Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Job satisfaction from an employee perspective
Factors of job satisfaction importance
Variables of job satisfaction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Job satisfaction from an employee perspective
Job satisfaction is the very important factor in general quality of life because it is closely connected with working life (e.g. Argyle, 1989; Bang & Lee, 2006), with family life, everyday life, and mental health (Orpen, 1978; Schmitt and Bedeian, 1982; Faragher, Cass & Cooper, 2005). Level of job satisfaction is also highly related to turnover, absenteeism rate, work productivity or accomplishment (Muchinsky, 1977; Organ, 1977). Many researchers (e.g. Cherrington, 1994; Acorn, Ratner & Crawford, 1997; Ostroff, 1992; Spector, 1997) state that employees who experience high job satisfaction contribute to organisational commitment, job involvement, their physical, mental health and overall well-being are improved. Job dissatisfaction on the other hand, leads to higher absenteeism, employee turnover, and a negative atmosphere at work (Clark, Georgellis, & Sanfey, 1998; Judge, Thoresen, Bono, & Patton, 2001). There are many definitions of job satisfaction. According to Locke (1976, p. 1304) job satisfaction is: “a pleasurable or positive emotional state resulting from the appraisal of one’s job or job experiences”. Hoppock (1935, p.47, as cited in Scott, Swortzel, & Taylor, 2005) defined job satisfaction as “any combination of psychological, physiological, and environmental circumstances that causes a person truthfully to say, ‘I am satisfied with my job’”. Spector’s (1997) states that job satisfaction is measured by an individual’s like or dislike of their job. Despite the fact, that the definitions vary, their common feature is that job satisfaction is a job-related emotional reaction. Some aspects of the job may lead to the employees' sa...
... middle of paper ...
...ght be changed under certain conditions (Twenge, Campbell, Hoffman & Lance, 2010; Noordin & Jusoff, 2010).
Many researchers (Hui, 1988; Hui & Yee, 1994, 1999) have found that individualism-collectivism dimension is related to the facets of job satisfaction. Satisfaction with work in collectivist cultures has been positively related to satisfaction with payment, opportunities for promotion, co-workers and supervisors, this is extrinsic values. On the other hand, satisfaction with intrinsic job values, such as nature of work, job security, was found higher for individualists than for collectivists (Oyserman, Coon, & Kemmelmeier, 2002). Furthermore, the study by Hui (1984) revealed that collectivist employees reported higher overall job satisfaction than individualistic workers, mainly in terms of work-related social relationships with supervisors and co-workers.
Job satisfaction is an important issue to address within a work force because it ensures that the employees’ care and value is considered. If the company puts effort into making their employees happy with their work, then this will produce positive outcomes. This includes having more people wanting to work for the company, the employees will want to stay longer, increased productivity and the company will gain an exceptional reputation. When employee satisfaction is not addressed, the ...
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
The idea of individualism is the employees have their own judgement whether to keep or to use their techniques which allows employees to deal with corporate management and negotiate their salaries and bonus. (Ian Kessler, John Purcell, 2003) Individualists may ignore group interests if the conflict is happening within the group. Alternatively, collectivist will search in the group whether are there any well-being that they are belonging to, even this may ignore their personal interests. (Wagner, 1995) While individualism is directing the management how they can manage the individual employees, collectivism encourage management to address and deal with collective and representative institutions. (Ian Kessler, John Purcell, 2003) By combining two different approaches, it can conceptualise employment
What happens when a worker is not being fulfilled in his or her perspective job? Everyone has had or will have a job. Whether he or she is a farmer, CEO, or burger flipper; regardless these are jobs. Additionally, throughout these jobs people have experiences, some good, and some bad. Some will hate their jobs and dread going to work when they wake up, while other will flourish at their jobs and gain a sense of fulfillment. Someone can come to hate a job because of a high workload, low salary, or long hours, while the love of a job comes from a sense of fulfillment by doing what he or she loves or having high salary and low workloads. In some cases, because employees are in the job for just the money and not personal gain they become dissatisfied more easily than someone who goes into a job looking for personal improvement or passion for the job.
To be satisfied with one’s job, they must have optimistic feelings surrounding the job they are in, along with the physiognomies associated with it (Kroeger, Thuesen, Rutledge, 2002, p. 83). Not every single part of a job is always desirable, however, if the majority of responsibilities adequately challenge and stimulate, the job will, more often than not, satisfy the employee (Robbins, Judge, 2009, p. 84).
