More handpicked essays just for you.
Discuss the physiological and psychological effects of LSD
Discuss the physiological and psychological effects of LSD
Discuss the physiological and psychological effects of LSD
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
I do not think that society should be criticizing a drug like LSD just because they disapprove of it. For Ken Kesey when he was using LSD it was considered to be legal and he was not breaking any laws. Ken Kesey was a part of a research program to experiment with LSD which was being run by the government. Society was going to find any reason possible as to why LSD should be illegal. Since there are no withdrawal symptoms of LSD that are not physically visible and the fact that it is not an addictive drug then I do not see anything wrong with it. Yes, there are side effects related to LSD but that goes for every drug in the world whether the drugs are legal or illegal. I think the main reason for this criticism is that society did not like the
Erika Dyck Psychedelic Psychiatry: LSD on the Canadian Prairies (Winnipeg: The University of Manitoba Press, 2012).
LSD-25 or Lysergic Acid Diethylamide was first synthesized and used by pharmaceutical chemist Albert Hoffman. LSD-25 is an illegal drug belonging to the hallucinogen category. The physical effects are eye enlargement, pupil dilation and sweating. However the common psychological effects are euphoria, no recollection of time, visual distortions, and mentally visualizing geometric patterns and shapes, which lasts about 6-9 hours or sometimes longer. Though non-addictive LSD-25 can induce anxiety, paranoia, negative perceptions such as frightening visuals and sounds, feelings of insanity, and produce long-term effects such as flashbacks.
And last but not least is the villain in these movies. Most of the killers in these films are portrayed as mentally deranged and/or has some type of facial or bodily deformation and who have been traumatized at an early age. Even though these characters terrorized and murder people they have taken on the persona of anti-heroes in pop culture. Characters like Halloween’s Michael Myers, A Nightmare on Elm Street’s Freddy Krueger and Friday the 13th’s Jason Voorhees have become the reason to go see these movies. However, over time,”their familiarity and the audience’s ability to identify and sympathize with them over the protagonist made these villains less threatening (Slasher Film (5))”.
The CIA’s clandestine operation known as Project MKUltra, inadvertently transformed the use of LSD from being a highly classified method of mind control into a massively popular drug that, in part, defined the counterculture movement of the 1960’s. While the CIA had no intention to supply the American public with the most potent hallucinogen known at the time , their poorly ran mission to create a foolproof truth-drug created an LSD following and changed it into a prominent entheogen. At that time, issues like the threat of an apocalyptic war with the USSR to the horrifying reports from the Vietnam War to the struggle for civil rights pervaded the minds of many young, disillusioned Americans who then sought an escape from their harsh reality. When they discovered a new and legal (until 1968) psychedelic drug thanks to public advocates like Ken Kesey or Timothy Leary, a massive demand was created, with roughly 2,000,000 individuals admitting to have tried it by the end of 1970 .
LSD has proved that the mind contains much higher powers and energies, beyond the average10% of the brain that a typical human uses. These powers and energies, under the right circumstances, can be taken advantage of to benefit human kind spiritually, creatively, therapeutically, and intellectually. LSD has given human kind the option to chemically trigger mental energies and powers. Arguments that LSD is potentially a dangerous discovery and mind control should be strictly prohibited by the government holds much validity, although there are benefits and arguments of personal freedom of neurology to consider. Whether LSD reflects negativity as a weapon and mind control drug, or radiates euphoria as a mind-expanding chemical and sacrament, the choice to engage in such an experience should be through personal reasoning. It is not the states and other bureaucracies’ duties to take control of the human brain and body.
the problems it created in the 60's because the average street dose is al least
When discovered, LSD had a considerable research interest. However, this stopped after it was placed under the US controlled substance act in 1970. It was classified a schedule one drug, meaning it had a high risk for abuse and no accepted medical use. There are no current, legal human studies with LSD, although there are some with MDMA, DMT, and psilocybin. But, the FDA has recently approved a human study examining how LSD affects the brain’s neurotransmitter systems. Harvard Medical School is also looking into a study on how hallucinogens affect cluster headaches. In my opinion, there has to be some way to use a derivative of LSD in either psychological research or treatment and I believe researchers will eventually find one.
