a) In Kevin Blue’s book, Practical Justice, the author expresses three main concerns in the book. In my opinion, the first concern is spread out through chapters 1 through 3, second concern is spread out through chapters 4 through 6 and the last concern is spread out through chapters 7 through 11. The first main concern addressed in the book is the failure to help those in need. Blue states that “love of money, individualism, materialism and consumerism have polluted our Christian spirituality” (p. 22). Most importantly, Blue states that the world has trained us away from helping those in need. Furthermore, Blue states that “the world’s influence on us is not neutral. It trains us not to love, not to be concern for the well-being of another …show more content…
75), “business practices” (p. 79), “other forms of discrimination” (p. 81), and “foreign policy” (p. 86). Blue divides “call justice ministry into three categories” (p. 51). The first category is “direct relief” (p. 51). The second category is “provision of skills” (p. 51). The third category is “addressing systemic injustice that exploits the poor and even encourages poverty” (p. 52). Blue discusses ways to help those in need by providing direct relief and teaching people how to fish. However, the author suggests that the direct relief and provision of skills would be ineffective without changing the systemic failures in the society. Blue states that “sometimes we can help deal with an immediate crisis for an individual or group of people, and we can provide the skills necessary to improve their situation in the long run and gain a means of support, but there are other factors that can prevent them from becoming successful and self-supporting” (p. 71). Furthermore, Blue suggests that “if we are to actually deal with the root causes of poverty, some of our work will have to be done at the systemic or environmental level” (p. 71). Therefore, the author seeks for systemic change in the
Recently, in India the more powerful people have been depriving the poor of their mere wealth. According to the author, " million living below the poverty line is that the public exchequer is being looted, and that the money earmarked for development is going into the pockets of the rich and the powerful."(2 Bunker). This portrays that the donated and tax money that has been put forth for the poor is going into the high authority pockets. This leads to a greater gap between the rich and poor. The ones that deserve more are being deprived and tormented of their rights. Only 17% of the development money is reaching the poor the rest is taken by the corrupt officials. This is also shown when the article states, "Thousands of schools, dispensaries, roads, small dams, community centres and residential quarters have been shown to be complete on paper, but in reality are incomplete, inhospitably unutilized and abandoned."(1 Bunker). It is evident that the government is showing these facilities have been provided to seem diligent on paper. However, the basic necessities which is a citizens right have been taken away from the poor. Many rights including the voting rights of the poor village people are snatched by the officials. The poor do not have the right to true information of where the money for the poor from the government is being spent. It is because false receipts and vouchers
In order to sustain a vibrant economy, the government needs to help the poor with their resources. The poor are poor not because they don’t work, but because government has failed to provide wages that American families can survive on. Cost can be an issue but the cost to subsidize the workers with low-wage jobs are higher (Kukathus 49). Acknowledging ethical and reli...
There is so much that goes into helping people in the most effective and efficient manner. I have learned that you have to expand your knowledge in every aspect of the developing country, and you have to focus on the issue that you are trying to tackle. We also have discussed in class about the corruption of people especially ones that hold power or ones that want power. And Jacqueline challenges that issue. For instance, the government maybe taking gains for itself and not for the people that it is meant to be for. Such as financial aids that might go straight to the governments instead for the people that need the aid. She also challenges the system of agricultural department in the sense that people that make the policies or distribute the money don’t take the culture of the area such as implementing polices for men even though the main workers in farming are women. And the fact that the farmers don’t have adequate resources from the government or financial support. In class, we talked about government failures in the agriculture sectors such as proper policies, market boards, and the big bias towards agriculture. The government has no system set up to lend money or help the
In order to improve the economy and raise the poor standard to higher economic status, we must not ignore the poor. We must understand them and leave the punitive attitude in the past.
Most people of the society still blame the poor for their own predicament. They believe that "if there is a will there is a way". However, they do not think about their government that might had made bad decisions and policies that could actually harm successful development. This causes of poverty and inequality are usually less discussed and often neglected. We must recognize the effects poverty could have on the society and seek ways to create better understanding and resolve the issue before it is too late.
Abuse of power and discrimination are bound to happen when people are given the position of authority over others. This happens in businesses, households, and in the police force. The corruption and abuse of policing is a serious problem facing many people living in the world today. But in countries that are less developed there is an abundance of power abuse and corruption especially over the poor and marginalized who fall within the lowest quintile of income (Agbiboa). Seeing that this happens in other countries looks horrible but that is because the corruption is easier to see in the underdeveloped countries, but the fact that it happens in other places means that
Christian faith and Ethos is the class I am taking this term. The professor 's name is Reverend Leroy Leach Jr. The class is about God, the creation, and how to read the Holy Bible.
