Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The trial of socrates
The trial of socrates
Philosophy thesis statement on socrates trial
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The trial of socrates
Private vs. public lifestyles
Socrates was one of the first philosophers of the civilized world. He spent his life publicly dedicating himself to the Greek gods and to fixing the people of his city. Throughout his life, Socrates upheld his views that truth and wisdom were very important. While some people suggest that Socrates should have lived a private life in order to avoid his trial and death, living a private life would have meant giving up what he deemed important.
On one hand, Socrates could have lived a private life. In 23c Socrates mentions how the young men who follow him around try to “examine” people. The people they examine get angry at him. Had Socrates lived a private life, no one would have been examined and become angry. Had he lived a private life, Socrates would have avoided his trial and execution.
…show more content…
In addition, 38c of The Apology explains how Socrates couldn’t escape death because he didn’t want to beg for his life the way many people on trial do.
He knew that had he taken the pity route, he would have had a better chance to save his life. Socrates himself said that had he lived privately he would have had time to manage his own property and made money. Through Plato’s writing, Socrates says, “I have never had time…to manage my own property…I am totally broke.” (22e). He later mentions his “general self-neglect” and how there is “something supernatural” about how he “stood so many years neglecting” his own property; “going around to each” person because they needed it. Had he not done what he did, he would have had property and money. Socrates knew that if he changed his ways, his life would be spared and he could have been happy, at least happy in the face of
others. On the other hand, if Socrates had chosen to avoid his trial by living a private life, then he would have been the opposite of Hector. In 28b, Plato wrote that “He (Hector) was much more afraid to live as a coward, and not get revenge for his friend.” Basically, it is more important to do what you think is right rather than hide and submit to others. Socrates also said that he should stand his ground (as he has been assigned to by the God) no matter what. He uses the example of a commander ordering a person to stand their ground and to not “take into account death or anything else next to shame” (28d). However, Athens was a democracy (which means one person gets one vote) during the time of Socrates’ trial. The politicians of this time were more worried about getting votes and not losing them than they were worried about being right. With truth thrown out the window, Socrates would have had to give up on proclaiming the truth. He would have had to give up his views on wisdom as well. During his trial, Socrates talks about his search for wisdom. After the Oracle of Deplhi told Chærephon (Socrates’ friend) that there was no one wiser than Socrates (20e), Socrates went about deciphering what that meant by interrogating the wise people of that time (21b-22c). Once he was on board with how he was wisest, Socrates sought to show others how they were not wise. Plato wrote that Socrates, “in alliance with the God,” shows wise people that they are not wise (22e). Socrates would have had to give up wisdom and truth because even had the audience decided to let him go on the condition that he stop philosophizing; he would have continued (29a). However, had he chosen to save himself and follow that ruling, Socrates would have had to give up wisdom because he could not have continued this practice of showing people they were unwise. Continuing this practice would have violated living privately. In addition, Plato writes that Socrates said, “I wake you and convince you, and criticize each and every one of you, and am constantly at it, all day long, settling all over you,” (30d). Socrates spent each day trying to improve his fellow citizens. If Socrates had lived privately before the trial no one would have noticed their faults and been able to improve themselves. If Socrates stopped this after the trial then there would still be many people in need of fixing themselves. Furthermore, surrendering to cultural practices and thoughts would have caused Socrates to give up what he deems as important. Truth can be seen as important to Socrates when he addresses his audience and says, “Gentlemen, I am ashamed to tell you the truth; however, it must be told,” (22a). Earlier in the passage, Socrates states, “while they said little or nothing that was true, from me you will hear the whole truth” (17b). In both of these quotes Socrates shows that he not only knows the truth but wishes to share it with the people around him. Knowing the truth and sharing the truth are important to Socrates because it is what he bases his life work on- going around trying to get people to see the truth of their ways. He would have had to give up truth because many people in his society did not want the truth or thought they knew a truth different than his. Wisdom is important to Socrates as he says in his defense, “In all likelihood, gentlemen, God is really wise, and this is what he means by his oracle: that our human kind of wisdom is worth little or nothing” (22e). In conclusion, Socrates did the right thing by living his life the way he did; rather than living it privately. When regarding the position that Socrates should have avoided his trial and death by living privately, one should bring up that then individuality and values are lost.
... them to acknowledge the unjust state of affairs that persists in the deteriorating city-state. Socrates believed it was better to die, than to live untrue to oneself, and live unable to practice philosophy, by asking people his questions. Thus, we can see Socrates was a nonconformist in Ancient Greek society, as he laid down his life in the hopes of saving his state, by opening the eyes of the jury to the corruptness and evils of society. Socrates also laid down the framework for a paradigm shift to occur in his city, as his acquired a formidable fan group, or following, of individuals, who, began to preach his philosophy and continue his Socratic method of questioning and teaching. Socrates philosophy is still influential and studied today, thus his ways of thinking about life, truth and knowledge, changed the way western society perceives the world.
When he is questioned why he doesn’t want to attempt to escape his death, he states that he feels it is unjust to escape. Socrates did what he believed his job was, which was to enlighten the youth to the unjust ways of society. While the way he was punished for it was unjust, Socrates stated that he has lived a happy life, and if he can’t rightly persuade the Laws of Athens to change its mind and let him go, then he can accept that.
Socrates was wise men, who question everything, he was found to be the wise man in Athens by the oracle. Although he was consider of being the wises man alive in those days, Socrates never consider himself wise, therefore he question everything in order to learned more. Socrates lived a poor life, he used to go to the markets and preach in Athens he never harm anyone, or disobey any of the laws in Athens, yet he was found guilty of all charges and sentence to die.
