Henri Mintzberg considers the image of management which was developed from the work of Henry Fayol as one of folklore rather than fact. However, it could be argued that the image portrayed by Fayol is superior to that of Mintzberg, and the latter’s description is of rather ineffective management! Who do think is right?
Over 50 years ago, English-speaking managers were directly introduced to Henry Fayol’s theory in management. His treatise, General and Industrial Management (1949), has had a great effect on managers and the practice of management around the world. However, 24 years after the English translation of Fayol, Henri Mintzberg in the Nature of Managerial Work (1973) developed another theory and stated that Fayol’s work was just “folklores”.
…show more content…
He supposed that those were not what a manager actually did in his day to day work. However, there are some empirical studies supporting Fayol’s functions when showing that managers spend time in these functions. Mahoney, Jerdee, and Carroll (1963, 1965) reported that managers’ time could be allocated into eight basic managerial functions including planning, representing, negotiating, evaluating, investigating, supervising, cooperating and staffing. Those functions were actually expanded from Fayol’s five functions. This study of 452 managers also indicated that all managers in various jobs and level categories had different time patterns with respect to these functions. This study was developed in a study by Penfield (1973) and a study by Haas, Porat, and Vaughan (1969). They also pointed out that it was possible to relate managers’ day to day activities to these functions simply by asking them why they were carrying those particular activities. In another study by Allen (1981), 932 managers questioned reported a variety of planning and controlling activities, though this study did not indicate the amount of time spent on those activities. It indicated that 80 percent of the sample managers were involved in formal activities such as developing forecasts and preparing budgets, 70 percent had …show more content…
However, while the functions that Fayol regarded as the most important elements of managerial work are not what can be observed from managers’ day to day activities, Mintzberg made some problems in his method of study to find out the nature of management. Also, while Fayol failed to draw a picture of management work in reality, Mintzberg was unsuccessful in giving an idea about what managers should do to be successful and effective. To some extent, Fayol and Mintzberd did not develop competing theories but theories about different dimensions of managerial work. In terms of gaining effectiveness in management, Fayol was performed better by indicating what managers should do to rather than just responding to the pressure of their job as what Mintzberg described. Therefore, it can be concluded that Fayol’s work is superior to Mintzberg’s and the latter is of rather ineffective
Henir Fayol a French industrialist defined management as consisting of five main activities, planning, organising, commanding, coordinating and controlling. Planning includes defining goals, establishing strategy, and developing plans to coordinate activities. Organising includes determining what tasks are to be done, who is to do them, how the tasks are to be grouped, who reports to whom, and where decisions are to be made. Commanding is telling people what should be done. Coordinating involves determining the timing and sequencing of activities so that they work together properly, allocating the appropriate proportions of resources, times and priority, and adapting means to ends. Controlling is the process of monitoring performance, comparing it with goals, and correcting and significant deviations.
– Management follows a work to rule philosophy even at the expense of other stakeholders, such as employees and shareholders. They do not have the drive to succeed or change processes to generate more profit, simply because they receive large salaries and benefits for doing merely what their contracts
Fayol devised a ‘common sense’ view of the managerial responsibilities, within which he crafted arguably his most notable work, his five functions of management. These functions covered vital managerial tasks from planning and forecasting to coordination of operations, aspects of which can still be seen in modern day management widely (Fayol cited in King and Lawley, 2013). Fayol believed that people should be treated with respect and fairness by their superiors which would ultimately prevent a high turnover of employees; something he deemed to be inefficient. (Ref) Similarly to Fayol, Taylor was a pioneering theorist who contributed critically to the theories of managements witnessed in the rationalised workplace. Like Fayol, Taylor held a somewhat basic view of the behaviour of humans within the workplace and believed that organisations could be tightly managed through a set of clearly defined rules and regulations. In contrast to the more sensitised view that was held by Fayol, Taylor saw humans as animals who were driven by the capitalist view. In addition to the aforementioned difference between the two theorists, Taylor felt that people should be micromanaged as they respond better than when addressed as a group, generally treating everyone in a standardised form (Taylor, 2011). Arguably, the authour of this study notes that Taylor may have allowed his personal mistrust of
Henri Fayol, at the age of 19, began working as engineer at a large mining company in France which eventually led to him becoming a director. Through the years that led on to this Fayol then developed his 14 principles of management which he considered to be the most important. According to Fayol, these principles indicate how managers should organise and interact with their peers. Fayol’s analysis is considered to be one of the earliest theories of management that has been created and therefore can be considered to be redundant. The many arguments considered in relation to Fayol have been considered throughout this essay as well as my own argument to gain an overall conclusion as to whether Fayol’s classical analysis of management has been made redundant.
