More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of communication in career
Importance of communication skills in engineering pdf
Importance of communication skills for engineering students essays
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“Is Writing an Essential Skill for Engineers”
Summary
The article “Is Writing an Essential Skill for Engineers” by James Koelsch discussed how having the ability to write and communicate is a very important quality for all engineers to possess. The author used multiply techniques in trying to persuade the reader as to why successful engineers must be able to write, as well as be able to communicate to others. Koelsch started out by using anecdotes, talking about his own personal experience with learning about writing and communication in his college years, which he used to relate to his audience because his audience seems to be engineering college students. Likewise he used a few different examples on some professionals’ views on how they
…show more content…
Koelsch was very adamant about how he believed that having the education and experience with writing can go a long way in determining how successful of an engineer you become. Koelsch showed right away his thoughts on if writing is an important attribute for engineers to have, he started his paper stating that the technical skills engineers need to have are still the most valuable skills to possess, but having writing and communication skills is also an essential attribute to possess.
Analysis
1) Anecdotes
2) Examples
3) Quotes
4) Analogies
5) Scenarios
Anecdotes:
One thing Koelsch sure didn’t leave out of his article was anecdotes. He used a plethora of anecdotes to try to convince the reader just how important writing and communication skills are in shaping your career as an engineer. I have mixed feelings on the anecdotes used in this paper; I do think Koelsch use of anecdotes was somewhat effective in proving his argument. On one hand I like how he tries to appeal to reader through more of a personal level through using stories to convince the reader, but on the other hand I believe he didn’t appeal to the audience as well as he
…show more content…
For me as an engineer I like comparing things to something else in my life, so the use of analogies would really appeal to me. The author did use one analogy that I saw and I really liked that he included at least one in his paper. Koelsch compared how learning to write is like learning to ice skate or learning how to do karate, I thought this was a good way for me to see what he meant by learning to write is only done through the experience of just writing. In the one occasion where Koelsch used analogies he was very effective, I just feel he could have used them more to try and convince the reader that writing and communication skills are important. For example he could have said that the skill of writing and communication is as important to engineers as studying a playbook is for a football player. If a football player wants to become successful he has to study the playbook, because even if he is a very strong athlete, if he doesn’t know the plays he won’t become successful; just like if an engineer is very strong in the technical side of engineering but very poor in the communication and writing side that person will not develop their
While preparing for one of his college lectures, Dennis Baron, a professor and linguistics at the University of Illinois, began playing with the idea of how writing has changed the world we lived in and materials and tools we use in everyday life. This lecture slowly transitioned into “Should Everybody Write?” An article that has made many wonder if technology has made writing too easy for anyone to use or strengthens a writer's ability to learn and communicate their ideas. Baron uses rhetorical strategies in his article to portray to his audience his positive tone, the contrast and comparison of context and his logical purpose.
I am more knowledgeable about invention, arrangement, style, and delivery, all in which create a masterful piece of text. A few examples, I have learned to organize and construct my thoughts and ideas clearer. I have been taught to use stronger transitions and focus more on the delivery and content of the body element of essays. Further, the instructions and advice I have received throughout this term have influenced my understanding of the purpose of writing. My outlook on writing has been modified by shifting my perception of writing from, writing to prove I am a good writer by perceiving it as using “fluffy” or BIG words to impress my audience. I grew to understanding that good writing’s purpose is to engage the writer by mind-striking ideas and arguments, which therefore will prove and title me as a “good writer”.
“Although both articles are exploring writing and the change that needs to or that does happen, Peter Elbow’s idea of growth in writing is a more naïve and simplistic approach to writing, where as Somers and Saltz’s article, while still very general, takes a more realistic point of view at the writing experience for students and new writers”.
In Donald M. Murrays’s essay “What is Practical Education” he explains his reasoning behind why he allowed his students to write badly. He shares his own experience with police-like teachers who drove him to hate writing. In hopes of helping his students find their voice he allows his students to write the words down as they come, no matter how awkward they sound. Often times they find out that they have more to say then they thought. Rhetorical devices are used to help the readers relate to his point of view on writing.
Several people have trouble writing college level essays and believe that they are unable to improve their writing skills. In “the Inspired Writer vs. The Real Writer,” Sarah Allen argues how no one is born naturally good at writing. Sarah Allen also states how even professional writers have trouble with the task of writing. Others, such as Lennie Irvin, agree. In Irvin’s article “What is ‘Academic’ Writing?” states how there are misconceptions about writing. Furthermore, Mike Bunn’s article “How to Read Like a Writer” shows ways on how one can improve their writing skills. Allen, Bunn, and Irvin are correct to say how no one is born naturally good writers. Now that we know this, we should find ways to help improve our writing skills, and
...s educational system on traditionalism that focuses on fluency, appreciation, and comprehension. King states, “no one can be as intellectually slothful as a really smart person” (138). As a whole we are “creatures of habit”, thus resisting changes in the traditional sphere of academics. King uses his spin on popular culture to engage future readers and inspire the next generation of writers. “Some of this book—perhaps too much—has been about how I learned to do it. Much of it has been about how you can do it better. The rest of it—and perhaps the best of it—is a permission slip: you can, you should, and if you're brave enough to start, you will.” (King 269-270). “On Writing” is a poignant, educated, and inspiring book, a book that is sure to help hundreds of struggling writers and will motivate others who may pick up the book not for inspiration, but mere curiosity.
