Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Police discretion corruption
Police discretion corruption
Conclusion on police corruption
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Michael Villar
Mrs. Ricobaldi
English 12CP
02 May 2016
Police Power Abuse
Abuse of power and discrimination are bound to happen when people are given the position of authority over others. This happens in businesses, households, and in the police force. The corruption and abuse of policing is a serious problem facing many people living in the world today. But in countries that are less developed there is an abundance of power abuse and corruption especially over the poor and marginalized who fall within the lowest quintile of income (Agbiboa). Seeing that this happens in other countries looks horrible but that is because the corruption is easier to see in the underdeveloped countries, but the fact that it happens in other places means that
…show more content…
it is just as possible to happen here in the United States. To be able to understand the conflict you need to know that the municipal police are the only segment of the government that normally has the authority to use coercive force. As such, they represent the coercive power of government. They have many responsibilities but because it is they who decide whom to arrest and take into custody, they are looked at and considered the gatekeepers of the criminal justice system (Sims). This is the reason they are brought to question when people feel they have been unlawfully arrested or detained by an officer. Unfortunately the trust has been broken over the years between the people and the police this is most likely caused by the media and the influence that it has on people. With most people having a phone on there person with a camera able to videotape and expose cops when they feel that they are being discriminated against or having their rights violated, the cops get shown abusing their power over the media it spreads the idea that not all cops are there for the good of society, which goes against what there job is because the police are “officers of municipal law-enforcement agencies whose primary mission is to protect their communities from crime and other threats to public safety and well-being” (Sims). But in some cases they do not seem to be following their own rules and may need somebody to make sure that they stay within the laws. To fully understand the debate surrounding police actions, a person needs to understand their training.
Police are trained to demand control of all situations some officers even have problems separating their career life from their personal life. They "eat, live, die" police work. Their identity is defined by the uniform that they wear and any conflicts in their life are seen as challenges to their dominance (“The Misuse”). This training shows that the police are given the idea that they have authority over other citizens. The officers of the law are also trained to use force continuum which means to only use the amount of force necessary to control the situation and the person. It begins with officer presence, vocal direction and soft empty-hand techniques. If the person continues resistance, the officer may escalate to hard empty-hand techniques, chemical agents and upward toward lethal force the idea is to bring the person into compliance and under control without causing injury” (“The Misuse”). This system gives the police the idea of needing superiority and full control over the suspect in all cases also this gives the officers the permission to use the amount of power that they feel is necessary in order to gain the control of the situation. So when they stop somebody that has the predetermined negative connotation and fear of police will be scared of what is going to happen so they will be more likely to try to run or resist the officers commands and direction even if …show more content…
they have done nothing wrong to begin with because in reality if they did nothing the police have no control over where they go or what they say, which will then lead to the officer in the situation having to use more force to gain control of the person. Although officers have clear expectations more and more people are beginning to question whether the police can be trusted or not this could be caused by the constant sense of contradiction that the youth see first that the police are here to protect us, and we honor that, but then there is the media that shows the police as power hungry and abusive, because for so many of our young people, there’s a fear (de Blasio).
