Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Kantian vs virtue ethics
Connection of virtues and happiness
Aristotelian virtue vs kant virtue
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Kantian vs virtue ethics
Section I
Question 1 Socrates describe his role in Athens being gadfly since according to him he is given to the Athens state by God. His work is to persuade, arouse, and reproach the Athenians. Since there is no other like him, he should be spared. In the light of Socrates, who claims “the unexamined life is not worth living” usually is because the greatest good of the man is their daily converse about virtue. That is why the Socrates keeps examining himself and others.
Question 2 The two types of virtues are the virtue of character and the virtue of thought. The virtue of thought usually arises and grows mostly from teaching and needs time and experience. The virtue of character results from habit, hence, its name Ethical which slightly
…show more content…
Happiness acts as the center of understanding morality. The pain and the pleasures of life are the ones that determine happiness that an individual have. For Kant, happiness does not provide any moral motive to an individual. Kant believed more in the hypothetical imperative; thus he says that an action whether good or bad that contribute to the happiness of the individual is only good for some purposes (Kant 397). These are either the actions are actual or possible. Therefore, Kant and Aristotle have different takes in happiness, and they describe happiness in different ways as it comes from their theories. Both disagree on happiness’ moral importance since they tend to take happiness as just caused by individual moral actions. These are because happiness is determined by whether someone is feeling painful or has pleasure. Since moral is the virtue that a person holds and which give them their dignity, that is why disagreement on happiness in their theories comes in. My position on this matter is that I also disagree on happiness moral importance. The pleasure causes happiness that individuals face in their life. Hence, the individual morals are never determined by their happiness. I think that it usually is the other way round. The person moral is the one that determines the happiness of an individual. The virtue of the character or the virtue of the thought that one learns in the course of their lives is the one that determines happiness as well. Thus, happiness according to different individuals have different meanings. That is why it cannot be taken such as wealth or education that is similar to
Throughout all the years, he never could find anyone as wise as himself, and all he did was make enemies searching. These enemies are now his accusers, and they accuse him of spreading evil doctrines, corrupting the youth, and not believing in the Gods. Throughout the speech, Socrates continues to shoot down every accuser and it is evident that he has done no wrong. Eventually, one of his accusers states that he must be doing something strange and that he wouldnt be that famous if he were like other men. Socrates did not live a very public life unlike most people at that time. His thoughts of being virteous had more to do with examining yourself and becoming a better person and in that way, you benifit society. He did not believe Athens to be virtuos at all, and that they relied on materail things and reputation rather than finding happiness by searching for it deep within
Socrates was wise men, who question everything, he was found to be the wise man in Athens by the oracle. Although he was consider of being the wises man alive in those days, Socrates never consider himself wise, therefore he question everything in order to learned more. Socrates lived a poor life, he used to go to the markets and preach in Athens he never harm anyone, or disobey any of the laws in Athens, yet he was found guilty of all charges and sentence to die.
In Book 1 of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, he argues that happiness is the best good, and the goal of an individual and of those leading and governing society. Here, happiness is understood as both living well and doing well, rather than the convention sense of happiness as an emotion. According to Aristotle, happiness is achieved though actions involving reason and in accord with virtue, or the best of the virtues of there are more than one. In this paper, I will provide a brief overview of the work and its author, then proceed to provide an overview of the ideas expressed and the argumentation supporting them, before finally performing an analysis and critique of the ideas expressed.
To begin with, Aristotle tells us his meaning of virtues and vices. They are not just any habits that we experience, but the outcome of what we feel as pleasure or pain. A virtuous person feels pleasure at the most beautiful action. A person who is not virtuous will feel their pleasure misleading. the definition of virtue is a behavior showing high moral standards or good characteristics. Virtues comes as a consequence of following the right habits. There are two different types of virtues: Intellectual and moral. To have virtues you have to have intellectual morals. This means you ethically do things on your own, you comprehend what doing, and realizing why you doing it. Aristotle says we can describe virtu...
In conclusion, Aristotle’s elucidation of happiness is based on a ground of ethics because happiness to him is coveted for happiness alone. The life of fame and fortune is not the life for Aristotle. Happiness is synonymous for living well. To live well is to live with virtue. Virtue presents humans with identification for morals, and for Aristotle, we choose to have “right” morals. Aristotle defines humans by nature to be dishonored when making a wrong decision. Thus, if one choses to act upon pleasure, like John Stuart Mill states, for happiness, one may choose the wrong means of doing so. Happiness is a choice made rationally among many pickings to reach this state of mind. Happiness should not be a way to “win” in the end but a way to develop a well-behaved, principled reputation.
...t virtues of character are acquired through habituation and require external goods, and that a deficit of external goods may prevent individuals from acquiring virtue. A final consequence was examined which showed that virtue is necessary but not sufficient for happiness, and that only a subset of the individuals who acquire virtue might acquire happiness. However, while this final consequence might seem problematic or counterintuitive, Aristotle offers that happiness is actually one of the most divine things and seems to suggest that our concept of ‘happiness’ in the context which makes this seem so troubling is not a fully conceived notion. That is, you can still lead a good or blessed life without happiness, but the most blessed life is a happy one.
