Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Exegesis on Isaiah 58-66
Isaiah holy bible
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Exegesis on Isaiah 58-66
Introduction
There are numerous issues that can be examined concerning The Gospel According to Isaiah 53. It is this author’s desire to detail various issues that are in the text. This analysis will focus on the Servant in Isaiah, the Messiah and the Servant, and the Servant in the New Testament. This author will be highlighting the issues deemed most important to him in explaining Isaiah’s teaching on the Servant of the Lord.
The Servant in Israel
To best discern this text, the reader needs to understand how the original audience comprehended it. When the Lord spoke of a suffering servant, who or what was the Lord alluding to? Was the Lord suggesting the nation of Israel? Or was the Lord indicating a particular individual?
…show more content…
This text assists the reader in examining these particular issues and explains them impartially. When explaining the answer in regards to the nation of Israel one viewpoint is “Here the Lord refers to them as “witnesses” (plural) and then goes on to identify them as “my servant” (singular).” Therefore, one can believe that the singular “my servant” may actually apply to the nation of Israel. As claimed by this text and the Jewish understanding of Isaiah 53, when delving into the discrepancy concerning the number of instances “Servant” is attributed to the nation of Israel against the occurrences of the individual, there is a considerable disparity between the two. A careful examination of The Gospel According to Isaiah 53 affirms that the “Servant of the Lord” is said nineteen times in chapters 40-51 indicating the nation of Israel, and occasionally pointing to a righteous man inside of Israel. Although, there seems to be numerous passages upholding the notion that the servant is the nation of Israel, however, that is not correct. God communicates in the first person singular, where He characterizes the sufferings of the Servant in the third person singular. This demonstrates that the only appropriate interpretation of Isaiah 53:8, is that the Servant of the Lord suffered for His chosen people. Michael Brown makes it clear that “Isaiah 53 indisputably features the vicarious sufferings of the righteous Servant as a central theme, and that righteous Servant cannot be Israel, whose sufferings have not brought atonement and forgiveness to the nations.” What one can comprehend after a thorough examination is that Israel can’t be the Servant the Lord is speaking of, because it does not possess the righteousness that is necessary. Moreover, it is because of the absence of righteousness that Israel’s can’t provide its own salvation. Walter C. Kaiser Jr. lends more support by stating, “This Servant has a mission to all Israel to see that they are restored back into their land, so this usage of the term “servant” cannot be reference to the nation of Israel, for in that case, they would be acting on themselves rather than receiving the deliverance promised to them.” Through the reasoning provided above, it is this author’s belief that the Servant of the Lord is referring to the Messiah the Lord Jesus Christ. The Identity of the Servant After examining the book of Isaiah and the New Testament it clearly confirms that Jesus Christ is the Servant of the Lord.
Kaiser provides four aspects of what God did to the Servant of the Lord.
1. “He was pierced” with the nails that went into his hands and feet.
2. “He was crushed” or “bruised” by the thrust of the spear in his side, the slap of his face, and the effort of dragging the cross.
3. He took “the punishment that brought us peace” as he faced his crucifixion alone.
4. He took the welts and stripes we should have received.
These are only a few signs that the Servant of the Lord was none other than Jesus Christ. When God the Father raised Jesus from the dead, it was a demonstration that He accepted His suffering and death as full payment for sin for all who believe in Him (Rom. 4:25). Additional confirmation is found in the Servant’s arrest, which correlates to Jesus’s arrest in the Garden of
…show more content…
Gethsemane. Furthermore, the Servant is submissive, like a lamb led to slaughter, to the will of the Father. Jesus demonstrates this submission in the garden when He prays ““Abba, Father, all things are possible for you. Remove this cup from me. Yet not what I will, but what you will” (Mark 14:36). There is no protest from the Servant of the Lord, “for he was on a holy mission to atone for the sins of the world.” The Servant paid for the sins of all humanity and the final insult to the Servant would be that people would plan to bury Him among the wicked, implying His own wickedness. The final stanza of the poem, Isaiah 53:10-12, explains the Servant’s submissive suffering for sinners. The servant’s grief would accomplish a greater good, which was the forgiveness and reconciliation on sinful humanity. His righteousness will be able to man to be put right with God. It all rises to the culmination in verse 12. Where God will exalt the Servant because of His work and its results. “There are two divine gifts that are mentioned in Isaiah 53:12.” God will reward His Servant with the great ones who He justified and would “divide the spoils” with the ones who became strong through His work for them. Isaiah 53 concludes with “four divine reasons why God’s seal of approval is put on his Servant,” who is assumed to be Jesus Christ. 1.
