Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Inequality in the healthcare system
Inequality in the healthcare system
Health care injustice
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Inequality in the healthcare system
Justice is being fair, impartial, honest, and treating each individual equally. Additionally, justice is ensuring access, benefits, and opportunities are available equally to all individuals. Justice should be applied to every situation in one’s life. In doing so, one can ensure the best possible actions were taken in treating individuals impartially, honestly, equally, and fairly. Uninsured Patients Applying justice to healthcare is tricky. First, one needs to determine if healthcare is a fundamental right. Many people believe that it is not a basic human right since it is not specifically mentioned in the Constitution or the Declaration of Independence. However, the World Health Organization states that access to good quality healthcare …show more content…
is not a privilege. It is a basic human right (2015). Matthew Robinson explains John Rawls’ theory of social justice as justice as fairness (2015). This theory states that something is either just or unjust based on whether the access to civil liberties, human rights, opportunities for fulfilling and healthy lives, and whether it allocates a fair share of benefits to societies least advantaged is promoted or hindered. If one is to believe this theory, justice must be applied to healthcare. The Kaiser Family Foundation estimated more than 41 million people were uninsured in 2013 (2014 Oct 29). Harvard Medical School and Cambridge Health Alliance conducted a study finding uninsured, working-age Americans have a 40 percent higher mortality rate than privately insured Americans (Cecere, 2009 September 17). Based on the statistics much needs to be done with applying justice to our healthcare system. Downsizing Downsizing or layoffs affect those that were laid off and those that survived the layoff.
Psychological depression, physical, social, and economical problems, as well as, dissatisfaction in life has been reported by employees, which have been laid off (Sobieralski & Nordstrom, 2012). Sobieralski & Nordstrom (2012) also note that survivors of layoffs may experience decreased productivity, organizational commitment, and job satisfaction. Sobieralski & Nordstrom (2012) determine employees’ perceptions of layoffs are based on distributive justice, interactional justice, and procedural justice. Distributive justice involves whether severance packages, benefits, or outplacement services were provided to employees, which were laid off. Interactional justice focuses on whether the employee feels he/she was treated with dignity and respect, as well as how the layoff was communicated to the employee. Procedural justice deals with the perception of fairness of the process used to determine which employees would be laid off (Sobieralski & Nordstrom, 2012). The author of this paper has personal experience with this and while distributive and interactional justice might have been appropriate in her case, interactional justice was not and therefore she will not consider employment with that company in the future. While downsizing may be necessary, applying justice to how downsizing is handled can benefit the employees and the …show more content…
company. Stockholders Cost containment in healthcare is a huge issue that has received much publicity over the past couple of decades.
Healthcare managers are now accountable to profit-oriented boards. The accountability of healthcare involves corporate management, shareholders, and the investment community (Maddox, 1998 December). Ensuring the needs of stockholders to see an adequate profit share requires distributive justice. Maddox (1998 December) explains that distributive justice requires that all individuals are provided an equal opportunity to access scarce resources, which requires healthcare organizations and health plans to provide healthcare to each individual that is due. There is a careful balancing act in healthcare while trying to retain earnings and provide access to quality care for all
individuals. Discipline It is important to ensure that justice is included in the policies and procedures of an organization. Organizations must be diligent in following the policies and procedures and documentation provides a complete an accurate picture of the account. Legal ramifications may occur if disciple in the workplace is not done in an appropriate manner. The first step to employee discipline is ensuring the organization has a good disciplinary policy in place and has clearly communicated it to all employees. Attorney Anne Williams (2002) advises consistent discipline. In addition, discipline must be fairly applied to employees. Ensuring equal discipline is given to each employee with similar misconduct is one way to ensure the discipline is consistent and fair (Williams, 2002). Applying justice to employee discipline will ensure fairness. In conclusion, treating individuals impartially, honestly, equally, and fairly ensures justice is served. All situations should involve justice in the treatment of people. The use of justice is ethical and morally correct.
By definition justice means the quality of being just or fair. The issue then stands, is justice fair for everyone? Justice is the administration of law, the act of determining rights and assigning rewards or punishments, "justice deferred is justice denied.” The terms of Justice is brought up in Henry David Thoreau’s writing, “Civil Disobedience.”
Health care is an uprising issue today in the United States. I believe in order for health care or the medical field to succeed in the future that social contract should be enforced. By enforcing social contract, it will allow health care to be more efficient by allowing individuals to assume responsibility for their own healthy by having the ability to ensure health. According to The Enduring Democracy book, " from the philosophy of Jean- Jacques Rousseau, an agreement people make with one another to form a government and abide by its rules and laws, an in return the government promises to protect the people’s rights and welfare and promote their best interest"(Dautrich, 7). In other words, if people came to an agreement about health care being available for all American citizens, the government will uphold this idea and will make sure all American citizens have the right to health care.
Justice is defined in many different ways, one referring to a form of judgment that provides order in a situation. Justice offers a fair punishment that fits the offense. The term holds a positive connotation, in contrast to the word injustice.