I think it is important to first explain Socrates’ divine mission. Chairephon, a friend of Socrates, went to the Oracle of Delphi and asked if there was anyone wiser than Socrates. The Oracle proclaimed that no one was wiser than Socrates. Socrates pondered over the Oracle’s proclamation that he was the wisest person (The Apology 21a). Socrates attempted to find someone who was wiser than himself but he could not. Socrates realized that he was the wisest person because he was the only person who was aware of his own ignorance (The Apology 23b). Socrates took this as being a sign that the gods had a mission for him. Socrates thought that the gods wanted him to make other people aware of their ignorance. Socrates thought that he was not only performing a divine mission but he was also doing Athens a great favor (The Apology 30b). Socrates thought that he was helping the Athenian citizens to consider the state of their souls and not wealth and power (The Apology 30b). What I think Socrates was trying to help the Athenian citizens with was to help develop their critical thinking skills. Socrates’ elenchus is useful bec...
Happiness is based off of morality and it is a desire that everyone uses as the main goal in life. All the other desires such as wealth, good health, good friends and family, etc. that people have lead up to the one desire which is happiness.
Socrates describes his role in Athens as being a gadfly, an individual who challenges the status quo through posing novel questions. The prevailing situation in Athens then was people being involved in public affairs and politics, but Socrates decides to challenge this state of affairs by remaining largely aloof from the political arena and public affair. Instead, he prefers to interact with other people at a more individual level than being public. His actions, he notes, arise from a supernatural sign or an inner voice dissuading him from being involved on public issues (Plato). He claims at two occasions he almost died for being brave when he challenged public authorities over justice. He makes sense that an unexamined life is not worth living since one may not survive for long with such a life.
1. Aristotle said the final cause, the goal of life, for a human being happiness? Aristotle called happiness ( Eudaemonia ) the highest good and the end at which all our activities ultimately aim. he draw the Socrates view that the highest good happiness must be something proper to the person. Mill said that happiness is a pleasure and the absence of pain. The achievement goals of the people should be counts as part of their happiness. Kant disagreed what they meant about about happiness and defines happiness as get thing what one wants or continuous well- being and enjoyment of life. I would say that the philosophers definition of happiness is the same. Based on my own understanding happiness is a freedom and being satisfied on what you have.
According to Aristotle, “Virtues, then, are dispositions engendered in us through practice or habituation” (Aristotle’s Ethics), here he is talking about virtue of character, he says that it is something that in created in us through habit. There are two types of virtue – virtue of character and intellectual virtues. He differentiated between virtue of character and intellectual virtue. “Intellectual virtue is acquired primarily through teaching, while the virtues of character arise through habit” (Aristotle’s Ethics). For example, when someone is born they might have a very good talent like dancing and singing, but then in terms of virtue of character one has to learn, for example, learning how to paint. Aristotle seem to focus more on
Socrates was one of the first philosophers of the civilized world. He spent his life publicly dedicating himself to the Greek gods and to fixing the people of his city. Throughout his life, Socrates upheld his views that truth and wisdom were very important. While some people suggest that Socrates should have lived a private life in order to avoid his trial and death, living a private life would have meant giving up what he deemed important.
He is the first person we can identify who seriously asked and pursued answers to questions that we now think of as characteristically philosophical. Thinkers before Socrates, the Pre-Socratics they 're called, had asked questions about mathematics, about metaphysics, and about natural phenomena. Socrates spent his life asking philosophical questions of the citizens of Athens, questioning their answers, debating them. He wanted to know what goodness was, what morality was, what piety was, whether virtue can be taught, what knowledge is and similar questions. The question Does Socrates allow his enemies to win by staying and accepting his sentence? The best answer is yes and no. His enemies have the relief of Socrates not being around now, but Socrates assures there will be more people to question the norms of Athens society and
Socrates was considered by many to be the wisest man in ancient Greece. While he was eventually condemned for his wisdom, his spoken words are still listened to and followed today. When, during his trial, Socrates stated that, “the unexamined life is not worth living” (Plato 45), people began to question his theory. They began to wonder what Socrates meant with his statement, why he would feel that a life would not be worth living. To them, life was above all else, and choosing to give up life would be out of the picture. They did not understand how one would choose not to live life just because he would be unable to examine it.
The importance of Aristotle’s theory of virtue and happiness is that happiness serves as the ultimate end and purpose of human existence and we have to understand that happiness is not mere pleasure. Also, we have to be able to recognize that it is not virtue, but it is the exercise and practice of virtue. Happiness is a goal and is not just a temporary state and it cannot be achieved nor obtained until the end of one’s life. Happiness is part of human nature and it depends on reason because as humans we are rational beings. Aristotle makes it clear through his interpretation that happiness depends on developing morals and displaying virtues such as courage, generosity, selflessness, friendship, and justice. Ultimately, acquiring happiness is the realization of our power to act and perform rationally.