John Keltner's Secondary Appraisals

844 Words2 Pages

1.

On page 166 of our textbook, Keltner introduces Lazarus' theory of discrete emotions that interpret the variables in primary appraisals. In this situation, if person V were to choose between two jobs (Job A or Job B) based on happiness, according to Lazarus they would experience a primary appraisal, followed by a secondary appraisal. Primary appraisals are more innate and are based off of goal relevance and goal congruence. In the secondary appraisal, ego involvement occurs as well as values and morals. When going through goal relevance, person V would usually know right away which job is relevant to their goals, and if a certain job was more than the other they would feel an emotion instead of apathy (lack of elicited emotion). If person …show more content…

The first source for false memories is misinformation, where for whatever reason memories are just not accurate to what happened, this can be due to perceptions, assumptions, misunderstandings, or misattribution. Dr. Loftus, a psychologist at University of California, Irvine has done many studies on the topic and has concluded that the second paradigm is false memories being implanted either by someone offering information about an event, or by someone asking suggestive and leading questions which would spark 'false memories' of you witnessing an event. According to Module 5, if someone is told something about a crime or incident, often this can lead to the person remembering the events that they were told about. This has been seen in past court cases involving witness testimonies and childhood sexual abuse. Loftus' research is extremely popular mostly due to a study conducted in the 1990's where she successfully was able to "impant false memories" into college students about a time they had gotten lost in mall as a child. Therefore, Person H probably remembers this false memory of breaking a vase because either somebody told him he did it, and he accepted that and learned to remember it as a memory. Or perhaps he was questioned about it and through the suggestive questions he may have been lead to believe it actually happened thereby giving him false memories about the

Open Document