Wren. (2005). The History of Management Thought (5th ed.). Danvers, MA: Wiley & Sons. (Original work published 1976)
Frederick Taylor and Henri Fayol are both considered classical contributors to management theory. Both were developing and expression their viewpoints at similar time period with the aim of “raising standard of management in industry” (Brodie,1967, p7) in a period were very few publications and theories on management. While both theories were developed with the same influencing factors such as war, social struggles and industrial revolution (Urwick. 1951, p7) each developed quite different management theories. Frederick Taylor is considered the Father of Scientific management and he developed scientific principles of management, focusing on the individual,...
Through the interview, it is proven that Fayol’s four functions; Mintzberg’s managerial roles and Katz’s idea of management skills are essential to be part of the manager consideration when making a decision because these theories are able to assist in organisation’s progress. Tracy (2014), suggested “The true measure of the value of any business leader and manager is performance” and this could be reflected in Manager X as he has proven that organisation performance is top priority for him. To make a conclusion on this topic of discussion, a manager duty is to function as a leader of an organisation, a negotiator with the clients, a motivator to the team and the coordinator of the whole organisation’s progress.
Rodrigues, C. (2001), “Fayol’s 14 Principles of Management then and now: a framework for managing today’s organisations effectively”, Monclair State University, New Jersey.
I don?t believe that ether Chester Barnard?s nor Henri Fayol?s ways of managements are impractical for today?s business environment. They both fit in almost perfectly to almost any company in the United States and even the world.
The first function of management is planning. "Planning is systematically making decisions about the goals and activities that an individual, a group, a work unit, or overall organization will pursue." (Bateman & Snell) In my organization, planning takes up the most time. Objectives must be laid out, potential products must be examined and the timing and type of marketing must all be planned out before we provide our product to our customers. This function should be first and foremost to all individuals involved in the organization. Poor planning will result in your organizations demise.
There are three well-established theories of classical management: Taylor?s Theory of Scientific Management, Fayol?s Administrative Theory, Weber?s Theory of Bureaucracy. Although these schools, or theories, developed historical sequence, later ideas have not replaced earlier ones. Instead, each new school has tended to complement or coexist with previous ones.
According to Kantooz and O’ Donnell, the principles of management are the fundamental truth of general validity, in which these truths are the guiding foundations in executing of the management functions and solution to problems that may arise (Gupta, 2009). Management, like every form of social science, has a developed set of principles, as management is also considered a type of social science, therefore has developed a number of principles of management. A famous French industrialist by the name of Henry Foyol, has introduced a set of 14 principles of management back in 1916 that is still widely considered by many authors (Gupta, 2009). This essay will look at comparing two companies which are based in Dubai, which are Virgin
Management plays a significant role in how business operates. The diversity of approaches to the theoretical and practical background of management has come up with several versions of what is meant by such key words as management and organization. The academia views expressed in relation to management theories take a different role than that prescribed to managers. There has not been any concrete definition of management even though the classic definition of Henri fayol still remains in contention to be the preferred choice after eighty years. In the context of what is required I would like to elaborate on the following journals.
Over the past hundred years management has continuously been evolving. There have been a wide range of approaches in how to deal with management or better yet how to improve management functions in our ever changing environment. From as early as 1100 B.C managers have been struggling with the same issues and problems that manager’s face today. Modern managers use many of the practices, principles, and techniques developed from earlier concepts and experiences.
Nowadays, management has become an important part of the society. The role of management is to assist the organisation to make the best use of its resource to achieve its goal. Base on the aim of management, one of the theorists Henri Fayol proposed the four necessary management functions: planning, organisation, leading, controlling are the tools managers use to achieve these goals. (Jones 2006) This essay is going to describe and discuss these functions.