Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Character development recitatif
Humor as a Literary Tool
Character development recitatif
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
My presentation is based an article titled The Inhibited and the Uninhibited: Ironic Structure in the Miller’s Tale it s written by Earle Birney. The literary theme that Birney is discussing in his essay is structural irony. Structural irony is basically a series of ironic events and instances that finally build up to create a climax. The events and the climax the Birney chooses to focus his essay on are the events that lead towards the end when almost each character suffers an ironic event:
Absolon: kisses Alisoun’s backside
Nicholas: gets his backside burned
John: falls from the tub and breaks his arm
Ironic events and play on words were used to lead to this ironic climax.
First Event
Birney writes that the description of each character as sweet or using the word sweet to describe them on Chaucer’s part is ironic.
Nicholas: sweet singer, sweet smelling of herbs all day &
Being uninhibited. l. 97, l. 99., l. 107 Birney p. 76 middle
Alisoun: naturally sweet as well as Nicholas, her mouth is described as sweet. l. 153 Birney p. 78 top.
Absolon: is a contrast, he is artificially sweet, he chews spices an herbs to try to be sweet. Birney p. 79 lower.
These three descriptions are the first things in Birney’s article that are beginning the ironic structure that Chaucer has carefully built.
Second Event
Next, Birney examines the irony between the rivalry of Nicholas and Absolon in order to gain Alisoun’s kiss, affection, or to have an affair with her.
Nicholas: has no rivals in a way he just becomes forceful and persistant he offers himself in an aggressive manner and he gains her permission to do what he pleases to her body. l. 165-186, Birney p. 78 (before the quote).
Absolon: approaches her by going to her window at night and serenading her mind you he does not have a sweet voice (sqeaky, feminine) his approach is the most pathetic and apologetic
Then he tries to woo her by giving her gifts such as waffles and sweet wine Birney argues that he should not have tried to give sweet gifts to someone who is naturally sweet. l. 245- 259, l. 270 – 272, Birney p. 79 lower –80 top & 80 middle.
Third Event: The Climax
Finnaly, the third event has been unraveled and anticipated, through
The two first events. The greatly anticipated climax begins to unravel.
Absolon: kisses Alisoun’s rear end and the vengefully burns Nicholas instead of Alisoun (he dosen’t really care).
The Merchant's Prologue and Tale presents the darkest side of Chaucer's discussion on marriage. Playing off both the satire of the moral philosopher, the Clerk, and the marital stage set by the Wyf of Bathe, the Merchant comes forth with his angry disgust about his own marital fate. Disillusioned and depraved, the Merchant crafts a tale with a main character who parallels his own prevarication and blind reductionism while he simultaneously tries to validate his own wanton life by selling his belief to the other pilgrims. As both pervert reality through pecuniary evaluations on different levels, however, both are exposed to be blind fools, subject to the very forces that they exert on others. As this reversal happens and the Merchant satirizes Januarie blindness, Chaucer reveals the Merchant's blindness, giving him the very significance that he had spent his whole tale trying to deny.
One of the most striking parts of the novel Sugar, by Bernice L. McFadden is her choice of names, especially that of the main character, Sugar. McFadden chooses a name that was unconventional for the time period and remains unconventional today. Not only is there significance in the name Sugar, but the names Pearl and Mercy also have deeper meanings intentionally chosen by the author to further expand upon their roles as characters within the setting of the novel. Each of these three character’s names represent a persona that can be applied outside of the constraints of the novel.
In “The Pardoner’s Tale,” Geoffrey Chaucer masterfully frames an informal homily. Through the use of verbal and situational irony, Chaucer is able to accentuate the moral characteristics of the Pardoner. The essence of the story is exemplified by the blatant discrepancy between the character of the storyteller and the message of his story. By analyzing this contrast, the reader can place himself in the mind of the Pardoner in order to account for his psychology.
...y. This is seen in lines 11-13 when he writes, “To be specific, between the peony and the rose/ plant, squash and spinach, turnips and tomatoes; / beauty is nectar” (Meinke, Lines 11-13). After reading these lines the reader can visualize what these foods look like, including their shape, color, smell and texture.
However, after hearing his tale it is quite shocking about his frankness about his own hypocrisy. We know that he bluntly accuses himself of fraud, avarice, and gluttony, all things that he preaches against throughout this tale. It is in lines, 432-433 that the Pardoner states, “But that is not my principal intent; I preach nothing but for convenience.” It is here that we truly begin to learn that The Pardoner’s Tale is merely an example of a story that is often used by preachers to emphasize a moral point to their audience. That is why, this tale in particular helps to comprehend Chaucer’s own opinions, and how he used satire to display them.
