Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Motivational and leadership theory
Motivational and leadership theory
More effective leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Motivational and leadership theory
In “The Human Side of Enterprise” Douglas McGregor defines two different sets of
assumption about human nature and the way it influences the behavior of the individual;
especially how managers react towards their employees. McGregor illustrates a way to
effectively manage people through Theory X and Theory Y. McGregor proposed two types of
managers, one who had a negative view of their employee, which was known as Theory X, and
one assumed a positive view of their employees, which was known as Theory Y.
Theory X is a geared towards traditional approach where the manager role is to control
their employees. In this theory, managers assume the employees dislike their work and will avoid
doing it as much as possible. In turn employees do not want to take responsibility,
…show more content…
If employees focus their energy
to the lowest level, which is physiological, needs then it will be insufficient (McGregor
1957/2012:156).
In contrast, a new theory of manage was known as the Theory Y assumes that it is the
manager’s role to develop the employee by creating opportunities, releasing potential,
encouraging growth and proving guidance. Theory Y assumes that employees are participative in
which they will self-direct and self-control to achieve the organization 's goals and objectives.
Managers assume the best in their employees, which in turn drives the employees to want to
come to work. Employees are also full of potential through creativity and imagination and are
able to solve organizational problems (McGregor 1957/2012:156).
By using the scientific management, this is trying to steer away from giving jobs to
employees that do not utilize their capabilities. Management wants to move towards Theory Y
but management knows it will be difficult to change the attitudes. Employees and managers are
accustomed to being directed and controlled (McGregor 1957/2012: 157). The change will
They cannot be fulfilled in their work if their success depends on the opinions or whims of another person, no matter how benevolent that person may be. Without a tangible means of assessing success or failure, motivation eventually deteriorates as people see themselves as unable to control their own fate,” (Lencioni, 2007, p. 222).
ideology followed by them. Sometimes, discontented former employees can also stalk aiming their former bosses, co-workers or the entire company.
This study will also identify the theories that will help answer these and other questions. In addition, this research will determine methods in which these theories can motivate the employees.
It is some benefits to the conventional theory which are the average man is by nature indolent, he lacks ambitions, he is by nature resistant to change. It is also two different approaches to management is hard
not having any interest in their suggestions to the employee that thinks they were hired
Miles, R. (1975) Theories of Management: Implications for Organisational Behaviour and Development. McGraw-Hill, New York.
There are several theories that examine an organization and it’s approach to managing work in an effort to develop efficiency and increase production. Two classical approaches to management are Taylor’s scientific management theory and Weber's bureaucratic management theory. Both men are considered pioneers of in the study of management.
The concept of scientific management is based on the idea that work could be studied to increase efficiency, and specialization. Economist Adam Smith changed the way the world looked at the economy and organization. In his essay, “Of the Division of Labour,” Smith emphasizes the importance of specialization, and how division of labor leads to specialization. He states that this would allow a worker to be more productive and efficient (Shafritz, Ott, & Jang, 2011, p. 41-45). Frederick Taylor introduced the principles of scientific management, which stated that management is a science, workers should be scientifically selected and trained scientifically, and both management and workers should work together.
There are many theories that have been developed by scholars to explain the principles and practice of management. Some of these theorists include: Henry Fayol; and Mintzberg among others. Henry Fayol is believed to be the first scholar to develop the management theory. Other scholars developed their theories based on the weakness of Henry Fayol’s theory of management (Thomson 2004).
Scientific Management also has a relationship with today’s environment because it has two advantages. Firstly, compare to the past, management is getting more scientific. How to improve production efficiency is the starting point of Scientific Management, and also is the final destination. It aims to unearth and cultivate workmen’s endowment, let them have the best performance in their work ---to obtain the highest efficiency farthest. Taylor said that the enormous increasing in production efficiency was the evident distinction to differentiate which a nation was civilized one or not. Moreover, it is the huge progressive emblem of human’s community. To change the production efficiency, he focused on management and labor. It based on “co-operation between the management and workers” (4) close together. The most quick and effective way is to import scientific analyses and knowledge into management practice, using scientific method instead of experienced way in various categories of work. “Bring everyone’s production efficiency into full play to accomplish maximum profit.”(5)For example, nowadays in the situation of teem of two workers in the factories, the fact is clearly identical. To understand that a worker and his helper, their workmanship become a extraordinary skill .The worker and his helper can produce two TV sets in one day, meanwhile, their competitor and helper can only produce one. After selling, the worker and helper can earn more money; the management can make more profits. In the same way, two competitive companies, different areas in a country, even between two nations, they will have the same situation while they in the same competitive market.
If the organization succeeds then the employees also succeeds. Employees must see the bigger picture and must feel that they are part of the organization and not just a one man show.
The job of a manager in the workplace is to get things done through employees. To do this the manager should be able to motivate employees. But that’s easier said than done! Motivation practice and theory are difficult subject, touching on several disciplines.
...erybody's need, thus making the job for the manager harder to comply with his entire employee.
Individuals behave in a given manner based not on the way their external environment actually is but, rather, on what they see or believe it to be. An organization may spend millions of dollars to create a pleasant work environment for its employees. However, in spite of these expenditures, if an employee believes that his or her job that assigned to them is lousy and feel unsatisfactory, that employee will behave accordingly.
Different companies and departments of those companies have very different approaches to motivate their workers to being the best they can. For example, I worked for three years at a food Store called Wegmans when I was younger. I worked as a cashier which was interesting to say the least. Managers were always trying to motivate the cashiers to go that much faster, be that much friendlier, and to be more efficient at every opportunity. They took many different approaches to find what would motivate each cashier, which was a difficult task considering how young each cashier was, the large number of us their were, and how different each employee was from the other.