“Because he poured out his life unto death.”
2. He allowed himself to be “numbered with the transgressors.”
3. “He bore the sin of man.”
4. He “made intercession for the transgressors.”
The work of the Servant is exhibited in the life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. Just like the Servant of the Lord in Isaiah 53, Jesus Christ came to seek and save the lost and to take on all their transgressions, guilt, and iniquities.
The Servant in the Gospels
A couple of issues that need to be addressed are, how is the Servant of the Lord explained in the New Testament, and does Jesus believe that He was the prophesied Servant of from Isaiah 53? Regarding the question of, does Jesus believe that He was the prophesied Servant from Isaiah 53, it was a big influence on His own mission and it was essential for His followers to understand that Jesus’ death was the fulfillment of this prophecy. The authors of the New Testament quoted and referred to Isaiah 53 at least fifty times, and in the Gospels approximately twenty-nine times. This paper is concentrate in particular on the Gospel of Matthew’s references to Isaiah 53. “At least eighteen of the twenty-nine references to Isaiah 53 in the Gospels are found in Matthew’s Gospel, more than any
other.” This author is going to concentrate on the Songs of the Suffering Servant. In Matthew 3:17, Matthew uses language from Isaiah 42:1. As Jesus is coming out of the water, the Spirit of God descends upon Him like a dove, and the Father speaks from heaven. The voice from heaven identified Jesus with the suffering Servant of Isaiah 42:1 and prepares the people of Israel for His ministry. By the Holy Spirit anointing Jesus it signaled His crowning as the prophesied Messiah of Israel and He was commissioned by God to be His Servant to carry out His work through the Holy Spirit. At the very same time Jesus identified Himself as the Servant in Isaiah with His baptism, He begins His public ministry that fulfills the suffering Servant in Isaiah 53. In Matthew 8:17, Jesus “took our illnesses and bore our diseases.” When Jesus took the sins of man, He also took our sickness. This sickness exists because sin is in the world, and one of the effects of Jesus taking our sin on the cross is physical healing. “Matthew draws upon this prophecy to link Jesus’ healing ministry with the substitutionary atonement theme of Isaiah 53.” Jesus refers to the suffering Servant prophecies in Isaiah 53 in Matthew 26:24. Jesus is predicting His rejection, suffering, and death. Jesus’ mission on earth was not always understood because He was perceived incorrectly and because of wrong assumptions from the Israelites, Jewish leaders and His own disciples. The prophecies of the Suffering Servant in the Old Testament were not expected by many during His time, even among His followers. However, Jesus makes clear that Scripture prophesied that the Messiah would be murdered. Conclusion This paper has provided a better understanding of who the Servant of the Lord was in the book of Isaiah. Even though there is possible indication that the Suffering Servant in the nation of Israel, however, after further examination its clear that Israel can’t provide its own salvation. It is apparent to this author that the prophecies regarding the Servant in Isaiah 53 is Jesus Christ. Lastly, this author used Old Testament prophecies that were quoted and referred to in the New Testament, specifically in the Gospel of Matthew to gain a better understanding of how the Suffering Servant correlated to the life and ministry of Jesus Christ. It is this author’s belief that Isaiah 53 is referring to Jesus as the Messiah.
Gerhard Lohfink, in his book, “Jesus of Nazareth” believes that Jesus’ person and ministry are intertwined, or actually one and of the same. After Lohfink clarifies the difference between the "reign of God" as distinct from the “Kingdom of God,” he asserts that in Jesus, there is this active, ongoing reign which is not only revealed, but is manifested in all He says and does. Lohfink states, that Jesus is “not just preaching about the reign of God, but He is announcing it,” going on to indicating that Jesus is manifesting this reign in His own self disclosure and the actions of His ministry. Jesus ways of teaching and interactions with others, is shown as compassionate, gentle, direct and personal, as well as definitive and bold. As we also find in Ch. 3, “All that is happening before everyone’s eyes. The reign of God is breaking forth in the midst of the world and not only within people.” (51) And for Lohfink, this is taking place in the actual preaching, actions and life of Jesus Christ. Simply, we are personally and collectively and actively a part of establishing this “reign” right here, right now. A “reign” of mercy, compassion, forgiveness, self-giving, sacrificial love, as well as of justice and peace.
