Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
French political revolution and industrial revolution
Henry fayol theory of management 6 functions of management relevant now
The industrial revolution in france
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
There are many theories that have been developed by scholars to explain the principles and practice of management. Some of these theorists include: Henry Fayol; and Mintzberg among others. Henry Fayol is believed to be the first scholar to develop the management theory. Other scholars developed their theories based on the weakness of Henry Fayol’s theory of management (Thomson 2004).
Henry Fayol is a scholar of French national and was born in 1841. The scholar Fayol was born at the cusp of French’s industrial revolution. Fayol mainly developed theories on management and organization of labor. Fayol developed the theory of management out of the experiences of French economy in the early years of the 19th century. During this period, France was underdeveloped compared to countries like Britain and Prussia. During this period the unification of Germany further exposed the underdevelopment of France and made it more economically insecure. Fayol is believed to be the founding father of the administration school and the first to describe management as a top down process based on planning and the organization of people (Thomson 2004).
The industrial and trade success of Germany and Britain to the expense of France was influential to Fayol too. This led to Fayol developing the French economic centralization and firm policy. The development of these policies boosted the development of France as it began to catch up with the rapidly growing Germany. This was in the year 1871 (EmeraldInsight 2011).
These were also considered to be Fayol’s productive years as a businessman in the mining industry. At this timeframe France was also desperately in need of a new management theory so as to address its rapid and destabilizing economi...
... middle of paper ...
...d realization of the goals; planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating and controlling processes are vital and essential (12manage).
Due to the changes in management patterns and advancements, there are changes that could be made to the theory to make it relevant and applicable in the contemporary management. For instance, in the fourteen principles, the inclusion of staff welfare may make the theory flexible and adaptable (Thomson 2004).
References
EmeraldInsight, (2011). Henri Fayol, Practitioner and Theoretician-Revered and Reviled. Web 4 April. 2015.
http://www.emeraildinsight.com/1751-1348.htm
12Manage, (2010). Principles of Management by Henry Fayol. Web 4 April. 2015.
http://www.12manage.com/methods_fayol_14_principles_of_management.htm
Thomson, (2004). Management Theory and Practice. Web 4 April. 2015.
http://www.thomsonlearning.co.uk
Compared to other countries, France’s economy is the fourth largest in the world. France is a very industrialized nation, yet it has kept some of the cultural characteristics that contribute to its old-world charm. The economy is “exceptionally diversified” (“Economic Structure”, 1). It produces everything from aircrafts to pharmaceuticals.
The French economic policy, during these times were conducted in accordance with the "Mercantilism"(the theory and system of political economy prevailing in Europe after the decline of feudalism, based on national policies of accumulating bullion, establishing colonies and a merchant marine, and developing industry and mining to attain a favorable balance of trade) that had held sway in the economic thinking of Europe for some three centuries. Mercantilism expected that governmental control would be exercised over industry and trade in accordance with the theory that national strength (i.e. the Royal states treasury) is increased by a preponderance of exports over imports.
Scientific management was thought up by an American called Fredric Winslow Taylor (1856-1915). His theory consisted of 5 principles. These were: 1. An understandable dissection of tasks and responsibilities between management and the workforce. 2.
Over 50 years ago, English-speaking managers were directly introduced to Henry Fayol’s theory in management. His treatise, General and Industrial Management (1949), has had a great effect on managers and the practice of management around the world. However, 24 years after the English translation of Fayol, Henri Mintzberg in the Nature of Managerial Work (1973) developed another theory and stated that Fayol’s work was just “folklores”.
Frederick Taylor and Henri Fayol are both considered classical contributors to management theory. Both were developing and expression their viewpoints at similar time period with the aim of “raising standard of management in industry” (Brodie,1967, p7) in a period were very few publications and theories on management. While both theories were developed with the same influencing factors such as war, social struggles and industrial revolution (Urwick. 1951, p7) each developed quite different management theories. Frederick Taylor is considered the Father of Scientific management and he developed scientific principles of management, focusing on the individual,...