LSD stands for Iysergic acid diethylamide. LSD is a hallucinate know to be the most powerful drug of this kind. LSD is commonly known as acid. This drug changes a person’s mental state by distorting the perception of reality to the point where at high doses hallucination occurs. Acid is derived from a fungus that grows on rye and other grains. It is semi-synthetic. It’s manufactured chemically in illicit laboratories, except for a small percent, which is produced legally for research.
... be on board with it. Surprisingly though there are still those, who doubt it and think it should remain illegal, but when you have a something that takes the edge off and is supposed to help with your anxiety, diabetes, and even seizure disorder and it ends up with a long list of harmful side effects isn’t something that’s natural worth a try?
Reviewing cult movies, one will notice that many films will involve scenes using drugs such as marijuana or hallucinogens. Drugs performed in films with scenes of actors or actresses smoking pot tend to draw in a wide spread of audience; those who find marijuana to be the “sin” and fun to watch, and those of the smoking-hippie era themselves. Many cult drug films are solely based around marijuana or LSD because these are two drugs that cause someone to feel relaxed, or help stimulate the way the brain thinks. Many drugs that are viewed in films cause the audience to feel different from mainstream, therefore they play an important role towards the reception of the film. (Mathijs and Sexton, 164) With further discussion on the film and the way it was portrayed and viewed by the initial audience, I believe that Requiem for a Dream can be considered a cult film that prominently features drug use.
In 1960 professor Timothy Leary urged people to try the drug LSD. Leary thought that it could help people therapeutically and he saw many benefits in the usage of the drug. LSD was first available in tablet form but when it became illegal people began to use it in other forms such as liquid acid which was taken orally, through the eyes or mucous membrane or mixed with other drugs such as marijuana.
Growing up, Ken Kesey lived in Oregon with his family. When he grew older, he attended Stanford University in the 1960’s. While attending the college, he was offered a chance to partake in a government experiment and earn extra money. The medical experiment was on the use of hallucinogenic drugs and the effects that they had on the human mind. During the time of the experiment, Kesey took various mind-altering drugs such as LSD. The newly introduced drug allowed for Kesey to have unique experiences and perceive the world in a different manner (Vitale).
Almost every person in the United States has their own opinion on drug legalization. There are many different pros and cons to the legalization of the drug. Drug legalization is also an ethical and moral issue. Should drugs be legalized or not? While I think drugs should be legalized, many others disagree.
Throughout human history people have sought experiences that somehow transcend every day life. Some sort of wisdom that might progress their knowledge of self and of the world that they live in. For some reason they believed that the tangible world just could not be all there is to life. Some believed in a greater force that controlled them, some believed of invisible beings that influenced their lives, some of an actual other world that paralleled their own. Many of these people also believed that it was possible to catch a glimpse of these forces, beings, or worlds through a variety of means that propel individuals into altered states of consciousness. These techniques include meditation, hypnosis, sleep deprivation, and (what will be discussed here) psychoactive drugs, more specifically psychedelic drugs.
People are correct when they say that drugs come from plants, but after they are brought out from plants, they are then manufactured and they come out to be way different, and more harming than just a plant. No one that actually takes these awful things, is never going to go against them and say what they are doing is the wrong thing. Drugs are, without doubt very addicting. The things inside are the things that take you in, and make you feel that you always need more. Drugs will never be a good thing, unless they are prescribed, and a lot of people will never understand that. Once you try just once, you are dooming yourself. Drugs are so addicting with the things that they contain. When people think that vapor is no big deal, they are so wrong. Vapor in your lungs is bad alone, but when incorporated in with nicotine and tobacco, it becomes worse than before. Vapor is about as bad as cigarettes because they are bad for your lungs and vapor could easily give you pneumonia. Making right decisions about illegal substances, could literally save your life. The need for these things to get that high never is a good thing, but the people that do have to use them will never understand that. If they someday do realize that substances are ruining their life bit by bit, it will be well too late, they are