Encyclopedia Britannica Defines Justice as the concept of a proper proportion between a person’s deserts (what is merited) and the good and bad things that befall or are allotted to him or her. There is a duality to the idea of justice because it acts as a reward and a deterrent. It makes sure the people who abide by rules get treated “justly” but also insures an example out of the people who break laws so that the amount of law-breakers dissipates. Judgment’s importance stems from its dual-concept base. Britannica defines it in terms of law and thought. Judgment in all legal systems is a decision of a court adjudicating the rights of the parties to a legal action before it. The Encyclopedia explains judgment in thought using multiple components:
What is justice to you. Justice is known to dictionary.com as, “the quality of being just; righteoussness, equitableness, or moral rightness”. So how do you define justice. Is it fairness or correctness, maybe it’s throwing all the bad guys in jail. In To Kill a Mockingbird and The Merchant of Venice justice is defined several times in several different ways that open to our eyes if we look through one of the character’s. When looking through a character’s eyes we must take a look at someone’s background hence absorbing their perspective and understanding their
Moral rightness and fairness are two alternate ways of saying justice. Justice is defined in a legal dictionary on law.com as “a scheme or system of law in which every person receives his/ her/its due from the system, including all rights, both natural and legal.” There are many different opinions on the law and justice systems in America, many of which are not particularly positive. Law.com also states, one problem can be found in the attorneys, judges, and legislators, as they tend to get caught up more in the procedure than actually achieving justice for the people. While others say that our law system is not interested in finding out the truth, but more criticisms can also be seen in Herman Melville’s story, “Bartleby, the Scrivener.” Melville
There are many different causal reasons for the existence of this problem with employee satisfaction and morale. In this paper, I will address what I believe to be the most important factors that contribute to this problem. This employee satisfaction problem, and its causal and symptomatic problems, impacts the department in many ways. For example, we have lost valuable employees resulting in unnecessary attrition. There is a loss in productivity that results from the time and energy that many employees spend dealing with components and symptoms of the individual problems. This wasted t...
How do we define justice? The dictionary defines it with words like righteousness and fairness. Often times when we hear the word justice, or hear about an unjust situation, we have an instinctual reaction. We all know what justice is, even without a dictionary definition. Justice is a virtue, justice is doing the right thing. But how can we define justice if it is doing what we individually think is the right thing to do?
"Of all the forms of inequality, injustice in healthcare is the most shocking and inhumane." This quote by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., a social justice hero, exemplifies the significance in addressing medical injustice. Healthcare injustice can come in several different forms, most notably intentional misdiagnoses. This injustice, although normally neglected, is extremely cruel and indubitably effective. The race is on as the government and the World Health Organization fight to combat this issue. When individuals choose the medical career out of monetary greed, their patients are seen as secondary priorities. This greed paired with significant scientific data restricting the actions of health professionals, can lead unjust treatment
The word "justice" appears frequently in many of the United States' documents, such as the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Pledge of Allegiance. According to Wikipedia, “justice is a concept of moral rightness based on ethics, rationality, law, natural law, religion, equity and fairness, as well as the administration of the law, taking into account the inalienable and inborn rights of all human beings and citizens, the right of all people and individuals to equal protection of their civil rights, without discrimination on the basis of race, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, color, ethnicity, religion, disability, age, and / or other characteristics" (Wikipedia). Harper Lee expands on the idea of justice in her novel, To Kill A Mockingbird.
Market justice has long been fundamental component of US healthcare system well in to 20th century. Buyer’s i. e consumers of healthcare used individual resources like personal savings to buy healthcare from sellers in the market. It thrived very well in to 20 th century until employer based health coverage came in to picture. Market justice is mostly applied in private healthcare.
According to Pojman (2006), justice is the constant and perpetual will to give every man his due. This would seem to imply that for justice to be carried out, people must get what they deserve. But there is some debate over what being just entails; to be just is to be fair, but is being fair truly to give people what they deserve? In this essay, I will detail why justice requires that people are given what they deserve through the scope of punishment, reward, and need.
Justice is a very interesting concept. As an idea it is often very difficult to define because justice is often perceived differently by each individual to whom it is applied. Even today, there are many definitions by which it operates. Each of these different definitions has been informed to some degree by the work of either Rousseau, Hume, or Kant. Each philosopher took a vastly different stance on what constituted justice and the manner in which justice functioned in society. Rousseau believed very simply that justice was reflective of the common will. Hume believed that justice was little more than an “artificial virtue” and only
So if justice in considered to be fair, that would make something unjust, unfair, right? What if an innocent person was proven guilty in a court of law and spent time in jail or money to pay a fine? That would be considered just, because in the court of law he was in fact proven guilty, however it would also be unfair because the person is innocent. This is the same result in another case, the most current issue and most relative in my belief would be Affirmative Action. If justice is in fact fair, therefore not treating persons of different races or gender any different then Affirmative Action is unjust, and although I do not oppose such a policy, I still see it as unjust.
Justice can be defined as, valuing the diversity and challenging the injustice in society while human rights refer to, benefits an individual enjoys by virtual of being a human being. Justice is said to exist when all citizens share a general humanity and, therefore, experience equitable treatment, fair community resource sharing and human right support. According to justice citizens are not supposed to be discriminated, nor their well being or welfare prejudiced or constrained on the lines of gender, religion, age, belief, race, political affiliation and even sexuality.