However, I believe that giving resources to an underperforming community, replaces a culture of poverty with a culture of dependency. Ultimately, a culture of dependency is worse than a culture of poverty because it strips the community of its identity. By changing the rules within the culture, dependency creates a limited mindset where people strive to only do the minimum. Therefore, the notion of bridging the gap between a culture of poverty and society becomes hazy, since there has to be a way to treat those that are apart of poverty and those that are apart of the larger society as equals. The preceding sparks the question of does the onlooker have to behave in some ways to change the culture’s people; that is – should the onlooker seek to improve the inhabitants’ work ethic, optimism, and the ability to follow the rules.
There are countless social justice issues that Christian ethicists have the opportunity to address. The aim of Christian ethics is to determine one’s moral responsibility based off of a biblical framework. When discussing many social justice issues, it is easy to decipher precisely what scripture has to say, and what humanity’s moral stance should be. Yet, in many ways, humanity will still struggle to accept that moral and ethical responsibility, even when that moral stance is clearly mapped out in scripture. One such issue is poverty. This paper will look closely at the biblical teachings on poverty, the key ethical standpoints of sacredness of life, love, and justice, as well as the moral responsibilities Christians face. It seems,
Can there be justice for all? To answer this question I must first define what justice is. Justice is ?the quality of being just, impartial or fair? in your dealings with others according to Merriam Webster?s Collegiate Dictionary. Keeping that definition in mind, I now must turn to the Voices of Wisdom in order to find an example of a situation in which all parties feel that they are being treated justly. After examining examples such as: Euthanasia, discrimination based on sexual orientation, and equal opportunity offered within the book, it becomes clear to me that there is in fact no possible way for there to be justice for all because everyone?s judgement is in some way or another clouded by their own self interests.
What causes the poor to remain poor, how there are gaps in the developmental schemes of the government and the ways to improve it forms the central essence of the book. Why is the theme important to us as administrators? Given that massive budgetary allocations yearly are set aside for social sector schemes as also the fact that India is one of the fastest growing economies of the world, there is barely any translation of such prosperity and government efforts into visible development. Through the book, the author searches for alternative paradigms of governance for better outcomes, in the form of effective decentralization, empowerment of communities and self help groups, as well as competitive development.
Today poverty is recognized worldwide as an “unacceptable human condition”. It means that it is the right of each individual that he can provide and take care of his basic needs for him and give enough sustenance for his family. As a matter of fact, it is considered that poverty is one of the major causes that hinder peace not only here in Mindanao but also in the whole world. As a result of this it created structures of inequality and social injustice because resources in the society are not properly distributed among the ...
On today’s life, social inequality is given based on a variety of different characteristics, of race, ethnicity, gender, culture, economic class, immigration status, and sexual preference that a person may have. It is the power of privilege the holds the honor and respect, and the prestige of income and property, that wins every time. Auto-differentially positioning the poor as minority groups to hold less power, and manipulated by those who want to maintain themselves as elite. “Often experiencing unequal treatment compared to the dominant group, giving them a collective sense of being discriminated against” (Carl 2013, Pg.41) It is clear that society still struggles to find opportunities to live in equality with the poor. Rewarding them with only unequal distribution of opportunities that only increases, today’s wage gap and the disadvantages that they must overcome on their way to survive and succeed in life. What factors can increase this inequality? The poor must overcome the lack of economic resources, the stereotypes created among their group, and the government cutbacks that they must live on their daily basis till the rest of their lives.
As a result, research and public policies are designed to try and solve the problems. Dye (2008, p 7) observed that, in the American context the problems faced by communities include; ingnorance, crime, poverty, racial conflict, inequality, poor housing and ill health. It follows that in attempting to resovle these issues there are limitations that disturb the good process of public policy for the benefit of the society. Dye (2008, p 7) said, “there are many reasons for tempering our enthusiasim for policy analysis, some of which are illustrated in the battle over education policy”. The reasons or limitaions include; limits on government power, disagreement over the problem and complexity of human behavior. Argawal and Somanathan (2005, p 13) has discussed the shortcomings to public policy in resovling economic and political issues as excessive overlap between policy making and implementation in the context of India and some of those are; excessive fragmentation in thinking and action, excessive overlap between policy making and implementation, lack of non-governmental inputs and informed debate, lack of systematic analysis and integration prior to policy-making and reforming the policy-making
The maxim, ‘help the poor’, expresses the supersession of the specific thing, poverty. The maxim, ‘help the poor’, tested by being evaluated into a principle of universal legislation, will prove to be false because it annihilates itself…. either they