Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Body image and its effects
Body image and its effects
Body image and its effects
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In The Canterbury Tales, Chaucer writes the discrepancies between the way the pilgrims present themselves and the way they are internally or spiritually. In modern society, as well, celebrities wear masks that hide who they really are. One such celebrity is Jared Fogle, who showed himself to the public as a representative for the Subway franchise, and a public figure of the well-known “Subway Diet”, but in actuality he is an egregious sex offender. The way that Jared portrayed himself in the media seems to be one way, but he was actually hiding behind a mask. Chaucer’s message that people do not always reveal who they truly are is still pertinent. Jared S. Fogle, also known as The Subway Guy was a representative who worked for the Subway …show more content…
Food Chain Restaurants in its advertising Campaigns. When he was still in college he fascinated many people for his significant weight loss, known as the “Subway Diet”. The “Subway Diet” was a diet in which he only ate subway sandwiches and worked out. He started working for Subway as a spokesman and was a well-liked man to many employees and people who looked up to him and who wanted to lose as much weight as he did through “The Subway Diet”. The media viewed him as a fairly successful, winsome guy. But, under his mask he was a vulgar perverted sex offender. In reality, he received child pornography, and repeatedly had sex with minors. He traveled across country lines to pay minors for sex. He worked with a fellow business partner to secretly tape videos of minors with hidden cameras. He even said that the cause of his actions was due to a sickness of “mild pedophilia”. He was a profane man, and unequivocally not someone who America thought he was. Jared Fogle made everyone think he was a stupendous representative and public figure. Many people wanted to be like him. They wanted to be able to lose hundreds of pounds by only eating subway sandwiches. He was a prosperous man with a wife and two kids, the media portrayed him to be a “good guy”. He is most definitely not a “good guy”. One of the many bad things that the sex offender has done was when he befriended Tayler, his business partner. Fogle received many pornographic pictures of minors while they were engaging in sexually explicit contact. When Fogle first befriended Taylor, they had conversations about child porn, and Fogle found out what Taylor was doing. What Fogle should have done was alert the authorities and tell them how he takes videos and pictures of minors secretly. But instead, he chose to benefit from the pornographic images by gaining access to a copious amount of the material. All the pictures and videos were recorded by Taylor at his home through using hidden cameras. Fogle had the chance to turn Taylor in, but instead he joined forces with him and took videos and pictures with Taylor. The media thought he was a role model for weight loss. He made an organization about weight loss for children. But he was a gross man who connivingly took pornographic images and videos of minors. Not only did Jared Fogle have pornographic images and videos of minors, but he acted upon his perverted needs.
Between 2010 and 2013, Jared traveled from Indiana to New York to have sex with minors by paying them. One of the many poor victims of Jared came out and said that she had sex with Fogle two times when she was seventeen in exchange for money. He traveled to New York and met her there. Once at the Plaza Hotel and once at the Ritz Carlton. She also said that Fogle had sex with her three times when she was only sixteen. After that girl came out, another girl said that Fogle paid her as well when she was only sixteen. By his court trial, there were even some witnesses that testified against him saying that he went up to them and asked them to find minors for him for a “finder’s fee”. Jared was not a good man, people thought that he cared about children, that America should work on weight loss and that he contributed to that cause. But in reality, Jared was hiring people to find minors for him so that he can pay them to have …show more content…
sex. Once Jared Fogle was caught in his despicable acts and was sent to court, he tried making up excuses for why what happened, happened.
He could not even take responsibility for his actions. Instead, his psychiatrist testified for his saying that the “Subway Diet” made him do it. “Once he lost weight, it seemed as though in a short time he had hyper-sexuality. There are brain disorders that can be associated with sexual drive” says his psychiatrist. Fogle has the nerve to blame his famous weight loss of 245 pounds to be the reason he committed all the crimes. Even if this was true, just because someone has the urge to do something, if it is not right, then they should not be doing it. Especially Jared who went all out for his sexual urges. What he did was wrong and against many laws, but he still did it and he should not be blaming a sickness of “mild pedophilia” according to his psychiatrist, for the reasons he has done what he has done. The media portrayed him as an honest man, but the fact that he cannot even admit to what he has done shows that he is
not. Just because someone is famous, or seems to be a good person by the cover, does not mean that they are one. Someone who might sound like a great public figure or a good role model from the media, might not be true in reality. Jared Fogle, who showed himself to the public as a spokesman for the Subway franchise, and a public figure for the well-known “Subway Diet” is in fact in actuality an egregious sex offender. He was a disgusting man, and most definitely not someone who people should aspire to be. Fogle had the chance to turn his business partner Taylor in, for secretly taping videos of minors. But instead he joined forces with him and decided to connivingly take the pornographic images and videos of minors for his own benefit. Jared even hired people to find minors for him so he can pay them to have sex. What he did was wrong and against many laws and he blamed the sickness “mild pedophilia” for the reasons he committed the crimes which are not acceptable. Jared hid who he really was from the media and portrayed himself as a good role model while in reality he was not. Chaucer shows the readers of The Canterbury Tales sides of the characters that were not recognizable before he showed who they really were, just as Jared Fogle presented himself as a dichotomy to the media.