According to the reading, Writing as a Mode of Learning by Janet Emig, knowledge is described as “an act of knowing that enters as a passionate contribution of the person to know what is being known, which is a coefficient that is no mere imperfection but a vital component of a person’s knowledge.” Essentially, knowledge is composed of what a person, association or discourse community knows about what is already known in their area of expertise or fully know what could occur in a certain situation, similar to how a rhetor must prepare and know what rhetorical situations might occur at any moment during their speech or writing. Knowledge is created to prepare for various outcomes and situations as goals are being constructed in a discourse community.
Although the greater picture is that reading is fundamental, the two authors have a few different messages that they seek to communicate to their audiences. “The Joy of Reading and Writing” depicts how reading serves as a mechanism to escape the preconceived notions that constrain several groups of people from establishing themselves and achieving success in their lifetimes. “Reading to Write,” on the other hand, offers a valuable advice to aspiring writers. The author suggests that one has to read, read, and read before he or she can become a writer. Moreover, he holds an interesting opinion concerning mediocre writing. He says, “Every book you pick has its own lesson or lessons, and quite often the bad books have more to teach than the good ones” (p.221). Although these two essays differ in their contents and messages, the authors use the same rhetorical mode to write their essays. Both are process analyses, meaning that they develop their main argument and provide justification for it step by step. By employing this technique, the two authors create essays that are thoughtful, well supported, and easy to understand. In addition, Alexie and King both add a little personal touch to their writings as they include personal anecdotes. This has the effect of providing support for their arguments. Although the two essays have fairly different messages, the authors make use of anecdotes and structure their writing in a somewhat similar
Writing can be a very difficult process for those who do not know how to go about constructing
... effectively convey thoughts and ideas. These skills will be beneficial in any job an individual obtains after college. For example, a doctor would benefit greatly from a foreign language class. Many intercity hospitals cater to minorities that may only speak their native languages. If a physician were able to communicate with foreign patients it would make their job much easier and the patients more comfortable. English courses that develop writing skills will truly benefit all individuals. Communicating thoughts through writing will aid success in any field. Even blue-collar labor workers would benefit by having the knowledge of expressing concerns through a letter to a superior. While taking these courses one may not see how it will benefit them in the future. However, at some point one will draw from the knowledge or experience to assist them in their careers.
Any craftsman knows that you need the right tools to complete a project successfully. Similarly, people need the right language and usage to communicate in a positive way. How people write is often a problem because they don’t have the right tools, but a bigger problem occurs when a writer “is almost indifferent as to whether his words mean anything at all” (592). If a writer carries this mentality, why try to communicate in the first place? People need...
One of the most prevalent is the value of expository writing and how it can be helpful in many other areas as well. Michael was a prime example of this; in the last group discussion he talked about how he was able to use what he learned in expos to write papers in other subjects. In the end even Arpan was able to say, ”It did help me… I was able to understand a lot more about proving a point in the paper and that’s something that I’ve never been able to do.” In continuation, Arpan and Nneka’s experiences showed the importance of seeking help. When he was unable to write, Arpan began tutoring, and when Nneka could not manage her time, she sought supplementary support to create a manageable and effective schedule.
Being back in grad school has been an amazing experience because it has put me back in touch with my own process of writing; I am conscious of how I write in comparison to the way in which I expect my students to write. I find myself using the information that I share with them, although at times I feel the pressure that I must earn all A’s on my papers because if I haven’t mastered the process of writing, then I must be a bit of a fraud to be teaching it. But then I have to remember what I have learned about my own process, and what I continue to learn about my own writing process. I keep in mind the epiphany I experienced in graduate school, and I seek to share this information, for current or later use, with my students in the classroom.
Writing is an excellent practice because the benefits gained are essential to an individual’s success in a job, or just conveying their ideas through words. Within the semester we have written three major papers, and have rewritten two of those papers. In each paper I discovered new ways to get information, and have gained more experience in sculpting a paper. Obtaining this new knowledge of how to present my ideas in different writing styles will help me expand my range in how I can write, and essentially allow me to be better prepared for upcoming jobs following my college education. I can safely say that with the papers from this semester and their mistakes that dealt with minor grammar errors, awkward sentence structures, and oversimplifying
Have you ever read a novel that was so appealing that it left you with the interest of writing something similar? Writing a novel is a time-consuming process that requires patience, knowledge and a certain language. However, not all writers known today were born with natural talents. In fact, many had to work on their skills in order to succeed. Although it could be difficult to come up with an idea and express it in words, writing can be easier if you followed certain steps, such as writing a plot, building the characters and making it plausible to anyone who reads it.