, they are abusive of this power and cause many unnecessary problems. For example a twenty year old black man was stopped for dancing in a residential street. The officer was able to get the man's identification and continued to run his name for warrants, found nothing then told the man he was free to go. The man then responded with profanities. The officer then told him that he needed to watch his language then let him know again that he was not being arrested, the man continued to use profanity and ended up getting arrested for manner of walking in roadway (“Ferguson”). This shows that the police do sometimes cause problems because although there was no reason for the man to get stopped in the first place so he ended up getting in trouble for his reaction to getting stopped for doing nothing meaning he never should have got arrested because citizens have freedom of speech and the cop did not have initiate their confrontation in the first
place. Body language is a big part of being a police officer the police are sign that the police demand control and power over situations officers learn to project a command presence. They practice and observe eye contact, stance, and non-verbal body language and are schooled, "If you look good, you feel good. If you look confident, people will perceive you to be confident." Men and women change once they do not have the uniform and equipment of an officer” (“The Misuse”). The confidence changes with the uniform which shows that the police have a false sense of superiority because of the badge that they wear. This could be seen as intimidating to people that have a fear of police that is pushed onto the people through the media so without having that same sense of demanding control will be more likely to conform to what the officer says even if it were to infringe on their rights because most people are unaware of their own rights that they are given. Also considering that the police are suppose to enforce the laws they should be trusted to follow them themselves because if a cop is seen breaking a law then that means that they do not fully understand the rules that they are meant to enforce. For example the police are often seen turning their sirens on just to get around traffic. Even supervisors throughout the chain of command endorse questionable and sometimes unlawful conduct by officers (Smith). One way that the police seem to abuse their power most often is when they stop people and searching them “In recent years barely 10 percent of searches have resulted in an arrest, suggesting that officers have been far too willing to invoke their powers” (“Can”). The people who do get searched are often made to feel suspect because there should not be any reason for a cop to be stopping them, then if the cop were to search the person and find nothing you have to question why they were stopped in the first place? When the situation involves a caucasian police officer that searches a person of another race, racism is the first conclusion people come to. “A recent poll reveals that 52 percent of white Americans believe that police officers are treating black people fairly. Only 12 percent of black Americans think that” (Starr). But the history of racial tension in america between the government and african american community that creates the fear of one another and addresses how people need to stop judging people on their looks. On the other hand there are also police officers who do there job correctly and do seem to follow the set of rules that they are given as a police officer. This is where the conflict happens because the police that do their job wrong give the the cops that do follow the laws a bad reputation. Because they do follow the rules the officers themselves have to make sure not to trust somebody who does have the intentions of hurting them or anybody else. For this reason the “police feel it is necessary to treat each suspect as a threat because they can never be too sure about what the person may do when they approach the person” (de Blasio). Also the citizens have to understand that not all of the police are abusing their power and are following the order of a crime report and are trying to keep the general public safe. This means that if there is somebody that is reported to have done something and the police officer sees a person that fits the description given they are supposed to question that person as part of their duty. To fix the problem of power abuse and broken trust there are a few things that could be done. To fix the problem of racism in the police system there needs to be transparency “having cops record the age, ethnicity, and result of the search so that it will be clearer to see which cops are stopping people because of race” (Tsin). This system would expose the cops that tend to be stopping people because of race and the good cops would be shown as well. Another thing that could help both protect good cops and the citizens that are unlawfully stopped and detained or physically harmed would be for all police officers to have body cameras recording all situations with suspects so it eliminated the ability to lie about what has happened in the situation. But the people have to work together in order to get the body cameras in use but “The people believed that stop and frisk had to stop and it ended. The people believed there were too many people arrested and then having a record for something as simple as possession of a small amount of marijuana and that policy has changed” (de Blasio). People need to start working together if they want change to happen without using violence and vandalism to get their message across because if the people work together for something peacefully it is more likely to get noticed as a positive movement instead of having a destructive riot. To make a change in our society there needs to be an understanding of both sides the police officers and the people because they do not fully trust each other and that is the biggest problem. To help fix the trust problems body cameras should be worn by all police. Then what needs to be done is the police that do get found abusing their power as a police officer need to be removed from their position and have it publicly noted when done so. Also on the other hand cops that are doing their job correctly should be publicly praised as they do the right things in the community. Having the police officer's actions open to the public is a good way for the police to gain the trust of the people back and at the same time the body cameras will prevent the police from abusing their powers. Abuse of power may never stop as it is human nature to want power and to take advantage of it. That is why it is important to have checks and balances to monitor the heads of police departments, and other officials in charge. In this day and age of cell phones and dash cam cameras everyone is or should be more aware that abuse, when it does happen, is not just “he said she said” when there may be video proof. People in charge can use and abuse power, and “victims” may not really be providing the full story. Police officers know that they have to be more aware and cautious when dealing with a person who is not cooperating with an arrest or questioning. They are aware that cameras are everywhere this hopefully this will change the way people in charge use their power over people. All people should be treated with respect and should be assumed innocent until proved guilty. Police put their lives at risk every day, most of which are honest, dedicated and hardworking people. It only takes a couple of prejudiced, power hungry people to corrupt any system. This is why check and balances are so important. Police and the people they protect must all be held accountable for their actions. In this age of readily available technology is it wise to provide all responding police with body cameras?
