contingency theories are the most modern theories about leadership.
Many people associate leadership with a specific job title or form of power within an organization. However, through personal experience, I have concluded that leadership can come in many forms and position as well as from multiple sources of roles and job titles both with and without power. Based on the definition of leadership, anyone can be considered a leader as long as they have the ability to influence people to achieve a particular result or goal which benefits the organization or group as a whole. Individuals with a secure sense of self and understanding, acceptance of diversity within an organization tend to be the strongest leaders that not only make others want to follow, but they also encourage other leaders to gravitate to their