In the Bible, God, sacrifices his only son, a respectable, revered "heavenly" figure, allowing Jesus to live amongst sinful people. In human form, Jesus treats the common people's illnesses and performs miracles to help them; above all, he cares for them and loves them. Jesus is selfless, endlessly devoting himself to helping and serving others, and ensuring that they will have a better life by showing them "the way" to God. Jesus sacrifices his life in heaven to come to Earth and help his people.
The Gospel of Matthew is an eyewitness story written for an audience of believers, under great stress, and persecution. Matthew develops a theological plot incorporating genealogy, speeches, parables, inter and intra textual references, common vocabulary, and fulfillment quotations, with a tension that builds as we are invited into the story. The crucifixion and resurrection bring us to a Christological climax that symbolically points beyond its conclusion to God’s Kingdom, bringing atonement, salvation and the ushering in the Eschaton. The extraordinary events surrounding the crucifixion act as commentary, adding important details concerning the death of Jesus.1
At the very beginning of the gospels the authors make their representation of Jesus known to the reader, but they rely upon different methods. Mark focuses on Jesus’ role as a servant is apparent as he quotes the prophet Isaiah: “Here is my messenger, whom I send on ahead of you!” (Mark 1:2) This is a rather simple statement, and the use of the word “messenger” connotes a sense of being under another’s command; Jesus is seen as an intermediary between God and man. John’s introduction to Jesus is much more majestic and poetic, devoting many verses to explaining his divine relationship with God: “In the beginning there was the divine word and wisdom. The divine word and wisdom was there with God, and it was what God was. It was there with God from the beginning. Everything came to be by means of it” (John 1:1-3).
In the days of Christ’s life on this earth, believers did not have access to the Bible in its entirety as we know and are familiar with today. Believers in this ancient time period only had access to the Old Testament. However, through their access to the Old Testament, believers were provided a foundation for New Testament times. This foundation provided New Testament believers with the Lord’s established principles of right and wrong they were expected to follow. In addition, the Old Testament is overflowing with accounts of people whose lives exemplified the future life of Christ on this earth. These pictures allowed the Israelite nation to begin to have an understanding of why Christ needed to come as their Messiah and the work He needed to do on earth. Finally, there are common themes that are interwoven throughout the entire Old Testament. Three of these themes: transgression, redemption, and consummation point to the purpose of Christ’s atoning death on the cross. These themes portray God’s work both in the lives of Old Testament believers, but they also foreshadow God’s desire and plan for believers in New Testament times and beyond.
The book consists of three parts. The first part has five chapters of which focuses on explaining what the key questions are and why we find them difficult to answer. The second part has nine chapters explaining in detail what N.T. Wright considers Jesus’ public career and the approach he had in first century Palestine. The third part of the book, the last chapter, challenges readers to wrestle with the questions of Jesus’ life and ministry.
My passage is Isaiah 53 where it talks about a suffering servant for Israel. While Christians believe this is a prophecy of Jesus, Muslims believe that Jesus was only a prophet. They believe Jesus was never crucified, and Allah made someone look like Jesus instead. (Koran 4:157) Interestingly enough, when our Muslim consultant, Dr. Akhter, was asked about Jesus’ teachings according to the Koran and how it may relate to this passage, he said that he does not know of His teachings. Thus, the suffering servant, according to Islamic teachings, is the man who Allah made to appear identical to Jesus.
