Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Contribution of Socrates as teacher
Socrates contribution to western civilization
Socrates used the Socratic method in Athens
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Contribution of Socrates as teacher
In this paper, I will argue that Socrates does not typically benefit those that he cross-examines, but that his activity is nonetheless useful and justified. I will argue that Socrates’ cross-examinations are justified and useful because it is a divine mission and because it develops critical thinking skills. I will argue my thesis by first, using The Apology and Euthyphro dialogues to show the usefulness and justification of Socrates’ elenchus. Second, I will suggest objections to the reasons why Socrates’ elenchus is useful and justified. Finally, I will give my rebuttal to the objections against Socrates’ elenchus.
I think it is important to first explain Socrates’ divine mission. Chairephon, a friend of Socrates, went to the Oracle of Delphi and asked if there was anyone wiser than Socrates. The Oracle proclaimed that no one was wiser than Socrates. Socrates pondered over the Oracle’s proclamation that he was the wisest person (The Apology 21a). Socrates attempted to find someone who was wiser than himself but he could not. Socrates realized that he was the wisest person because he was the only person who was aware of his own ignorance (The Apology 23b). Socrates took this as being a sign that the gods had a mission for him. Socrates thought that the gods wanted him to make other people aware of their ignorance. Socrates thought that he was not only performing a divine mission but he was also doing Athens a great favor (The Apology 30b). Socrates thought that he was helping the Athenian citizens to consider the state of their souls and not wealth and power (The Apology 30b). What I think Socrates was trying to help the Athenian citizens with was to help develop their critical thinking skills. Socrates’ elenchus is useful bec...
... middle of paper ...
... ignorance. Once people become aware of their own ignorance, they may try to conduct an elenchus on their own. By conducting their own elenchus’, people would most likely begin to develop the critical thinking skills. Ultimately, the elenchus would be useful and justified because it does help complete Socrates’ divine mission.
In conclusion, although Socrates did not benefit the people that he cross-examined, his actions were still useful and justified. By showing that reason should be what influences thought and action, it can be seen that Socrates’ elenchus is useful in that it shows how people should critically think about different positions that they are presented and that they think are right. I think that Socrates’ elenchus is justified in that by studying and using it, people will become aware of their own ignorance by developing critical thinking skills.
... them to acknowledge the unjust state of affairs that persists in the deteriorating city-state. Socrates believed it was better to die, than to live untrue to oneself, and live unable to practice philosophy, by asking people his questions. Thus, we can see Socrates was a nonconformist in Ancient Greek society, as he laid down his life in the hopes of saving his state, by opening the eyes of the jury to the corruptness and evils of society. Socrates also laid down the framework for a paradigm shift to occur in his city, as his acquired a formidable fan group, or following, of individuals, who, began to preach his philosophy and continue his Socratic method of questioning and teaching. Socrates philosophy is still influential and studied today, thus his ways of thinking about life, truth and knowledge, changed the way western society perceives the world.
Socrates was wise men, who question everything, he was found to be the wise man in Athens by the oracle. Although he was consider of being the wises man alive in those days, Socrates never consider himself wise, therefore he question everything in order to learned more. Socrates lived a poor life, he used to go to the markets and preach in Athens he never harm anyone, or disobey any of the laws in Athens, yet he was found guilty of all charges and sentence to die.
Consequently, In Plato's Euthyphro, our acquaintance with Socrates is immensely beneficial to society, as we obtain awareness on such an innovative method of achieving intuition. The Socratic approach is now a fundamental approach implemented in daily conversation in society Furthermore, not only is Socrates is able to verify that the true seekers are the wise; he also validates the notion that the answers to many questions are merely questions. Simply because, life is so debate that certain subjects begin to intertwine. To sum up, Plato's Euthyphro is extremely indicative of this Socratic irony, for the reason being that: Socrates's portrays a sense of intellectual humility.
The Theaetetus is composed of three main parts, each part being allotted to a different definition of what constitutes as knowledge. While the Theaetetus is focused primarily on how to define knowledge, the arguments faced by Socrates and Theaetetus greatly resemble arguments made by different later theories of knowledge and justification. I will argue in this essay that due to the failure faced by Socrates and Theaetetus in their attempt at defining knowledge, the conclusion that would be best fit for their analysis would be that of skepticism. In doing this I will review the three main theses, the arguments within their exploration that resemble more modern theories of knowledge and justification, and how the reason for the failure of the theories presented in the Theaetetus are strikingly similar to those that cause later theories of epistemology to fail.
(339e) Socrates concludes from Thrasymachus’ argument that it is just to do the exact opposite of what Thrasymachus presumes. Socrates uses his intelligence to flush out Thrasymachus’ viewpoint, where Thrasymachus must be able to see the error in his reasoning. Thrasymachus believes that he is only elucidating his viewpoint, but Socrates is able to turn his views over, and pick out the fallacies. Socrates is not trying to make a fool out of him; on the contrary, he is “trying to help Thrasymachus enter a state of productive confusion in which he will discover that he does not know what he things he does, and then want to learn about what he does not know”.
