Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Formulation and implementation of strategy
Why strategy implementation is important
Why strategy implementation is important
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Formulation and implementation of strategy
Knowledge management (KM) is extolled by some as being an important intangible asset that enhances an organization’s ability to innovate (Chea, 2009). Broadly defined, KM involves a company’s process of obtaining, consolidating, and communicating knowledge to various members of the firm, in which those individuals use the knowledge acquired to make the organization more productive, efficient, and competitive (Mousavizadeh, Harden, Ryan, & Windsor, 2015). The use of knowledge to create innovations involves having an effective KM strategy. Irizar, a company who at one point faced insolvency, represents a firm whose exemplarily knowledge management strategy led to the organization’s innovation and competitive advantage (Forcadell & Guadamillas, …show more content…
The leaders at Irizar knew that a company’s culture determines the degree to which creative ideas are encouraged, supported, and transformed (Kenny & Reedy, 2006). The new mission of Irizar reinforced the value the organization placed on its workers, as the new process based on people, encouraged teamwork, risk taking, mutual respect, and trust (Forcadell & Guadamillas, 2002). The new strategy had a profound effect, exemplified by the workers reporting high satisfaction levels (Forcadell & Guadamillas, 2002). Literature regarding organizational culture factors and innovation indicate that correctly framed and articulated missions have a positive effect on the organization (Kenny & Reedy, 2006). This implies that Irizar’s workers bought into the corporate philosophy, which helped to garner …show more content…
The difficulty that companies face lies with the imitation and replication of complex forms of knowledge (Donate & Guadamillas, 2010). In addition, often organizations struggle with knowing how to approach the daunting task of implementing an effective KM strategy (Earl, 2001). Garavelli, Gorgoglione, and Scozzi (2004) theorized that a leader’s management style, along with other variables such as culture and atmosphere, heavily influences an organization’s KM strategy. Evidence from Garvallie’s et al. (2004) study indicates that the star model, developed by the researchers, can assist leaders with assessing the culture of their organizations, and executing a KM approach consistent with the organizational climate (Garavelli et al.,
Based on interviews with management, we found that XTO’s management style encourages innovation. Employees are encouraged to ask for forgiveness and not permission. We’ve learned this semester through lecture and readings, that this management technique empowers employees and gives them the autonomy they like and the freedom to create. Employees that work under this type of management style are not faced with the possibility of loosing their jobs if they make a business decision that turns out to have negative consequences. Employees are free to innovate and take pragmatic risks. The company culture at XTO is described as laid back and relaxed. XTO believes that major oil and gas companies are unable to implement this type of culture due to their size. Since XTO is smaller, the company is able to deploy a much different policy from what the majors employ. As the company rapidly grows, this relaxed practice has become a concern for XTO’s management. The company has recently grown so much that they’ve had to pull back slightly on the relaxed atmosphere. Management has been working with Human Resources to increase the amount of structure within the company. It remains to be seen if this policy will stifle company innovation.
Knowledge work according to Raman, (1999), contains activities, which are "information-based, knowledge intensive and knowledge generating" (p. 2). The paper's theme is, "organizations staying ahead of the competition have come to realize knowledge and knowledge workers are their key to success in today's environment where knowledge and information have become commodities" (Raman, 1999, p. 1). This paper's theme traces the historical development of knowledge management and knowledge workers; differentiates between knowledge workers and non-knowledge workers, and illustrate the knowledge workers experience in the author's organization. Knowledge systems contain the potential to increase business value (Bang, Cleemann, & Bramming, 2010).
Hansen M., Nohria N., and Tierney T. (1999), “What’s your Strategy for Managing Knowledge?,” Harvard Business Review (March 1999), 106–16.
Organizational cultural is the system of shared beliefs and values that develops within an organization and guides the behavior of its members, while organizational structure is an expression of social and economic principles of hierarchy and specialization (Kinicki, 2015). Both the culture and the structure of an organization are important things for management to understand in order to successfully set and achieve an organization’s goals. Companies who excel in highly competitive fields can attribute their successful economic performance to a cohesive corporate culture that increases competiveness and profitability. This culture is best utilized in an organization that has the necessary structure to allow its employees to coordinate their
Bose, R. & Sugumaran, V. (2003) Knowledge and Process Management: Journal of Corporate Transformation, 10(1), 3-17
T.D. Wilson (2002) makes a point of identifying several sources of articles, references and course syllabi with varying takes on knowledge management within organizations. Wilson is convinced that organizations misuse the terminology “knowledge management” and that their activities are more concerned with managing information than with the management of knowledge (Wilson, 2002). Wilson defines knowledge as involving “the mental processes of comprehension” or, as “what we know” and information as the expression of what we know and can convey through messages (Wilson, 2002). By researching the use of the “knowledge management” Wilson conveys that the terms knowledge and information are used interchangeably, which results in an inaccurate application
The literature review has emphasised on the importance of four major and common factors in regards to managing knowledge work, that is, communities of practice, information technology support, KM activities, and performance outcomes (Davenport & Prusak 2000; Demarest 1997; McDermott 1999). Much of the existing research on knowledge creation focuses on the source and state of knowledge. In fact, the term management control of activities that may be uncontrollable or stifled by ...