Through a review of the literature, numerous articles reveal that job satisfaction is one of the most frequently deliberated topics in organizational behavior and of great concern among management and leaders globally (Cowden & Cummings, 2012; Chang, 2014; Gellatly, Cowden & Cummings, 2014; Hairr et al., 2014; Hellreigel & Slocum, 2011; Jahrami et al., 2011; Moneke & Umeh, 2013; Rani, Sharma, Sharma & Kumari, 2016; Van Bogaert et al., 2014). Therefore, several definitions of job satisfaction were discovered, one definition is “the feeling of pleasure and achievement that you experience in your job when you know your work is worth doing, or the degree to which your works gives you this feeling” (Cambridge Dictionary, n.d.). This definition is an example of the psychological component to job satisfaction, however, some researchers believe that job satisfaction is more correlated with the employee’s work culture (Roussel, 2013). There is also increasing substantiation in nursing literature with reference to the positive influence of healthy work environments on employee satisfaction, retention, enhanced patient outcomes, and overall organizational performance (Atefi et al., 2014; Gerard, Owens & Oliver, 2016; Hairr et al., 2014; Hellreigel & Slocum, 2011; Van Bogaert et al.,
Different facets of organizational behavior were addressed in the three articles reviewed for this project. Pay Satisfaction, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover Intent by Parbudyal Singh and Natasha Loncar examines the relationship between employee position and salary satisfaction and job turnover. The 4 Rs of Motivation by Michael Maccoby suggests a formula from which leaders should pull to motivate subordinates, and Relations Between Leader-Subordinate Personality Similarity and Job Attitudes by Lior Oren, Aharon Tziner, Gil Sharoni, Iafit Amor, and Pini Alon examines the effect the relationship between leaders and subordinates has upon job satisfaction.
Job satisfaction is a pleasurable or positive emotional state resulting from the appraisal of one’s job or job experiences. It has been treated both as a general attitude and satisfaction with five specific dimensions of the job: pay, the work itself, promotion opportunities, supervision, and coworkers. Challenging work, valued rewards, opportunities for advancement, competent supervision, and supportive coworkers are dimensions of the job that can lead to satisfaction (Nelson & Quick, 2013, pg. 58-59).
According to Robbins, DeCenzo, and Coulter (2011) “motivation is the process by which a person’s efforts are energized, directed, and sustained toward attaining a goal” (p. 267). Organizations are always looking for new ways to motivate employees. In a global economy it is important to understand that cultural differences can impact how an organization can motivate its employees. Geert Hofstede (as cited in Sledge, Miles, & Coppage, 2008) believed there are five dimensions of culture. These five dimensions are power distance, individualism versus collectivism, uncertainty avoidance, masculinity versus femininity, and Confucian dynamism (p. 1670). This paper will discuss each dimension of culture and how they could effect employee motivation.
For instance, in the Ivory Coast, the group goal prevails. Indeed, individuals share a common goal and work for the group or organization’s success. Oscar Rudenstam in his article “Individualism vs Collectivism” points out that in a collectivist culture as the one in the Ivory Coast, the workplace is prioritized higher than the individual self. This mindset means that individuals are more likely to put the institution’s interests before their own and work together to achieve the institution’s goal. In fact, the Ivory Coast motto “Union- Discipline- Work’’ best illustrate this point. On the other hand, in the United States, the individual goal and the “self-made man’’ concept are pronounced. In the same article “Individualism vs Collectivism”, Rudenstam comments that “it is typical of an individual who is relatively individualistic to prioritize individual ambitions to a higher degree and strive to fulfill such ambitions’’. Rudenstam believe that an individualistic individual tends to value self accomplishment more. The individual is the only person responsible for his success and achievements. A collectivist culture which promotes and work for the institution’s success opposes an individualist culture where individuals are focus on achieving their personal
Based off of the gratification an individual contains towards their work, job satisfaction is a key. The productivity could either be positive or negative, while the relationship between the productivity and satisfaction may not be consistent. There are multiple internal and external factors in job satisfaction that can impact the behavior of an employee and engagement over time. The way the worker’s attitude concerning their field affects the performance they perform on a daily basis. One who is satisfied with the job they do, succeeds at what they do.
In many organisations, managers and bosses have found it a struggle implementing successful strategies to improve job satisfaction and productivity among its employees. While dealing with unproductive, unmotivated and unsatisfied employees, there is an increased risk for turnover, which can be prevented. The risk of high turnover is a problem to workplaces as turnover has been proven to ‘take its toll’ on productivity as it disrupts current projects and increases workloads for other employees. It also has a negative impact on team cohesion (Patrick and Sonia, 2012). Job satisfaction is one’s general attitude to the job, and higher the job satisfaction, the more likely he/she will hold a positive attitude towards their job (De Menzes, 2011). De Menzes (2011) believes that employees who are satisfied with their jobs are likely to be more committed to their organisation and be more productive. People are significantly more productive when they are content and achieving individual and organisational goals are able to be fulfilled in a work environment where employees feel happy and motivated. Interventions which can be used to improve job satisfaction and productivity to decrease rates of turnover and unmotivated employees include an increase in workplace training, as well as performance pay.
Employee satisfaction is undoubtedly the best predictor of employee retention. A job environment consisting of good working relationships usually fosters employee satisfaction. Employees feel motivated as they believe that the company is appreciating their service and commitment. Job satisfaction results in employee retention. Employee retention could be defined as the length of time employees stay with the organization.
“I need a job.” How many times have I heard that one – I’ve heard it a million times. Living in a modern society based on a green piece of paper, I am burdened, and feel it maybe even impossible to survive without one. Without money, I wouldn’t have cars, clothes, livelihood or maybe even my health. Today it is simple, to luxuriate in finer things you need money, and to get money, I need a job.
In conclusion, the of motivation factors have a strong influence on job satisfaction resulting in any positive feelings that accompany human, who is trying to keep this state as long as possible, which leads to further efforts.