Most law enforcement agencies have policies that determine the use of force needed. The policies describe the escalating series of actions an officer can take to resolve a situation, first level is officer presence which means no force is used, and just the mere presence can reduce
Recently police officers are questioned if they are abusing or utilizing their power the correct way. For example a police officer shot an African American whom he “believed was armed” but had no evidence of a gun. In “Partial People” by Terry Bisson the weaker people, or the partial people as Bisson calls them, are allowed to be beaten and do not have equal rights as non-partial people. In Bisson’s “By Permit Only” people who have money can buy permits to abuse other people. Bisson uses the absurdity of “Partial People” and satirical situation of “By Permit Only” to demonstrate that powerful people will always try to dominate the weaker people.
A '''use of force continuum''' is a standard that affords law enforcement officials & security officers (police, probation, or corrections) with guidelines as to how much use of force may be used against a repelling subject in a given situation. In certain ways it is similar to the military’s escalation of force. The reason of these models is to clarify, both for officers and citizens, the complex subject of use of force by law officers. They are often vital parts of law enforcement agencies' use of force policies. Although various agencies have developed different models of the continuum, there is no universal standard model (Stetser, 2001, p. 36)
With the articles and past research that I have collected, studies tell us that less than 3 percent of police-citizen contacts involve the threat of physical force by the police. The percentages are higher when the level of force is below lethal force, for instance 20 percent of arrests may involve some type of special or needed force to obtain and control the suspect in able to put him in custody. In the academy, police officers are taught to use equal or greater force to subdue the suspect and do what is necessary to protect the public and also look out for officer safety. Most incidents of force are low level applications such as using the arms, hands, legs, or their bodies to gain control of the suspect. Every police officer is supposed to be trained to a certain standard, and should be able to use the correct amount of force for the situation at hand. Police officers have situational training in the academy on what level of force to use if necessary. All police officers are equipped to handle most if not all situations or levels of force that is need to
Firstly, even after government advancement, the integration of a democratic society, and a greatly improved justice system, individuals still feel threatened by police officers. When police training was created, and guidelines/ penalties were and laid out, they were expected to have a large impact on minimizing incidences of excessive police force. Yet, this is not the case. It is often said that prevention is better than cure, this statement can be applied to police brutality by preventing it befor...
Police officers abuse of their power and use excessive force against people which most of the time isn’t necessary. In the case of Richard Moore, two Toronto police officers beat him leaving him with fractured ribs and a severe cut to the skull because he was running in the streets allegedly drunk and they wanted to save him from running across the street and harming himself. The results from the hospital indicated that there wasn’t even any alcohol in Moore’s system therefore the police honestly had no reason to beat him up like that. This just goes to prove that police officers don’t think twice about their actions and often use excessive force when it isn’t necessary.
America as a people gloat when it comes to our freedoms we think we have it better than every other country out there but the protectors of our freedom are becoming fear and hated because of the injustices committed by certain officers. Some say life of an officer is hard because they do not know if they will ever see their family again after they drive out of their house in the morning, others might say every officer knows what they were signing up for so they should not be pitied. Police officers face dangers everyday but profiling and racially motivated brutality is not justifiable and officers should be severely punished for committing these crimes.
Police brutality is a very real problem that many Americans face today. The police carry an enormous burden each day. Police work is very stressful and involves many violent and dangerous situations. In many confrontations the police are put in a position in which they may have to use force to control the situation. There are different levels of force and the situation dictates the level use most of the time. The police have very strict rules about police use force and the manner in which they use it. In this paper I will try to explain the many different reason the police cross the line, and the many different people that this type of behavior effects. There are thousands of reports each year of assaults and ill treatment against officers who use excessive force and violate the human rights of their victims. In some cases the police have injured and even killed people through the use of excessive force and brutal treatment. The use of excessive force is a criminal act and I will try and explore the many different factors involved in these situations.
“But they didn't have to beat me this bad. I don't know what I did to be beat up." Rodney King, March 3, 1991. Police Brutality has been a long lasting problem in the United States since at least 1903 when police Captain Williams of the New York Police Department said the phrase, "There is more law at the end of a policeman's nightstick than in a decision of the Supreme Court." In the 1920's the Wichersham Commission had a number of instances of police brutality. Many of these included the use of the "third degree" (beating to obtain a confession). This is a very effective way to get a confession out of somebody. However, beating the accused could easily elicit a confession from a scared and innocent person. Also, this puts the accused person's life in danger. Police officers must make snap life and death decisions daily. Officers' work in an environment where death (theirs, their partners, and an innocent or guilty person) is one decision away. How does that constant fear effect an officer's perception? Unfortunately, many that are attracted to law enforcement are aggressive and prone towards violence as a solution. Police officers have a lot of power. With this power comes responsibility. Police brutality can be defined as the excessive or unreasonable use of force in dealing with citizens, suspects and offenders.