Rodrigues, C. (2001), “Fayol’s 14 Principles of Management then and now: a framework for managing today’s organisations effectively”, Monclair State University, New Jersey.
The founding father of scientific management theory is Fredrick Winslow Taylor. He was an American mechanical engineer and an inventor. Modern management theorist Edward Deming credited Taylor for his contributions while Joseph Juran criticized his work for extracting more work from workers. However a careful reading of Taylor’s work will disclose that he placed workers interest as high as the employer’s in his studies. Before the principles of management are discussed it is very important to understand the causes which led Taylor to derive the four principles of management. The three causes are as follows:
Managing a workplace can be an eventful, yet stressful occupation, as motivating others while handling conflict can be challenging. In order to achieve success, the manager can explore many theories to help effectively manage the working environment. The implement of management theories help increase quality of service as well as increase the level of productivity within an organization (Hawthorne). “Not many managers use a singular theory or concept when implementing strategies in the workplace: They commonly use a combination of a number of theories, depending on the workplace, purpose and workforce” (Hawthorne). Contingency theory and Theory X and Theory Y are two of the many options that a manager can explore and adopt in order to effectively
Henri Fayol Born in 1841 was a French engineer and director of mines. His work was not well known outside of France until Constsnce Storrs published his book "Administration Industrielle et Generale" in 1916. Upon publication of the book he wrote, people where more and more interested in his theories of management. Today he is credited with the fourteen principles for organizational design and effective administration.
There are three well-established theories of classical management: Taylor?s Theory of Scientific Management, Fayol?s Administrative Theory, Weber?s Theory of Bureaucracy. Although these schools, or theories, developed historical sequence, later ideas have not replaced earlier ones. Instead, each new school has tended to complement or coexist with previous ones.
In the last two decades both the public and private sector organisations have experienced incredible changes in their management processes (Hassard et al 2013). Some of these changes in the world of work have been influenced by technology, demography, globalisation to name but a few. These changes are occurring at different areas and levels thus posing a challenge for the management of organisations (Burke and Cooper 2006), hence the importance of using theoretical approaches in organisational development. Organisational theories therefore can be seen as radical changes in organizational thinking based on the changes occurring in human resource management (HRM) (Hassard, et al 2013). Supporting the thinking of Suddaby et
Organizing: Builds up structures, materials and human. Forecasting: Provide means, examine the future, draw up the action plans. Control: Seeing that everything occurs in conformity with established rules. Commanding: binds together and harmonizes the activity and
Management plays a significant role in how business operates. The diversity of approaches to the theoretical and practical background of management has come up with several versions of what is meant by such key words as management and organization. The academia views expressed in relation to management theories take a different role than that prescribed to managers. There has not been any concrete definition of management even though the classic definition of Henri fayol still remains in contention to be the preferred choice after eighty years. In the context of what is required I would like to elaborate on the following journals.
Over the past hundred years management has continuously been evolving. There have been a wide range of approaches in how to deal with management or better yet how to improve management functions in our ever changing environment. From as early as 1100 B.C managers have been struggling with the same issues and problems that manager’s face today. Modern managers use many of the practices, principles, and techniques developed from earlier concepts and experiences.
First and foremost, to learn more about the foundation for the birth of the management theory and its details, we will look at Fayol’s life, work, attainments and his theory. Henri Fayol was born in France in 1841, educated at the Lycée at Lyons and afterward trained to be a mining engineer at the national School of Mines at St Etienne. He then joined the Commentry - Fourchambault Company, a coal mining and iron foundry combine where he quickly ascended through the managerial ranks – from engineer aged 19, became manager of the Commentry pits at the age of 25, to manager of a group of coalmines at 31. When being 47 years old, he finally took the position of managing director of Commentry - Fourchambault and remained as its chief executive until retiring in 1918. In the 1916 to 1923 period, he published General and Industrial Management and set up a Centre for Administrative Studies (CAS) to develop and publiciz...