One of the greatest debates that continues to rage on amongst theologians, as well as others, is in regards to the balance between the humanity and the divinity of the person of Jesus Christ (also known as Christology). This debate can be especially challenging in the Scripture passage of Matthew 26:36-46 where the reader finds Jesus praying in the Garden of Gethsemane. Many of the ancient and medieval theologians worked to explain away apparent humanistic characteristics seen in this section of the text, while more modern theologians seem to be more open to embracing these characteristics. While the ancient and medieval theologians may not have embraced the humanity of Jesus, the translations and backgrounds of the words “cup”, “grieved”, and “agitated”, along with the translation of the passage itself, the humanity of Jesus is not only present in the passage but also a necessity to the salvation of humanity through the sacrifice of Jesus. Simply put, for the salvation through death to be relatable for humanity, Jesus had to also be, at least in part, fully human as well as being fully divine.
Support is defined as a means to endure bravely or quietly (Merriam-Webster). In Losing Isaiah, Khaila, a recovered crack addict, serves some time incarcerated. She then goes through a rehabilitation program, during which her main source of support was her case worker and counselor. In the process of fully recovering from crack she discovers that her baby, Isaiah, is still alive. With the help of her counselor and a lawyer she is able to endure a long and pressing trial to gain a second chance to be a better mother to Isaiah (Losing Isaiah). In the United States, stories like Khaila�s are constantly replayed. These cases occur more frequently in urban areas, where the majority of women on crack who give birth to crack babies are minority women, usually Hispanic or African American (Thomas). Crack is common in crowded municipalities because it is one of the cheapest and most available drugs in the streets of most inner city communities in America (Thomas). Khaila�s drug habit played directly into the stereotypes of her demographic. In the movie, her situation depicts how the lack of a strong support system leads recovered/recovering crack mothers to resort in little to chances of resuming a normal life when they begin to reshape their lives.
Stuart has authored commentaries and articles in journals and magazines. The authors acknowledge that many books have been written on this topic. Their goal is to be unique by focusing on different types of literature (genres) so their readers will understand how to properly interpret them in the context they were written. This review will examine the principles the authors use to interpret the Bible. The review will summarize the book, followed by a critique, and a conclusion.
God’s goodness and mercy far transcends the comprehension of the most brilliant human mind! He “who stoops down to look on the heavens and the earth”(Psalm 113:6).Yet in His infinite love for us He stoops down to reveal Himself to us by a multitude of illustration, types, and shadows, so that we may learn to know him. This paper will describe what is meant by the Kingdom of God; examine the religious philosophy of the various sects of Judaism during the Second Temple period: Pharisee, Sadducees, Essenes, and Zealots, describe the religious philosophy and political philosophy of each sects, it will also describe how the Messianic expectation differ from the Messianic role that Jesus presented, and include an exegesis of the temptation of Jesus and how other sects defined the Messiah.
The gospels explain Jesus’ life and death including His identity but also his activities, works, leadership and his suffering. Jesus is seen as a manifestation of God’s relationship with humans. An important fact about Jesus is the humility and modesty associated with his birth, upbringing and death. The fact that such a person ...
The word "gospel" is a translation of the Greek word "euangelion" which means "good news. The first three books in the New Testament (Mark, Matthew, and Luke) are often referred to as the Synoptic Gospels (from Greek synoptikos, "seen together") They bear greater similarity to each other than any of the other gospels in the New Testament. Along with these similarities come some differences among the gospels, suggesting that each gospel was written for a specific audience and for a specific purpose. This paper will examine the resurrection of Jesus, while identifying the significant differences between Mark, Matthew and Luke. This paper will also analyze the differences to suggest the prominent theological perspective each gospel author might be trying to convey about the resurrection of Jesus.
Isaiah chapter 6 versus 1-13 stand apart from the rest of the Bible as a unique record of how God called on and reached out to a man, and in doing so a prophet was born. Interpreting this chapter is of vital importance for the understanding of Isaiah's teaching as a whole. In it he describes a real experience which effects him both psychologically and spiritually. Through the passage it can be perceived that his ministry was initiated by a soul shaking experience of the reality of God, and it's authenticity validated by it's results and influence on the prophet's life and work (Berrtrick, p 205).
The book is an account of the past of the Jewish people. It is powerful in its ability to foretell the future. Isaiah is a book, much like Jeremiah from our previous assignment that calls out to God and questions why things are unjust. People at times wonder if God has left themor no one or nothing is in actual control—these are questions that are being asked today. The answer today is the same as yesterday—Isaiah reminds us that we are limited in our true understanding of God’s ways and