Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Tourism impact on environment and ecology
Tourism impact on environment and ecology
Tourism impact on environment and ecology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Tourism impact on environment and ecology
In former United State’s president Jimmy Carter’s Foreword to Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Season of Life and Land, A Photographic Journey by Subhankar Banerjee, he states his opinions on the topic of turning the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge into a building for industry. In this foreword, Carter uses three main rhetorical devices in order to strengthen the logic and persuasiveness of his argument of protecting the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. These three rhetorical devices: ethos, pathos, and logos, are considered universally as the three necessary tools of persuasive literature. Ethos is the appeal to credibility or ethics. As a former president, Carter’s appear trustworthy to there who voted for him and believed in him back …show more content…
then. His status as a former president established him as trustworthy since a man who governed the United States of America what he is talking about. Furthermore, during his time as president Carter “signed the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act… that safeguard more than a hundred million acres of national parks, refuges, and forests in Alaska” (5). The act of signing this Act allowed Carter to establish trust with the people who are eco-friendly. This proves to them that Carter’s words in the foreword are truth and not lies since he previously showed his involvement in protecting the wildlife. As a result, former president Jimmy Carter uses ethos to establish trust and credibility in his foreword which helps strengthen the persuasive of his argument. Pathos is the appeal to feeling and emotions.
In his farewell, Carter states that a decade year ago, his wife and him took a trip to the Arctic Refuge. Carter claims that they “walked along ancient caribou trails and studied the brilliant mosaic of wildflowers, mosses, and lichens that hugged the tundra” (2). By using such descriptive language, that appeals to one of our five senses, sight, Carter is able to help the American people image the amazing Arctic National Wildlife Refuge that they might teardown. They would feel pity for the plants and animals. Furthermore, Carter claims that most of the unforgettable experience of his trip was when they saw the migration of caribou. He described the migration with the words “the sweep of tundra before us become flooded with life, sounds of grunting animals,... clicking hooves filling the air” (3). All of his descriptive language in his foreward helps his audience, the American people, imagine that they were the ones who actually took a trip there. In addition, this also builds up Carter's credibility because he has actually been to the Refuge, his opinions of the place came from the bottom. Also, Carter later descended the refuge as “consumed by a web of reddis and pipelines, drilling rigs, and industrial facilities” (4). When he adds in a scenario of the great wilderness of the refuge being replaced by tools, the American people can image the destruction of the place which makes them feels angered and say. Carter uses pathos by appealing to the feeling of pity, anger, and sadness to strengthen his
argument. Logos is the appeal to logic. In his foreward, Carter states that if the American people decide to turn the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge into an industry, it would be pointless. Carter brings out statistics and states that “at best, the Arctic Refuge might provide one to two percent of the oil out country consumes each day” (7). Jimmy Carter basically asks that what is the point of turning an amazing space of wilderness into an industry for a small amount of oil when there are better methods of gaining oil. He rebuttals that “ we can easily conserve more than that amount by driving more fuel-efficient vehicles” (7). Carter provided real statistics as his evidence for his main argument of not turning the Refuge into an industry. Carter appeals to logos by bringing an argument and supporting it with real evidence such as facts. Overall, it is clear that in former United State’s president Jimmy Carter’s forward to Arctic national Wildlife Refuge: Season of Life and Land, a Photographic Journey by Subhankar Banerjee, he uses three rhetorical devices to communicate the American people not to turn the Arctic National Refuge into an industry. These three rhetorical devices ethos, pathos, and logos, helps Carter build up his argument by strengthening the logic and persuasiveness of it.
Ethos is a category that appeals to connecting one thing to another to help advertise the product.Resse's uses this tactic by including the pretty well -known rapper Mr.lupo linking the fans of mr.lupo to the cereal.People who watch the commercial will recognize mr.lupo and will want to buy the cereal from the commercial he's in.Connecting the two products together gets out more publicity for and the said product.Ethos is efficient in the process of linking two different subjects so they benefit each other.
“Consider the lobster” by David Foster Wallace and “Letters from Birmingham Jail” by MLK Jr. apply rhetoric such as pathos, logos, ethos, and diction in order to create a firm persuasive essay. In Wallace’s article the audience is questioned about the morality behind killing and cooking a lobster, while in MLK’s article we are persuaded to take action about social injustice and inequality. Both authors try to prompt their readers with different types of rhetoric, but together they apply pathos more than ethos and logos.
Pathos in persuasive writing involves engaging the readers’ emotion. In the article, Carlson’s use of pathos is clearly present. She uses phrases such as “phenomenal takeover”, “commercial conquest”, “alleged discrimination”, and “cultural insensitivity” to describe Wal-Mart. These are powerful words of rhetoric in the sense that this language is used to a pick a side, one against the Wal-Mart franchise. These statements also arouse emotion by personifying the company as an empire, per say, overtaking territories everywhere. This, along with the use of language, such as discrimination and insensitivity, clearly evoke a negative outlook on Wal-Mart. Carlson is also able to conjure up anger amongst the reader by showing how Wal-Mart could care less for the land they are building on, as workers “had orders to hide any archaeological relics they found.” By presenting a side for her audience to take and her jab at Wal-Mart, Laura is able to appeal to the reader’s emotion and successfully includes pathos in her persuasive argument.