In 2007 this reporter, Herman-Walrond took these comments seriously and immediately contacted Sarasota police. Walrond took things even further, and befriended Fogle. She also contacted the Federal Bureau of Investigations and agreed to be wire-tapped for four years when communicating with Fogle. If it was not for this reporter, Fogle could still be committing these sex crimes. On November 19, 2015 Jared Fogle took a guilty plea and was convicted of distribution and receipt of child porn, traveling to engage in illicit sex conduct with a minor. His criminal penalty was issued by Federal Judge Tanya Walton Pratt. Fogle was given fifteen years and eight months of federal prison with a thirteen-year minimum. He also has a lifetime of supervised release, a $175,000 fine, forfeiture of $50,000 and $1.4 million of restitution to be split among 14 victims. Fogle currently resides in the Federal Correctional Institution Englewood in Colorado. The earliest possible release is 2029 (Perez,
The moral compass of mankind has always piqued the interest of authors. The Middle Ages was a time of immoral behavior, corrupt religious officials, and disregard of marital vows. Geoffrey Chaucer used The Canterbury Tales to explore his personal views of this dark time. In particular, he crafted “The Wife of Bath’s Tale,” “The Prioress’s Tale,” and “The Shipman’s Tale” to portray the tainted society, using women in all of them to bring forth his views. In The Canterbury Tales, Chaucer depicts women as immodest and conniving beings to suggest the moral corruption of the Middle Ages.
In his Canterbury Tales, Geoffrey Chaucer assembles a band of pilgrims who, at the behest of their host, engage in a story-telling contest along their route. The stories told along the way serve a number of purposes, among them to entertain, to instruct, and to enlighten. In addition to the intrinsic value of the tales taken individually, the tales in their telling reveal much about the tellers. The pitting of tales one against another provides a third level of complexity, revealing the interpersonal dynamics of the societal microcosm comprising the diverse group of pilgrims.
We have all heard the common adage “Practice what you preach.” Another version of this sentiment can be found in the saying “You cannot just talk the talk; you must walk the walk.” In other words, it is commonly considered useless for one to talk about doing something or living a certain way if he does not actually live out those words. It is overall a sentiment that denounces hypocrisy. This idea is explored by Geoffrey Chaucer in his “Pardoner’s Prologue and Tale,” as well as the Introduction to the tale. Chaucer identifies a pardoner as his main character for the story and utilizes the situational and verbal irony found in the pardoner’s interactions and deplorable personality to demonstrate his belief in the corruption of the Roman Catholic Church during this time.
In The Canterbury Tales, written by Geoffrey Chaucer, the stereotypes and roles in society are reexamined and made new through the characters in the book. Chaucer discusses different stereotypes and separates his characters from the social norm by giving them highly ironic and/or unusual characteristics. Specifically, in the stories of The Wife of Bath and The Miller’s Tale, Chaucer examines stereotypes of women and men and attempts to define their basic wants and needs.
Critics interpreting Chaucerian depictions of drunkenness have traditionally focused on the state as an unalloyed vice, citing variously as justification the poet’s Christian conservatism, his intimate association with the disreputable London vintner community, and even possible firsthand familiarity with alcoholism. While we must always remain vigilant to the evils of excessive inebriation, to portray Chaucer’s images of drink and revelry in The Canterbury Tales as an unqualified denunciation is to oversimplify the poet’s work and to profane his art. By fusing his portrayals of drunkenness with the revelation of truth and philosophical insight, Chaucer demonstrates the capacity of wine and ale to evoke the funky earthiness of humanity that we so desperately seek to avoid and that is so fundamental to our corporeal experience.
