Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Should parents give children allowances
Influence of parents on children
Research on parents'expectations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Should parents give children allowances
My opinion is that kids should get allowance no matter what. Because it could help kids manage money for when they get older. And it doesn't take up too much time for kids to be kids. I think kids should get paid no matter what. It gives them more time to be kids. Rather Than having to do chores to get paid. And if they get paid then have there own money to spend so they may realize how expensive things really are.this also could help them understand how to deal with financial problems. It could also help them understand how to deal with a lot of money at one time. It can help kids buy something they have been saving up for. If kids get money then they might
act better. One reason why kids should get paid is because it may help them with their college funds. Now here are some things that would happen if kids had to work for money they might not get enough time outside. They also might not get enough sleep. Example a kid might want more money so they stay up on a school night and do extra work for a little extra money and then in the morning they are very sleepy and miss the bus. The kids also might get hurt doing something like cleaning out the gutters on the house while standing on a ladder like twenty feet in the air. Even worse what if they attempt this when their parents are gone and fall and then break their legg what are going to do and what if they don't have a phone with them.
In summary college athletes should be paid because they are too busy to have a job, the NCAA has enough money and they can put in salary caps so everybody get paid
College athletes should be paid because of the huge amount of money being made off of the use of their athletic ability. The college basketball and football games that everyone watches on TV is no longer just a game, it is a business. The colleges and arenas hosting such events are not doing it solely for the love of sport, they are doing it for the money that will flow generously into their banking accounts. The coaches also, they are not volunteers, they are not there just for their love of the game, coaching is their job. The athletic directors, coaching staff, and event staff are all doing their job to put food on the table. The fans are watching the game, the players, the ones who are making huge sacrifices to be on the court. The athletes are the only ones in this circle of business who are putting in the hours, maybe even the most hours, and not getting a paycheck. It is time for a change, the fans, the players, and the NCAA is ready for it, it just has to be done. However, there are those out there fighting the other side of this battle, saying there is no need for these student athletes to be paid. Both sides have good points but one of them has great points.
No, it is not fair to pay teens less than adults. I think this because based on what Marilyn Watkins states, “Teens often need jobs as much as any other workers. Many have to work to help support their families. Others live on their own or are trying to save money for college” (Watkins 23). Many teens such as me are independent and have to pay a lot for their expenses. Teens including myself need money just as any other adult would and if the job requires the same amount of training as the adult, there is no reason the same amount of pay should not be distributed to the teens as the adults. Another example that would support my opinion of no is, “If they’re performing the same tasks as a 20-year-old, they should earn the same amount of money” (Watkins 23).
A family is referred to me because the parents have been using excessive punishment with their son and daughter. Whenever their children misbehave at school or at home the father beats them with a belt all over their legs and back and the mother does not beat them with a belt or other objects but she will slap them in the face if they are out of line or she will refuse to let them eat for a whole day if they do not do their chores or if they have a temper tantrum. The parents are wanting to change and find better ways to punish their children when they misbehave because they are at risk for losing their children to Child Protective Services if they do not change their forms of punishment. Both the Mother and Father were raised in a household where their parents used excessive punishment and they do not know any other way to punish their children. They also have no knowledge of the fact that they can change the behaviors of their children in a positive way by using the appropriate forms of extinction, punishments and reinforcements. I would then define, explain and give examples of extinction, punishment and negative reinforcement to the parents to make sure that this excessive punishments does not happen again. I would ask the parents what some of the triggers are and discipline problems that they are experiencing from their children to cause them to resort to using excessive punishments. I would then use those behavior problems such as temper tantrums and the children not doing their daily chores without being told to do so to be able to come up with an action plan to try and help the parents change those negative behaviors in their children in a positive way.