Ethos, by definition, represents credibility or an ethical appeal which involves persuasion by the character involved. Budweiser, also
The author’s main argument in “Rhetoric: Making Sense of Human Interaction and Meaning-Making” is that rhetoric does not need to be complicated if writers incorporate certain elements to their writing. Downs further analyzed the elements that contribute to rhetoric such as symbols and signals, motivation, emotion, ecology, reasoning and identification. The author emphasized that writers can learn how to deliver their writing effectively once they are more aware on how rhetoric works. Downs constantly assures that rhetoric is quite simple and does not need to provoke fuzziness. Even though the term rhetorical is applied to everything, the author of the article made it clear that the “rhetorical” thing is situated. The example provided by the author in this article, further guides our understanding on what rhetoric
Ethos is something that makes the article creditable. Or what gives the author the right to be saying what he/she is saying. This article was revolved around the interview that was done with Governor Snyder. That is why they were able to quote what he was saying about the situation and have a file with his emails on them. This makes it clear to the audience that what is being said is true. That is why ethos, that make the article creditable, actually make the article better fo...
On a cold winter’s morning on the 28th day of January in the year 1986, America was profoundly shaken and sent to its knees as the space shuttle Challenger gruesomely exploded just seconds after launching. The seven members of its crew, including one civilian teacher, were all lost. This was a game changer, we had never lost a single astronaut in flight. The United States by this time had unfortunately grown accustomed to successful space missions, and this reality check was all too sudden, too brutal for a complacent and oblivious nation (“Space”). The outbreak of sympathy that poured from its citizens had not been seen since President John F. Kennedy’s assassination. The disturbing scenes were shown repeatedly on news networks which undeniably made it troublesome to keep it from haunting the nation’s cognizance (“Space”). The current president had more than situation to address, he had the problematic undertaking of gracefully picking America back up by its boot straps.
“Thoughts in the Presence of Fear” is a manifesto written by Wendell Berry, dated October 11, 2001. It is a post-September 11 manifesto for environmentalists. Berry uses terms such as “we” and “they” as he expresses his ideas, regarding how our optimism for a “new economy” was founded upon the labors of poor people all over the world. I will conduct a rhetorical analysis of four sections of Berry’s manifesto; Sections XI, XII, XIII, and XIV; and discuss his use of ethos, logos, and pathos. Berry uses pathos more often in his paper, to instill feelings of guilt and fear in his readers. While many areas of his paper can be thought of as logos, Berry makes little use of ethos.
Environmentalist and desert-lover, Edward Abbey in his essay “The Great American Desert” warns readers about the perilous dangers of the American deserts while simultaneously stirring curiosity about these fascinating ecosystems. He both invites and dissuades his readers from visiting the deserts of North America through the use of humor and sarcasm. In this essay, he is rhetorically successful in arguing that the open spaces of the undeveloped deserts are sacred places in need of respect and protection through his clever use of pathos and logos.
Ronald Reagan was one of the most liked Presidents. When being elected for his second term, he won by a landslide—winning all the states minus Minnesota and Washington D.C. Reagan addresses the people of the United States of America. He wants the American people to reflect on his presidency, and as all presidents do in their farewell addresses, he wants to say goodbye to the nation that he's led for the past eight years. Ronald Reagan uses repetition, parallel structure, and allusion to reflect on his presidency and to say farewell to the American people.
In Cesar Chavez’s article, he uses many rhetorical devices to help give the reader a better understanding of how important nonviolence vs violence is. Chavez explains how Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Mahatma Gandhi have endowed reasons of nonviolence worth following.
Ethos or moral character, is used when we are trying to persuade an audience that a
http://www.cartercenter.org/news/experts/jimmy_carter.html, Revised 2/22/2011 by Steven H. Hochman, © 2011 The Carter Center. All Rights Reserved, accessed May 23, 2011
James Earl Carter, also known as Jimmy Carter was the 39th President of the United States. Jimmy Carter was born in Plains, Georgia on October 1, 1924 (Millercenter). His parents use to own a peanut farm which was where he grew up. His father was a businessman and a farmer. His mother was a nurse in Georgia. She quit her career after she got married because she was pregnant. Jimmy was the first President to be born in a hospital. He was a smart kid. He made a lot of money by working at the farm. By the age of thirteen he bought six houses around Georgia which were used for other people to rent. Jimmy’s father was shocked and proud of Jimmy at the same time. Jimmy was very active as a teenager. When he attended Plains High School he played basketball. Not only did he play basketball but he also ran crossed country in high school. In Annapolis he played a lot of football. When he was growing up at the farm they had a tennis court made from the dirt that Jimmy use to play on. Jimmy Carter enjoyed a plethora of music. He liked country, classical and folk music. Some of the musicians he liked were Allman Brothers, Bob Dylan, and Paul Simon. When he graduated High School he noticed World War 2 which really motivated him to join the military service. There was a lot of competition. He was extremely interested so he started studying in Georgia Institute of Technology. Carter was 100 percent sure that he wanted to go to Annapolis. He graduated exactly at the end of the war and in the top ten of his class in August 1943. End of his year he met his sister’s friend named Rosalynn Smith. They met the junior year of high school. The first time Jimmy asked her to marry him she didn’t want to marry him. The next year, Ros...
Corbett, Julia B. Communicating Nature: How We Create and Understand Environmental Messages. Washington, DC: Island, 2006. Print.