The Canterbury Tales, written by Chaucer, and Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, written by an anonymous author, are both sophisticated fourteenth-century examples of medieval romance. Medieval romances captured the heart of their audiences as narratives and stories that featured a protagonist, often a knight, and dealt with religious allegories, chivalry, courtly love, and heroic epics. The concept of the knight emerged from the remnants of the Anglo-saxon literature and ideals and influence of the Christian religion and church. There is a distinct difference between the famous pagan heroic like Beowulf and the romantic medieval tales like Sir Gawain and the Green Knight of the Canterbury Tale. The Anglo-Saxon hero Beowulf exemplified qualities expected of warriors who could attain kingship by their heroism and battle deeds. They possessed the qualities of valor, military prowess, generosity, and honor. The hero fights for the survival of their tribe and nation, and it is in battle that the mettle of the epic hero is ultimately tested. The romantic conventions , influenced by Christianity and French ideals, created a new chivalric knight who sets out on a trial or adventure. They possessed similar qualities to their epic hero counterparts – valor, loyalty, honor, and skill in battle – but differed in knowing temperance, courtesy towards women, and courtly skills. The hero is no longer fighting for his people but for his ideals. By the 14th century, The Tale of Sir Gawain and the Green Knight and The Canterbury Tales have began to criticize the notion of chivalry which had become old and obsolete in their society; the idealization of chivalry practiced by knights could longer withstand the complexities and indeterminateness of situa...
It is not hard to apply Chaucer's description of the greedy doctor to today's medical system, nor is it difficult to find modern-day people with equivalent personalities to those of many of Chaucer's other characters. However, it is the institutions of his time as well as their flaws and hypocrisies that Chaucer is most critical of; he uses the personalities of his characters primarily to highlight those flaws. The two institutions that he is most critical of have lost much, if not all, of their influence; in many instances, the Church has only slight hold on the lives and attitudes of the people as a whole, and the strict feudal system has entirely disappeared. Few institutions today are as clearly visible and universally influential as those two forces were in the Middle Ages, so, if Chaucer were writing his tales today, he would most likely turn to the hypocritical attitudes of the general populace and the idiosyncracies of our daily lives. He gives some emphasis to these in the Tales (for example, he mentions the prioress's ladylike compassion for even the smallest creature in the Prologue, but has her tell an anti-Semitic tale later), but, in today's American culture, he would be most likely to criticize businessmen, middle-class parents, and the demand formust instantaneous gratification.
as brown as is a berry." (P 120 line 211) This shows that the Monk spends
Chaucer’s book The Canterbury Tales presents a frame story written at the end of the 14th century. It narrates the story of a group of pilgrims who participate in a story-telling contest that they made up to entertain each other while they travel to the shrine of Saint Thomas Becket at Canterbury Cathedral. Because of this, some of the tales become particularly attractive for they are written within a frame of parody which, as a style that mocks genre, is usually achieved by the deliberate exaggeration of some aspects of it for comic effect. Chaucer uses parody to highlight some aspects of the medieval society that presented in an exaggerated manner, not only do they amuse the readers, but also makes them reflect on them. He uses the individual parody of each tale to create a satirical book in which the behaviours of its characters paint an ironic and critical portrait of the English society at that time. Thus, the tales turn satirical, ironic, earthy, bawdy, and comical. When analysing the Knight’s and the Miller’s tale, one can realise how Chaucer mocks the courtly love convention, and other social codes of behaviour typical of the medieval times.
One of the most recognized attribute of Chaucer’s narrative was the ability to create characters that embodied features distant from the fiction, making them very real and believable through the writing. To verify this statement it is necessary to examine Chaucer’s work. The most celebrated of them is the collection of stories "The Canterbury Tales" (originally written in Middle English) which were the last work of Geoffrey Chaucer and perhaps the best of the middle ages in England. Therefore, for literary reasons, three characters were taken for an analysis to distinguish the level of transcendence recognized (if any) in their inner and outer lives.
arrived home from service and is in such a hurry to go on his pilgrimage that he
An interesting aspect of the famous literary work, "The Canterbury Tales," is the contrast of realistic and exaggerated qualities that Chaucer entitles to each of his characters. When viewed more closely, one can determine whether each of the characters is convincing or questionable based on their personalities. This essay will analyze the characteristics and personalities of the Knight, Squire, Monk, Plowman, Miller, and Parson of Chaucer's tale.
My presentation is based an article titled The Inhibited and the Uninhibited: Ironic Structure in the Miller’s Tale it s written by Earle Birney. The literary theme that Birney is discussing in his essay is structural irony. Structural irony is basically a series of ironic events and instances that finally build up to create a climax. The events and the climax the Birney chooses to focus his essay on are the events that lead towards the end when almost each character suffers an ironic event:
In The Canterbury Tales, Chaucer writes a prologue in which characters are given at face value. Then, he writes tales that are spoken by these characters. Perhaps Chaucer is commenting that people should not judge others by their outward appearance because the differences in the outward character of Chaucer’s travelers are often greatly different than the personality that is shown through their tales.