...bjectives and realize growth. Knowledge Management Knowledge management plays a key role in ensuring that the different functions and activities of a company are synchronized. In Google’s case, the purchase of Motorola (which has turned out not to have been the best business decision) probably could have been avoided if the knowledge within the company was managed and used better. Knowledge enables a company to create, recognize and distribute opportunities. When every employee of a company contributes his or her part of knowledge into the knowledge pool, it is very beneficial as it contributes to the overall success of the company. Proper application of the available knowledge in a company can offer several competitive benefits to both the company and the employees. Application of accurate knowledge at the correct situation helps a company to make good decisions.
Leaders have influence the organizational climate and can change the command culture. However to accomplish that they have to first understand the existing organizational culture within which they are operating. Culture is the behavior characteristic of a particular group. In an organizational setting, leaders have to be mindful of this cultural factors in the context that is sensitive to the different backgrounds of team members to best leverage their talent. There are three levels of culture. First level is the Artifacts. This is the surface level. It includes all phenomena that one sees, hears, and feels when one encounters a new group with unfamiliar culture. Second level is the espoused values. These reflect the original values. Third level is the basic underlying assumptions. These are what were once hypothesis, supported only by a hunch or a value, come gradually to be treated as reality. Climate, in the other hand, is a prevailing trend of public opinion or attitude in a given organization at a given time.
New ideas can lead to programs and activities that are superior leaders in an organization. Creativity is what makes new ideas come to live in an organization, leaders often use creativity to keep the business running. The first priority of leadership is to engage the right people, at the right times, to the right degree in creative work. That engagement starts when the leader recasts the role of employees (Harvard Business School Publishing, 2015). Innovation causes leaders to have new ideas and work methods that will impact the organization in the future. A substantial leader will have an effective organization if they apply innovation and creativity to the success of the
Organisational culture is one of the most valuable assets of an organization. Many studies states that the culture is one of the key elements that benefits the performance and affects the success of the company (Kerr & Slocum 2005). This can be measured by income of the company, and market share. Also, an appropriate culture within the society can bring advantages to the company which helps to perform with the de...
Pasher, E., & Ronen, T. (2011). The complete guide to knowledge management: A strategic plan to leverage your company 's intellectual capital. Hoboken, N.J: John Wiley & Sons.
...t for the systematic han-dling of knowledge. Most influencing factors could be considered within the building block approach and all important knowledge activities are included. Moreover, the au-thors provide several case examples in their book. On the other hand, the concept does not provide an implementation model for the knowledge management concept. A knowledge management audit is not considered either. In contrast to the spiral of knowledge concept by Nonaka, the building block approach focuses on explicit knowledge and does not offer instruments how to manage and leverage tacit knowledge. In general for SMEs the concept is applicable because it is easy to under-stand, but as it does not provide an implementation model. Without a guideline for the implementation the effort significantly increases for SMEs and could therefore be re-garded as to complex by SMEs.
Over the course of this class I have learned how important it is to be creative and innovative in the way that businesses are conducted within the organizations. The ability to innovate is the “secret sauce” of business success (Dyer, et al., 2009). However, creativity and innovation cannot take place if the leaders are not willing to foster a culture of innovation within the organization. Amabile & Khaire (2008) asserted that, it is essential to motivate people to contribute ideas by making it safe to fail. Stress that the goal is to experiment constantly, fail early and often—and learn as much as possible in the process. Convince people that they won’t be punished or humiliated if they speak up or make mistakes (Amabile & Khaire, 2008).
Knowledge Management majorly can be seen as an approach whereby an enterprise or organization can influence the ‘tacit’ and ‘explicit’ Knowledge of its employees, trading partners, and outside experts for the benefit of the organization (Ackerman et al., 2002, Bellaver and Lusa, 2001). Knowledge Management leads to driving Knowledge till an extent of being a vital asset of an organization and alongside develops processes and activities to manage it efficiently & effectively (Moffet & McAdam, 2003). This essay throws light on two approaches to knowledge management and how they differ in context to the their respective techniques of Knowledge Management. The next section gives a broader view of Nonaka’s Theory and approach to knowledge management and his basis of considering individual knowledge articulation and Knowledge Sharing, a facilitator to organizational knowledge creation. Further, this essay explains how the implications of Knowledge Management, Individual and Organizational; link to management and strategy and how adapting proper techniques and processes of knowledge management provide organizations with a competitive advantage over its contenders.