Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Experience as a source of knowledge
The importance of leaders in the military
Importance of military leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Experience as a source of knowledge
In this essay I will be analyzing the adaptive leadership qualities of General John Stark from the state of New Hampshire in the United States of America. General John Stark was born August 28th, 1728 in Londonderry, New Hampshire and then later died on May 8th 1822 in Derryfield, New Hampshire at the age of 93. Stark would eventually be buried in a cemetery bearing his name, Starke cemetery in Manchester, New Hampshire. John Stark served in many battles during the French and Indian war and later in the American Revolutionary war. Stark served with Rogers Rangers and eventually would attain the rank of Major General in the U.S. Continental Army. At the age of 23 John Stark embarked on a hunting expedition with his two older brothers. During the expedition Stark was captured by Abenaki Indians and was brought to St. Francis near Qubec. While being held captive, John Stark and his brother Amos Eastman were forced to walk between two lines of Indian warriors while they were beaten with sticks. Amos when first and was nearly beaten to death. When Stark walked through, instead of letting himself be beaten he grabbed a club out of the hands of a warrior and proceeded to swing at anyone that was near him even though he was surrounded …show more content…
and outnumbered. This quality proves that from an early age John Stark was not only resilient and driven, but also a risk taker. These actions impressed the Abenaki tribal leader who would eventually treat Stark with respect during his captivity. Years later, Stark would show other leadership qualities such as being proactive and tactically proficient.
A prime example of this would occur the Battle of Bunker Hill where Stark would eventually lead his men into a strategic position in anticipation of a British advance. Because Stark was proactive by taking control of the situation and tactically proficient in his placement of his men he was able to inflict heavy British casualties. In this battle Stark shows that he is aware of the capabilities of his men and himself. This is only true because Stark is also aware of the work environment he has to deal with and is using timing to his advantage. All of these factors are only possible because of his experience as a soldier and a
leader. In the Battle of Bennington, Stark would once again show a driven leadership quality by gathering up his Green Mountain Boys and proclaiming, “Boys! There’s the enemy. They must be beat, or Molly Stark must sleep a widow this night! Forward, boys! March!”. With this act Stark would stir up emotion in his men and give them confidence that he would be there with them during the advance, leading the way. All of these qualities and many more that go unmentioned are what defines John Stark as a great American military leader.
In 1776, David McCullough gives a vivid portrayal of the Continental Army from October 1775 through January 1777, with sharp focus on the leadership of America’s greatest hero, George Washington. McCullough’s thesis is that had not the right man (George Washington) been leading the Continental Army in 1776, the American Revolution would have resulted in a vastly different outcome. He supports his argument with a critical analysis of Washington’s leadership during the period from the Siege of Boston, through the disastrous defense of New York City, the desperate yet, well ordered retreat through New Jersey against overwhelming odds, and concludes with the inspiring victories of Trenton and Princeton. By keeping his army intact and persevering through 1776, Washington demonstrated to the British Army that the Continental Army was not simply a gang of rabble, but a viable fighting force. Additionally, Mr. McCullough supports his premise that the key to the survival of the American Revolution was not in the defense of Boston, New York City, or any other vital terrain, but rather the survival of the Continental Army itself. A masterful piece of history, 1776 is not a dry retelling of the Revolutionary War, but a compelling character study of George Washington, as well as his key lieutenants, and his British adversaries, the most powerful Army in the 18th Century world. When I read this book, I went from a casual understanding of the hero George Washington to a more specific understanding of why Washington was quite literally the exact right man at the exact right place and time to enable the birth of the United States.
“Winthrop did not aim at power for the sake of power, but he longed to use his talents in the cause of God” (Morgan, 39) Winthrop’s perseverance and determination for success was another reason why he was a good leader. Though he had been voted out of office more than once, he still managed to come back and lead his
Many people possess leadership qualities although they don’t rule a country. Meriwether Lewis, the official leader of the Lewis and Clark Expedition has been called “undoubtedly the greatest pathfinder this country has ever known.” Just like Hazel, Meriwether Lewis led a group of followers into unknown territory. The two guides faced many difficult situations that they were able to overcome since they had the qualities of a notable leader. Both of the journeys were rough, but because of the brave leaders both expeditions were successful.
In deed on June 6, 1944, the little town of Bedford, VA, suffered a tragedy that would never be forgotten. But through the pain and hardship some of officers who leaded the Bedford boys displayed remarkable leadership’s principles. One of the basic functions of leadership is to unite people: bring people together to achieve common objectives. There is truth in the statement, where there is unity there is strength. This essay will offer a working definition of effective leadership principles and discuss the function of leadership as it relates to followers, motivation and power.
General George B. McClellan was born to a prestigious upper class family in Pennsylvania. He attended the Military Academy at West Point and graduated second in his class in 1846. He served during the war with Mexico and earned three brevets for gallantry and sound professional service. He resigned his commission but returned early during the Civil War and immediately given a high rank. He led a successful campaign in West Virginia. These events fueled General McClellan’s egotistical and elitist attitudes.