He describes the flesh of the first berry of summer to be “sweet like a thickened
Geoffrey Chaucer used sarcasm to describe his characters in “The Canterbury Tales.” It will point out details that are seen in the book that help explain how he used this sarcasm to prove a point and to teach life lessons sometimes. I will also point out how this sarcasm was aimed at telling the reader his point of view about how corrupt the Catholic Church was. Chaucer uses an abundance of sarcasm, as opposed to seriousness, to describe his characters in “The Canterbury Tales.”
I felt in my heart a wicked, burning desire that they would kiss me with those red lips. It is not good to note this down, lest some day it should meet Mina’s eyes and cause her pain, but it is the truth. The fair girl shook her head coquettishly, and the other two urged her on. One said, “Go on! You are the first, and we shall follow. Yours is the right to begin.” The other added, “He is young and strong. There are kisses for us all.” I lay quiet, looking out from under my eyelashes in an agony of delightful anticipation (39).
Much of our knowledge about ancient Egyptian culture is based on elaborate worship rituals related to death and the afterlife. Egyptians were devoted to their gods and to their pharaohs who were gods on earth, as demonstrated by their willingness to build the pyramids for the safe passage of their leaders into the afterlife.
Many years ago Egeon a merchant of Syracuse was in a shipwreck in which he was separated from some of his family. His wife, Emilia, from one of his twin sons, then Antipholus of Ephesus, and the son’s slave Dromio of Ephesus. With Egeon, were the slave’s twin Dromio of Syracuse and Egon’s remaining son Antipholus of Syracuse. When Antipholus of Syracuse was old enough he set out to find his missing brother. Years after that Egeon then went and looked for his remaining son, and then the play begins.
At the opening of the Pardoner’s Tale, Chaucer introduces the three main characters and, by his description of them, identifies them as sinners. Also, through emotive lingual and poetic techniques, a mood is set which the rest of the tale can later develop.
Working in pairs, each person chooses a pilgrim from the three different social classes in “The General Prologue” and answers the following:
The beliefs, values and attitudes of Ancient Egyptian society is depicted through the effects of their social hierarchy on their funerary practices. Ancient Egyptians were very religious, believing in many gods and goddess. Of course their religion had a major impact on their burials and funerary rituals that were performed during this period. The processes of these funerary practices were affected by change between the old kingdom and the new kingdom, yet some continuity in practices. Overall the culture of ancient Egypt was based on their religion, balance and the continuation of life on earth in the afterlife through their funerary Practices.
“The Egyptians believed that the mummified body was the home for the soul or spirit. If the body was destroyed, the spirit might be lost” (si). The priests of the Egyptian temples were in charge of completing this process. Mummification took approximately 60 days because the body had to be dried and pre-wrapped. The priests often wore jackal masks to represent Anubis, the god of the dead. The first part in the mummification process was the removal of all internal organs. “The heart, which the Ancient Egyptians believed to be the center of emotion and intelligence, was left in the body for use in the next life” (historyonthenet). The brain was thought to be useless so it was discarded. The rest of the organs were stored in canopic jars which helped preserve them. The body was then bathed in oils and fragrances and left to dry for 40 days. The body was wrapped again several times and magic charms were placed between the bandages for luck. Once the wrapping is finished, the body was placed in a sarcophagus with 3 layers. The first, or top layer, is the most detailed layer with a very accurate mold of the person’s entire body and intricately painted features. The middle layer is also a detailed layer, but it does not outline the exact shape of the body or have as much paint as the first layer does. The third and final layer is the least detailed out of all the layers and just has a basic
Geoffrey Chaucer was a on a mission when he wrote The Canterbury Tales. That mission was to create a satire that attacked three major institutions. Raphel displays, “Medieval society was divided into three estates: the Church (those who prayed), the Nobility (those who fought), and the Patriarchy. The General Prologue to The Canterbury Tales is an estates satire.” Chaucer wanted to shed light on the institutions that were taking advantage of the everyday man. Chaucer does this by making up tales about certain people that she light to the undercover world of the institutions. In The Canterbury Tales, Chaucer uses satire to attack the Church, the Patriarchy, and the Nobility.