According to Pierre Hadot, “Thus philosophy was a way of life, both in its exercise and effort to achieve wisdom, and its goal, wisdom itself. For real wisdom does not merely cause us to know: it makes us “be” in a different way” ( Pierre 265) This explanation of a philosophical way of life is in all ways the definition of Socrates’ life. Socrates made his way through his entire life living in this way, seeking out wisdom, seeking out answers and never once got in trouble with the court until the age of seventy years old. He believed that by telling people about ignorance and wisdom, that he was only doing so for the good of the people. Socrates even goes as far as saying, “I am that Gadfly which God has attached to the state, and all day long and in all places am always fastening upon you, arousing and persuading and reproaching you”(Plato 9). Socrates believes that he was sent from God to show people a different way of life, a life of questioning and reason to which he should teach to all people. When asked if he was ashamed of a course of life of which would likely bring him to an untimely end Socrates says, “you are mistaken: a man who is good for anything ought not to calculate the chance of living or dying; he ought only to consider whether in doing anything he is doing right or wrong” (Plato 7).
First of all, there was no legitimate reason Socrates should have been brought to court and absolutely no reason he should have been found guilty. Socrates lived a humble, poor life so that he could spread his wise words throughout the land. He was not boastful and he did not preach anything that he did not believe himself. “It seems
... a criminal matter nor a strain on the Athenian society, but a challenge to an oppressive and aristocracy ruling class. Socrates became a symbol of true wisdom and knowledge, a symbol that needed to be disposed of for the elites to remain the power holders in society.
He states that if he were to escape he would not be living honorably which he describes in Plato 's “Apology” as living a unexamined life and to him he would much rather die. Socrates states, “one must not even do wrong when one is wronged, which most people regard as the natural course” (Plato, 268). Socrates even though his sentence maybe biased and not morally right still believes that he must follow what he is condemned to. Through this he implies that even if we are cheated of fairness we must still do what is honorable and not fight it. He explains that the majority of people in his case would justify it to escape because they were sentenced for something that is completely moral. I disagree with Socrates in that if I was in his place, I would gain freedom and face my enemies for they wronged
Socrates lived such a private life that it lead to the most important revelation of his entire life. He would go about his life doing nothing but self-examination. In examining his life so strenuously others would come to him to be taught, or to have their children be taught by Socrates. They would offer him money and he would refuse. They would do whatever they could to learn anything Socrates had to teach. What they did not know is that Socrates was not teaching anyone he was simply going about his usual life and people just happened to learn from it. This was also why Socrates was put on trial. He was brought up on two charges, one of impiety and the other of corrupting the youth. These two charges set the course for the last month of his life.
(37) The problem is that many of the citizens of Athens who wanted Socrates dead, lacked that emotional intelligence and thought highly of themselves. So of course they become defensive when Socrates sheds light on the idea that they may be wrong. As someone who cared most about the improvement of the soul, Socrates would have made a constructive role model to the criminals of Athens, as he would go on saying, “virtue is not given by money, but that from virtue comes money and every other good of man…”(35) Socrates was able to benefit everyone alike as he had human wisdom- something that all the Athenians could relate
In conclusion, Socrates was guilty of inventing his own deity, which violated the Athenian laws and the general moral principle held by Athenians, though his main purpose was to improve the society and educate the youth through questioning. However, he was a great citizen and thinker in ancient Athens, since he developed a new value system which did guide the people to the truth and rightness, despite the fact that some part of defense was not convincing and involved sophistry. In addition, the legal system of Athens had some defects for it let the majority rather than professional judges or lawmakers make judgment, leading to the tragedy of Socrates’ death.
...to make its final decision, Socrates was given the death penalty. However, because this man had faced death many times before, he was not fearful of his fate. He believed that it would be good for him because the internal oracle had given no sign of opposition. And so, Socrates was put to death for the violations he had committed. Because Socrates was able to maintain his composure throughout the trial, and was able to truthfully discuss his tactics with the court even though it went against the common practices of the ancient world, I feel that he was a very honorable man. Even at the brink of death, Socrates did not modify his defense to what he thought the court would want to hear. He did not apologize for his way of thinking or for the way he went about doing things, but he, essentially, apologized for the fact that others were unable to understand his virtues.
If I were Socrates then I would have escaped. My first reason for this decision is that, as the text points out, the State would not have been destroyed if he had decided to live. Second, our relationship
Since Socrates only taught by means of public conversation and oration, most of what we know about him we learned from his student; Plato. Unlike other philosophers of his era, Socrates didn’t concern himself with issues on how or why the world worked; he pondered things like how man should live and what morality means. Socrates was hailed as the inventor of the branch of philosophy known as ethics. It is exactly his concern with
Socrates was an insightful philosopher who had an opinion on all the basic fundamental questions. He had very strong beliefs that he willed others into believing through questioning and proving ignorance in others beliefs. He has particular views on every fundamental question and particular views on how people should live their lives. He says God has spoken to him about philosophy and says that it is his destiny and it is his calling in life. Through philosophy he searches for answers to the fundamental questions and gains wisdom and knowledge. The fundamental question of condition is the question of what, if anything, has gone wrong with the world? The question of solution is what can fix the problem? Then there is Death which asks what happens
Socrates was a wise man who realized that life was not something that could be easily understood. He knew that questioning life would lead to a stronger conception of life and reality. When he stated that “the unexamined life is not worth living” (Plato 45), he truly meant that without questioning life, one would not be truly living. Actions would have no understanding of being right or wrong. For Socrates, a man who believed that life should be based on what was right, there would be no greater wrongdoing.