The history of Lieutenant General Lewis B. “Chesty” Puller is not well known outside of the U.S. Marine Corps, but as the most decorated marine in history his legend will live on and continue to inspire the marines of tomorrow. The enlisted corps has idolized him, frequently encouraging one another to do that last push up when motivated by fellow marines saying “Do one for Chesty!” The purpose of this essay is to demonstrate that Chesty, using current day leadership theories, was a visionary and ethical leader who exemplified the characteristics that our nation’s military needed during World War II and still needs today. I will explain how he embodied some principles of Full Range Leadership Development that are taught today. Then I will describe how he demonstrated his ethical leadership through combat actions when faced with general military ethics situations. Finally, I will examine how my own leadership abilities, though noncombat focused, compare to how Chesty led his marines. Let’s begin by exploring the visionary leadership that Lt Gen Puller exhibited.
As students, studying battles such as this, we have the advantage of hindsight, knowing the outcome. Nonetheless, we can still learn valuable lessons from it. To do so, this analysis will explore some of the decisions of the leaders at Gettysburg, and how they were affected by the operational variables. This essay will scrutinize some of the leaders at Gettysburg, and the impact of their actions. The outcome of this analysis will show that what was true in 1863 is still true today.
Throughout history there have been many great leaders. Many leaders who have changed the shape of America and also soldiers of today’s Army. One leader that comes to mind and has shaped me into the leader I am today is Abraham Lincoln. When I look at Abraham Lincoln and what he has done, I think of what Army Leadership manual ADRP 6-22 defines what a leader should be and how leadership is based off of attributes and competencies.
General Powell received some of the best military preparation the country, and world, offers, including technical, strategic, and leadership training. Still he stands out from his peers as being one of the few individuals who can traverse political party lines, as well as, lead diverse individuals and organizations. Maybe it is his gifted ability to speak; perhaps it is his straightforward, charismatic approach; but more than likely, it is both these traits combined with his personal core values, which make him great. Powell’s intelligence, endurance and committed practice of taking personal responsibility for his actions are included in one of the first stories he tells in his book.
John W. Gardner born 1912, had a varied and productive career as an educator, public official, and political reformer. Gardner's belief in society's potential was his guiding force, but he was wary of the dangers of complacency and inaction. Perhaps best known as the founder of the lobby Common Cause, he was the author of several best-selling books on the themes of achieving personal and societal excellence.
In a recent verbal bout with my History of the Military Art professor, I contended that the true might of a nation may be inversely proportional to the size of its military during peacetime. My thinking, though perhaps idealistic, was that the maintenance of a large military during relative international tranquility is an overt admission of weakness and increases the likelihood of unnecessarily employing that force—it is contextually irrelevant. Instead, I proposed that a strong and stable economy is the best metric of national prowess, for such an economy can resource many opportunities as they arise. On the contrary, a robust standing military has a much narrower utility. To be sure, this author is not one that intentionally seeks to take an interdisciplinary approach to academia, but the connection seems relevant given the nature of this assignment. Whereas a nation may accomplish a strategic goal through military force, a leader may accomplish a task relying upon coercive power; whereas a nation may transform and develop the world through its economic strength and versatility, a versatile leader may transform others through the employment of one or many leader development principles—both theoretically based and experientially acquired. This piece serves to describe acquired PL499 course concepts and their relevance to my project team and the West Point Leader Development System (WPLDS). Only through a...
U.S army general John J. Pershing, also known as “Black Jack” once said “A competent leader can get efficient service from poor troops, while on the contrary an incapable leader can demoralize the best of troops.” (“John J Pershing Quotes”). John commanded the American Expeditionary Force, or “AEF” in Europe at the time of World War 1 (Mifflin). He was one of the greatest generals in our society and accomplished a lot in his time on earth.
There are many qualities that make up a person. Each different quality gives their person a different personality and strengths. Several of my strengths, or virtues, would help further the Schindewolf student body, and turn our school into one of the greatest in the county. I am goal-oriented, considerate, and studious. These would all help me to make our school a better place for every student.
As an officer in the United States Army, it has been imperative for me to understand every facet of leadership and why it remains important to be an effective leader. During this course, I have learned some valuable lessons about myself as a leader and how I can improve on my leadership ability in the future. The journal entries along with the understanding of available leadership theories have been an integral part of my learning during this course. For all of the journals and assessments that I completed, I feel it has given me a good understanding of my current leadership status and my future potential as a leader. All of the specific assessments looked at several areas in regards to leadership; these assessments covered several separate focus areas and identified my overall strengths and weaknesses as a leader. Over the course of this paper I will briefly discuss each one of these assessments and journal entries as they pertained to me and my leadership.
Raymond Cattell developed a Leadership Potential equation based on military leaders. It described the characteristics of an effective leader. One of the characteristics included