There are times in every mans life where our actions and beliefs collide—these collisions are known as contradictions. There are endless instances in which we are so determined to make a point that we resort to using absurd overstatements, demeaning language, and false accusations in our arguments. This tendency to contradict ourselves often questions our character and morals. Similarly, in The Trial of Socrates (Plato’s Apology), Meletus’ fallacies in reason and his eventual mistake of contradicting himself will clear the accusations placed on Socrates. In this paper, I will argue that Socrates is not guilty of corrupting the youth with the idea of not believing in the Gods but of teaching the youth to think for themselves by looking to new divinities.
Socrates was accused of being a sophist because he was "engaging in inquiries into things beneath the earth and in the heavens, of making the weaker argument appear the stronger," and "teaching others these same things." (Apology, Plato, Philosophic Classics page 21) Socrates is also accused of denying the existence of the gods, and corrupting the youth. Socrates goes about trying to prove his innocence. The jury that Socrates was tried by was made up of 501 Athenian citizens of all classes of society. While he fails to convince the Athenian jury of his innocence, he does a wonderful job in this effort. I personally believe that Socrates is innocent, and that the Athenian jury made the wrong decision.
During this essay, the trail of Socrates found in the Apology of Plato will be reviewed. What will be looked at during this review is how well Socrates rebuts the charges made against him. We will also talk about if Socrates made the right decision to not escape prison with Crito. Socrates was a very intelligent man; this is why this review is so critical. In Plato’s Apology, it seems that overall Socrates did an effective job using the 3 acts of the mind.
Within the duration of this document, I will be discussing the charges laid against Socrates and how he attempted to refute the charges. One of the reasons why Socrates was arrested was because he was being accused of corrupting the minds of the students he taught. I personally feel that it is almost impossible for one person to corrupt the thoughts and feelings of a whole group of people. Improvement comes from the minority and corruption comes from the majority. Socrates is one man (minority).
In the Crito, Socrates debates with his friend and follower Crito on escaping from prison where Socrates awaits execution. Crito unsuccessfully attempts to persuade Socrates to escape from prison but the latter is adamant and opts to remain in prison and meet his fate. This paper argues that Socrates had strong convictions in his arguments. Therefore, the paper defends Socrates decision citing it as accurate and commendable even though it marked the end of his life. Firstly, the paper examines Crito’s propositions exhibiting the eminent strong points as well as the destabilizing shortcomings. The second part examines Socrates defense outlining why it was the rightful choice. The main attention will be on Socrates core argument founded on justice and doing injustice maligns one’s soul. Therefore, the paper concludes by phrasing that it is not worth to live with a tainted, distraught and ruined soul.
Out of the confrontation with Cephalus, Polemarchus, and Thrasymachus, Socrates emerges as a reflective individual searching for the rational foundation of morality and human excellence. The views presented by the three men are invalid and limited as they present a biased understanding of justice and require a re-examination of the terminology. The nature in which the faulty arguments are presented, leave the reader longing to search for the rational foundations of morality and human virtue.
His ultimate goal in doing this was to prove the Oracle was wrong. It was because of the Oracle that Socrates began to question his wisdom and the wisdom of others. He was not trying to corrupt the youth, nor did he believe in false gods. Socrates was a man who believed that the Oracle’s message, “There was no one wiser than Socrates,” was misguided and tried to prove it wrong.
questions the positive uses for the mind and the great minds in history. Socrates shows him that
In order to counter the two charges brought against him, Corruption of the youth and impiety, Socrates uses the elenchus. The elenchus is essentially a cross examination to test the beliefs of an individual to point out their inconsistences. As Socrates is refuting the charges presented against him by Meletus, he examines them by looking at Meletus’s beliefs, and demonstrates his three major contradictions. The first charge, corruption of the youth is divided into two contradictions, the first being that all Athenians besides Socrates improve the youth (24d-25c). Through elenchus Socrates interrogates Meletus, “All the Athenians, it seems, make the young into fine good men, except me [Socrates], and I alone corrupt them. Is that what you mean?
Socrates, a world renown Greek philosopher, is respected for intentionally making himself appear more intelligent by making others look and feel dumb. Those who are aware of Socrates’ intentions should not be surprised of his actions in The Republic of Plato. As the narrator, Socrates writes a monologue between himself, the master, and Plato, the student. Socrates soon addresses two main questions that lead to greater discussion throughout the book: “what is justice?” and “is it greater to be just or unjust”? As we read into Book 2, we are introduced to Glaucon and Adeimantus, who intend to challenge Socrates on his two main questions. Glaucon’s challenge to Socrates is to: show