Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The use of force continuum
Use of force continuum essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The use of force continuum
A '''use of force continuum''' is a standard that affords law enforcement officials & security officers (police, probation, or corrections) with guidelines as to how much use of force may be used against a repelling subject in a given situation. In certain ways it is similar to the military’s escalation of force. The reason of these models is to clarify, both for officers and citizens, the complex subject of use of force by law officers. They are often vital parts of law enforcement agencies' use of force policies. Although various agencies have developed different models of the continuum, there is no universal standard model (Stetser, 2001, p. 36) The initial examples of use of force continuum were developed in the 1980s and early 1990s. Early models were portrayed in various formats, including graphs, semicircular gauges, and linear developments. Most often the models are presented in a "stair step" approach, with each level matched by a corresponding level of subject opposition, although it is commonly eminent that an officer need not progress through each level before attaining the final level of force. These developments rest on the evidence that officers should heighten and decrease their level of force in reaction to the subject's actions. Although the use of force continuum is used chiefly as a training tool for law officers, it is also valuable with citizens, such as in criminal court cases by police review boards. Specifically, a graphical illustration of a use of force continuum is useful to a jury when deciding whether an officer's use of force was sensible. While the precise progression of force varies significantly (especially the extensive gap between soft control and deadly force) among different agencie... ... middle of paper ... ...enforcement officer must respond to resistance offered by another. In order to determine what actions officers find reasonable in similar situations, some experts utilize surveys with law enforcement officers, who are provided with certain scenarios to determine what actions they would take if placed in certain situations. Knowing what other officers and citizens deem reasonable helps to craft a solid response to opposition continuum. Works Cited Faulkner, S. (2007). Response to resistance- Defining what is objectively reasonable. Retrieved from: http://www.responsetoresistance.com Stetser, Merle (2001). The Use of Force in Police Control of Violence: Incidents Resulting in Assaults on Officers. New York: LFB Scholarly Publishing L.L.C. Desmedt, John C. (2009). The Use of Force Paradigm for Enforcement and Corrections. Retrieved from http://www.pss.cc/uofm.htm
Most law enforcement agencies have policies that determine the use of force needed. The policies describe the escalating series of actions an officer can take to resolve a situation, first level is officer presence which means no force is used, and just the mere presence can reduce
With the articles and past research that I have collected, studies tell us that less than 3 percent of police-citizen contacts involve the threat of physical force by the police. The percentages are higher when the level of force is below lethal force, for instance 20 percent of arrests may involve some type of special or needed force to obtain and control the suspect in able to put him in custody. In the academy, police officers are taught to use equal or greater force to subdue the suspect and do what is necessary to protect the public and also look out for officer safety. Most incidents of force are low level applications such as using the arms, hands, legs, or their bodies to gain control of the suspect. Every police officer is supposed to be trained to a certain standard, and should be able to use the correct amount of force for the situation at hand. Police officers have situational training in the academy on what level of force to use if necessary. All police officers are equipped to handle most if not all situations or levels of force that is need to
Cheh, M. "Are lawsuits an answer to police brutality." Police violence: Understanding and controlling police abuse of force (1996): 247-72.
Carter, D. L. (1985). "Police Brutality: A Model for Definition, Perspective, and Control," in A.S. Blumberg & E. Neiderhoffer (Eds.), The Ambivalent Force. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
The use of force, particularly with correlation to officer morale and/or inadequate education/training, has become particularly problematic. Measures should be taken to reduce the injury to suspects, particularly physical injury resulting from poor officer tactics or malicious intentions not related to upholding the law. These are problems, which, if properly handled and rectified, will result in improved officer morale, improved relationships with the public as well as ensure a continued upstanding reputation for the oldest police force in the nation.
Police brutality is a very real problem that many Americans face today. The police carry an enormous burden each day. Police work is very stressful and involves many violent and dangerous situations. In many confrontations the police are put in a position in which they may have to use force to control the situation. There are different levels of force and the situation dictates the level use most of the time. The police have very strict rules about police use force and the manner in which they use it. In this paper I will try to explain the many different reason the police cross the line, and the many different people that this type of behavior effects. There are thousands of reports each year of assaults and ill treatment against officers who use excessive force and violate the human rights of their victims. In some cases the police have injured and even killed people through the use of excessive force and brutal treatment. The use of excessive force is a criminal act and I will try and explore the many different factors involved in these situations.
