Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on communication theories
Essay on communication theories
Essay on communication theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Through concepts and principles which we studied in the “dialogic communication studies”, “Dialogue” is a special form of communication that creates positive results for individuals, group, organization and communities. This concept has become a central of various theoretical perspectives in humanity and social sciences studies by looking at social relation and interaction as dialogue. In this essay I want to outline some dialogue schools related to my project which is about analyzing social media and face to face interaction, present in case of various types of communication. In my project, The main theory in use is the uses and gratifications theory but accompanied by the dramaturgy theory, the spiral of silence theory, the social distance theory and the politeness theory whereas the fieldwork are on the basis of personal interviews with the students. In the following parts regarding to my project, I want to know, how I can reformulate my project using dialogic communication theory. What theory/theories of dialogue could I use as my theoretical framework? How can I design the project along collaborative, dialogic lines? As a matter of fact, from the first time, A the beginning of our course, a new perspective opened in front of my eyes towards how could I apply dialogic communication theory to my project work? Every seconds of ongoing further on this theory, I think about specific moments of our interviews as a valuable data. Through opening this vision, I could see special points that are related to various parts of dialogic theory, such as experience of different moments of dialogue, top-down and bottom-up of power relation. By accessing to this valuable knowledge, if I want to answer this question, could I analyses the commu... ... middle of paper ... ...see. (Kvale, p. 488) In conclusion, “Dialogue” is the fundamental feature related to our project and our life. But, the direction of research to find the answers for our questions require further ongoing through different aspects of our project. However, by focusing on reforming our interviews strategies and analyzing our interviews, which is due to focus group and individual interviews, by using dialogic theories and approaches, it is possible to generate new knowledge regarding to different aspects of dialogic communication, identity, multiculturalism senses approaches, power, centrifugal or centripetal movements to create facilitates from and moreover phases. By considering to the different aspects of dialogic communication, we try to put our effort on gathering the different pieces of puzzle on dialogic moments in real life due to the online forum interactions.
The thesis, or the main idea of the book, is that by using specific communication techniques, we can turn difficult discussions into productive learning conversations.
To examine various discourses, it is crucial that the idea of discourse and the way in which discourses operate is clear. A discourse is a language, or more precisely, a way of representation and expression. These "ways of talking, thinking, or representing a particular subject or topic produce meaningful knowledge about the subject" (Hall 205). Therefore, the importance of discourses lies in this "meaningful knowledge," which reflects a group’s ideolo...
Swales, Gee and Porter all give their understanding of how they believe a discourse community operates and contributes to society. It can be seen as a type of language used to connect between particular groups and integrate social identities into the world (Gee 484). The building of a discourse community starts with creating a type of communication plan. It is necessary that all members connect and confer alike in order to maintain a set of documented decisions and actions. A discourse community connects people to a lifestyle and provides a form of order that stretches the interconnections of words, writings, values, attitudes, and beliefs (Swales 220). Those interconnecting contacts though sometimes conflict with select purposes of other discourses, leading to confusion or even anarchy. When this occurs, awareness and a choice of acceptance or doubt sets into place (Porter 400). For a discourse community to continue all doubt and awareness have to be tracked and suppressed. The discourse community needs to insure that its values are well convinced and received by its members and potential new members, in order to remain accepted in a
Sam is an undergraduate student who majored in Public Relation, and this his fourth year in college. And he thought college is not the best place to learn communication skills in Public Relation. From the book, and the class, he knows a lot about Public Relations. But, not like other subject, Public Relation are subjects which needed real experience in different situation. In other words, when different situation comes, he should know how to response is the best. Especially the communication situation, communication skills play the essential part in Public Relation. He notice that all those communication skills which he needed in Public Relation can not only learn from books. Then he started to practice all the skills he needed in Public
Conversation Analysis (CA) is the study of talk-within-interaction that attempts to describe the orderliness, structure and sequential patterns of interaction in conversation. It is a method of qualitative analysis developed by Harvey Sacks with the aid of Emmanuel Schegloff and Gail Jefferson in the late 1960s to early 1970s. Using the CA frame of mind to view stories shows us that what we may think to be simplistic relaying of information or entertaining our friends is in fact a highly organised social phenomena that is finely tuned in a way that expresses the teller’s motivation behind the talk. (Hutchby & Wooffitt, 2011). It is suggested that CA relies on three main assumptions; talk is a form of social action, action is structurally organised, talk creates and maintains inter-subjectivity (Atkinson & Heritage, 1984).
In order to approach this daunting task, it is important which medium is chosen through which to proceed. Following in the footsteps of Plato and Socrates, it seems fitting to do utilize the dialogue format. The dialogue format consists of a conversation in which a discussion ensues, questions are asked, hypotheses are formed and challenged, and hopefully, in the end there is some clearer understanding of the issue at hand.