On the issue of college athletes getting paid, I believe they should. When I mean getting paid I only mean a stipend or weekly check, not thousands or millions. All the hard work and dedication they put into their sport and academics are worthy enough. I have had a chance to play collegiate sports and it takes a lot out of you mentally and physically. The student athletes deserve at least enough money to have a normal student life. $300-$400 a month should give athletes enough money to get the required necessities. All this does is replace the notion of the athlete getting a job for a source of income. This will also help reduce the rate at which athletes accept money, cars, and gifts from boosters. When athletes get caught accepting something from a booster it looks bad on the athlete and the college. So, in my opinion yes college athletes should get paid, there is too much money that the universities have earned floating around going unanswered for the athletes not to get their cut.
There has always been a lot of debate on whether or not college athletes should get paid. With as much money as college sports makes from these student athletes, should these student athletes be getting paid? There are many different stances on why I feel like these student athletes should be getting paid. I will talk about some of the reasons on why they should get paid. Being a student athlete is a very stressful thing in life at that age as they are attending school full time and working extremely hard at being the best athlete they can on the field.
Some college football players may be on commercials and get paid so it’s not really fair if they get paid but the other players don’t. So I think that college football players that aren’t in commercials and don’t get paid I think they should get paid. All the money that goes to football the coach gets and I don’t think its fair. All the coach does is coach the players, the players actually play the game and they risk getting hurt for life. I think that the college football players need to get paid.
Student athletes deserve a payroll because of the vast amount of money they earn for their school. Schools like Texas, Alabama, and Oklahoma all make over $150 million dollars a year. The players should get a small amount of the profit added to their scholarships. It’s only fair that the players make some of that money. This is also one of the big reasons players are upset at the NCAA. They feel as though they should get paid for their efforts.
To begin with, student athletes being paid would only create more problems for other athletes, students and universities. It would be challenging to distinguish who gets paid what and how the universities would raise academic funds? The funds that may go towards academics would be slim if the athletes were being paid. There would not be any money left over for the schools to get tutored, hire better teachers, or acquire updated technology. In reality, not all universities can afford to pay the athletes. Some sport teams may be required to be cut so the university can have enough money to pay the popular teams. As a result, cutting the sport teams will limit student athlete’s verities of sport teams to join.
People say that College Athletes should get paid a set amount each year. Division 1 athletes have minimal time to even have a job, plus there are strict rules when it comes to Division 1 athletes having jobs, so why not pay them each month. According to SmartAsset.com "College athletes put their bodies on the line each game” (Patterson par. 1). However, even after hearing all of that information you have to dig deeper to find why paying college athletes is a bad idea. College athletes already have great bonuses that comes with being a stud division 1 athlete. Many kids see their favorite athlete as their idol and strive to be like them, and also they are worshiped around campus. Paying college athletes would just cause an even bigger problem, that is why college athletes should not get paid.
There have been ongoing arguments over the past decade of whether or not college athletes should be paid to play. Many argue that they do not have time to get real jobs because the requirements for the sport that they participate in are far too demanding. Others cite that these athletes are provided full scholarships to attend the schools at which they are playing the sport. However regardless of the argument, I still feel that college athletes should NOT be paid to play.
With the abundance of issues that currently surround the citizens of this country, decisions must be made when it comes to prioritizing these challenges in order to most effectively solve them. Different groups of people have varying views in terms of what is most important to work on. Due to this disagreement, there is a standstill and some issues are left to grow while they are overshadowed. While the United States government focuses their attention mainly on the economy and foreign affairs, the issue of protecting children from abuse and neglect is an ongoing struggle that needs to be more acknowledged.
There has been many points proven on why athletes should get paid. There is such little information on why college athletes should not get paid. The reason for this lack of information is, because the majority of people, believe that student athletes should get paid. But a few articles were found on why they should not.
In conclusion, students should be paid to do well in school because it has many benefits to the student. Those benefits include motivation to get good grades, the money would help the student financially, and the student would learn how to manage their money more effectively. School is a big part of every person’s life, so it should be more rewarding to the
I choose they should have Halloween In school to. Mostly every kid will enjoy school a little more.Most kids will have lots of fun at school by playing with costumes and getting extra candy from teachers and having fun. Kids also need to have exercise so if they walk around classrooms they could have more exercise and more fun. Kids also have friends to socialize with.