Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Positive effects of conflict
Negative effects of conflicts
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Brief Description of Essential Information Douglas Stone, Bruce Patton, and Sheila Heen, of the Harvard Negotiation Project (HNP), wrote the book, Difficult Conversations: How to Discuss What Matters Most. Viking Press originally published the 234-page book in 1999. This self-help book, ISBN 0-670-88339-5, is available for purchase on Amazon for $24.95. Introduction Communication skills are important in professional negotiations and in personal life. This book discusses why we find some dialogue difficult, why we avoid it, and why we often address it ineffectively. Most important, the authors suggest methods for more effective, productive, and rewarding, interaction. Thesis The thesis, or the main idea of the book, is that by using specific communication techniques, we can turn difficult discussions into productive learning conversations. Overview of Main Points The book is divided into two main sections. In the first section, “Shift to a Learning Stance”, the authors suggest that each difficult conversation actually involves three concurrent conversations: the “what happened” conversation, the feelings conversation, and the identity conversation. The “what happened” conversation is complicated by the differing perspectives of the participants. Although parties often agree on basic facts, there are differences of opinion regarding the interpretation of their meaning or importance. These diverse viewpoints may be the result of differences in personality, exposure to different information, or different life experiences. Progress toward a learning conversation requires letting go of strong mindsets and shifting toward genuine curiosity about the other’s point of view. Adoption of the “And Stance” can be helpf... ... middle of paper ... ...om an unbiased perspective, engage in self-discovery, listen from a stance of genuine curiosity, ask questions, and pay attention to feelings. Finally, with consideration for both perspectives, we can begin problem solving. The authors of Difficult Conversations suggest working toward a productive, learning conversation, and they offer realistic advice on obtaining this objective. I am glad that I had the opportunity, and that I took the time, to read this book. It has empowered me to tackle difficult conversations with confidence, and it has changed my approach to problem solving. Works Cited Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (1981). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. New York, NY: Penguin Books. Stone, D., Patton, B., & Heen, S. (1999). Difficult conversations: How to discuss what matters most. New York, NY: Viking Press.
Lewicki, J. R., Barry, B., & Saunders, M. D. (2011). Essentials of negotiation (5th ed.). New
Fisher, Roger, William Ury, and Bruce Patton. Getting to yes: negotiating agreement without giving in. 2nd ed. New York, N.Y.: Penguin Books, 1991. Print.
Lewicki, J. R., Barry, B., & Saunders, M. D. (2011). Essentials of negotiation (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill. ISBN-13: 9780073530369
Lewicki, R., Saunders, D.M., Barry B., (2010) Negotiation: Readings, Exercises, and Cases. 6th Ed. McGraw-Hill Irwin. New York, NY
McCarthy, A. (n.d.). 10 rules of negotiation. Negotiation Skills. Retrieved March 31, 2014, from http://www.negotiation-skills.org
Michael R. Carrell, C. H. (2008). Negotiating Essentials: Theory, Skills, and Practices. New Jersey: Pearson.
We are all influenced by our human nature. Indeed, very often, our natural traits affect more than we would the decisions we think we make rationally. One of these human tendencies is to agree with our neighbor and to some extend, to avoid conflicts with individuals that we know. In other words, we are intrinsically inclined to say yes, especially if we praise the relationship. Even if negotiators are fully aware of this weakness, they cannot get rid of it. On the contrary, when they strongly desire a positive outcome to an exciting or a challenging negotiation, they might yield to any agreement, just to close the deal. Sometimes, they can do so even if the agreement does not meet their objectives. In order to address this human propensity that might be painful both in negotiation circumstances and in everyone’s private life, William Ury wrote the book The Power of a Positive No.
Lewicki, R. J., Saunders, D. M., & Barry, B. (2011). Essentials of Negotiation (5th ed.). New York, NY, US: McGraw-Hill.
I think it is important to experience both ends of the communication spectrum in order to really appreciate the benefits of having good communication skills. After observing and writing this paper, it really pushes me to better my own skills, and appreciate those of others.
Lewicki, R. J., Barry, B., & Saunders, D. M. (2007). Essentials of Negotiation. New York: McGraw-Hill/ Irwin.
We’ve all been there at some point in our lives, and the mere thought of it creates anxiety for many of us. Those “crucial conversations” with your boss about how you feel like he’s unfairly assigning you excessive work, or that moment when your best friend finds out you’re not using her husband as your real estate agent. These moments, painful, awkward, and annoying as they are, are an unfortunate byproduct of our daily existence in the 21st century and are best left avoided at all possible costs. Or, they can be the conversations that matter the most, and the “results could have a huge impact on the quality of your life ”. That’s what the authors of “Crucial Conversations: Tools for Talking when the Stakes are high” think, and believe they can offer the tools to better navigate these conversations and provide the opportunity for people to thrive.
Negotiating styles are grouped into five types; Competing, Collaborating, Comprising, Avoidance, and Accommodating (Colburn, 2010). Even though it is possible to exhibit different parts of the five types of negation styles in different situations, can see that my tendencies seem to default to, Compromise and Accommodating. In reviewing the course work and reviewing my answers for Questionnaire 1 and 5, I find that the data reflects the same assumption. The accommodating profile is one where relationship perseveration is everything and giving what the other side wants is the route to winning people over. Accommodators are well liked by their colleagues and opposite party negotiators (Colburn, 2010). When analyzing my accommodating tenancy in negations, I find often it is easier to give into the demands when they are within a reasonable range. I often consider it the part of providing a high level of customer service. It has been my experience that continued delaying and not coming to an agreement in a topic will only shorten the window in which you will have to meet the request since. The cons to this style are by accommodating highly competitive styles the accommodator can give up to much ground in the process. “Giving away value too easily too early can signal to your negotiation counterpart that you've very deep pockets, and your gift is just a taster of bigger and better gifts to come”. The other negations type I default to is compromising. Compromising “often involves splitting the difference; usually resulting in an end position of about half way between both parties’ opening positions” (Colburn, 2010). In the absence of a good rationale or balanced exchanged concessions, half way betwee...
Dialogue and the Art of Thinking Together: A Pioneering Approach to Communicating in Business and in Life William Isaac http://www.allscout-book.co.uk/finance/Dialogue_and_the_Art_of_Thinking_Together_A_Isaacs_English.htm
Communication with others is something we perform on a daily basis in today’s society. People talk to form and grow social bonds and to increase the likelihood of understanding one another. How we use language often signals to people their importance to us. As men and women, our identities are constantly shaped and refined by the type’s conversations we have. Our values are evident in the conversations with our family, community, society, country and church. In addition, through our profession we are continually refined by the people we talk with. Sharing information makes life more manageable, talking helps to grow social bonds with others, and choosing what we talk about allows us to manage how others perceive us. Therefore, verbal communication
Unit One introduces the concept of listening and being present as a foundation to collaborative conversations. Three main messages conveyed within both the Clark (2006) and Wong (2004) academic articles are; positioning oneself from a place of not-knowing, mindful listening and the importance of experiencing discomfort mindfully. These messages help to create a space for understanding through listening. A not-knowing stance repositions the client as an expert, mindful listening allows for a non-judgemental gaze, both at oneself and others, within mindful listening, discomfort is viewed as a way to promote individual growth. Creating a space for understanding makes room for a listening silence that embraces dialogue that crosses