In the publication Language and social identity by John J. Gumperz, a professor of anthropology at the University of California, Berkeley, Gumperez discusses communicative characteristics of modern society and the way in which they correspond to societal and ethical elements of identity by accumulating research on interactive communication between ethnographically differing groups. He states, “The study of language as interactional discourse demonstrates that these parameters are not constants that can be taken for granted but are communicatively produced. Therefore to understand issues of identity and how they affect and are affected by social , political, and ethnic divisions we need to gain insights into the communicative processes by which they arise,” (Gumperz 1). Language is the voice in which identity is spoken. Without it, the separations of identity he discusses in this publication would be unclear and disconnected as language is the element that guides them all together in a palpable
This theory has been subject to many articles and studies in the communication and social departments. Indeed, studying this theory can help us understanding human relations in interpersonal communication. Each of us has been one day confronted to uncertainty, whereas in initial encounters, or moving to a new a new place, or beginning a new work.
Conversation is an informal talk in which two or more people participate and news and ideas are exchanged. It is an unorganized, spontaneous, and interactive form of communication in which two or more people follow rules of etiquette. Conversations might have poor grammar, slangs, and may wander from one subject to another. The first characteristic of conversation is that it takes place between more than two people because a single individual cannot exchange ideas with himself, there must be a person at the receiving and the sending end of the information. It is managed locally, during the course of interaction the participants themselves decide which person gets to speak, for how long, and in what order, it is all worked out as the conversation progresses. It cannot be carried out in the absence of exchange of information. There must be mutual understanding between the participants, the information must be received with the same spirit by the receiver with which it is given. It is not necessary that the participants should be face-to-face during the conversation, it can be direct i.e. face-to-face conversation or
it is important to note that the history and the future of the company and the client is considered in the communication used by this institution. There are four basic elements to this system of discourse: the forms of discourse, the socialization, the ideology and the face systems. These four elements influence one another which means they interact with each other to create a certain ideology of discourse. When the client or the employee fits into this system of discourse they identify more with it and see themselves as a member of the discourse system.
Everything we do in our life involves communication because it is a way for a sender to send message to the receiver by verbal and non-verbal communication. However, in some parts of the world messages that are delivered sometimes are not received in a way it is supposed to. A way to solve this is by using competent communicator and intercultural communication because it makes it easier for people from other cultures to communicate in general. On the other hand, there are also some problems faced because different cultures have different ways to express their way of communication. By understanding these types of communication and by defining them may solve this dilemma. In addition to that, there are also types of communication to consider that are commonly used, which is Proxemics, Gestures and body language.
First, nature of power argued in Discourse Analysis is related to the nature of language. Using language in life is accompanied by using its power. Different conditions vary the power and the language. Language functions change and maintain power relationship. How to negotiate, resist or change that relationship is case study in itself. Whenever power is an issue, there are two sides. Those sides never come to an equal position. There is a reason why we say what we speak or write; there is always a reason behind spoken or written text. People need to be aware on language use and never underestimate the condition of language use. “Discussing the categories of definitions for discourse and discourse analysis, the author is careful to distinguish between formal and functional approaches to the topic” (Stoehr 53-54) by that language is essential to choose appropriate linguistic rules. Each person is at some point the dominate side and at another point he is the weak link. Therefore, being aware of power of language and how the use of it can achieve your goal is essential to resist and change of others’ domination. Linguistics have no relation to the power of language, they only study language...
Conversation is defined as an “informal interchange of thoughts, information, etc., by spoken words; oral communication between persons” (“Conversation”). This informal talk gives people the opportunity to open up to others, analyze other’s perspectives, and share ideas and interests. Conversation is an intimate experience that initiates bonds between all who are involved. These bonds unite people, creating a sense of community. A community is described as a group of people that live in the same place or have common interests. In a community, people are proactive and are involved. Also, they truly care about the wellbeing of a common interest or activity. Conversation helps to bring people together in a community by giving a voice to all who are involved and uniting all as one.
Communication is a huge part of our lives because through communication and language is that how we make sense of the world around us. Through language we can share information, express our feelings and creativities. In support, Stanley A. Deetz who wrote the book Democracy in an Age of Corporate Colonization, Dan O’Hair and Mary Wiemann who wrote the book of Real Communication has agreed on the concept of language is symbolic and we need language to better understand the world around us. Thus, this experience has gave me a better understating of the importance of communication. It has a lot taught me how to respect others and how to value time. It made me realize that I have such a rich culture but many people are losing it because of what they had gone
Speaking is a natural ability given to most reluctant individuals. Since the beginning of time, it has been assumed that we have a right to speak and use words, thus we naturally begin our development of language during the early stages of live. After years of grasping and perfecting our vocabulary and language, it seems unnecessary to study the purpose of our development. Why, then, should we study “oral communication?” There are many purposes, benefits, and institutions that branch from oral communication. Of course, communication is the basis of interaction with other individuals through the use of expressions and words; however, through studying oral communication, one can take the words and expressions being used and apply them to his or her own life. After all, the most effective and useful knowledge is applied knowledge.