Skolnick, J., Fyfe, J. (1993) Above the law: Police and the Excessive use of force. United States: The Free Press
Research Paper Rough Draft: Police Brutality Police misconduct is as rampant as ever in America, and it has become a fixture of the news cycle. Police brutality is the use of any force exceeding that reasonably necessary to accomplish a lawful police purpose. The media is inevitably drawn toward tales of conflict, hence why there are so many crime and police stories on the news. Despite the increasing frequency of misbehaving cops, many Americans still maintain a high respect for the man in uniform. Still, police misconduct is a systemic problem, not just an anecdotal one.
The use-of-force continuum. (2009, August 4). Retrieved Nov. 22, 2014, from U.S. department of justice: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/topics/law-enforcement/use-of-force/continuum.htm
Recently in the United States there has been in increase in deaths that have come from police officers using deadly force. The use of force is inevitable as a police officer, many times their own lives or the life’s civilians are at risk when it comes to determine what type of force a officer should use. There are many incidents where police officer have to react in a matter of seconds and has to choose between his own life or that of the individual causing the disturbance. When a Police Officer uses deadly force has caused outraged with the public, stirring up protests and creating a scandal for the police officer and the Police Department. Many do not know when it is right for an officer to use deadly force and what constitutes it, or what happens when the officer does not use the appropriate amount of force that is required to control the situation. There has been many changes in Police Departments around the country to try to reduce the use of deadly force in response to the issues that have occurred because of it.
Normal force is distinct from legal and brutal force (Hunt, 1985). Legal force is taught in police academy. It pertains to being able to subdue, restrain, and control a suspect if the officer is threatened with great bodily harm. Legal force also encompasses the use of deadly force if justified. Normal force is learned when the officer hits the streets and is conditioned to buy more effective weapons, which produce more damage to the suspect. In the academy recruits are taught not to hit a person on the head or neck because of their vulnerability, but on the street officers must hit the suspect wherever they can to control them. Peer approval further justifies this treatment. Thus, when police use the necessary amount of force they are not held accountable for a needed increase, but in fact will be looked down upon by fellow officers if a rookie does not show the necessary aggression.
When hearing the phrase “police brutality,” many people imagine batons cracking skulls, tasers electrocuting bodies and bullets penetrating innocent teens. While police officers have been known to use violence, police brutality does not occur as often as many believe. In many situations, officers have to act on impulse and curiosity, despite the backlash the media may create.
Continuum of force is defined as or known as a scale of force alternatives, to mediate the level of response used in a given situation. (Sgt. George Godoy) In addition, the force continuum is broken down into six levels that are designed or created to be flexible for the force needed in different situations. According to the National Institute of Justice, “officers are instructed to respond with a level of force appropriate to the situation at hand, acknowledging that the officer may move from one part of the continuum to another in a matter of seconds.” The use of the continuum of force is a helpful guide that helps provide officers with how much force may be used against someone that is resisting in any situation. Sometimes using too much force on a resting individual may resort to them getting injured or even worse killed in the process of an arrest similar to a video that I watched last year by a man being suffocated from the weight of a police officer while he was resisting arrest. So, having certain guidelines or different options of force to go by is helpful when faced with different and unique scenarios.
According to a survey conducted by the Department of Justice by Steven Rosenfeld most common reasons police officers or law enforcement officials use excessive force are because Officers are on their own; Excessive force is likely and protected; Officers do not know how to de-escalate; Police consider their beats as war zones; Police use of excessive force has been a prevailing topic in society. Through this paper, I aim to analyze New York Police Department (NYPD) use of force and excessive force towards minority groups throughout the five boroughs of NYC. Which include; Brooklyn, Manhattan, Bronx, Queens and Staten Island. Prior literature posits that use of excessive force is a factor in how police and citizens interact with one another.
Gul, Zakir, Hakan Hekim, and Ramazan Terkesil. “Controlling Police (Excessive) Force: The American Case.” International Journal of Human Sciences 10.2 (2013): 285-303. Academic Search Premier. Web. 12 Mar. 2014.