One of the main powers law enforcement officers carry is the authority to make citizens involuntarily give up their rights. Most people when confronted by police get mild to moderate panic reaction, can become nervous or anxious, and do as much as possible to limit the time spent with the officer. Due to the difference in power between a citizen and a police officer, citizens often unknowingly, give up their constitutional rights when an officer acts tough or bullies them (Guidelines?1).
Just it isn’t a fake scene this is real life. There are six levels of force an officer can use and may have to use doing there time as an officer. The lowest level of force is presence of an officer at the scene and the officer’s body stance. This level of force is used typically whenever an officer first appears to a scene or a call. The second level of force is verbal control or commands. The verbal use of force is when an officer demands you to do something. The third level is physical control. This level involves escort holds, pain or pressure compliance. This force is brought in when a suspect tries to resist arrest or verbal commands. The fourth level is really close to the third, this is serious physical control. This really is when you use carotid control and electronic devices. The carotid control is a kind of choke hold which makes the person want to comply. The fifth level is impact and weapons. This is when you first so your willingness to use your baton by touching it or holding it out. Then possibly cause the suspect to feint so he or she can’t resist again. The last resort is deadly force. Most officer try their hardest to not have to get to this level or even be in a position to which this force is used. But deadly force is drawing your gun, pointing your gun, and, or finally firing your gun. (Police
Recently in the United States there has been in increase in deaths that have come from police officers using deadly force. The use of force is inevitable as a police officer, many times their own lives or the life’s civilians are at risk when it comes to determine what type of force a officer should use. There are many incidents where police officer have to react in a matter of seconds and has to choose between his own life or that of the individual causing the disturbance. When a Police Officer uses deadly force has caused outraged with the public, stirring up protests and creating a scandal for the police officer and the Police Department. Many do not know when it is right for an officer to use deadly force and what constitutes it, or what happens when the officer does not use the appropriate amount of force that is required to control the situation. There has been many changes in Police Departments around the country to try to reduce the use of deadly force in response to the issues that have occurred because of it.
Normal force is distinct from legal and brutal force (Hunt, 1985). Legal force is taught in police academy. It pertains to being able to subdue, restrain, and control a suspect if the officer is threatened with great bodily harm. Legal force also encompasses the use of deadly force if justified. Normal force is learned when the officer hits the streets and is conditioned to buy more effective weapons, which produce more damage to the suspect. In the academy recruits are taught not to hit a person on the head or neck because of their vulnerability, but on the street officers must hit the suspect wherever they can to control them. Peer approval further justifies this treatment. Thus, when police use the necessary amount of force they are not held accountable for a needed increase, but in fact will be looked down upon by fellow officers if a rookie does not show the necessary aggression.
Jenny Holzer verifies in one of her truisms that “abuse of power comes as no surprise”. She is trying to affirm to the readers that when leaders get authority in their hands, it will come no surprise seeing their rulers abuse their power. Holzer is trying to imply that people essentially know beforehand that once leaders have the clout, they will certainly exploit it. She is uttering that that it will not be something new if a leader is spot abusing the powers granted to him. The reader might disagree with Holzer’s statement because if the people knew that their leader will eventually misuse their powers then they would not give him those powers. The people of a nation don’t know when their leader would turn to a dictator and control everything. They will surely be surprised to know that their leader will exploit their supremacy. This can be support by an event that took place in Germany as well as by George Orwell’s Animal Farm.
Police corruption and misconduct come apparent in many different forms. A basic definition for police corruption is, when an officer gets involved in offenses where the officer uses his or her position, by act or omission, to obtain improper financial benefit. The main reason for such corruption is typically for personal gain, such as bribery. Police abuse of authority occurs in three different general areas such as physical abuse, psychological abuse, and legal abuse. Physical abuse is such abuse where one uses excessive force or physical harassment. The psychological abuse occurs through disrespect, harassment, ridicule, excessive stops, or intimidation. Finally, legal abuse is abuse that occurs during unlawful search and seizure or manufacturing evidence (Pollock, 2012). One source describes police corruption in eight different ways. They include: corruption of authority, kickbacks, opportunistic theft, shakedowns, protection of illegal acts, the fix, direct criminal acts, and internal payoffs (Roebuck & Barker, 1974).